logo
Pros and cons of alcohol ban in Port Dickson's public spaces

Pros and cons of alcohol ban in Port Dickson's public spaces

The Star2 days ago
SEREMBAN: Negri Sembilan's ban on the consumption of alcoholic beverages in some public places has received backing, but the prohibition along Port Dickson's beaches has kicked up a row.
National Indian Crime Prevention Society (ICPS) president Datuk Ignatius Lourdsamy, who gave his support, described the ban as progressive and necessary in the interest of public safety and community well-being.
'Over the years, ICPS has received numerous reports and complaints about disruptive and unsafe behaviour from alcohol consumption in public areas affecting children, women, senior citizens and families trying to enjoy some peace in the outdoors.
'By curbing alcohol use in these spaces, the state is taking a firm stance against public nuisance, potential criminal activity and vandalism,' he said.
MCA vice-president Datuk Seri Dr Wee Jeck Seng (pic) however felt the ban 'violated the spirit of diversity' and harmed tourism.
'Which foreign tourist will come if he or she may be fined just for having a drink at the beach. This is not welcoming of tourists,' he said.
Urging the state government to review the policy, he pointed out that Visit Malaysia 2026 was approaching with federal authorities working hard to attract international tourists.
Former Chuah assemblyman Datuk Michael Yek Diew Ching described the ban on alcohol at beaches and open spaces as a shortcut solution.
'Bad behaviour, littering and public disorder should be dealt with targeted enforcement and not a blanket ban.
'Why not increase patrols, issue fines and take other measures to ensure the culprits are held responsible?' he asked.
A Port Dickson resident who wished to be known as Patrick said he was swarmed with text messages from friends in other states mocking the blanket ban.
'My friends and I gather at the beach for barbecues at least once every six months, during which we will drink alcohol, but responsibly and always clean up before leaving.
'With the ban, they'll probably stop coming to PD because we can't afford to pay for drinks at hotels or other beachfront establishments,' he lamented.
Another individual said the ban at beaches would be all right if enforced after certain hours.
'Ban it, say from 10pm to 10am like in some places abroad,' he added.
State local government development, housing and transport committee chairman J. Arul Kumar maintained that the ban along Port Dickson's public beaches was necessary.
However, he said hotels, resorts, private clubs, cafes and restaurants there can continue to serve alcoholic drinks.
'We had no choice but to impose the ban on public beaches as irresponsible individuals leave trash, which gives a bad image,' he said, adding that broken bottles also posed a hazard to beachgoers.
'The area is packed with people exercising and engaging in recreation during the day but some gather at night to drink and leave a mess,' he added.
On Wednesday, Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Aminuddin Harun announced the ban on the consumption of alcoholic beverages in public recreational spaces such as parks, playgrounds, fields and beaches with immediate effect.
Enforcement will be conducted by local authorities and police, with a maximum fine of RM2,000.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PSmall Change, Big Impact, Whistleblower Act Amendment Passed In Parliament
PSmall Change, Big Impact, Whistleblower Act Amendment Passed In Parliament

BusinessToday

time7 hours ago

  • BusinessToday

PSmall Change, Big Impact, Whistleblower Act Amendment Passed In Parliament

The Dewan Rakyat today passed the Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2025, marking a landmark legislation, which amends the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (Act 711), which is expected to significantly strengthen safeguards for individuals who report improper conduct, particularly in cases involving public interest. The passage of the bill marks a crucial step in addressing long-standing concerns about the effectiveness of existing whistleblower protections in Malaysia. A key amendment widely lauded is the removal of the proviso in Section 6(1) of the principal Act. Previously, this clause denied protection to whistleblowers if their disclosures contravened any other written law, such as the Official Secrets Act (OSA) or Section 203A of the Penal Code. Bangi MP Syahredzan Johan, debating the bill, highlighted the 'profound impact' of this change. 'The amendment may seem simple, just a deletion of a provision, but its impact is profound,' he told the Dewan Rakyat. 'Previously, whistleblowers were only protected if the disclosure didn't contravene any written law. That meant if they revealed information under the Official Secrets Act (1972) or Section 203 of the Penal Code, they weren't entitled to protection. This effectively disqualified many honest individuals who wanted to report wrongdoing.' The revised clause now allows disclosures made in the public interest to qualify for legal protection, even if the information in question would otherwise be restricted under secrecy laws. Another notable amendment allows authorities to exercise discretion in granting protection to whistleblowers who may themselves be implicated in misconduct, provided that such protection serves the public interest. This aligns Malaysia's approach more closely with international best practices, recognizing that insiders, even those with some involvement, are often the only ones with knowledge of hidden wrongdoing. The bill also includes the establishment of a Whistleblower Protection Committee. This committee will be tasked with overseeing the implementation of the Act, collecting data on whistleblower complaints, and providing general oversight on the powers of enforcement agencies. However, some civil society groups, including the Center to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4 Center), have previously voiced that while a positive step, this committee falls short of a fully centralized, independent whistleblower protection agency, calling for a clear timeline for such an establishment. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said had earlier emphasiaed the importance of whistleblowers channeling their disclosures through proper enforcement agencies to ensure authenticity and avoid risks to national security. She also confirmed that enhanced protections under Section 7 of the Act now include specific references to the Witness Protection Act 2009 (Act 696), allowing for additional safeguards like relocation or new identities in serious cases. Related

Wisma Putra: Ambalat reference inaccurate, ND6, ND7 blocks part of Malaysian sovereign territory
Wisma Putra: Ambalat reference inaccurate, ND6, ND7 blocks part of Malaysian sovereign territory

The Star

time8 hours ago

  • The Star

Wisma Putra: Ambalat reference inaccurate, ND6, ND7 blocks part of Malaysian sovereign territory

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia holds the position that Blocks ND6 and ND7 in the Sulawesi Sea, claimed by Indonesia as the Ambalat block, are part of Malaysia's sovereign territory. According to a written reply posted on the Parliament portal, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, better known as Wisma Putra, stated that the stance was based on international law following the decision of the International Court of Justice in 2002. "In this regard, the reference to 'Ambalat' for parts of the blocks is inaccurate and misleading. Therefore, the correct term for the area in question, in line with Malaysia's position, is the Sulawesi Sea,' the ministry said. The ministry was responding to a question from Datuk Jonathan Yasin (GRS-Ranau), who asked whether the consent of the Sabah government would be sought before any agreement is made with the Indonesian Government regarding a proposed joint development approach for the Ambalat block, which reportedly lies partly within Sabah's maritime area. The ministry explained that during Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's official visit to Indonesia on June 27, both leaders issued a joint statement on the proposed joint development in the Sulawesi Sea. "The joint proposal refers to a matter that is still in the early stages of consideration to explore the feasibility of such cooperation and has yet to be finalised. "This represents initial efforts by both leaders to seek the best solution for both countries,' it stated. Wisma Putra said the Federal Government had always worked closely with the Sabah government during negotiations and discussions to resolve maritime boundary issues between Malaysia and Indonesia. It also said the Federal Government took seriously the views and stance of the state government in making any decision to ensure Malaysia's sovereignty, sovereign rights, and interests were protected. The ministry added that discussions on maritime boundaries were based on legal and technical principles, conducted in a careful and prudent manner. "In this matter, the government continuously undertakes thorough and comprehensive assessments of any proposed solutions, including economic cooperation, in search of outcomes that are mutually beneficial for both parties,' it said. The Foreign Ministry also stressed that it closely collaborated with relevant stakeholders on matters relating to Malaysia's maritime boundaries through a whole-of-government approach and was committed to negotiations with neighbouring countries to reach mutually agreed solutions.- Bernama

Reference To 'Ambalat' Inaccurate, ND6 And ND7 Blocks Part Of Malaysian Sovereign Territory
Reference To 'Ambalat' Inaccurate, ND6 And ND7 Blocks Part Of Malaysian Sovereign Territory

Barnama

time9 hours ago

  • Barnama

Reference To 'Ambalat' Inaccurate, ND6 And ND7 Blocks Part Of Malaysian Sovereign Territory

KUALA LUMPUR, July 22 (Bernama) -- Malaysia holds the position that Blocks ND6 and ND7 in the Sulawesi Sea, claimed by Indonesia as the 'Ambalat' block, are part of Malaysia's sovereign territory. According to a written reply posted on the Parliament portal, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, better known as Wisma Putra, stated that the stance was based on international law following the decision of the International Court of Justice in 2002. 'In this regard, the reference to 'Ambalat' for parts of the blocks is inaccurate and misleading. Therefore, the correct term for the area in question, in line with Malaysia's position, is the Sulawesi Sea,' the ministry said. The ministry was responding to a question from Datuk Jonathan Yasin (GRS-Ranau), who asked whether the consent of the Sabah Government would be sought before any agreement is made with the Indonesian Government regarding a proposed joint development approach for the Ambalat block, which reportedly lies partly within Sabah's maritime area. The ministry explained that during Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's official visit to Indonesia on June 27, both leaders issued a joint statement on the proposed joint development in the Sulawesi Sea. 'The joint proposal refers to a matter that is still in the early stages of consideration to explore the feasibility of such cooperation and has yet to be finalised. 'This represents initial efforts by both leaders to seek the best solution for both countries,' it stated. Wisma Putra said the Federal Government had always worked closely with the Sabah State Government during negotiations and discussions to resolve maritime boundary issues between Malaysia and Indonesia. It also said the Federal Government took seriously the views and stance of the state government in making any decision to ensure Malaysia's sovereignty, sovereign rights, and interests were protected.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store