Vroom: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
On a per-share basis, the Fort Worth, Texas-based company said it had a loss of $1.65. Losses, adjusted to account for discontinued operations, came to $1.73 per share.
The company posted revenue of $45.7 million in the period.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Buy a Car or a House: Which Is the Better Deal for You Right Now?
Deciding between buying a car or a house is one of the most significant financial choices in 2025. Both involve long-term commitments and can have a lasting impact on personal finances. While the two serve different purposes, the smarter investment depends on individual circumstances, financial priorities and current market trends. Read More: Find Out: According to real estate expert Robert Grunnah, founder of Castle Hill Investments and Austin House Buyer, only one offers lasting value. 'Houses win this competition hands down because they build wealth and autos destroy it with depreciation,' Grunnah said. 'Real estate appreciates over time and generates tax savings, equity appreciation and potential rental income, while cars depreciate 20%-30% the instant you purchase them and continue to do so.' Homeownership offers benefits such as equity growth and fixed monthly payments. Programs like FHA loans and first-time buyer tax credits provide support for qualifying buyers. The mortgage interest deduction also remains available for many homeowners, according to the IRS. Still, buying a house requires a significant upfront investment. A 20% down payment on a $440,000 home totals $88,000, not including closing costs and ongoing maintenance expenses. The process can also be complex, with potential financial risk if personal circumstances change or the market shifts. The Car Market in 2025 The automotive market in 2025 faces rising prices, elevated interest rates and growing demand for electric vehicles. The average price of a new car remains over $48,000, according to Kelley Blue Book (KBB), and loan rates have increased across the board. 'Car prices remain high due to supply chain disruptions and the shift to electric vehicles is calling into question the resale value of conventional cars,' Grunnah explained. 'Gas-powered vehicles are at risk of accelerated depreciation.' Learn More: The average new vehicle loses about 55% of its value within the first five years, according to KBB. By contrast, home values have increased at a much faster pace. U.S. home prices have appreciated about 8% to 9% per year over the past five years and about 6% to 7% annually over the past decade, according to NCHStats. Grunnah recommends keeping car purchases modest. 'A good used car in the $15,000 to $20,000 range is adequate for transportation needs without the massive depreciation hit of buying a new car,' he said. 'The plan preserves money for the ultimate home purchase, which builds wealth in the long term.' Comparing Long-Term Value From a financial standpoint, homes typically outperform cars in value retention. 'I've watched clients build six-figure wealth through homeownership over the past 20 years, while their car payments became monthly financial drains,' said Grunnah. Both homes and vehicles are commonly financed, but only mortgages contribute to long-term equity. Homeowners may benefit from appreciation, refinancing opportunities, or rental income. Cars, on the other hand, continue to lose value over time and offer no return on investment. 'Homeowners accumulate wealth more reliably than renters who put the same dollars into car loans and increased insurance,' Grunnah said. 'The numbers unequivocally favor housing as the foundation of wealth.' So, Is a Car or a House the Better Deal? The decision to buy a car or a house depends heavily on lifestyle and personal goals. For individuals or families planning to settle down, homeownership often aligns with the goals of stability and wealth building. For others, especially those who relocate frequently or have flexible living arrangements, a car may be a more practical and immediate purchase. Ultimately, the choice depends on individual priorities, market conditions and financial health. Both a house and a car have roles in building a secure and convenient lifestyle, but timing and circumstances will dictate which is the better deal in 2025. 'Intelligent consumers should purchase a house first and then opt for the most economical, dependable transportation available that meets their needs,' Grunnah concluded. More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact Retirees5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on Buy a Car or a House: Which Is the Better Deal for You Right Now? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Whitmer told Trump in private that Michigan auto jobs depend on a tariff change of course
WASHINGTON (AP) — Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer met privately in the Oval Office with President Donald Trump to make a case he did not want to hear: the automotive industry he said he wants to save were being hurt by his tariffs. The Democrat came with a slide deck to make her points in a visual presentation. Just getting the meeting last Tuesday with the Republican president was an achievement for someone viewed as a contender for her party's White House nomination in 2028. Whitmer's strategy for dealing with Trump highlights the conundrum for her and other Democratic leaders as they try to protect the interests of their states while voicing their opposition to his agenda. It's a dynamic that Whitmer has navigated much differently from many other Democratic governors. The fact that Whitmer had 'an opening to make direct appeals' in private to Trump was unique in this political moment, said Matt Grossman, a Michigan State University politics professor. It was her third meeting with Trump at the White House since he took office in January. This one, however, was far less public than the time in April when Whitmer was unwittingly part of an impromptu news conference that embarrassed her so much she covered her face with a folder. On Tuesday, she told the president that the economic damage from the tariffs could be severe in Michigan, a state that helped deliver him the White House in 2024. Whitmer also brought up federal support for recovery efforts after an ice storm and sought to delay changes to Medicaid. Trump offered no specific commitments, according to people familiar with the private conversation who were not authorized to discuss it publicly and spoke only on condition of anonymity to describe it. Whitmer is hardly the only one sounding the warning of the potentially damaging consequences, including factory job losses, lower profits and coming price increases, of the import taxes that Trump has said will be the economic salvation for American manufacturing. White House spokesman Kush Desai that no other president 'has taken a greater interest in restoring American auto industry dominance than President Trump." Trade frameworks negotiated by the administration would open up the Japanese, Korean and European markets for vehicles made on assembly lines in Michigan, Desai said. But the outreach Trump has preferred tends to be splashy presentations by tech CEOs. In the Oval Office on Wednesday, Apple CEO Tim Cook gave the president a customized glass plaque with a gold base as Cook promised $600 billion in investments. Trump claims to have brought in $17 trillion in investment commitments, although none of those numbers has surfaced yet in economic data. Under his series of executive orders and trade frameworks, U.S. automakers face import taxes of 50% on steel and aluminum, 30% on parts from China and a top rate of 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico not covered under an existing 2020 trade agreement. That puts America's automakers and parts suppliers at a disadvantage against German, Japanese and South Korean vehicles that only face a 15% import tax negotiated by Trump last month. On top of that, Trump this past week threatened a 100% tariff on computer chips, which are an integral part of cars and trucks, though he would exclude companies that produce chips domestically from the tax. Whitmer's two earlier meetings with Trump resulted in gains for Michigan. But the tariffs represent a significantly broader request of a president who has imposed them even more aggressively in the face of criticism. Materials in the presentation brought Whitmer to the meeting and obtained by The Associated Press noted how trade with Canada and Mexico has driven $23.2 billion in investment to Michigan since 2020. General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis operate 50 factories across the state, while more than 4,000 facilities support the auto parts supply chain. Altogether, the sector supports nearly 600,000 manufacturing jobs, forming the backbone of Michigan's economy. Whitmer outlined the main points of the materials to Trump and left copies with his team. To Grossman, the Michigan State professor, a key question is whether voters who expected to be helped by tariffs would react if Trump's import taxes failed to deliver the promised economic growth. 'Everyone's aware that Michigan is a critical swing state and the auto industry has outsized influence, not just directly, but symbolically,' Grossman said. AP VoteCast found that Trump won Michigan in 2024 largely because two-thirds of its voters described the economic conditions as being poor or 'not so good.' Roughly 70% of the voters in the state who felt negatively about the economy backed the Republican. The state was essentially split over whether tariffs were a positive, with Trump getting 76% of those voters who viewed them favorably. The heads of General Motors, Ford and Stellantis have repeatedly warned the administration that the tariffs would cut company profits and undermine their global competitiveness. Their efforts have resulted in little more than a temporary, monthlong pause intended to give companies time to adjust. The reprieve did little to blunt the financial fallout. In the second quarter alone, Ford reported $800 million in tariff-related costs, while GM said the import taxes cost it $1.1 billion. Those expenses could make it harder to reinvest in new domestic factories, a goal Trump has championed. 'We expect tariffs to be a net headwind of about $2 billion this year, and we'll continue to monitor the developments closely and engage with policymakers to ensure U.S. autoworkers and customers are not disadvantaged by policy change,' Ford CEO Jim Farley said on his company's earning call. Smaller suppliers have felt the strain, too. Detroit Axle, a family-run auto parts distributor, has been one of the more vocal companies in Michigan about the impact of the tariffs. The company initially announced it might have to shut down a warehouse and lay off more than 100 workers, but later said it would be able to keep the facility open, at least for now. 'Right now it's a market of who is able to survive, it's not a matter of who can thrive,' said Mike Musheinesh, owner of Detroit Axle.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brinker International (EAT) Stock Falls Amid Market Uptick: What Investors Need to Know
Brinker International (EAT) closed the most recent trading day at $151.97, moving -4.71% from the previous trading session. The stock fell short of the S&P 500, which registered a gain of 0.78% for the day. Meanwhile, the Dow gained 0.47%, and the Nasdaq, a tech-heavy index, added 0.98%. Shares of the operator of restaurant chains Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy have depreciated by 4.34% over the course of the past month, underperforming the Retail-Wholesale sector's gain of 1.32%, and the S&P 500's gain of 1.86%. Market participants will be closely following the financial results of Brinker International in its upcoming release. The company plans to announce its earnings on August 13, 2025. The company's earnings per share (EPS) are projected to be $2.43, reflecting a 50.93% increase from the same quarter last year. Meanwhile, our latest consensus estimate is calling for revenue of $1.43 billion, up 18.56% from the prior-year quarter. EAT's full-year Zacks Consensus Estimates are calling for earnings of $8.84 per share and revenue of $5.35 billion. These results would represent year-over-year changes of +115.61% and 0%, respectively. Investors should also take note of any recent adjustments to analyst estimates for Brinker International. These revisions help to show the ever-changing nature of near-term business trends. Therefore, positive revisions in estimates convey analysts' confidence in the business performance and profit potential. Our research reveals that these estimate alterations are directly linked with the stock price performance in the near future. To benefit from this, we have developed the Zacks Rank, a proprietary model which takes these estimate changes into account and provides an actionable rating system. The Zacks Rank system, ranging from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), possesses a remarkable history of outdoing, externally audited, with #1 stocks returning an average annual gain of +25% since 1988. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has witnessed a 1.39% increase. Currently, Brinker International is carrying a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold). Investors should also note Brinker International's current valuation metrics, including its Forward P/E ratio of 16.32. This expresses a discount compared to the average Forward P/E of 19.44 of its industry. It's also important to note that EAT currently trades at a PEG ratio of 0.38. The PEG ratio bears resemblance to the frequently used P/E ratio, but this parameter also includes the company's expected earnings growth trajectory. The Retail - Restaurants industry currently had an average PEG ratio of 2.43 as of yesterday's close. The Retail - Restaurants industry is part of the Retail-Wholesale sector. With its current Zacks Industry Rank of 181, this industry ranks in the bottom 27% of all industries, numbering over 250. The Zacks Industry Rank evaluates the power of our distinct industry groups by determining the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks forming the groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1. To follow EAT in the coming trading sessions, be sure to utilize Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio
