logo
BBC Breakfast viewers issue same complaint as they fume 'there's no need'

BBC Breakfast viewers issue same complaint as they fume 'there's no need'

Daily Mirror2 days ago
BBC Breakfast viewers were left confused as they pointed out a "strange" detail on Thursday
BBC Breakfast viewers issued the same complaint as they fumed, "There's no need".

On Thursday (August 14), presenters Charlie Stayt and Naga Munchetty were positioned on the famous red sofa to bring viewers the latest headlines from across the UK and beyond.

Mike Bushell was also present in the studio for the sports round-up, whilst Carol Kirkwood delivered regular weather updates.

During the show, Charlie and Naga chatted to education correspondent Vanessa Clarke, who was stationed at a college in Middlesbrough as A-Level pupils collected their examination results.
They also provided updates on the conflict in Ukraine, in advance of Friday's meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, reports the Express.
Elsewhere in the episode, business correspondent Ben Boulos reported live from a wind farm in North Lincolnshire amid shifts in the UK economy.
"This isn't just any old wind farm, this is England's largest onshore wind farm," Ben disclosed.
"The reason we've come here is because the government hopes that renewable energy sites like this can power not just our homes and our workplaces, but also potentially power some economic growth as well."

Ben then interviewed Sam Peacock, Managing Director of Corporate Affairs at SSE, and John McHale, Managing Director of ActionCOACH Lincolnshire, regarding the influence of wind farms.
Later, Ben returned to screen to report on the latest business figures, after it was revealed that the economy grew by 0.3% in the second quarter of this year.

However, BBC viewers were quick to share their confusion over Ben wearing a hard hat and thick gloves on the empty field, with many commenting on how "strange" the detail was.
"Why are they wearing hard hats in the middle of a field?" one person wrote on X (formerly Twitter).
"There is literally no need for all the ppe standing in a field ffs," another added, while a third said: "Hard hats and goggles on a wind farm? Ok."
A fourth viewer shared: "A hi viz and padded jacket? We have a heat wave," with another similarly commenting: "Why are they wearing gloves stood in the middle of a field."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin was the real winner of the Alaska summit
Putin was the real winner of the Alaska summit

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

Putin was the real winner of the Alaska summit

Vladimir Putin couldn't stop smiling at the spectacle awaiting him in Anchorage yesterday, as American soldiers knelt to adjust a red carpet rolled out from his presidential plane. Donald Trump applauded as the Russian President walked towards him under the roar of fighter jets and stepped onto American soil for the first time in a decade. The pair shook hands for the cameras, ignoring a journalist who shouted, 'Mr Putin, will you stop killing civilians?' before riding off together in the presidential limo to the summit site. A royal reception, not a ceasefire, was what the international pariah had come out of his bunker for. After almost three hours of negotiations, Trump left Alaska with neither peace nor a deal. The lunch between the two delegations was cancelled. The brief press conference allowed no questions from the media. A seemingly energetic Putin gave an eight-minute speech on the history of Alaska while Trump stared blankly into the void. On Ukraine, Putin called it a 'brotherly nation', hypocritically claiming that 'everything that's happening is a tragedy for us, a terrible wound'. He then repeated the need to eliminate the 'root causes' of the war, signalling that Russia's demands for Ukraine's capitulation have not shifted. Yet there still seemed to be some sort of an agreement taking shape behind closed doors. Putin said he expected Kyiv and European capitals 'will perceive it constructively and won't throw a wrench in the works'. Trump said that 'many points were agreed' and announced later in a Fox News interview that now it was up to Volodymyr Zelensky to 'get it done'. Trump added that Ukraine would have to make territorial concessions, though Kyiv may not agree because Joe Biden 'handed out money like it was candy'. Asked what advice he would give to Zelensky, Trump said: 'Make a deal. Russia is a very big power. And they [the Ukrainians] are not.' Putin left the summit having achieved the goals he came for. He emerged from international isolation and was welcomed as a king rather than as an indicted war criminal. He left with plenty of photos alongside Trump for the Kremlin propaganda wing to talk about and contrast with pictures of Trump lecturing a humiliated Zelensky in the Oval Office in February. Russia also avoided further sanctions despite rejecting a ceasefire, with Trump promising once again that he might think about it in another 'two or three weeks'. As for Trump, he has nothing to show for the meeting except for being laughed at in Russia and at home. Had there been progress, he would already be boasting about it, but he knows too little about the conflict he is trying to fix, and the stick he carried was too short to make Putin care. The summit labelled 'Pursuing Peace' failed to achieve even a partial ceasefire. No trilateral meeting with Zelensky has been agreed. The war will grind on, soldiers will keep dying and Russia will continue bombing Ukrainian cities. All Trump has to offer is his refrain to Ukraine: make a deal – whatever that means.

The good, the bad and the ugly of the Alaska summit
The good, the bad and the ugly of the Alaska summit

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

The good, the bad and the ugly of the Alaska summit

The three-hour Friday summit in Alaska between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin ended as well as it conceivably could have ended: as a big nothingburger. But that does not mean that Ukraine and its supporters can breathe a sigh of relief. Trump may be unhappy that the prospect of his Nobel Peace Prize remains elusive as Putin has not agreed to an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine. But it is far from clear that he will end up directing his anger against Russia. To be sure, it is a good thing that nothing of substance was agreed in Anchorage. Any big great-power bargain made over the heads of Europeans and Ukrainians, which Trump and Putin would then seek to impose on the hapless old continent, would mean the end of any semblance of a rules-based international order, in which borders of European nations are not redrawn by force. We can be reasonably confident that Putin would have been happy to agree to an immediate ceasefire in exchange for Ukraine meeting his maximalist demands – Ukraine's capitulation, the ceding of territories that Russians do not yet control, or a prompt election to unseat Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The failure to reach a deal with Trump suggests that the US administration has not bought into Russia's interpretation of the war and how to end it – at least not yet. The presence of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, once a Russia hawk, in the room might have played a role in preventing the worst-case outcome – unlike in Helsinki where the US president was left with Putin unsupervised for several hours. Yet, 'normie' Republicans must have felt more than a bit of shame about the spectacle that Trump orchestrated – the red carpet, the ride in the 'Beast', and the apparent warmth extended to a mass murderer and child kidnapper all reflect poorly on the United States – and help return Putin from pariah status to a respected global leader. Relatedly, while the summit did not bring about a catastrophe for Ukraine, neither is it likely to lead to better Ukraine policy in Washington. It is hard to imagine now a tightening of existing, congressionally mandated sanctions by the executive branch – never mind the bill put forward by Senators Graham and Blumenthal, imposing a de facto trade embargo on countries buying Russian oil and gas, getting through a Republican-controlled Senate. And, even if Trump does not stand in the way of military sales to Ukraine, it will have to be the Europeans who continue to do the financial heavy lifting – all while being held hostage by America's sluggish defence industrial base. Finally, an ominous, ugly thought. In his remarks, Vladimir Putin warned Kyiv and European capitals against 'throw[ing] a wrench' into the works of the emerging deal (whatever it may be) between Russia and the United States. Clearly, the Russian dictator is playing the long game here: hoping to peel off the United States away from the broader pro-Ukrainian coalition. By itself, the summit has not accomplished that goal yet, but it has likely opened new opportunities to lure Trump and his inner circle closer to Russia. Even before the summit, there was speculation about 'money-making opportunities' that could bring the two world powers closer together. The presence of US Treasury and Commerce Secretaries, Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick, and Russia's Kirill Dimitriev, the head of the country's sovereign wealth fund – alongside 'tremendous Russian business representatives', as Trump put it – signalled a desire on both sides for normalisation of 'businesslike' relations. In practice, that might mean more investment, trade and other 'deals' – especially ones that generate cash for the Trump family enterprise. What lies at heart of the summit is that the US president neither understands nor cares about understanding Putin's motives and the threat he poses to the world. In contrast, Putin, a former KGB lieutenant colonel, has a solid grasp of what makes Trump and his entourage tick. He might make the occasional mistake and overplay his hand but he has focus, consistency, and a voracious appetite. And all of those, wrapped in a thoroughly delusional view of the world and Russia's place in it, were both on full display and unchallenged on Friday.

'We didn't get there': Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal in Alaska talks
'We didn't get there': Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal in Alaska talks

ITV News

timean hour ago

  • ITV News

'We didn't get there': Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal in Alaska talks

After talks with President Trump, Putin has hinted a deal is immiment, as ITV News US Correspondent Dan Rivers reports A deal on ending the war in Ukraine has not been reached, despite the efforts of US President Donald Trump during face-to-face talks with Russia's President Putin in Alaska. On Friday, the two leaders greeted one another on the tarmac of Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. They shook hands and smiled for pictures together before making their way to Trump's presidential limousine. They spoke for around two and a half hours before delivering a joint news conference. Standing next to Putin, Trump said: 'We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to. 'And there are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there.' However, Trump also admitted: 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' Putin claimed they had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' The meeting marked the Russian president's first time on US soil in more than a decade. Trump said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders to brief them on the talks. The US President pledged he would bring about an end to the conflict, which began after Russia 's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, on his first day in the White House. Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, Trump ended his remarks by thanking Putin and saying, 'we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon'. When Putin smiled and offered, 'next time in Moscow,' Trump said 'that's an interesting one' and said he might face criticism but 'I could see it possibly happening'. The Russian president also praised the talks in the press conference, describing them as a "reference point" from which the conflict could be resolved. He went on to say he hoped they would mark the start of restoring "businesslike, pragmatic relations" between the two countries. Meanwhile, the UK's Ministry of Defence has said British personnel are ready to arrive in Ukraine just "days" after Moscow and Kyiv agree to put fighting on hold. The UK Government earlier this summer backed international efforts to set up a "Multinational Force Ukraine", a military plan to bolster Ukraine's defences once the conflict eases, in a bid to ward off future Russian aggression. "Planning has continued on an enduring basis to ensure that a force can deploy in the days following the cessation of hostilities," an MoD spokesperson said. It follows stern remarks from Trump last month, where he revealed a deadline for Russia to negotiate a ceasefire or face heavy tariffs, following his "disappointment" in Putin. At the beginning of August, Trump announced the repositioning of US nuclear submarines over what he described as "inflammatory" remarks by the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev. The war has caused heavy losses on both sides and drained resources. Ukraine has held on far longer than some initially expected since the February 2022 invasion, but it is straining to hold off Russia's much larger army.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store