Newcastle University students get £1.7m in strike compensation
Industrial action ended last month when the UCU said it had received assurances from the university no further job losses would be made until next year. More than 200 staff have already taken voluntary severance.
'Impact of action'
In response to a freedom of information request, the university said it had identified 12,769 students eligible for compensation payments.Home fee-paying students can be awarded £100 of compensation for each teaching module disrupted, up to a maximum of £600, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.International fee-payers can receive £200 of compensation per module, with an upper limit of £1,200.The university said the compensation scheme had not yet closed and so the final amount it would spend on compensation was not yet known.It said it was funding these payments using the cash it had saved as a result of unpaid salaries due to the industrial action.Prof Perry said: "The fact that they can pay £1.7m out to students shows the measure of the impact of our actions plus that the university had the money to cut compulsory redundancies in the first place."
Follow BBC Newcastle on X (formerly Twitter), Facebook and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Crystal Palace to FINALLY appear at Court of Arbitration for Sport to appeal Europa League demotion
Crystal Palace will attempt to overturn their Europa League demotion at a high-stakes hearing on Friday – and the man at the centre of the issue will not be present. Eagles lawyers and officials will present their case having appealed UEFA's decision to drop them into the Europa Conference League thanks to breaches of its rules on multi-club ownership. Last month, revealed how Palace were in grave danger of being kicked out of the competition. And, following a hearing at UEFA HQ, the FA Cup winners' fears became reality. UEFA adjudicators ruled that John Textor, the US businessman whose company held a 43 per cent stake in the club along with a majority stake in fellow qualifiers Lyon, did hold 'control or decisive influence' at Selhurst Park, despite the fact he only possessed 25 per cent of voting rights. Because the French side finished in a higher position in their domestic league they took the slot, with Nottingham Forest subsequently leapfrogging Palace. Palace will appear at the Court of Arbitration for Sport, in Lausanne, Switzerland, but Textor, who was a key witness at the UEFA hearing and who has subsequently sold his stake in the club, will not be there. Palace want their demotion overturned and for either Lyon or Forest to be demoted. Forest are sending their own legal team. Those who attend have the option to evade publicity by entering via a side exit. It is understood Palace, who believe they have done nothing wrong, will shun such a manoeuvre and enter via the main entrance.
The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Reeves and Starmer to roll the pitch for tax rises in a difficult autumn budget
The chancellor and prime minister will begin to pitch-roll tax rises and reforms from September as part of a strategy to prepare the country for a difficult budget that could be held in November, the Guardian has been told. Although Treasury sources have insisted Rachel Reeves will stick to her pledge not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT, senior Whitehall sources said that she and Keir Starmer had begun a series of meetings to thrash out the shape of the budget. A rise in gambling levies – advocated by the former prime minister Gordon Brown – is thought to be near-guaranteed as part of the package of tax rises. The pressure facing the government was underlined on Thursday when the Bank of England warned that it could be forced to keep interest rates at higher levels for longer than previously thought as soaring food prices linked to Labour's tax increases threaten to drive inflation to 4% this year. The central bank cut interest rates to their lowest level in two years but warned Britain was facing a toxic cocktail of sluggish growth, rising unemployment and stubbornly high inflation. Reeves and Starmer have held talks over the past weeks to begin to set the parameters of the budget and the economic narrative ahead of Labour's conference. The government's limited options were further emphasised this week when the National Institute of Economic and Social Research said 'moderate but sustained' tax rises would be needed in the budget for Reeves to overcome a deficit of £41.2bn and restore a near-£10bn buffer. No date has been set for the budget, which was held last year on 30 October, but government sources expect that it will be in November, giving the chancellor a little longer to roll the pitch for controversial tax rises or cuts – as well as hoped-for improvements in growth. Advisers believe that a 'no surprises' approach will be crucial to prevent negative market reaction. 'Last year was a model of how to do it,' one said. 'Had we done it otherwise, it would have been a mess.' one said. Sources pointed towards the early signs Reeves gave to the markets more than a month ahead of her budget last year that she planned to change her fiscal rules around borrowing to invest – and said there would be a similar approach this time. However, Labour was roundly attacked by business leaders after for failing to warn about a £25bn increase in employer national insurance contributions (NICs), with companies including Tesco and Boots warning that it would raise their costs by £7bn and lead to higher prices and job cuts. Starmer has spent the week in Chequers meeting key aides and ministers as he begins work on his conference speech. The prime minister is understood to be keen to spend much of the summer thinking about the longer-term major structural problems in the UK economy that the party failed to identify before the election; the sources of low economic growth and productivity. Strategists also believe that the budget should be a moment to make the argument that Britain must now make serious choices on growth and productivity. They say Starmer must forcefully rebut the charges that the poor state of the economy is down to individual tax and spend choices, but is a sign of the weakness of the economy's fundamentals. The budget, they believe, should be a moment to set out the hard road of reforms to tackle those issues. Reeves and Starmer are understood to have agreed some broad principles for the budget and the Treasury will begin to submit ideas to Downing Street towards the end of the month. But sources close to Reeves said she is unmoved on her two main pledges – there will be no rise in income tax, national insurance or VAT and no change to the fiscal rules. One tax rise which is near certain is changes to gambling levies, despite a massive lobbying offensive by the industry. Brown has urged Reeves to spend funds from raising taxes on parts of the gambling industry on lifting the two-child benefit cap, a measure likely to be made even more expensive by higher inflation. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion In one of its closest decisions since its independence more than 25 years ago, the Bank's monetary policy committee (MPC) voted by 5-4 to cut its key base rate by a quarter point to 4%. Taking borrowing costs to the lowest level since March 2023, a cut was widely expected in financial markets. However, the decision was a close call, with the rate-setting panel for the first time in history holding two votes before reaching its verdict. Andrew Bailey, the Bank's governor, said: 'We've cut interest rates today, but it was a finely balanced decision. Interest rates are still on a downward path, but any future rate cuts will need to be made gradually and carefully.' Reeves sought to claim credit for the cut, as she claimed Labour's economic management had helped Threadneedle Street to reduce borrowing costs five times from a peak of 5.25% in August last year. 'The stability we have brought to the public finances through our Plan for Change has helped make this possible,' she said. However, the MPC warned tax-raising measures in the chancellor's first autumn budget had contributed to the rekindling of inflationary pressures hitting shoppers in the pocket across the country. Bailey warned that rising inflation could delay further rate cuts in future. 'I do think the path continues to be down …' he said. '[But] the path has become more uncertain because of what we're seeing.' City investors pared their bets for the timing of future rate cuts, with financial markets expecting a next quarter-point move in February and only one more similar reduction before the end of 2026. Reeves said reducing child poverty was a priority of the government but did not commit that any money from higher gambling levies would be spent on removing the two-child limit. The child poverty taskforce is expected to be released ahead of the budget this autumn. 'I talk to Gordon [Brown] regularly, and saw him last week when I was in Scotland,' Reeves said on Thursday. 'Like Gordon, I am deeply concerned around the levels of child poverty in Britain. No child should grow up hungry or parents not be able to afford the basics for their family. 'On gambling taxes, we've already launched a review into gambling taxes. We're taking evidence on that at the moment, and again, we'll set out our policies in the normal way, in our budget later this year.' Inside No 10 and the Treasury there was fury at the predictions of a £51bn hole in Reeves' budget by the NIESR thinktank, which aides say is impossible to calculate at the moment given that the budget could be another four months away. But there are fears in other parts of government about how boxed in the government has become, when Reeves has also appeared to rule out a wealth tax. 'I am at a loss really how they square the circle,' one Whitehall source said. 'It will have to be salami slicing small pieces here and there, when what we should do is bite the bullet.' At the Bank of England's press conference on Thursday, the MPC singled out fast-rising food prices as it warned that food price inflation was on track to reach 5.5% before the end of the year. It attributed much of the rise to global factors, including increasingly extreme weather events hitting cocoa and coffee harvests, highlighting the dangers from the climate emergency. However, it also pointed to 'material' rises in employment costs and new charges for recycling packaging, both driven by the government, that were being passed on to shoppers by UK supermarkets. 'In addition to global agricultural commodity prices, domestic labour costs are currently an important driver of food price inflation,' the Bank said. Business leaders had warned that Reeves's £25bn increase in employer NICs and a 6.7% rise in the 'national living wage' from April would force them to cut jobs and put up prices. Official figures show unemployment has crept higher in recent months, while the economy shrank in April and May. Inflation has also risen by more than expected, reaching 3.6% in June.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Wealth tax will not work, says Scottish Secretary
The Scottish Secretary has dismissed calls from people within his own party to introduce a wealth tax. Ian Murray told an audience at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe that the policy would not work. Speaking to comedian Matt Forde, the Labour minister said he 'wished' it worked but suggested wealthy people would leave the country. Some within Labour, including former leader Lord Neil Kinnock, Welsh First Minister Baroness Eluned Morgan and former equality minister Anneliese Dodds, have backed the idea. It has also become popular among unions and other left-wing parties, including the Greens and Jeremy Corbyn's new, unnamed party. On Thursday, Mr Murray said there was 'no silver bullet' to the economic issues facing the country, saying 'if you pull one leaver you have to push another' in a reference to tax rises and public spending cuts. He said while some UK Government decisions have been 'unpalatable', 'things would have been even more unpalatable' if they did not make tough choices. Asked if a wealth tax could be a solution to the issue, the Scottish Secretary said: 'No, it doesn't work. The Laffer curve (a theory showing the relationship between taxation and a government's revenue) is there for everyone to see. 'So, yes, you can bring in a wealth tax, because it might make you feel principally better. 'You might bring in £200 million but the cost of doing that would be huge because there is just flight, whether we like that or not.' Mr Murray said the tax had failed in other countries which, he said, had since gone on to roll back their decisions. He said: 'Every single principal decision we have to make has got to be on the basis of does it raise more money? 'Is it fair? Is it equitable? And will it resolve the situation? 'If the answer to any of those questions is no, we should not do it. 'So the wealth tax, and honestly, the wealth tax has been spent about 500 times over already for every single issue – just doing well tax, it doesn't work. 'I wish it did, but it doesn't.' Mr Murray added that the 'only real palatable option' was to grow the economy.
