Lady Carnarvon tells us what went on during the filming of Downton Abbey at Highclere Castle
Fans of Downton Abbey are eagerly awaiting the final movie, which is set to be released in cinemas this Autumn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
15 hours ago
- Perth Now
Lord Julian Fellowes 'doing alright' despite mobility issues
Lord Julian Fellowes is "doing alright", despite his mobility issues. The Downton Abbey creator previously revealed he had been using a wheelchair due to spinal stenosis - a narrowing of the spinal canal that can put pressure on the spinal cord - but he insisted his condition hasn't stopped him from being able to work or get on with his life. He told Deadline: 'I've got these mobility issues, and I use a wheelchair rather more than I would like, but that's not the same as feeling ill. 'I think you can stand anything like that as long as you feel okay, and that's the position I'm in now. I have to use a wheelchair because my spine doesn't work as it used to. But in terms of feeling okay and getting on with things and working and all that stuff, I'm fine. "There are many people much worse off than I am.' The 75-year-old writer explained in January that he had undergone surgery for spinal stenosis for a second time, but hadn't recovered as well as he had hoped to because he is much older now than when he had his first operation. He told the Daily Mail newspaper's Eden Confidential column: "It's true that I do spend too much time in a wheelchair these days. "About 40 years ago, I was diagnosed with spinal stenosis, probably resulting from an early slipped disc. I had an operation and, after quite a long convalescence, I was well again, dancing, riding and the rest. "Unluckily, a couple of years ago, I was told the condition had returned and, after another operation, I was obliged to recognise that my powers of recovery at 75 were not quite what they had been at 35. Which, I suppose, is no great surprise." But Julian doesn't feel "unlucky" because other people have "far worse" health issues to deal with. He added: "I am not entirely immobile, but I do have to remain sitting for most of the time. I don't consider myself unlucky in this. Other people have far worse to put up with."
Metro
19 hours ago
- Metro
UK viewers can finally binge 'gripping' Australian thriller series
An Australian thriller based on a best-selling novel can now be binged in full in the UK. In 2020 the first season of the psychological thriller series The Secrets She Keeps hit screens. Based on the book of the same name by acclaimed crime-fiction writer Michael Robotham, it was adapted by Sarah Walker and Jonathan Gavin, the former who worked on shows including Home and Away, Neighbours and All Saints. Set in Sydney, the series follows two women from 'vastly different backgrounds with explosive secrets that could destroy everything they hold dear'. It stars Jessica De Gouw (Arrow, Dracula) as Meghan Shaughnessy, who is happily pregnant with her third child. However, her husband Jack (Michael Dorman) is on edge, facing money issues and a stressful job. Meanwhile Agatha Fyfle (Downton Abbey's Laura Carmichael) is also pregnant, with both women's lives soon colliding. Sorry, the video was not found At the time of its release, critics were somewhat unconvinced by the storyline but praised the lead stars' performances. 'Without performances as layered and emotionally sound as the ones Carmichael and De Gouw give, The Secrets She Keeps would be little more than the aforementioned pulpy ride,' Paste Magazine shared. 'The whole thing is held together by Laura Carmichael as Aggie, a compulsive liar played at the screeching end of camp, complete with weird, limp hair and beaky fury,' The Sunday Times wrote. 'The leads bring more than enough credibility to their roles to make the series worth watching,' Decider added. However, viewers were much more glowing in their reviews. 'It was gripping, and off-the-charts, and more than once, difficult and even stressful to watch. But this is what the best dramas do: they evoke a response from the viewer, and this did that in spades,' user InnerWisdom1000 posted on IMDB. 'Good casting, very entertaining and pretty tense at times. Would definitely recommend,' Laura wrote. 'First episode I wasn't sure, but this series turned into a binge watch for me! Dark, and with some pretty good twists, the story of Agatha and Megan is brilliantly done. Agatha especially gets more and more bonkers in a sinister way,' Juli added. Although the first season was originally made available on BBC iPlayer, it was later taken down. But two years after the second season was released, UK fans and those yet to tune in can now watch both in full on Channel 4, where the show has been uploaded this week. The original novel was inspired by the kidnapping of newborn baby Abbie Sundgren in Nottingham in 1994. Just three hours after her birth, Abbie was taken by a woman posing as a nurse, who kept her for 17 days. At the time Michael was working as a journalist in London and covered the story, which he used as the basis of his novel nearly 20 years later. More Trending 'The idea stuck with me and the turning point came when I thought about an added element — what if it wasn't just a random baby that was taken? What if someone had faked a pregnancy and intended to steal a baby …and they had chosen the baby they wanted to steal,' he previously told The West Australian. While the novel was set in the United Kingdom, the television adaption was set in suburban Sydney — a change the author encouraged. 'When I was approached, I was asked if it was a deal-breaker to me, but it didn't really cross my mind. It is a universal story. The TV series has done an astonishing job and Jess and Laura have done an amazing job playing two women from two different sides of the economic equation … one with a nice husband and a nice house in an expensive neighbourhood, the other, who is living in much poorer circumstances, just trying to get by.' View More » The Secrets She Keeps is streaming on Channel 4. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Netflix quietly adds 'superb under-the radar comedy' set in Victorian London MORE: Gogglebox family announce heartbreaking death as fans pay tribute MORE: Paddy McGuinness reveals his unexpected celebrity crush 'he wasn't supposed to have'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Musk and Trump's Social-Media Fight Reveals How Power Works Today
The fact that Elon Musk kicked off last week's emo bloodbath with the words 'I'm sorry, but' has got to be the realest-housewives part of it. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk posted to X on Tuesday. Bless his heart — he sounded really contrite. Then he consulted a 'Downton Abbey' phrasebook and found 'disgusting abomination' to poshly trash Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' He kept huffing his own X fumes through Wednesday until, on Thursday at 2:30 p.m., Trump all-capped him on Truth Social: 'CRAZY!' Off to the races. Everyone has their favorite part of Thursday's cage match. I was instantly startled by the non-pettiness: Musk gunning for Trump's impeachment, Trump gunning for Musk's financial ruin. All amid a cacophonous peanut gallery that included Ye, MAGA billionaire Bill Ackman and Musk ex Ashley St. Clair. But the Trump-Musk feud is not just a clash of two madmen; it is a clash between the two fiercest social-media influencers of all time. Trump and Musk are human memes, forged on Twitter and its spinoffs, X and Truth Social. Their rise, their public personas, their marriage of convenience and their falling out took place in short-form posts and the freestyle cultivation of likes and engagement. Their feud is in many ways a story of our times: It reveals how online power struggles work now — with rivals leveraging online fanbases, battling for authority across platforms and aiming for the ultimate flex: starving the opponent of any attention at all. Long before most, both Trump and Musk understood that traditional PR handlers would sterilize their personas, blunt the trolling potential of their best material and interfere with their relationships with fans. Trump built his political identity on Twitter, beating his chest and savaging his foes with a rawness that used to make his every utterance on Twitter unmissable. Musk built his celebrity through it, too, with runic tweets, like 'laws are on one side, poets on the other.' In late 2021, he was so proud of his philosopher-king status that he considered going pro: 'thinking of quitting my jobs & becoming an influencer full-time wdyt,' he tweeted, to 371,000 likes. The Musk-Trump bond, but also the tension in it, has also been defined by these platforms. It heated up in the fall of 2022, when Trump was in exile from Twitter and out of the White House. Metabolizing pandemic redpills, Musk was still half-heartedly striking a neoliberal pose, only recently having supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020. But he was also slagging Twitter for having banished groypers, conspiracy-mongers and especially Trump, its star, for insurrectioning. That's when Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion. He claims now he knew he was vastly overpaying — and in February he said X is worth 'like, eight cents' — but the expense was for a noble cause: to restore freedom of speech and welcome @realDonaldTrump back to the green pastures of his social-media homeland. In November of that year, Musk polled X, and a slight majority said Trump should be reinstated. 'The people have spoken,' Musk posted. 'Vox Populi, Vox Dei.' The voice of people is the voice of God. Right. But then, if we're just talking about the course of human events, something extremely cruel happened, a monumental act of Trumpian ingratitude. After his account was reinstated, Trump didn't come back. For nine long months, @realDonaldTrump met Musk's devastatingly expensive largesse with stony silence. Trump, of course, had built his own dopey Twitter dupe, Truth Social, and he probably liked no longer being someone else's tenant, vulnerable to eviction. He also probably liked looking down at the world's richest man from his own social-media castle. When asked when he'd go home to Musk-owned, Trump-friendly Twitter, Trump said, coldly, 'I don't see any reason for it.' Trump was betting that he had made Twitter powerful, not the other way around. If Musk had hoped to spend his days evading the fun police with Trump on Twitter, he might have been hurt that Trump didn't even bother to visit Musk's platform, which he renamed X in July 2023, until he had a mugshot to post in August of that year, after his indictment for a scheme to overturn election results in Georgia. The next summer, on July 13, 2024, Musk endorsed Trump, and soon started whooping and jumping and dancing like 2005 Tom Cruise. He tilted hard right for his hero, and he mostly did it on X, amplifying Dark MAGA posts, from Covid denial to QAnon praise. Tesla's stock tanked. Musk muted his environmentalist leanings. He lost his close friends, including Sam Harris and Philip Low. A month after the endorsement, Trump graced X with his presence with a campaign video. It was only the second time he'd posted to X since Musk rolled out the red carpet for him. In the last months of his campaign, while Musk's money and adulation surged his way, Trump finally managed to show Musk the occasional courtesy of using the platform Musk had bought, furnished and upholstered in part for him. Flash forward to last week. On Monday, June 2, three days before the Trump-Musk affair came utterly undone, @realDonaldTrump posted to X for what looks like the last time: a manly boast video about his steel tariffs. It was scored with what sounded like pounding Christian rock. These tariffs, which Trump increased to fully 50 percent last week, will raise the cost of imported car components, including at Tesla, and further imperil Musk's fortune. For Trump to crow about this insult to Tesla in Musk's own house when they were still acting like pals and Musk was mostly keeping mum about the 'big beautiful bill' (which if it passes will also injure Tesla) — this seems like the unkindest cut of the whole match made in hell. The end of last week's social-media spat reveals that the heavyweight champ of social-media influence is still Trump. At the news that Musk's net worth fell by $34 billion during the spat, while Tesla's market value sank by $153 billion, Musk waved a white flag. He deleted or retracted his incendiary X posts — the innuendo about Trump and the Epstein files and the threat to decommission a spacecraft. Trump, for his part, took back nothing. He now says he rejects a make-up call. He's selling the pretty red Tesla Musk presented to him. And most importantly, he's back to ghosting X. No posts there since Monday. By Friday he was on Truth Social praising Commerce Secretary Scott Bessent, one of Musk's most aggressive rivals for Trump's favor and the one whose April shouting match with Musk came to blows, according to Steve Bannon. On Sunday, Musk gave perhaps the clearest sign that he is tapping out: He screenshotted a Truth Social post by Trump in which the president called Gavin Newsom 'Governor Gavin Newscum' — and posted it admiringly to X. No commentary, no irony, no comeback. Just a tribute. In the posting wars, this is what bending the knee looks like: one man obsequiously signal-boosting the other, on the platform he couldn't lure him back to.
