US Ally Throws Down Gauntlet at China
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. doubled down in his country's long-running maritime dispute with China on Thursday, vowing not to "cede one square inch" of territory claimed by Beijing.
Marcos also said the Philippines would inevitably be involved in a potential war over Taiwan, prompting Beijing to warn the U.S. ally against "playing with fire."
Newsweek reached out to the Chinese Foreign Ministry by email with a request for comment.
Why It Matters
Marcos's remarks, given to the Indian news site Firstpost, came during a four-day state visit to India—his first since taking office three years ago. Marcos and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced they were elevating ties to the level of a strategic partnership and would strengthen cooperation in a range of areas, including security.
Both countries are locked in territorial disputes with China: India over the mountainous border in the Himalayas, and the Philippines in the South China Sea.
Beijing claims sovereignty over most of the busy waterway, where Chinese coast guard vessels, research ships, and paramilitary forces have encroached into Manila's exclusive economic zone—sometimes resulting in clashes.
Territorial Disputes
"Let me say it again, the Philippines will not cede one square inch of our territory. We will not give up the exercise of our sovereign rights. Ever," Marcos told Firstpost.
Asked whether the Philippines, which last year became the first country to purchase India's BrahMos cruise missiles, was eyeing additional arms purchases from New Delhi, the president replied: "Everything's on the table."
"The Philippines is in the midst of a modernizationof our military…So we are looking to see what's the most suitable for our defense needs," Marcos said. "Let me be clear though: we are not girding up for war. We are simply reacting to the challenges that we are facing."
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, right, listens to India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the ceremonial reception at India's presidential palace Rashtrapati Bhavan in New Delhi on August 5, 2025.
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, right, listens to India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the ceremonial reception at India's presidential palace Rashtrapati Bhavan in New Delhi on August 5, 2025.The Philippines is in the midst of a $35 billion military modernization campaign. Marcos said the upgraded equipment makes the country more interoperable with its allies, chiefly the United States.
As important as weapons procurement, he added, was defense cooperation with key partners that have a stake in the Indo-Pacific—partners such as India. On Monday, on the first day of his visit, ships of the Indian navy joined their first-ever joint exercise with the Philippines in the South China Sea, within the Southeast Asian country's maritime zone.
Marcos said the Philippines is "not against anyone." However, he said tensions "have increased."
Adding to regional tensions is China's claim to Taiwan. Beijing has not ruled out the use of force to bring the self-ruled democracy under its control, raising fears of a conflict that could draw in the U.S. and allied militaries.
The Philippines' northernmost province of Batanes lies about 100 miles from the southern tip of Taiwan. The country also hosts U.S. troops and weapons systems at several shared bases, which would likely come into play in any regional conflict.
War Over Taiwan
"If there is a confrontation over Taiwan between China and the United States, there is no way that the Philippines can stay out of it, simply because of our physical geographic location," Marcos said.
"If there is all-out war, then we will be drawn into it, and I assure you with the greatest hesitation. But we will have to defend our territory and our sovereignty," he added.
The "most considerable concern" at the outbreak of war would be the roughly 160,000 Filipino migrant workers currently living in Taiwan, Marcos said. "That would be immediately a humanitarian problem, because we will have to get involved…or find a way to go in there and to bring our people home."
China Hits Back
The Chinese Foreign Ministry said in a public statement: "The Philippines…has kept making wrong and provocative remarks and actions, kept fudging and hollowing out the one-China principle, and kept harming the China-Philippines relations."
"China firmly opposes this. The Chinese Foreign Ministry and embassy in the Philippines have lodged serious protests with the Philippine side."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Mary Peltola's Chances of Defeating Dan Sullivan in Alaska Senate Race—Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new poll of Alaska's 2026 Senate race showed Democratic former Representative Mary Peltola only one point behind incumbent GOP Senator Dan Sullivan. Newsweek reached out to Sullivan's campaign and the Alaska Democratic Party for comment via email. Why It Matters Alaska is among the states Democrats are hoping to make competitive in next year's Senate races, though it backed President Donald Trump by double-digits in the 2024 presidential race. Democrats must win at least two Senate races in double-digit Trump states to win back control of the Senate. Maine—which backed former Vice President Kamala Harris by seven points—and North Carolina—which voted for Trump by only three points—are viewed as Democrats' top targets. However, no other Harris or single-digit Trump states are up for grabs, so they are looking at races in states like Alaska, Iowa, Ohio and Texas as potential opportunities. What to Know A new Data for Progress poll released on Friday suggested Alaska could be competitive if Peltola jumps into the race. Peltola represented Alaska's at-large Congressional seat from 2022 to 2025 and narrowly lost to GOP Representative Nick Begich III in November. She has not made her plans clear for 2026 but has been floated as a potential candidate in either the Senate or gubernatorial race. The polling memo wrote that Peltola is "uniquely popular," being viewed positively by 52 percent of Alaskans despite the state's conservative bent. If she were to challenge Sullivan in the Senate race, the incumbent would hold only a one-point lead at this point in time, the poll found. Forty-six percent of respondents said they would vote for him, while 45 percent said they would cast their ballots for Peltola. An additional 5 percent said they would not rank either candidate, while 4 percent were still unsure. The survey was taken July 21 to 27 and polled 678 likely voters in Alaska using SMS and web panel respondents. The poll's margin of error associated with the sample size is ±4 percentage points. Notably, Alaska uses a ranked choice voting system. In the primary, the four candidates who receive the most support advance to the general election, regardless of their party. In the general, voters rank their candidates based on preference. Candidates are eliminated one-by-one until one reaches 50 percent support. Peltola, meanwhile, held a lead over Republican candidates in a hypothetical poll of the governor race. On the first round of ranked choice, 54 percent of respondents said they would vote for her. Trump carried Alaska by about 13 percentage points last November. Then-Representative Mary Peltola, an Alaska Democrat, speaks to reporters in Anchorage, Alaska, on November 8, 2022. Then-Representative Mary Peltola, an Alaska Democrat, speaks to reporters in Anchorage, Alaska, on November 8, People Are Saying Elisa Rios, a former campaign manager for Peltola, told The Alaska Beacon in July: "It's really just where she can make the greatest impact for Alaskans. She is going to make that decision on her own time." Jason Katz-Brown, of Data for Progress, told The 19th News on Friday: "The policies that she spent her whole last two years running on, especially on fisheries policy, are really, really popular things in Alaska, and the policies of the Republican governor are extremely unpopular. All that's combined, I think, really backs up the people in the state who really want to see a Peltola governorship." What Happens Next? The Cook Political Report classifies the Alaska Senate and gubernatorial race as being "Solid Republican." Sabato's Crystal Ball lists the Senate race as Solid Republican, but the gubernatorial race as Likely Republican.
Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
America Is Making Billions From Catching 'Tariff Cheaters'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Among the most frequently touted upsides of President Donald Trump's tariffs is that they can serve as an additional and substantial source of government revenue. Ahead of his reciprocal duties being reinstated this week, Trump wrote on Truth Social, his social media platform: "IT'S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW FLOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!" The Treasury Department has already provided evidence to this effect. Since April, the government has collected around $100 billion in tariff revenues, according to CNN analysis of Daily Treasury Statements, including $30 billion in July alone. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said he believes customs authorities could soon be raking in around $50 billion per month thanks to recent tariff hikes. The revenue is taken from importers themselves—rather than foreign governments or producers. However, many fear this will eventually result in noticeable price hikes for consumers. Should these taxes succeed in encouraging companies to relocate manufacturing practices to the United States or push consumers away from now costly foreign-sourced goods, the resulting decline in imports would also lead to more meagre tariff revenues. But another source of revenue is emerging alongside the imposition and dutiful payment of these tariffs—catching tariff cheaters. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the Homeland Security agency responsible for collecting tariffs, told Newsweek it is "aggressively combatting" efforts by businesses to evade the duties. This practice, known elsewhere as customs fraud or tariff "cheating," has been incentivized this year by higher tariffs and the increased reward for skirting these duties. But catching those engaged in this form of tax evasion has itself become more lucrative. The CBP told Newsweek that in the current fiscal year it has secured "over $27 billion in additional revenue as a result of targeted reviews of 55,004 shipments flagged as high-risk for duty evasion." This compares to around $668 million accrued in fiscal year 2024, an increase of over 3,900 percent. Trucks stop at a US Customs and Border Protection inspection facility in Detroit near the Ambassador Bridge, which connects Detroit to Windsor, Canada, on August 1. Trucks stop at a US Customs and Border Protection inspection facility in Detroit near the Ambassador Bridge, which connects Detroit to Windsor, Canada, on August 1. Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images What Is Tariff Cheating? According to litigation attorney Gregory Husisian, partner at Foley & Lardner LLP and chair of the firm's International Trade and National Security Practice, "any element that goes into the tariff calculation can potentially be manipulated by cheating." In the new, and still rapidly evolving tariff environment, it is up to businesses themselves to establish and correctly declare the goods they are trying to import into the U.S.—a fact that allows for honest mistakes and intentional evasion. Husisian told Newsweek that the five biggest ways companies could avoid tariffs—knowingly or not—are: Claiming the wrong country of origin Incorrectly classifying goods Valuing goods incorrectly Falsely claiming a free trade preference Simply failing to pay countervailing or anti-dumping duties, taxes placed on goods sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. Most of these are "much bigger deals under the new Trump tariffs," he added, given the varying rates between countries, as well as the now significant—potentially costly—distinction between being covered by a sectoral duty like those on steel, or a reciprocal country-specific tariff. How Is the CBP Catching Tariff Cheaters? According to David Simon, partner and a defense lawyer at Foley & Lardner, the most commonly used tool in penalizing tariff cheaters is the Federal False Claims Act, a broad anti-fraud statute violations that can result in severe civil and, in select cases, criminal penalties. He told Newsweek that the tariffs have put this statute "on steroids," given violators are forced to pay three times recovery—the amount lost due to the false claim. Higher tariffs—and higher rewards for catching evaders—has drastically increased the potential return-on-investment for the CBP to step up its anti-cheating efforts. The agency told Newsweek it is has intensified investigations into those suspected of evading duties, through programs like the Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA). It has also relied on public whistleblowers, who are able to file allegations of tariff cheating through its e-Allegations platform. The CBP said it had received over 2,100 such reports in the current fiscal year for a variety of alleged violations. Doing so could itself prove lucrative. As Simon told Newsweek, the False Claims Act contains a whistleblower provision, giving those who successfully bring a case to the federal government a percentage of the recovery. Given the higher tariffs in place, this can amount to "really big dollars." The CBP told Newsweek that attempts to evade owed duties "have always existed, regardless of the tariff environment." However, the issue of tariff cheating has undoubtedly grown in scale given the greater scope of the tariffs themselves. But understanding how widespread the issue is remains challenging, according to Husisian. "I don't think even CBP has the full answer to that," he said, acknowledging the perennial problem in such matters: that "they only know the people they've caught."
Miami Herald
29 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
US and Russia plan truce to cement Putin's gains in Ukraine
Washington and Moscow are aiming to reach a deal to halt the war in Ukraine that would lock in Russia's occupation of territory seized during its military invasion, according to people familiar with the matter. U.S. and Russian officials are working toward an agreement on territories for a planned summit meeting between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin as early as next week, the people said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. The U.S. is working to get buy-in from Ukraine and its European allies on the deal, which is far from certain, the people said. Putin is demanding that Ukraine cede its entire eastern Donbas area to Russia as well as Crimea, which his forces illegally annexed in 2014. That would require Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to order a withdrawal of troops from parts of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions still held by Kyiv, handing Russia a victory that its army couldn't achieve militarily since the start of the full-scale invasion in February 2022. Such an outcome would represent a major win for Putin, who has long sought direct negotiations with the U.S. on terms for ending the war that he started, sidelining Ukraine and its European allies. Zelenskyy risks being presented with a take-it-or-leave-it deal to accept the loss of Ukrainian territory, while Europe fears it would be left to monitor a ceasefire as Putin rebuilds his forces. U.S. Treasury yields retreated slightly from near session highs as the report sparked a drop in oil prices, including a decline of as much as 1.7% in U.S. benchmark WTI crude futures. Ukraine bonds jumped and Hungary's forint hit its highest level against the euro in almost a year. Under the terms of the deal that officials are discussing, Russia would halt its offensive in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions of Ukraine along the current battlelines, the people said. They cautioned that the terms and plans of the accord were still in flux and could still change. It's unclear if Moscow is prepared to give up any land that it currently occupies, which includes the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the largest in Europe. The White House didn't reply to a request to comment. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov didn't immediately respond to a request to comment. Ukraine declined to comment on the proposals. The agreement aims essentially to freeze the war and pave the way for a ceasefire and technical talks on a definitive peace settlement, the people said. The U.S. had earlier been pushing for Russia to agree first to an unconditional ceasefire to create space for negotiations on ending the war that's now in its fourth year. Putin on Friday held phone calls with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as well as with the leaders of South Africa, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Belarus to share details of his Aug. 6 meeting with Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow, according to the Kremlin. Having returned to the White House in January on a pledge to rapidly resolve Europe's worst conflict since World War II, Trump has expressed increasing frustration with Putin's refusal to agree to a ceasefire. The two leaders held six phone calls since February and Witkoff met with Putin five times in Russia to try to broker an agreement. Alongside those discussions, Ukraine was seeking security guarantees to ensure any truce holds and urging allies to keep Russia's economy under pressure through sanctions. Trump hasn't implemented any direct measures against Moscow so far, though he doubled tariffs on Indian goods to 50% this week for its purchases of Russian oil, sparking outrage in New Delhi. He has demanded that Putin agree to a ceasefire by Friday or the U.S. would act to impose tariffs on countries buying Russian oil to ramp up economic pressure on Moscow. Putin has repeatedly insisted that his war goals remain unchanged. They include demands for Kyiv to accept neutral status and abandon its ambition of NATO membership, and to accept the loss of Crimea and the other four eastern and southern Ukrainian regions to Russia. Parts of Donetsk and Luhansk have been under Russian occupation since 2014, when the Kremlin incited separatist violence shortly after the operation to seize Crimea. Putin declared the four Ukrainian regions to be "forever" part of Russia after announcing that he was annexing them in September 2022, even as his forces have never fully controlled those territories. Ukraine cannot constitutionally cede territory and it has said it won't recognize Russian occupation and annexation of its land. It's still unclear if Putin would agree to take part in a trilateral meeting with Trump and Zelenskyy next week, even if he had already struck an agreement with the U.S. president, the people added. The Russian leader told reporters on Thursday that he didn't object to meeting Zelenskyy under the right conditions, though he said they don't exist now. Multiple officials, including in the U.S., have expressed skepticism over Putin's willingness to call a halt to the war and whether he's genuinely interested in a peace deal that would fall short of his stated goals in Ukraine, according to the people. Trump said on Thursday that he'd be willing to meet with Putin, even if the Russian leader hadn't agreed to also sit down with Zelenskyy, apparently overriding earlier suggestions of a trilateral meeting. "I don't like long waits," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "They would like to meet with me and I will do whatever I can to stop the killing." Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov said Thursday that Russian and U.S. officials are finalizing details for a meeting within the next few days and that they have agreed on a venue, which he didn't name. The U.S. had previously offered to recognize Crimea as Russian as part of any deal to halt the war, and to effectively cede Russian control of parts of other Ukrainian regions. As part of those earlier proposals, control over areas of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson would be returned to Ukraine. ---------- -With assistance from Elizabeth Stanton, Andras Gergely and Selcuk Gokoluk. ------------ ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Visit Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
