Red alert for Reeves as government borrowing hits record high outside Covid in June with £16bn spent on debt interest alone - DOUBLE a year ago - fuelling tax hike fears
The public sector borrowed £20.7billion last month, far higher than the £17.6billion analysts had pencilled in.
The level was £6.6billion higher than a year earlier and only behind the height of the pandemic in 2020 since comparable figures began in 1997.
Alarmingly for the Chancellor, the surge was driven by debt interest as well as higher spending. Servicing debt cost £16.4billion over the month, more than double the number for the previous June.
Borrowing for the first three months of the financial year to date stood at £57.8billion, £7.5billion more than the same three-month period in 2024.
Ms Reeves is desperately hunting for options to increase taxes as she faces an estimated £30billion black hole in the public finances at the Autumn Budget
Ms Reeves is desperately hunting for options to increase taxes as she faces an estimated £30billion black hole in the public finances at the Autumn Budget.
The tax burden is already set to hit a new high as a proportion of GDP after the last Budget imposed a £41billion increase - the biggest on record for a single package.
Labour has ruled out increasing income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.
Many believe the Chancellor will opt to extend the long-running freeze on tax thresholds.
The policy, in place since 2022, is due to end in 2028-29. By that point it will have dragged an extra 4.2million people into the tax system as wages rise.
Ms Reeves has been carefully avoiding ruling out a 'wealth tax' - with backbenchers pushing for 2 per cent levy on assets worth more than £10million.
However, she is thought to be privately opposed to the move, with tax experts and Cabinet ministers warning it would only drive away more wealth people from Britain.
A raid on pensions is still said to be on the table, with fears that the Treasury is again looking at slashing reliefs.
Currently higher-rate earners are spared 40 per cent tax on money that is put into retirement funds.
However, reducing the relief to the 20 per cent basic rate could raise around £15billion for the government.
The idea was rejected at the Budget last year, but Ms Reeves' situation has dramatically worsened.
Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said: 'We are committed to tough fiscal rules, so we do not borrow for day-to-day spending and get debt down as a share of our economy.
'This commitment to economic stability means we can get on with investing in Britain's renewal, including fixing our NHS, strengthening our national defence and building hundreds of thousands of affordable homes through our plan for change.'
But shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Rachel Reeves is spending money she doesn't have.
'Debt interest already costs taxpayers £100billion a year – almost double the defence budget – and it's forecast to rise to £130 billion on Labour's watch.
'Labour's jobs tax and reckless borrowing is killing growth and fuelling inflation – paving the way for more tax hikes and more borrowing in the autumn. Make no mistake – working families will pay the price for Labour's failure and costly U-turns.
'Only the Conservatives, under new leadership, will break this cycle. Only the Conservatives believe in sound money and low taxes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Green Party responds after Jeremy Corbyn's new party receives more sign ups
Ellie Chowns defended the Green Party after LBC 's Henry Riley pointed out that Jeremy Corbyn 's newly formed party has had more sign ups that them Chowns appeared to laugh saying, "Nobody's had to pay them any money to sign-up." Jeremy Corbyn and former Labour leader Zarah Sultana are reportedly 'getting 500 people a minute' wanting to join their new political party. Despite Chowns and other Green Party leadership candidates warning against the Greens becoming 'a Jeremy Corbyn support act' Zack Polanski has said he's 'open' to working with new Corbyn and Sultana party' opening a divide in the party.
Daily Mirror
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Votes for 16 year olds – what teachers think revealed with intriguing age split
Teachers are broadly in favour lowering the general election voting age but those 50s-plus are marginally against, a survey of over 9,000 shows They are arguably the best judge on 16-year-olds getting the vote but teachers are split on the issue – depending on their age. Teachers are broadly in favour but those 50s-plus are marginally against, a survey shows. It comes after it was revealed 16 and 17-year-olds will be able to vote at the next general election, under government plans. Critics may question the maturity of those that young helping decide who runs the country. But the move represents a win for supporters who think youngsters old enough to join the Army are ready for the responsibility. Sir Keir Starmer has described it as 'important' for 16 and 17-year-olds to have the vote. The PM highlighted how 'they're old enough to go out to work, they're old enough to pay taxes,' adding: 'I think if you pay in you should have the opportunity to say what you want your money spent on.' And, overall, teachers are in favour of the move – with 47% either strongly or slightly agreeing the general election voting age should be 16. Only 38% disagreed, either strongly or slightly, and 15% neither agreed nor disagreed, according to a poll of over 9,000 teachers. But when the figures are looked at closely, a fascinating difference can be observed depending on teachers' age. Those in their 20s back the change 51% for to 35% against, with 30-somethings behind it 49% to 35%. Teachers in their 40s also support the move, 45% to 39%. But it is a different story for those aged 50s-plus. Though they are marginally opposed to it overall – 44% against compared to 43% backing – a gap opens up among those who feel most passionately. Among the 50-plus aged teachers who answered, 27% strongly disagreed. Teacher Tapp surveyed 9,626 secondary and primary teachers in England on 18 July on the statement 'The voting age for General Elections should be 16'. The results were weighted to reflect national teacher and school demographics. It comes after Labour 's manifesto last year pledged: 'We will increase the engagement of young people in our vibrant democracy, by giving 16- and 17-year-olds the right to vote in all elections.' And earlier this month, the government confirmed the move with Minister for Democracy Rushanara Ali declaring: 'By delivering our manifesto commitment to extend the vote to 16 and 17 year olds, we are taking a generational step forward in restoring public trust and boosting engagement in UK democracy…' Naomi Smith, chief executive of campaign group Best for Britain, said the change was "a brave choice set to benefit generations to come". But in the Commons, Tory shadow communities minister Paul Holmes questioned: "Why does this Government think a 16-year-old can vote but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they're voting in?" The Greens and Lib Dems both welcomed the decision. The voting age was lowered to 18 in 1969. And 16-year-olds are already able to vote in Scottish and Welsh elections.
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Two-fifths of mobile phones stolen in Europe are taken in UK, data reveals
Nearly two in every five phones stolen in Europe are taken in the UK, according to data collated an insurance firm. An analysis of claims made to the American insurance company SquareTrade showed that 39% of all phone thefts across the company's 12 European markets were in Britain. This was despite the UK only making up 10% of the company's European customers. The data revealed that phone theft claims in the UK had increased by 425% since June 2021 and 42% of phone thefts in the UK occurred in London. This equated to 16% of all phone thefts in Europe. The data, reported by the Times, comes amid growing concern about phone snatching, with police saying gangs are now stealing handsets as an easier way to make money than drug dealing. The Metropolitan police said about 80,000 phones were stolen in London last year, describing the phenomenon as an 'organised criminal enterprise'. The stolen devices had a street value of about £20m, with iPhones being targeted most frequently. James Conway, a Met police commander specialising in phone thefts, said phone theft had become more prevalent among gangs partly due to a growing demand for such gadgets in overseas markets, creating opportunities for 'huge profitability'. Conway said: 'These are the same sort of gangs that are also running county lines operations and dealing [drugs] but are getting increasingly involved in robbery and theft … They can make a far greater profit than from dealing drugs in the same period of time with a lower risk from a criminal justice perspective.' The commander added: 'The sort of sentences you see for drug trafficking or drug dealing offences, and those you might receive for a series of thefts as a young person are very different.' The police have called for phone companies to cut off cloud services on stolen phones in an effort to reduce their resale value. Representatives of Google and Apple told the House of Commons science and technology committee last month that security features were already in place to protect customer data. Simon Wingrove, a software engineering manager at Google, said its system for such situations was 'robust and works very well'. Gary Davis, a senior director in regulatory and legal at Apple, said the company was concerned about the potential for fraud. He said there was a risk of bad actors attempting to obtain data and the power to delete accounts for blackmailing victims. The Apple representative added the company had invested 'many hundreds of millions' in designing protections for its customers against phone theft.
