
On ‘suggestion' to drop Foreigners Tribunal cases against people from 6 communities, Assam CM Himanta clears the air
This suggestion, recorded in minutes of the meeting, has also been forwarded to DCs.
This has triggered a firestorm in Assam, with the All Assam Students' Union (AASU) announcing a statewide protest on August 8, accusing the government of 'selectively protecting illegal immigrants based on religion'. However, a senior Home and Political Department official, who was among those who attended the meeting, told The Indian Express that the records of the meeting do not amount to directives to the Foreigners Tribunals and that no formal order to withdraw cases against members of these six religions has been issued by the state government.
Asked about this while addressing reporters after a state cabinet meeting late Thursday night, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said that there is 'no need' for the state cabinet to take any special decisions in this regard since protections are already extended to the specified communities under the CAA.
'The state government has not issued any direction except what is already in the CAA. The CAA itself provides security and protection to the people who entered India prior to 2014. That is the law. No special cabinet decision is required. We have taken two cabinet decisions for the Koch Rajbongshis and the Gorkha people, and the cases have been withdrawn. Beyond that, for people from Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan who entered before 2014, the CAA itself provides protection. There is no need for the state government to bring any new decision on this.'
On July 17, a meeting was presided over by the Additional Chief Secretary to the Home and Political Department, and attended by eight other senior officials from the Assam Police, the Home Department, and the Health and Family Welfare Department with the stated agenda of 'sensitising for the use of e-Sakshya portal, capacity building and ensuring effective implementation of BNS, BNSS and BSA'. The minutes of the meeting mention that issues related to the accommodation of Public Prosecutors as well as Foreigners Tribunals, with reference to the Citizenship Amendment Act, were also included as additional discussion points.
The minutes said that DCs and SSPs of all districts are to conduct a review of 'all the Foreigners (Pakistani/ Bangladeshi/ Rohingya, etc.)'
'As per the amendments made to the Citizenship Act, the FTs are not supposed to pursue cases of foreigners belonging to the six specified communities (Hindu, Christian, Buddhist, Sikh, Parsi and Jain communities), who had entered Assam on or prior to 31.12.2014. It was suggested to drop all such cases. In this regard, the District Commissioners and Senior SPs should immediately convene a meeting with their respective FT members and also review the developments periodically and submit the action taken report to this department,' the minutes said.
'However, such foreigners should be encouraged and supported to apply for Indian citizenship as per provisions of the Citizenship Amendment Act,' it goes on to say.
Assam shares a long border with Bangladesh, and the question of 'illegal immigration' from the neighbouring country has long been a contentious issue. The state has different processes for declaring people who entered the state after March 24, 1971 — the cut-off date for citizenship as determined by the Assam Accord — as 'foreigners' and 'illegal immigrants'. Among these are trials by Foreigners Tribunals to determine whether suspected 'illegal immigrants' referred to them by the border police are Indian nationals or foreigners.
Last July, the Home and Political Department had directed the border police not to directly refer cases of newly detected 'foreigners' from these six categories, who entered Assam before December 31, 2014, to FTs and instead advise them to apply for citizenship under the CAA. This did not have a bearing on the over 90,000 cases pending with the FTs and cases where people have been declared foreigners.
The official who was present at the meeting claimed that the July meeting does not translate to an order for the withdrawal of cases against people from the six specific communities.
'If we are to take a decision on dropping cases, we will have to issue formal and clear-cut orders from Dispur. A discussion in a meeting on a matter like this is not actionable. In the past, the state government had taken decisions to withdraw all cases filed against people from the Gorkha and Koch Rajbongshi communities. In both these cases, clear-cut written orders were issued from the Home and Political Department in 2021 and in April this year, respectively. In this case, there has not been such an order. The only directions we formally issued in this matter are from last year, when we instructed the border police not to directly refer pre-2014 cases from the six specified communities to FTs,' said the official.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Delhi High Court Rules Victim Compensation Scheme Not Applicable Retrospectively; 1984 Riot Claim Rejected
New Delhi: In a significant ruling, Delhi High Court has said the Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme (DVCS) can't be applied retrospectively, rejecting a plea for compensation by a victim of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. Clarifying the legal position, a bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar also noted that DVCS compensation can be paid only in cases where victims have not already received money under other govt compensation schemes. The court was hearing a plea by a family that lost its breadwinner in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots following Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's assassination. Avtar Singh, a Sikh, was killed by a rampaging mob in the Raj Nagar area of Palam. The men accused were later acquitted in 1986. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Gold Rates Today in Delhi | Silver Rates Today in Delhi The HC traced the DVCS's origin to Section 357A of the erstwhile CrPC, which dealt with victim compensation. It opined that since the scheme owes its existence to Section 357A, it should apply prospectively. It added that "retrospective application of either the provisions of Section 357A of the CrPC or the DVCS would open the floodgates for all and sundry to rake up old and stale claims seeking compensation, be it for an incident occurring just before the introduction of the scheme or three decades prior, like in the present case." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like What does it take to be an air traffic controller in Singapore? CNA Read More Undo While rejecting the compensation claim, HC noted that the complainant, Baljeet Kaur, disclosed in an affidavit that her family had already received a total of Rs 11,90,000 from the govt for the death of her father, Avtar Singh, in the 1984 Sikh riots. "Clause 4 (of DVCS) restricts eligibility for compensation to victims or their dependents who have not been compensated for the loss or injury under any other scheme of the Central Govt or State Govt. This clarifies that the DVCS was formed as an umbrella scheme to provide relief to those victims who have been deprived of compensation through any other scheme or Act," HC noted, after amicus curiae appointed in the matter, Senior Advocate Sumeet Verma, argued that Singh's family is entitled to additional compensation under DVCS. The bench noted that the "incident in question took place in the year 1984, and since then, multiple schemes have been introduced by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt of India, and later adopted and implemented by state govts, including the Delhi govt. A review of these schemes shows that the total monetary benefit, without indexation, would surpass the upper limit of compensation prescribed under the DVCS. The govt has taken additional initiatives to reimburse the victims for property damage and loss, and skill development as well. " While this case was one of five reopened in 2017 due to a botched investigation into the 1984 riots, the verdict narrowed down on the issue of compensation payable, after it emerged that accused Mahender Singh Manan, also known as Mahender Sharabi, and Ram Kumar, are now dead. However, HC made it clear that its ruling won't exclude any victims affected by the riots who have not received compensation under any schemes from lodging their claims under other existing schemes. The bench directed that such claims be verified by authorities within a period of sixteen weeks of receipt and, if approved, payments be made within a period of eight weeks. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
HC overturns acquittal of four in 1984 riots case, orders retrial of surviving accused
The Delhi high court has set aside a nearly 40-year-old verdict that acquitted four men in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case and ordered a retrial, saying the trial was conducted in a 'hasty manner' and that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) failed to make sufficient efforts to collect evidence. (Shutterstock) The case concerned the killing of Harbhajan Singh in Ghaziabad's Raj Nagar on November 1, 1984 — a day after then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's assassination. According to his wife, a group of men attacked and set her husband ablaze and also torched their home. In May 1986, a trial court acquitted the four accused of arson and murder, citing contradictions between the woman's statements to police and in court, as well as the delay in filing the complaint. A bench of justices Subramanian Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar took up the matter suo motu after prima facie finding faults in the 1986 judgment and describing the investigation as 'perfunctory'. The issue came up while the bench was hearing appeals in another case from the same locality, in which five men — including former Congress councillor Balwan Khokhar, ex-MLA Captain Bhagmal, and Girdhari Lal — were convicted in 2013 for the murder of five Sikhs. Among the appellants in that case was Krishan Khokhar, brother of Balwan Khokhar. The court noted that neither the state nor the victims had challenged the 1986 acquittal, but said it could not ignore a flawed investigation and trial, particularly when the verdict was being cited in other appeals. In its verdict delivered on Monday, the bench said the trial court's decision had resulted in a 'miscarriage of justice' to the victim's wife and children, depriving them of their fundamental right to a fair trial. The judges faulted the CBI for failing to trace the victim's body or recover articles stolen from the house. They also noted that investigators did not associate key witnesses with the probe, including the victim's children — who were present at the time — and neighbours. The court rejected the trial court's conclusion that contradictions in the woman's testimony undermined the case, saying there was enough material to support her account. It also said the investigating agency had not taken 'sufficient efforts' to gather the best possible evidence. 'Failure to order a reinvestigation 40 years after the incident would be turning a Nelson's eye to society's needs and the victim's rights to a comprehensive, free, and fair probe,' the bench said. Quoting the amicus curiae, senior advocate Vivek Sood, the court noted that after the assassination of Indira Gandhi, large-scale violence forced widows, children, and residents to flee their homes for safety. This, it said, meant witnesses would not have been readily available for investigation — but that did not absolve the agency of its duty to secure evidence using the powers under the Criminal Procedure Code. 'These errors have resulted in miscarriage of justice… If not rectified, this may result in loss of hope in our legal system and compromise the interests of society,' the bench observed. Sood argued that the acquittal was 'totally perverse' and ignored the scale of violence, property destruction, and displacement suffered by victims. He pointed out that the complainant herself was forced to leave Delhi after her husband's killing and the loss of her home. While the counsel for the sole surviving accused argued that a retrial would serve no useful purpose, the court clarified that the fresh trial would apply only to him. Proceedings against the three other accused have abated due to their deaths. The CBI has been directed to conclude the probe expeditiously, bearing in mind the age of the case. In a separate ruling, the same bench ordered the reconstruction of four-decade-old trial records in another 1984 anti-Sikh riots case from Raj Nagar. That case concerns the acquittal of five men, including Balwan Khokhar, in the killing of four Sikhs. The court said victims' and society's rights to a fair investigation and trial cannot be undermined by missing files or flawed earlier proceedings, and directed the trial court to undertake the reconstruction.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab: YouTuber quizzed by central agencies over 2024 Pak visit
The central intelligence agencies questioned a Jalandhar-based travel vlogger over his alleged visits to Pakistan a few months ago. The travel vlogger had uploaded multiple videos related to his Pakistan visit on his YouTube Channel. (HT File) Amrik Singh, a resident of Turna village in Jalandhar district, was summoned by Jalandhar rural police to visit Lohian police station on Monday evening, where he was questioned for more than 20 hours. He was released on Tuesday evening. Deputy inspector general of police (DIG) Naveen Singla confirmed the development and said, 'The social media influencer was questioned over his visit to Pakistan around eight months back.' Shahkot's deputy superintendent of police, Onkar Singh Brar, said 'central agencies' questioned the YouTuber, and the local police don't have any details about the questioning. 'He has been released. We have informed the village panchayat to take Amrik back from the police station,' he said. Amrik had uploaded multiple videos related to his Pakistan visit on his YouTube Channel. Amrik's wife, Manpreet Kaur, said her husband was summoned in connection with their December 2024 trip to Pakistan during which they filmed videos covering Sikh religious sites and other human interest stories, and uploaded the same on their YouTube channel. 'My husband's phone remained unreachable for nearly a day after he went to the Lohian police station to record his statement,' she said.