Minister dismisses idea of split in Cabinet over Palestinian statehood
Israel announced at the weekend that it would suspend fighting in three areas of Gaza for 10 hours a day and open secure routes for aid delivery
Health Secretary Wes Streeting is among those to have signalled a desire for hastened action calling for recognition 'while there's still a state of Palestine left to recognise'.
While Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the Government wants to recognise a Palestinian state 'in contribution to a peace process'.
Speaking to Good Morning Britain, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'There's no split. The whole of the Labour Party, every Labour MP, was elected on a manifesto of recognition of a Palestinian state, and we all want it to happen.
'It is a case of when, not if.'
He added: 'It's about how we use this moment, because you can only do it once to have a meaningful breakthrough.'
He had earlier told Sky News that recognition would happen 'in this Parliament [..,.] if it delivers the breakthrough that we need'.
Later this week, the Prime Minister is expected to chair a Cabinet meeting on the conflict.
The UK is working with Jordan to airdrop aid into Gaza and evacuate children needing medical assistance, with military planners deployed for further support.
However, the head of the UN's Palestinian refugee agency has warned such efforts are 'a distraction' that will fail to properly address deepening starvation in the strip, and could in some cases harm civilians.
Images and warnings of starvation emerging from Gaza in recent days have piled pressure on the Israeli government over its conduct in the conflict.
The Prime Minister held crisis talks with French and German counterparts on Saturday, during which Number 10 said they agreed 'it would be vital to ensure robust plans are in place to turn an urgently-needed ceasefire into lasting peace'.
A Downing Street readout of the call made no mention of Palestinian statehood, which Sir Keir has faced calls to immediately recognise after French president Emmanuel Macron announced his country would do so in September.
Some 221 MPs from Labour, the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, SNP, Greens, Plaid Cymru, SDLP and independents have signed a letter pressuring the Government to follow suit at a UN meeting next week.
The majority of those who have signed, 131, are Labour MPs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
20 minutes ago
- BBC News
Migration fuels England and Wales population jump, figures suggest
The population of England and Wales is estimated to have jumped by more than 700,000 in the year to June 2024, the second largest rise in more than 75 years, figures Office for National Statistics (ONS) said almost all of the increase was due to international migration, despite it being lower than the previous year at 690,100 compared with 833,700 in the 12 months to June 2023. Natural change - where there are more births than deaths - accounted for only a small estimates suggest there were 61.8 million people in England and Wales in June 2024, up 706,881 from 61.1 million in mid-2023. Chris Mason: Why Labour aims to buck trend of rising migrationWhat are the challenges facing the government's immigration plan? The number of people living in England and Wales has risen annually since mid-1982, with migration contributing most to the growth every year since then, natural change was the main reason for rise in the year to June 2024 is the second biggest year-on-year jump in population since at least 1949 - the earliest comparable ONS immigration has been a key challenge for both the previous Conservative and current Labour said the estimates published on Wednesday "confirm the truth of the Tory legacy on immigration".Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: "Under the Tories, overseas recruitment shot up while training in the UK was cut, lower-skilled migration soared while the proportion of UK residents in work plummeted and hundreds of thousands of people were given visas to arrive and stay in the UK."She said net migration had "come steeply down" under Labour, there were now tighter controls on visas and stronger requirements to link the points-based immigration system to skills and home secretary Chris Philp acknowledged the numbers were "far too high" and "the pressure on housing and social cohesion is unacceptable".He said: "Under new leadership the Conservative Party has put forward serious, workable policies to get immigration numbers dramatically down."Leader of Reform UK, Nigel Farage, said the figures were "disastrous for the quality of life for everyone in the country. It puts impossible pressures on public services and further divides our communities". The ONS estimates suggest 1,142,303 people immigrated to England and Wales in the 12 months to June 2024, while 452,156 were likely to have emigrated, leaving a net migration figure of 690, drop from a net migration of 833,696 the previous year is likely due to to a fall in the number of foreign nationals from outside the EU coming to the UK on work and study visas, along with a rise in students leaving at the end of their in migration rules introduced in early 2024 by the previous Conservative government included restrictions on international students bringing family members with them to the UK as well as banning overseas care workers from bringing were slightly more births (596,012) than deaths (566,030), adding 29,982 to the natural change increased the size of the population in four regions - London, south-east England, the West Midlands and eastern ONS said other regions had negative natural change, reflecting "a long-term decline in fertility and an increasing number of deaths because of the growing proportion of older people".Previous ONS statistics showed women in England and Wales had an average of 1.44 children between 2022 and 2023, the lowest on 10 years from 2014 to 2024, the East Midlands had the highest level of growth at 9.1%, while north-east England had the lowest at 5.7%.
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
British hostage Emily Damari: Shame on Starmer for rewarding terror
A British-Israeli woman held hostage by Hamas for more than a year has condemned Sir Keir Starmer's plan to formally recognise the state of Palestine. Emily Damari said the Prime Minister's approach risked 'rewarding terror' and warned the move would send a dangerous message that violence earns legitimacy. Ms Damari, 29, who was released from captivity in January, said: 'By legitimising a state entity while Hamas still controls Gaza and continues its campaign of terror, you are not promoting a solution; you are prolonging the conflict. 'Recognition under these conditions emboldens extremists and undermines any hope for genuine peace. Shame on you.' On Tuesday, the Prime Minister said he would recognise Palestine as a state in September unless Israel met four specific demands, including accepting a ceasefire. Sir Keir also reiterated his calls for Hamas to release the remaining hostages captured in the attacks of Oct 7 2023 but did not explicitly say that is required before recognition of Palestinian statehood. Downing Street is now under growing pressure to explain its approach, with some warning it incentivises Hamas to avoid a ceasefire by keeping hostages in order to secure recognition. Meanwhile, the families of hostages held by Hamas have criticised Sir Keir for failing to make their release a precondition to recognising Palestine. Two representatives of families who still have relatives held by Hamas issued criticism of the Prime Minister's approach on Wednesday morning. Bring Them Home Now, a campaign group aimed at securing the release of hostages, published a statement posted on the social media site X. The statement read: 'Recognising a Palestinian state while 50 hostages remain trapped in Hamas tunnels amounts to rewarding terrorism. Such recognition is not a step toward peace, but rather a clear violation of international law and a dangerous moral and political failure that legitimises horrific war crimes. 'The abduction of men, women, and children, who are being held against their will in tunnels while subjected to starvation and physical and psychological abuse, cannot and should not serve as the foundation for establishing a state.' Another part read: 'Recognition of a Palestinian state before the hostages are returned will be remembered throughout history as validating terrorism as a legitimate pathway to political goals.' Adam Wagner KC, a barrister who has represented families of hostages taken by Hamas, wrote on X: 'We are concerned that the UK's proposal risks delaying the release of the hostages. 'This is because the UK has said that it will recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel agrees a ceasefire. But the risk is that Hamas will continue to refuse to a ceasefire because if it agrees to one this would make UK recognition less likely.' 'Concern is to bring loved ones home' Mr Wagner went on: 'The families are therefore deeply concerned that the UK's approach risks disincentivising Hamas from releasing the hostages. This risks doing exactly what the Prime Minister's statement says the UK will not do: reward Hamas for its heinous and illegal acts. 'The British hostage families take no position on the wider politics. Their concern is to bring their loved ones home, and time is fast running out.' Sir Keir's change in position was revealed in a statement issued by Downing Street on Tuesday afternoon following an emergency Cabinet meeting earlier in the day. The statement said that the Prime Minister had told Cabinet 'that the UK will recognise the state of Palestine in September, before UNGA (UN General Assembly), unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, reaches a ceasefire, makes clear there will be no annexation in the West Bank, and commits to a long-term peace process that delivers a two-state solution'. The wording of the position made clear that Israel would have to meet all four conditions if it wanted to stop the recognition of Palestine in September. The Downing Street statement also said Sir Keir had 'reiterated that there is no equivalence between Israel and Hamas and that our demands on Hamas remain, that they must release all the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, accept that they will play no role in the government of Gaza, and disarm'. However these demands were not explicitly linked to the declaration of Palestinian statehood, meaning they do not need to happen for recognition to take place. Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, was repeatedly pressed on the point on Sky News on Wednesday morning but would not say release of the hostages by Hamas was a necessary step that had to be taken before recognition of Palestine. Ms Alexander said: 'We have always said right from day one that the hostages needed to be released. 'We're absolutely clear that Hamas is a vile terrorist organisation, it has committed heinous crimes and the wounds of Oct 7 will live forever in Israel and in the consciousness of the Israeli people. 'This isn't about Hamas. This is actually about delivering for the Palestinian people and making sure that we can get aid in.' UK humiliated, says Tice Richard Tice, the Reform deputy leader, told The Telegraph: 'Starmer's recognition of Palestine as a state sends a dangerous message, that acts of terrorism are somehow acceptable. 'The fact that he has made this decision before the hostages are returned validates the violence that occurred on Oct 7 and humiliates us on the international stage against our main strategic ally, the United States. 'This decision amounts to nothing more than appeasement of the far Left and a desperate attempt to claw back votes from Jeremy Corbyn.'
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Wes Streeting's divide and rule tactics may have won against the doctors – but more strikes are coming
When thousands of ambulance workers went on strike on 21 December 2022 to demand better pay and conditions, the then shadow health secretary, Wes Streeting, wasn't shy in pointing out who was responsible. In their refusal to negotiate, he tweeted, Rishi Sunak and Steve Barclay had driven NHS staff to strike, leaving patients 'in no doubt who is to blame for this chaos'. Three years and one general election later, the surgical slipper is firmly on the other foot. Resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – have just finished a five-day strike, demanding a 29% pay rise over the next few years. Among placards on picket lines calling for 'pay restoration' and an end to 'cuts so deep that even a surgeon couldn't fix it' were printed copies of Streeting's tweet. Gone is the relaxed attitude displayed by the health secretary towards the British Medical Association (BMA) in 2024, when he agreed a deal with doctors that set them on a 'journey to pay restoration'. He has called this latest strike a 'gift to Nigel Farage' and urged resident doctors to cross picket lines and join their colleagues still 'turning up to work'. He has described the strike not only as 'reckless', but as an action that 'enormously undermines the entire trade union movement'. Union general secretaries have been quick to shoot back, with Dave Ward of the Communication Workers Union calling Streeting's comments 'shameful', and the Public and Commercial Services Union's Fran Heathcote accusing the health secretary of 'carping in the Murdoch press' instead of negotiating a settlement. For a government whose relationship with organised labour has so far been largely harmonious – apart from Unite's suspension of Angela Rayner over the Birmingham bin strikes – Streeting's denouncement of the BMA is the closest Labour has come to picking a fight with the unions. Is this the government's industrial shot across the bows? While on the face of it, the row might seem like the first real sign of confrontation between Labour and the unions, it's worth taking a closer look at what is happening. Underlying Streeting's intervention are a number of factors that make the BMA an easy target for a government that's keen to display that it can be tough on unions and not in the pocket of its 'union paymasters'. The BMA is not affiliated to Labour, nor is it part of the Trades Union Congress, making Labour's institutional link to it much weaker. There's also the fact that resistance to the strike isn't coming only from the government's side: other healthcare unions have expressed unease over existing discrepancies in NHS pay offers. Last month, the Royal College of Nursing called the government's decision to award resident doctors a 5.4% pay increase while offering nursing staff 3.6% 'grotesque'. In a video posted on X about the strike, Streeting plays into those divisions within the movement, stoking tension between resident doctors and other NHS workers. He talks about 'working hard with … staff that aren't paid as much as doctors to make sure that your pay and your career progression and the conditions that you work in are also good for you'. Add to that the older consultants and medical professionals who have been having their say: that a strike would 'further diminish the ability of the NHS to deliver', that 'it is too soon to go again', or simply that resident doctors are being 'very greedy'. Then there's the drastic lurch by the Tories – both in government and opposition – to the right on industrial matters, with Kemi Badenoch proposing this week to ban doctors from taking strike action, putting them under the same rules that apply to police, prison officers and soldiers. This approach gives Streeting more room to present himself as tough but reasonable. This isn't to defend Streeting, who is probably more than happy to use strike action to justify further NHS privatisation. Nor is it to undermine how galling his comments are for those standing out on the picket lines. One doctor has called them a 'slap in the face', while another asked where the Streeting of 2022 had gone: 'He was making some good points.' But government condemnation of the strike does not necessarily reflect a wider shift in its strategy towards unions. Amid frenzied attacks by Tories and their media allies on Labour's link with the unions, the reality of the relationship is all too often drowned out. That makes it harder to understand key dynamics: it's likely to be transport unions that the government hopes to take on, not only industrially but politically. It also makes it harder to spot how unions' different industrial priorities inform their relationship with the government. With so much of Labour's employment rights bill left to secondary legislation, general secretaries still have eyes on the prize of getting their sectoral needs met, whether that's Unison pushing for fair pay agreements or the Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers for zero-hours contract reform. Then there's the fact that there are those in Labour who are itching to embrace the spirit of the 1980s and launch a full-frontal attack on the movement. The country is once again facing the prospect of widespread public sector industrial action, with nurses and teachers potentially set to join the strike action. A decade of suppressed public sector pay, inflation and increases in the cost of living has challenged the idea that certain professions' wages are always guarantees of a good life. On a basic starting salary of £38,831 and saddled with as much as £100,000 of student debt, it's no longer enough for new resident doctor recruits to simply wait to earn more at some distant point in the future. While there are grievances specific to the resident doctors' strikes – a shortage of speciality training posts and having to spend thousands of pounds on exam fees, courses and equipment such as stethoscopes – many of their concerns are felt deeply across the movement. Stubborn mountains of student debt, housing costs that utterly eclipse wages and crumbling public services that drive down working conditions are not unique to the BMA. For this dispute, Labour has used inter-union tensions over NHS pay – as well as the outdated idea that all resident doctors are middle-class professionals – as a political opportunity to dodge blame for the strike. But that strategy won't work for all strikes. As public sector unrest continues to unfold, the government's battle with the unions might well begin in earnest. Polly Smythe is labour movement correspondent at Novara Media
