Humza Yousaf is quite right to caution against any involvement in action against Iran
Just like in 2003 the public are being warned of an existential threat from weapons of mass destruction - this time unless we rush headlong into war with Iran on the side of Israel.
Humza Yousaf is quite right to caution against any involvement at this point in what could well be an illegal action against a country which - while undoubtedly a threat - was at the negotiating table until Israel began launching missiles into its territory.
The US Air Force has already been moving jets closer to the middle east which could be used to facilitate dropping bunker buster bombs on nuclear facilities.
And the Scottish Government should think very carefully over whether it wants Prestwick Airport - which it owns - to continue to be involved in that operation.
Earlier this year Donald Trump famously accused Volodymyr Zelensky of 'gambling with World War III' in Ukraine.
But it is now surely the US President who is engaged in a high stakes game of poker which could ignite a global conflict if things spiral out of control.
Israel is a country which stands accused of horrifying crimes in Gaza where over 50,000 people have now been killed.
The utterly despicable October 7 attacks on Israel cannot be used as justification for the massive loss of civilian life.
And Benjamin Netanyahu's clear desire to now drag western allies into the conflict with Iran should be rejected in favour of diplomacy.
The last 20 years of wars in the middle east involving the US and UK have been an economic and humanitarian disaster for millions of people and have undoubtedly fuelled uncontrolled immigration to Europe.
To get involved in yet another due to pressure from a country accused of war crimes by the International Criminal Court would be an unforgivable misjudgment.
Legal aid for FAI families
Losing a child or relative is one of the most difficult things anyone will have to experience.
When a death happens at work or unexpectedly in hospital it's right that Fatal Accident Inquiries (FAI) take place to make sure it wasn't preventable.
Grieving families who are faced with having to attend an FAI should not have an added financial burden to do so.
Understandably relatives want to ensure their questions are answered. What isn't guaranteed is that they'll qualify for legal aid or have the funds to pay for a lawyer themselves.
As the parents of baby Freya Murphy point out, the thought of having no representation while a room full of lawyers discuss what happened to your relative is unthinkable.
That's why they are calling for government support to pay for lawyers for families in that situation.
The Sunday Mail back their call. The government has already granted legal aid for relatives of those who die in custody.
It's right they extend this to cover anyone whose relatives deaths are being probed by an FAI.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
What is Yvette Cooper's plan to fast-track asylum claims?
As tensions flare up in the UK over migration, with protests taking place in Newcastle, Manchester and north London, the government is pursuing a new plan to reduce the asylum backlog. The home secretary has said she plans to introduce a fast-track scheme to turn around asylum decisions within weeks, via a 'major overhaul' of the appeal process. The plan is part of a wider attempt to crack down on the number of people crossing the Channel, with Ms Cooper announcing a 'one-in-one-out' returns deal with France earlier this year. But despite their efforts, last week it was revealed that the number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 in record time, piling pressure on the government to take further action. It is hoped that the new plan will make a dent in the backlog and return people to safe countries faster, reducing the number of asylum seekers who are housed in hotels while awaiting the outcome of a claim or appeal. Here, The Independent takes a look at everything we know about the plan so far and how it will work in practice. How would the fast-track system work? Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation, including hotels, if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. But Yvette Cooper has now promised a 'major overhaul' of the appeal process, speeding up the time it takes for decisions on claims and appeals to be made. There are currently limited details on how this system would work, but sources told the Sunday Times it would allow decisions to be taken within weeks, rather than months or even years. Once a decision has been taken, those who have been rejected will be returned to their home country – reducing the number of people housed in temporary accommodation. 'If we speed up the decision-making appeal system and also then keep increasing returns, we hope to be able to make quite a big reduction in the overall numbers in the asylum system, because that is the best way to actually restore order and control,' Ms Cooper said. When will it be implemented? The home secretary has said she will legislate for the changes in autumn, when MPs return from their summer break. But it could take months for any legislation to pass through parliament, meaning we are unlikely to see the fast-track system implemented until the new year. How big is the asylum backlog and why is tackling it a priority? As of the end of March 2025, there were 78,745 asylum applications awaiting an initial decision – an 8 per cent decrease from the end of June 2024 and a 13 per cent decrease compared to the end of December 2024, official immigration statistics show. These outstanding cases related to 109,536 people, including both main applicants and their dependents. Labour has put a pledge to fix the 'broken' asylum system and crack down on the number of people coming to the UK on small boats at the centre of its plan for government. But with boat crossings at a record high, and the asylum backlog still above 75,000, there is mounting pressure on ministers to take more drastic action, a pressure exacerbated by the success of Reform UK in the polls. The government has also promised to end the use of asylum hotels before the end of this parliament, a promise it is unlikely to meet unless the backlog is reduced. Tensions over asylum hotels have flared up in recent weeks, with a protest and counter-protest taking place on Saturday outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in north London, and also in Newcastle and Manchester.
Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fears emerge that Donald Trump could jeopardize NFL's blockbuster deal with ESPN
There are fears that Donald Trump could block the NFL's multi-billion-dollar deal with ESPN, according to reports. Earlier this month, the NFL and ESPN agreed a blockbuster deal that will see the network broadcast seven more regular-season games, and have access to NFL Network and RedZone. In return, it is reported that the NFL will receive equity in ESPN. The shock announcement, first reported by The Athletic, angered many football fans. But now Front Office Sports reports that Trump could intervene in the deal, which is expected to require sign-off from the government. There is reportedly 'growing concern' that the president could try to 'delay, or block' the billion-dollar agreement. Trump has a history of involving himself in sports - particularly the NFL. Only recently, he has been a vocal critic of the new kickoff rules and recently threatened to disrupt the Commanders' new stadium plans if Washington didn't change their name back to the Redskins. A decade ago, he tried and failed to buy the Buffalo Bills for $1billion. In 2017, meanwhile, he called on NFL owners to fire players who take a knee during the national anthem. Colin Kaepernick sparked a nationwide debate when he protested against police brutality and racial injustice. Other players followed suit and they soon incurred the wrath of the White House. 'Wouldn't you love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, "Get that son of a b**** off the field right now?" Out. He's fired. He's FIRED!' Trump said during a rally in Alabama. A year later, the president canceled the traditional White House reception with the Super Bowl winners after it emerged that only a small number of Eagles players planned to attend. Trump claimed Philadelphia disagreed 'with their President because he insists that they proudly stand for the National Anthem, hand on heart, in honor of the great men and women of our military and the people of our country.' The president has also had feuds with ESPN and its parent company Disney. 'ESPN is paying a really big price for its politics (and bad programming). People are dumping it in RECORD numbers. Apologize for untruth!' he said in 2017.
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Sydney Sweeney's Republican voter registration revealed amid jeans ad controversy
Sydney Sweeney registered as a Republican voter in Florida a few months before Donald Trump won a second US presidency, it has been revealed, as the public continues fixating on a new jeans ad campaign featuring the actor and a pun about her genes. The Euphoria and White Lotus star registered to vote in Florida on 14 June 2024 – shortly after buying a mansion in the Keys – and listed her party affiliation as Republican, according to publicly available records reviewed by the Guardian on Sunday. That was about two weeks after Trump, another registered Republican Florida voter, was convicted in New York City of criminal falsification of business records and before he secured a return to the White House in November's presidential election. It was also about two years after Sweeney, 27, faced criticism from some US media consumers after she was photographed at her mother's birthday party where several of the guests were seen wearing hats that called to mind those which bear Trump's Make America Great Again (Maga) slogan. The native of Spokane, Washington, subsequently issued a statement on social media pleading with the public to 'stop making assumptions'. 'An innocent celebration … has turned into an absurd political statement, which was not the intention,' Sweeney's statement added at the time. Sweeney has not addressed her Florida Republican voter registration, the existence of which went viral on social media on Saturday and was later reported on by traditional news outlets. The actor by then had generated considerable media coverage after the outfitter American Eagle released several videos showing her modeling the company's denim jeans and jackets. American Eagle's campaign generally revolves around the punny use of the phrase, 'Sydney Sweeney has great genes.' In one video, 'genes' is crossed out and replaced with 'jeans'. Another clip showed the blue-eyed blond suggestively looking at the camera and discussing how her body's composition 'is determined by … genes'. 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color. My jeans are blue,' Sweeney continues in the advertisements, which include a joke about the cameraperson becoming distracted by her breasts. Some social media users dismissed the campaign as tone deaf, arguing that it echoed rhetoric associated with eugenics and white supremacy at a time when the Trump administration was seeking to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives as well as aggressively pushing to detain and deport immigrants en masse. One TikTok reaction video that received hundreds of thousands of likes accused Sweeney of ignoring the political climate of the moment, saying 'it's literally giving … Nazi propaganda'. US conservatives have seized on the indignation over the campaign on the liberal fringes, rushing to praise Sweeney for landing a blow on 'woke' advertising, invoking a term some use to criticize DEI measures. Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung wrote on social media that criticizing Sweeney's collaboration with American Eagle was 'cancel culture run amok'. Nonetheless, many have judged backlash to Sweeney and American Eagle's collaboration as exaggerated and overblown. American Eagle's stock has reportedly risen in the wake of its Sweeney-centered campaign. A statement from the company on Friday defended the campaign, saying: ''Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story.' That outcome cut a stark contrast with the 2023 Bud Light advertisement involving trans activist Dylan Mulvaney. A conservative-organized boycott against Bud Light substantially drove sales down. The brand lost its place as the US beer market's top seller. And Bud Light's owner, Anheuser-Busch, sought to distance itself from Mulvaney in a statement which blamed the promotion on an 'outside agency without … management awareness or approval'. 'No one was trying to cancel Sydney Sweeney,' said a post on the X account Wu Tang is for the Children, which counts on more than 270,000 followers. 'And no one cares if she's Republican or not.'
