Trump pulls US out of UN cultural agency Unesco
Donald Trump
pulled the
United States
out of the UN culture and education agency
Unesco
on Tuesday, repeating a move he had ordered during his first term, which had been reversed under
Joe Biden
.
The withdrawal from the Paris-based agency, which was founded after the second World War to promote peace through international co-operation in education, science and culture, will take effect on December 31st, 2026.
'President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from Unesco – which supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out of step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for in November,' White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said.
[
Donald Trump could be swallowed up by an Epstein conspiracy he helped create
Opens in new window
]
The US state department said remaining in Unesco was not in the national interest, accusing it of having 'a globalist, ideological agenda for international development at odds with our United States First foreign policy'.
Unesco chief Audrey Azoulay said she deeply regretted Mr Trump's decision, but that it was 'expected, and Unesco has prepared for it'.
The agency had diversified its sources of funding, receiving only about 8 per cent of its budget from Washington, she said.
French president Emmanuel Macron wrote on the social media platform X: 'Unwavering support for Unesco, universal protector of science, the ocean, education, culture, and world heritage.
'The withdrawal of the United States will not weaken our commitment to those who are fighting this battle.'
Unesco was one of several international bodies Mr Trump withdrew from during his first term, along with the World Health Organisation, the Paris agreement global climate change accord and the UN Human Rights Council. During his second term he has largely reinstated those steps.
[
Donald Trump's threats: 'Taco' trade gives way to paradox
Opens in new window
]
Unesco officials said the US withdrawal would have some limited impact on programmes the United States was financing.
Israel welcomed the US decision to quit Unesco.
The US state department said one of the reasons for the withdrawal was Unesco's decision to admit Palestine as a member state, which was 'contrary to US policy and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric within the organisation'.
Unesco officials said all relevant agency statements had been agreed with Israel and the Palestinians over the past eight years.
'The reasons put forward by the United States to withdraw from the organisation are the same as seven years ago even though the situation has changed profoundly, political tensions have receded and Unesco today constitutes a rare forum for consensus on concrete and action-oriented multilateralism,' Ms Azoulay said.
'These claims also contradict the reality of Unesco's efforts, particularly in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against anti-Semitism.'
Diplomats said it was felt at Unesco that the withdrawal was inevitable for political reasons, given that Mr Biden had brought the US back and had promised to repay arrears from the first time Mr Trump pulled out.
Unesco, whose full name is the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, is best known for designating world heritage sites, including the Grand Canyon in the United States and the ancient city of Palmyra in Syria.
The US initially joined Unesco at its founding in 1945 but withdrew for the first time in 1984 in protest against alleged financial mismanagement and perceived anti-US bias, returning in 2003 under president George W Bush, who said the agency had undertaken needed reforms.
In 2011 the United States stopped funding Unesco after it voted to include Palestine as a full member. The move was because of US legislation requiring a complete cut-off of American financing to any UN agency that accepted Palestine on such terms. The lack of money deprived Unesco of nearly a fifth of its budget, forcing it to slash programs.
In 2017 the Trump administration went further and announced that it was withdrawing from the organisation, citing anti-Israel bias. The US remained a non-member observer after that.
Tammy Bruce, a US state department spokeswoman, said in a statement on Tuesday that continued involvement in Unesco was 'not in the national interest of the United States'.
Ms Bruce accused the organisation of promoting 'divisive social and cultural causes' and of maintaining an 'outsized focus on the UN's sustainable development goals, a globalist, ideological agenda for international development at odds with our America First foreign policy'.
She also cited 'the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric within the organisation' as one of the reasons for withdrawal. In the past, the organisation has faced similar accusations of political bias on
matters
related
to Israel and the Palestinians.
(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
More countries plan to recognise state of Palestine at UN General Assembly
Palestine is set to gain recognition from France , the UK , Canada and six other countries during the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly in September. Thursday's US state department decision to sanction Palestinian officials, denying them visas to attend, could make these countries more determined to advance recognition. Palestine has been recognised by 147 of the United Nations' 193 members, but has been accorded observer status rather than UN membership. Membership has been vetoed by the US , one of the five permanent members of the Security Council – along with France, the UK, China, and Russia – which must approve applications. READ MORE The move for recognition began on November 15th, 1988, when the Palestine National Council, the parliament-in-exile, issued a declaration of independence. [ Israeli strikes and gunfire kill dozens of Palestinians in Gaza Opens in new window ] Written by national poet Mahmoud Darwish, the declaration called for a state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza . This amounted to a shift in policy, as the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) had dropped its aspiration for a state in the whole of Palestine. The PLO opted instead for a mini-state in the territories occupied by Israel in 1967. Israel was ordered to withdraw from the territories by the security council in November 1967 but failed to comply. Palestine was instantly recognised by 13 countries, including Algeria, Malaysia, Morocco, Turkey, Yemen and Somalia. On December 15th, 1988, the UN General Assembly acknowledged the declaration of independence and recognised Palestine rather than the PLO as representing Palestinians within the UN system. By the end of the year, Palestine was recognised by 81 countries from Asia, Africa, the non-aligned group and eastern Europe. In October 2014, Sweden became the first European Union member to recognise Palestine. Nato countries that recognise Palestine, July 31st, 2025 Among the countries recognising Palestine last year were Ireland, Spain and Norway. France, the UK, Andora, Canada, Finland, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Portugal, San Marino and Malta are set to recognise Palestine this year. Australia has refused to set a time, while Germany and Italy do not intend to extend recognition. France has issued no conditions, while the UK and Canada have done so. Prime minister Keir Starmer has said the UK will recognise Palestine unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in the conflict with Hamas, allow substantive humanitarian aid into Gaza, declare no annexation of the West Bank and commit to the two-state solution involving a Palestinian state next to Israel. G20 countries that recognise Palestine, July 31st, 2025 He said Hamas 'must release all the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, accept that they will play no role in the government of Gaza, and disarm'. In return for recognition, Canadian prime minister Mark Carney called for reform of the West Bank-based Palestinian Authority, a commitment to hold elections in 2026 and the exclusion of Hamas from politics. The addition of France and Britain would mean that – minus the US – Palestine is recognised as a state by four of the five permanent UN Security Council members. The US has criticised the spate of recognitions which have been, at least in part, driven by Israel's attack on Gaza and long-term refusal to engage in meaningful negotiations on the two-state solution. US president Donald Trump has dismissed France's stance and accused others of rewarding Hamas by granting recognition. 'I'm not in that camp, to be honest,' he said. The conflict began when 1,200 Israelis were killed and 250 abducted by Hamas on October 7th, 2023. Israel's army has since killed more than 60,000 and wounded 45,870, driven 90 per cent of Gazans from their homes, and laid waste to the strip.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump escalates fight with Brazil with 50% tariffs and sanctions Bolsonaro case judge
On Wednesday, the US made good on its threats to apply 50 per cent tariffs on Brazil two days ahead of schedule and imposed sanctions on the supreme court justice overseeing the criminal case against former president Jair Bolsonaro . The dual measures showed that, just as Brazilian officials sought dialogue, the White House sharply escalated the growing diplomatic crisis between the western hemisphere's two most populous nations. The tariffs against Brazil are the highest of any levy US president Donald Trump has imposed this year, though they exclude many of Brazil's key exports to the United States, such as commercial aircraft, energy products and orange juice. Brazil is also the only country to face tariffs while carrying a trade surplus with the US. READ MORE The actions against Alexandre de Moraes , a Brazilian supreme court justice, are a highly unusual use of some of the gravest human rights sanctions the US government has at its disposal. Trump is targeting Brazil for what he calls political persecution of his ally, Bolsonaro, and illegal censorship of conservative voices online. In an executive order Wednesday, he said actions by Brazil's government and supreme court 'threaten the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States'. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil has publicly defied Trump for weeks, including in an interview with The New York Times published hours before the US government actions Wednesday. 'I think it's important for president Trump to consider: If he wants to have a political fight, then let's treat it as a political fight,' Lula told the Times. 'If he wants to talk trade, let's sit down and discuss trade. But you can't mix everything together.' Trump has called on Brazil to drop the charges against Bolsonaro, who is accused of orchestrating an attempted coup after losing the 2022 elections. Lula and de Moraes have pledged not to allow Trump to interfere in Brazil's judicial process. [ Trump pledges 50% tariffs against Brazil, citing 'witch hunt' against Bolsonaro Opens in new window ] Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro is accused of five crimes, including an attempt to violently abolish the democratic rule of law and a coup d'etat. Photograph: Victor Moriyama/ The New York Times Lula told the New York Times on Tuesday that his government had been studying retaliatory tariffs against some American products if Trump went through with his threats. Now, he is faced with the decision of whether to launch a trade war against Brazil's second-largest trading partner after China. Last year, the US had a $7.4 billion trade surplus with Brazil on about $92 billion in trade. Trump's efforts to come to the aid of Bolsonaro could soon mean higher prices for items such as coffee and beef – products that are significantly sourced from Brazil. Yet, his executive order on Wednesday also said that many products would be exempt from the levy. The US imports about 90 per cent of its fresh orange juice from Brazil, which will not be affected by the new tariffs. More than 40 per cent of Brazilian exports would be exempt from the tariffs, according to estimates from the American Chamber of Commerce in Brazil. The levies will go into effect in a week, but goods already in transit will be exempt from taxes if they arrive in the United States by October 5th, according to the executive order. The treasury department sanctions against de Moraes would revoke his US visa and freeze any US assets, as well as generally prohibit many financial institutions from doing transactions with him. Yet, the US state department already revoked his visa this month, and de Moraes does not have bank accounts or financial assets in the United States, according to a spokesperson for Brazil's supreme court. Given the broad tariff exemptions, the actions on Wednesday could end up being less crippling than they appear – but they are a clear signal from the Trump administration that it is prepared for a fight with Brazil. In a statement, Brazil's supreme court defended de Moraes and said the case against Bolsonaro involves a 'a serious attack on Brazilian democracy,' falling within 'the exclusive jurisdiction' of the country's courts. The president's office did not immediately comment. De Moraes has become perhaps the most divisive figure in Brazil. For years, he has acted as the central check on Bolsonaro and his right-wing allies, many of whom attacked Brazil's institutions and claimed the 2022 election was rigged despite a lack of evidence. [ Brazil's former president Jair Bolsonaro to stand trial for alleged coup attempt Opens in new window ] Alexandre de Moraes at a voting station in Brasilia on October 2nd, 2022. Photograph: Dado Galdieri/New York Times When Brazilian highway police officers stopped busloads of voters in leftist strongholds on election day in 2022, for example, it was de Moraes who ordered the police to let them proceed. But in his fight to protect democracy, he has also been viewed, at times, as having taken authoritarian measures. He has unilaterally ordered technological companies to take down hundreds of popular social media accounts because, he said, they threatened democracy, but he has refused to disclose how. He has jailed people without a trial for threats they posted online. And he has presided over cases in which he was, in effect, the judge and prosecutor. Yet, many of his decisions have also been backed up by a majority of supreme court justices, who have said that his extraordinary powers are needed to fight an extraordinary threat to Brazil's democracy. The moves have made him an intense target. In Brazil, there have been failed assassination attempts on his life. In the US, billionaire Elon Musk criticised him for months over his orders against X. And, now, the White House has put him on a sanctions list shared by many of the world's worst human rights abusers. On Tuesday, Lula said that the US efforts to target de Moraes were a dangerous infringement on Brazil's democracy. 'The supreme court of a country has to be respected not only by its own country, but it has to be respected by the world,' he said. 'I will never question someone from America's supreme court.' 'Today is a historic day,' Eduardo Bolsonaro said in a statement, thanking Trump and Rubio. Photograph: Tomas Cuesta/ Getty Images US secretary of state Marco Rubio, who first floated the idea of sanctions against de Moraes in June, said the Brazilian justice had been targeted with economic penalties because he had committed 'serious human rights abuses'. 'Let this be a warning to those who would trample on the fundamental rights of their countrymen – judicial robes cannot protect you,' he said in a social media post. Trump's aggressive attempts to aid Bolsonaro come just weeks before the former Brazilian president is poised to stand trial on the coup charges. Brazilian prosecutors say he sought to overturn the 2022 vote, dismantle courts and hand special powers to the military. And, in perhaps the most damning accusation, the police say the conspiracy included a plot to assassinate Lula and de Moraes. Bolsonaro denies knowledge of an assassination plan, but admits to studying 'ways within the constitution' to hold on to power after the election. After Bolsonaro left office, thousands of his supporters ransacked government buildings in Brazil's capital, in an episode that echoed the January 6th, 2021, riots on the US Capitol. Bolsonaro has suggested that immunity from prosecution, for him and his allies, is the path to an economic truce with the US. Lawmakers aligned with Bolsonaro are pushing for an amnesty bill, though Lula is likely to veto it. The US measures are a major win for Bolsonaro, who could face decades in prison if he is found guilty. For months, Eduardo Bolsonaro, the former president's son, has been lobbying the White House to apply sanctions against de Moraes and other judges, arguing that Brazil's supreme court is unfairly targeting his father and other right-wing voices. 'Today is a historic day,' Eduardo Bolsonaro said in a statement, thanking Trump and Rubio for the 'courage' to apply sanctions against de Moraes. 'I will be eternally grateful to them for this act.' – This article originally appeared in The New York Times .
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
US trading partners rush to sign deals before Donald Trump's tariffs hit
Top officials from big US trading partners have rushed to Washington in a bid to strike last-ditch trade deals with Donald Trump less than 24 hours before being hit again with the president's highest levels of tariffs . US allies Canada and Mexico sent delegations, according to people familiar with the negotiations, and were locked in intense talks to Trump administration officials on Wednesday. As the August 1st deadline neared, Mr Trump signalled late progress with key trading partners, announcing a deal with South Korea late on Wednesday while also saying he would hold last-minute talks to India – just hours after he announced 25 per cent tariffs on the country. But Mr Trump also warned other trading partners he would not back away from the sweeping tariff regime he has threatened on countries that do not reach an agreement by his deadline. 'The August first deadline is the August first deadline – it stands strong, and will not be extended. A big day for America!!!' the president posted on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday. The threats, coupled with deals struck in recent days with the EU and Japan, have left negotiators from other trading partners in an urgent rush to find time to meet administration officials and settle terms. Despite Mr Trump's tariff threat to India, one person familiar with its negotiations said New Delhi was close to an agreement, even though its top negotiators have left Washington. Canada's prime minister Mark Carney struck a cautious tone about the progress of his country's talks to the Trump administration. 'These are complex, they're comprehensive, they're constructive negotiations,' Mr Carney told reporters. 'It's possible that they may not conclude by the first of August.' Trump hit out at Canada late on Wednesday, writing on his Truth Social platform that Mr Carney's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood would 'make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them'. Foreign diplomats have spent hours in recent weeks negotiating with commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and US trade representative Jamieson Greer. Although one diplomat described Mr Lutnick as 'instrumental' in securing any deal, many said he had warned them that all final decisions rested with Mr Trump. People familiar with various trade talks said Mr Trump had on more than one occasion rejected potential deals proposed to him by Mr Lutnick and other aides, and demanded they push for more concessions to the US. The president had personally intervened in several deals, including joining a call with the Indian trade minister and Mr Lutnick as negotiations progressed, according to two people familiar with the talks. Mr Trump is also due to decide whether to extend a pause in his trade war with China , after treasury secretary Scott Bessent and Mr Greer held a third round of talks to a team from Beijing in Sweden this week. The latest diplomatic blitz comes as US markets broadly shrug off Trump's trade war. The S&P 500 share index has zoomed to record highs, while the dollar has hit its highest level since May as traders bet on the president baulking at imposing levies severe enough to spook investors. But some Wall Street banks and investors remain concerned that markets are complacent. 'Deadlines have come and gone, tariffs have climbed ... but economic data and markets have not rolled over. So, it's tempting to move on from the idea that US trade policy will move markets,' Morgan Stanley told clients in a note. 'Resist that temptation.' The diplomatic efforts cap a tumultuous six months in US trade relations marked by truculent rhetoric and tariff threats from Mr Trump, often followed by reversals and climbdowns. US trading partners without a deal have until 12.01am eastern time on Friday to find one – or face Mr Trump reimposing the steep tariffs he announced in April but suspended after days of severe market turmoil. After threatening foreign capitals with levies to exact political concessions, the president has since made reciprocal tariffs the centrepiece of his combative trade agenda. Those tariffs, imposed on 'liberation day' in April, reached up to 50 per cent for most US trading partners. Mr Trump has said he wants the tariffs to eliminate trade deficits with foreign exporters. Although Mr Trump promised to strike 90 deals in 90 days of his earlier pause on the reciprocal tariffs, negotiations have often been fraught, with major trading partners seeking to protect crucial industries, and some negotiators confused by the administration's mixed messages. Mexico and Canada, among the US's top three trading partners, have been offered a substantial carve-out for goods complying with their existing 2020 free trade agreement with the US. But they were also among the countries Mr Trump threatened with steeper tariffs in a barrage of letters posted online in recent weeks. Trading partners have sought to understand the mechanism for new tariffs – or their removal – and have been confused about which tariffs might snap back or be imposed, and which would diverge from those announced. Mr Trump would need to issue executive orders in advance of the deadline on Thursday night to impose any levies that differ from those he set out in April. In the UK last week, the president also raised the possibility that he would impose blanket 15-20 per cent levies on countries without a new deal by August 1st. 'You can't sit down and make 200 deals,' Mr Trump said in Scotland, where he unveiled his trade deal with the EU. Several countries have also been sent letters outlining new tariff rates, or have agreed on new levies – but the administration has not yet issued any fresh legal documents to carry through on its threats. Mr Trump has suggested that he could send more letters to countries stipulating other tariff rates. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
