
The Long Complicated History Of How Iran And US Became Enemies
Relations between the United States and Iran have been fraught for decades – at least since the U.S. helped overthrow a democracy-minded prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh, in August 1953. The U.S. then supported the long, repressive reign of the Shah of Iran, whose security services brutalized Iranian citizens for decades.
The two countries have been particularly hostile to each other since Iranian students took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in November 1979, resulting in economic sanctions and the severing of formal diplomatic relations between the nations.
Since 1984, the U.S. State Department has listed Iran as a ' state sponsor of terrorism,' alleging the Iranian government provides terrorists with training, money and weapons.
Some of the major events in U.S.-Iran relations highlight the differences between the nations' views, but others arguably presented real opportunities for reconciliation.
1953: US overthrows Mossadegh
In 1951, the Iranian Parliament chose a new prime minister, Mossadegh, who then led lawmakers to vote in favor of taking over the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, expelling the company's British owners and saying they wanted to turn oil profits into investments in the Iranian people. The U.S. feared disruption in the global oil supply and worried about Iran falling prey to Soviet influence. The British feared the loss of cheap Iranian oil.
President Dwight Eisenhower decided it was best for the U.S. and the U.K. to get rid of Mossadegh. Operation Ajax, a joint CIA-British operation, convinced the Shah of Iran, the country's monarch, to dismiss Mossadegh and drive him from office by force. Mossadegh was replaced by a much more Western-friendly prime minister, handpicked by the CIA.
1979: Revolutionaries oust the shah, take hostages
After more than 25 years of relative stability in U.S.-Iran relations, the Iranian public had grown unhappy with the social and economic conditions that developed under the dictatorial rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
Pahlavi enriched himself and used American aid to fund the military while many Iranians lived in poverty. Dissent was often violently quashed by SAVAK, the shah's security service. In January 1979, the shah left Iran, ostensibly to seek cancer treatment. Two weeks later, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini returned from exile in Iraq and led a drive to abolish the monarchy and proclaim an Islamic government.
In October 1979, President Jimmy Carter agreed to allow the shah to come to the U.S. to seek advanced medical treatment. Outraged Iranian students stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran on Nov. 4, taking 52 Americans hostage. That convinced Carter to sever U.S. diplomatic relations with Iran on April 7, 1980.
Two weeks later, the U.S. military launched a mission to rescue the hostages, but it failed, with aircraft crashes killing eight U.S. servicemembers.
The shah died in Egypt in July 1980, but the hostages weren't released until Jan. 20, 1981, after 444 days of captivity.
1980-1988: US tacitly sides with Iraq
In September 1980, Iraq invaded Iran, an escalation of the two countries' regional rivalry and religious differences: Iraq was governed by Sunni Muslims but had a Shia Muslim majority population; Iran was led and populated mostly by Shiites.
The U.S. was concerned that the conflict would limit the flow of Middle Eastern oil and wanted to ensure the conflict didn't affect its close ally, Saudi Arabia.
The U.S. supported Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in his fight against the anti-American Iranian regime. As a result, the U.S. mostly turned a blind eye toward Iraq's use of chemical weapons against Iran.
U.S. officials moderated their usual opposition to those illegal and inhumane weapons because the U.S. State Department did not ' wish to play into Iran's hands by fueling its propaganda against Iraq.' In 1988, the war ended in a stalemate. More than 500,000 military and 100,000 civilians died.
1981-1986: US secretly sells weapons to Iran
The U.S. imposed an arms embargo after Iran was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 1984. That left the Iranian military, in the middle of its war with Iraq, desperate for weapons and aircraft and vehicle parts to keep fighting.
The Reagan administration decided that the embargo would likely push Iran to seek support from the Soviet Union, the U.S.'s Cold War rival. Rather than formally end the embargo, U.S. officials agreed to secretly sell weapons to Iran starting in 1981.
The last shipment, of anti-tank missiles, was in October 1986. In November 1986, a Lebanese magazine exposed the deal. That revelation sparked the Iran-Contra scandal in the U.S., with Reagan's officials found to have collected money from Iran for the weapons and illegally sent those funds to anti-socialist rebels – the Contras – in Nicaragua.
1988: US Navy shoots down Iran Air flight 655
On the morning of July 8, 1988, the USS Vincennes, a guided missile cruiser patrolling in the international waters of the Persian Gulf, entered Iranian territorial waters while in a skirmish with Iranian gunboats.
Either during or just after that exchange of gunfire, the Vincennes crew mistook a passing civilian Airbus passenger jet for an Iranian F-14 fighter. They shot it down, killing all 290 people aboard.
The U.S. called it a ' tragic and regrettable accident,' but Iran believed the plane's downing was intentional. In 1996, the U.S. agreed to pay US$131.8 million in compensation to Iran.
1997-1998: The US seeks contact
In August 1997, a moderate reformer, Mohammad Khatami, won Iran's presidential election.
U.S. President Bill Clinton sensed an opportunity. He sent a message to Tehran through the Swiss ambassador there, proposing direct government-to-government talks.
Shortly thereafter, in early January 1998, Khatami gave an interview to CNN in which he expressed ' respect for the great American people,' denounced terrorism and recommended an 'exchange of professors, writers, scholars, artists, journalists and tourists' between the United States and Iran.
However, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei didn't agree, so not much came of the mutual overtures as Clinton's time in office came to an end.
In his 2002 State of the Union address, President George W. Bush characterized Iran, Iraq and North Korea as constituting an 'Axis of Evil' supporting terrorism and pursuing weapons of mass destruction, straining relations even further.
2002: Iran's nuclear program raises alarm
In August 2002, an exiled rebel group announced that Iran had been secretly working on nuclear weapons at two installations that had not previously been publicly revealed.
That was a violation of the terms of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which Iran had signed, requiring countries to disclose their nuclear-related facilities to international inspectors.
One of those formerly secret locations, Natanz, housed centrifuges for enriching uranium, which could be used in civilian nuclear reactors or enriched further for weapons.
Starting in roughly 2005, U.S. and Israeli government cyberattackers together reportedly targeted the Natanz centrifuges with a custom-made piece of malicious software that became known as Stuxnet.
That effort, which slowed down Iran's nuclear program was one of many U.S. and international attempts – mostly unsuccessful – to curtail Iran's progress toward building a nuclear bomb.
2003: Iran writes to Bush administration
In May 2003, senior Iranian officials quietly contacted the State Department through the Swiss embassy in Iran, seeking 'a dialogue 'in mutual respect,'' addressing four big issues: nuclear weapons, terrorism, Palestinian resistance and stability in Iraq.
Hardliners in the Bush administration weren't interested in any major reconciliation, though Secretary of State Colin Powell favored dialogue and other officials had met with Iran about al-Qaida.
When Iranian hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected president of Iran in 2005, the opportunity died. The following year, Ahmadinejad made his own overture to Washington in an 18-page letter to President Bush. The letter was widely dismissed; a senior State Department official told me in profane terms that it amounted to nothing.
2015: Iran nuclear deal signed
After a decade of unsuccessful attempts to rein in Iran's nuclear ambitions, the Obama administration undertook a direct diplomatic approach beginning in 2013.
Two years of secret, direct negotiations initially bilaterally between the U.S. and Iran and later with other nuclear powers culminated in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, often called the Iran nuclear deal.
Two years of secret, direct negotiations conducted bilaterally at first between the U.S. and Iran and later with other nuclear powers culminated in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, often called the Iran nuclear deal.
Iran, the U.S., China, France, Germany, Russia and the United Kingdom signed the deal in 2015. It severely limited Iran's capacity to enrich uranium and mandated that international inspectors monitor and enforce Iran's compliance with the agreement.
In return, Iran was granted relief from international and U.S. economic sanctions. Though the inspectors regularly certified that Iran was abiding by the agreement's terms, President Donald Trump withdrew from the agreement in May 2018.
2020: US drones kill Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani
On Jan. 3, 2020, an American drone fired a missile that killed Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, the leader of Iran's elite Quds Force. Analysts considered Soleimani the second most powerful man in Iran, after Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei.
At the time, the Trump administration asserted that Soleimani was directing an imminent attack against U.S. assets in the region, but officials have not provided clear evidence to support that claim.
Iran responded by launching ballistic missiles that hit two American bases in Iraq.
2023: The Oct. 7 attacks on Israel
Hamas' brazen attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, provoked a fearsome militarized response from Israel that continues today and served to severely weaken Iran's proxies in the region, especially Hamas – the perpetrator of the attacks – and Hezbollah in Lebanon.
2025: Trump 2.0 and Iran
Trump saw an opportunity to forge a new nuclear deal with Iran and to pursue other business deals with Tehran. Once inaugurated for his second term, Trump appointed Steve Witkoff, a real estate investor who is the president's friend, to serve as special envoy for the Middle East and to lead negotiations.
Negotiations for a nuclear deal between Washington and Tehran began in April, but the countries did not reach a deal. They were planning a new round of talks when Israel struck Iran with a series of airstrikes on June 13, forcing the White House to reconsider is position.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Trump to lunch with Pakistan army chief Munir, PM Modi rejects invitation, Pakistan is worried but good news for India due to...
(File) Trump-Munir meeting: In a major development that could impact the India-US relations, Pakistan army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir will meet US President Donald Trump for lunch at the White House on Wednesday, where Islamabad claims talks will held on the Kashmir issue and Pakistan's conflict with India, along with other pressing matters, including the raging Israel-Iran war. Munir's US trip as Trump admin readies to attack Iran Munir's meeting with Trump comes at a time when the US is mulling to get involved in Israel-Iran war, and send fighter jets and American troops to aid Israel in taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, especially the hardened Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, which is built deep underground and cannot be damaged by conventional bunker buster bombs. In a public address in Washington DC, Asim Munir had declared Pakistan's 'clear and strong' support for Iran in its war with Israel while also backing US efforts to de-escalate the situation. While US readies to attack Iran, Asim Munir as well as the Pakistan's civilian government led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, has announced strong support for Tehran in its war against the Jewish state, a situation that presents a major conundrum for Islamabad to balance its ties with Washington. Its is believed that US could use Pakistani airbases to launch attacks against Iran if it decides to get involved in the Israel-Iran war, and Trump's meeting with Munir could be meant to sway the Pakistani army chief to change Islamabad's stance on Tehran. Experts say that if America jumps into the war against Iran, then Pakistan's airbase can be used and that is why Trump is giving so much importance to Munir. The Pakistanis themselves are not able to digest the fact that the US President is meeting an Army Chief. Pakistani journalist and analyst Waqas wrote on X, 'It is surprising that Trump is going to have lunch with the Army Chief of Pakistan. That too when his counterpart is the PM of Pakistan. Meeting a low-level government official is out of protocol but it shows that Trump needs General Munir. Trump is going to talk about Pakistan's support in the war with Iran.' Geopolitical have pointed out the significance of Asim Munir being invited to a meeting with the US President at the White House, as it not the norm to host foreign Army chief in the Oval Office. 'Senior US officials often engage with Pakistani Army Chiefs, but rarely is one hosted at the White House by the US President. One of many reasons why Munir's scheduled meeting with Trump is so significant, especially as his administration considers its options regarding the war in Iran,' South Asia analyst Michael Kugelman wrote on X. Kugelman noted that the Trump-Munir meeting shouldn't only be seen through the lens of the Israel-Iran war as the there's been US-Pakistan engagement on critical minerals, crypto, and Counter Terrorism. 'Trump takes a deep personal interest in all of these. And Munir is empowered to talk about it all. Also, Kashmir,' he added. According to Derek J. Grossman, National Security and Indo-Pacific analyst, it was time for India to 'speak up'. 'India, time to speak up! Trump this week is scheduled to meet at the White House with Pakistani Field Marshal Asim Munir, who New Delhi believes is the terrorist mastermind behind attacks on Indians.' Good news for India? While Asim Munir being hosted at the White House is certainly a setback for India's diplomatic efforts to isolate Pakistan on the global stage, experts note that there may be silver lining for New Delhi as Iran would likely move closer to India if the Pakistan army chief is coerced into changing Islamabad's stance on the Israel-Iran conflict. 'Trump will meet Asim Munir. There is no doubt he (Trump) will seek cooperation from Pakistan against Iran, which includes providing Pakistani airbases to the US Army. This is a tempting offer for the Pakistani army, but Tehran could move closer to India if Islamabad allows US to attack it from its soil,' West Asia affairs expert Kabir Taneja wrote on X. PM Modi declined Trump invite Notably, it has also come to the fore that Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday rejected an offer to visit the US after attending the G7 summit in Canada. According to details, Trump, in a 35-minute telephone conversation with Modi, had requested the Indian Prime Minister to visit the US after departing from Canada, presumably to arrange a meeting with Pakistan's de-facto ruler, Asim Munir and the Indian PM, with the US President acting as mediator. However, PM Modi turned down the offer, reinforcing India's stance of not accepting any third-party mediation to resolve its issues with Pakistan 'Earlier today, Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a telephonic conversation with US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 Summit, which took place in Canada. During the conversation, which lasted over half an hour, PM Modi briefed the US President about India's Operation Sindoor and firmly conveyed the message that India has never accepted and will never accept mediation on the issues with Pakistan,' Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri informed..
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
'I may do it, I may not; No one knows what I'll do': Trump on striking Iran
Donald Trump said his patience with Iran had run out, as Israeli airstrikes intensified in Tehran. Meanwhile, Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei rejected Trump's call for unconditional surrender Prateek Shukla New Delhi US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that his patience with Iran had run out. His statement came amid intensified Israeli airstrikes around Tehran. Speaking to reporters outside the White House, Trump said Iran had made contact, but added, 'it's very late to be talking.' He refused to confirm whether the US would support Israel's bombing campaign against the Islamic Republic. 'There's a big difference between now and a week ago,' Trump said. 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Asked if he is moving closer to striking Iran's nuclear facilities, Trump said, 'I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Iran's Supreme Leader rejects US demands In response, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected Trump's calls for unconditional surrender in a televised address — his first since Friday. 'The Americans should know that any US military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage,' Khamenei said. 'Intelligent people who know Iran, the Iranian nation and its history will never speak to this nation in threatening language because the Iranian nation will not surrender.' Israel continues strikes; civilians flee Tehran As the conflict escalated, Israeli airstrikes intensified, prompting residents to flee Tehran in large numbers. Highways out of the city were jammed with people trying to escape the bombing. 'As we promised – we will continue to strike at symbols of governance and hit the Ayatollah regime wherever it may be,' said Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz. According to Israel's military, 50 fighter jets struck 20 targets in Tehran, including facilities involved in missile production. The Israeli military also urged civilians to evacuate parts of the city for their own safety. Trump's tone has shifted in recent days — from hinting at a diplomatic solution to suggesting military involvement. In a series of social media posts on Tuesday, he speculated about targeting Khamenei and demanded Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!'
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Ready for peace talks, but first condemn Israel's action: Iranian diplomat
Amid the escalation of conflict between Israel and Iran, a senior Iranian diplomat posted in New Delhi on Wednesday said that his country is ready for any peace negotiation, but with the condition that the actions of the Israeli military should first be 'condemned'. 'We are ready for any peace negotiation, of course conditional that first Israel should be condemned, for its action, and whatever it has done,' Iran's Deputy Chief of Mission to India Mohammad Javad Hosseini told PTI Videos. Hosseini asserted that his country is always in favour of peace and security and said that Americans should 'put pressure' and bring Israel back to the negotiating table. United States President Donald Trump has so far backed Israel's military action and demanded the 'unconditional surrender' of Iran. As recently as Wednesday, speaking to reporters on the White House lawns, Trump said he had asked Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to 'keep going' in the conflict against Iran. On 13 June, Israel started conducting air strikes on several Iranian military and nuclear facilities, as well as key military personnel and scientists attached to that country's nuclear programme, in an attempt to eliminate the 'nuclear threat'. Iran retaliated to the Israeli strikes with drone and missile attacks of its own. 'We are attacked by the Israeli regime on the pretext of some baseless allegations,' Hosseini said, adding, 'We actually tried to resort to the UN Charter, as a self-defence, and retaliated.' Hosseini also said that Iran 'showed that we are capable of defending our country, our people, including foreign nationals', and alleged that Israel's military action has targeted non-military sites too. VIDEO | Here's what Deputy Ambassador of Iran to India, Mohammad Javad Hosseini said on Iran's view of India's role in mediating stability in the Middle East amid heightened tensions with Israel: "We obviously know that India is a big power and a rising voice of the Global… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) June 18, 2025 Evacuation of Indian nationals in Iran On the evacuation of Indian nationals in Iran, he said his country has a very 'good connection' with the Indian Embassy and will ensure the safe evacuation of Indian nationals, including students, 'who are willing to leave the country'. 'We try to protect all foreign nationals,' he added. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Tuesday said that Indian students in Tehran 'have been moved out of the city for reasons of safety, through arrangements made by the Embassy'. Meanwhile, Israel's Ambassador to India Reuven Azar on Tuesday said, 'Indians are our friends, other countries who are interested in safety of their nationals, should condemn these kinds of aggression, which can make Israelis to stop it, to save lives of innocent civilians in Iran, of Iranians or other nationals.' India's role in de-escalation As the situation continued to escalate in West Asia, the Iranian diplomat said, 'Iran is always in favour of peace and security' and that Tehran 'welcomes any initiation in the region regarding stability'. As for a possible role for India to play in de-escalating the situation, Hosseini said, 'We expect India, as a friendly and brotherly country, in a collective action with the international community will put pressure' on the Israeli regime to halt the hostilities. 'We expect India, in collaboration with other countries... to actively engage in these matters,' he added.