
Deal Or No Deal: What Happens With Trump's July Tariff Deadline?
The tariffs taking effect July 9 are part of a package Trump imposed in April citing a lack of "reciprocity" in trading ties.
He slapped a 10 percent levy on most partners, with higher customized rates to kick in later in countries the United States has major trade deficits with.
But these were halted until July to allow room for negotiations.
Analysts expect countries will encounter one of three outcomes: They could reach a framework for an agreement; receive an extended pause on higher tariffs; or see levies surge.
'Framework' deals
"There will be a group of deals that we will land before July 9," said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last Friday on CNBC.
Policymakers have not named countries in this group, although Bessent maintains that Washington has been focused on striking deals with about 18 key partners.
"Vietnam, India and Taiwan remain promising candidates for a deal," Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) vice president Wendy Cutler told AFP.
Without a deal, Vietnam's "reciprocal tariff" rises from the baseline of 10 percent to 46 percent, India's to 26 percent and Taiwan's to 32 percent.
Josh Lipsky, international economics chair at the Atlantic Council, cited Indian negotiators' extension of their US trip recently in noting that it "seems like a frontrunner."
"Japan was in that category, but things have set back a little," Lipsky said, referring to Trump's criticism Monday over what the president called Japan's reluctance to accept US rice exports.
The deals, however, will unlikely be full-fledged trade pacts, analysts said, citing complexities in negotiating such agreements.
Since April, Washington has only announced a pact with Britain and a deal to temporarily lower tit-for-tat duties with China.
Extended pause
Bessent has also said that countries "negotiating in good faith" can have their tariffs remain at the 10 percent baseline.
But extensions of the pause on higher rates would depend on Trump, he added.
"With a new government, (South) Korea looks well positioned to secure an extension," Cutler of ASPI said.
Lipsky expects many countries to fall into this bucket, receiving an extended halt on higher tariffs that could last until Labor Day, which falls on September 1.
Bessent earlier said that Washington could wrap up its agenda for trade deals by Labor Day, a signal that more agreements could be concluded but with talks likely to extend past July.
Tariff reimposition
For countries that the United States finds "recalcitrant," however, tariffs could spring back to the higher levels Trump previously announced, Bessent has warned.
These range from 11 percent to 50 percent.
Cutler warned that "Japan's refusal to open its rice market, coupled with the US resistance to lowering automotive tariffs, may lead to the reimposition of Japan's 24 percent reciprocal tariff."
Trump himself said Tuesday that a trade deal was unlikely with Japan and the country could pay a tariff of "30 percent, 35 percent, or whatever the number is that we determine."
Lipsky believes the European Union is at risk of having tariffs snap back to steeper levels too -- to the 20 percent unveiled in April or the 50 percent Trump more recently threatened.
An area of tension could be Europe's approach to digital regulation.
Trump recently said he would terminate trade talks with Canada -- which is not impacted by the July 9 deadline -- in retaliation for the country's digital services tax, which Ottawa eventually said it would rescind.
This week, EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic is in Washington in a push to seal a trade deal, with the EU commission having received early drafts of proposals that officials are working on.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
Google makes new proposal to stave off EU antitrust fine
Google has proposed fresh changes to its search results in an attempt to fend off growing criticism from rivals, a week before a key meeting that could lead to yet another EU antitrust fine, according to a document seen by Reuters. The US tech giant has been under pressure after being hit in March with European Union antitrust charges of unfairly favouring its own services such as Google Shopping, Google Hotels and Google Flights over competitors. The company, owned by Alphabet, will meet its rivals and the European Commission to discuss its proposals during a July 7-8 workshop in Brussels, the document said. The EU's landmark Digital Markets Act, under which Google has been charged, sets out a list of dos and don'ts for Big Tech aimed at curbing their power and giving rivals more room to compete and consumers more choice. Last week, Google offered to create a box at the top of the search page for a so-called vertical search service (VSS) which would contain links to specialised search engines as well as to hotels, airlines, restaurants and transport services. The latest offer, called Option B, is an alternative to last week's proposal, according to a Google document sent by the Commission to involved parties and seen by Reuters. "Under 'Option B', whenever a VSS box is shown, Google will also show a box that includes free links to suppliers," the document said. The box for suppliers - in essence hotels, restaurants, airlines and travel services - would be below the VSS box, with Google organising the information about the suppliers. Option B "provides suppliers opportunities while not creating a box that can be characterised as a Google VSS", the document said. "We've made hundreds of alterations to our products as part of our DMA compliance," a Google spokesperson said. "While we strive for compliance, we remain genuinely concerned about some of the real world consequences of the DMA, which are leading to worse online products and experiences for Europeans." Google risks a fine as much as 10% of its global annual revenue if found in breach of the DMA.


Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk's father Errol Musk to Donald Trump: ‘Listen to Elon…he's not a fool'
Elon Musk 's father Errol Musk has shared an advice for his son. According to a report by Al-Arabiya English, Errol Musk advised his son Elon to 'stay silent' and concentrate on his businesses, especially Tesla. He acknowledged that politics can be complicated, with 'tempers flare' and 'human behavior is so complicated,' and suggested it's better for Elon to stay focused on what he does best—running his companies. Errol also expressed his surprise over the Tesla and SpaceX CEO's feud with US President Donald Trump . He said: 'As far as President Trump going against Elon, I can't really understand what is going on. It makes no sense to me at all.' Errol also expressed his optimism despite the rising tension between the two. He said: 'Something good will come out of this, I'm pretty sure.' Elon Musk's father supports Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill According to the report, Errol and Elon have different opinions about the Trump administration's One Big Beautiful Bill . While the tech billionaire has been a vocal critique of Trump's bill, Errol, on the other hand, supports it. Talking about the bill, Errol said 'United States needs a lot of rebuilding…they need to spend money'. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Walmart Photos Which Are Not For Everyone Old Money Style Undo The senior Musk also made a request to President Trump to 'Listen to Elon,' adding that 'He's not a fool'. At last, Musk's father advised both Trump and Elon to 'talk it out.' Trump-Musk feud The feud between Trump and Musk reignited after the tech billionaire criticized Trump's new federal spending bill. So much so that he threatened to create a new political group, calling it the 'America Party,' if the bill is passed by the Senate. Trump responded by questioning Musk's loyalty and criticizing electric vehicle mandates, which he called 'ridiculous.' Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed [sic] me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate. It is ridiculous, and was always a major part of my campaign. Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one,' the president wrote on Truth Social. OnePlus Nord 5 and OnePlus Nord CE 5: Unboxing and first look AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ukraine arms freeze sparks GOP fury: Pentagon's pause catches Donald Trump allies off guard; target Colby
Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth (AP) The United States' latest decision to halt some weapon shipments to Ukraine came as a surprise even to people usually in the loop on such matters, including officials from the state department, members of Congress, and some key European allies, according to Politico. The halt was prompted by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby and a close group of advisers, who expressed concerns that some US weapons stockpiles were becoming depleted. The unexpected decision on Monday sparked concern and frustration, even among leading Republicans, over the apparent perception that a single senior Pentagon official had such influence on the outcome. Even President Donald Trump's allies expressed frustration over the decision, accusing officials like Colby, who conducted a review of US munitions stockpiles prior to the pause, of advancing the move without informing the rest of the administration or other stakeholders. They pointed out that the decision to suspend weapons shipments to Ukraine appeared to be made with minimal coordination across the administration, following major reductions to the national security council that had significantly weakened its influence. 'I think it's all made by the DOD policy director, this Colby guy. We essentially don't have a national security adviser,' said Republican representative for Texas Michael McCaul. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Искате да научите повече за новото BMW 2 Gran Coupe? BMW Научете повече Undo 'I'm not even sure (Secretary of State Marco) Rubio was consulted on this one … There's internal division in the White House.' The decision sparked confusion and a sense of shock in Ukraine, while also prompting concern in Europe over whether the US was beginning to retreat from its military backing of Kyiv, at a time when Trump seemed increasingly open to the idea of providing additional aid to help defend Ukraine against Russian attacks. Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, a member of the house intelligence committee, wrote a letter to Trump on Tuesday requesting an emergency briefing from the White House and the department of defense regarding the suspension of military aid, which had originally been approved under the Biden administration. One official said the Pentagon's move was uncoordinated and surprised the state department. According to two other officials, Pentagon leaders didn't consult the state department, the US embassy in Kyiv, or Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg's team before halting a shipment of critical weapons already in Poland. Some members of the Joint Staff also opposed the decision, they added, reported Politico. The White House and the state department rejected claims that the munitions pause took officials by surprise. 'This is false,' said a White House official. 'The president and top officials expect the DOD to regularly review aid allocations to ensure they are in line with the America First agenda.'