Failure to curb subsidy leakages risks economic liabilities, says economist
An economist says public distrust of the government is fuelled by leakages, particularly when unqualified recipients benefit from government subsidies.
PETALING JAYA : Subsidy leakages severely undermine economic efficiency and fiscal discipline, and if left unchecked, could result in significant liabilities, says an economist.
Goh Lim Thye of Universiti Malaya said the short-term consequences of such leakages include direct revenue losses, weakened impact of fiscal transfers and a decline in credibility in public spending.
'In the long-run, these leakages create systemic distortions: they entrench rent-seeking behaviour, reduce incentives for energy efficiency, and delay the necessary shift towards a more targeted, sustainable subsidy framework.
'Without reform, subsidies risk becoming politically entrenched fiscal liabilities rather than tools for equitable development,' he told FMT.
Another economist, Madeline Berma of Institut Masa Depan Malaysia, said leakages also fuel public distrust, particularly when unqualified recipients benefit from government subsidies.
'Subsidy leakages can also potentially exacerbate income inequality which also creates opportunities for corruption and rent-seeking behaviour,' she added.
She said that while reforms have been implemented, Malaysia is still grappling with leakages and has yet to entirely eliminate them.
However, she noted that the government's move to rationalise diesel subsidies in June last year had led to significant decrease in leakages.
Earlier this month, the government ended price controls on eggs and reduced subsidies from 10 sen to 5 sen per egg, with full removal set for Aug 1.
The agriculture and food security ministry said prolonged price controls and subsidies were unsustainable in the long term for both local egg producers and the country's fiscal health. It said rationalising subsidies was the fairer approach, as subsidies are currently also enjoyed by foreign nationals and high-income groups.
'By resetting the system and using technology to monitor eligible recipients, the government has saved RM7.5 billion without harming those genuinely in need of subsidised diesel,' said economist Geoffrey Williams.
He said success in tackling leakages not only saves money for more meaningful public spending, but also eliminates the broader disadvantages of subsidy-related corruption.
The funds saved could be redirected to for health services, education, and social protection, encouraging a return of public trust.
'It cuts out all the disadvantages of subsidies and removes market distortions, creating a more competitive, agile and efficient system,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
We are sorry, prime minister
PETALING JAYA : The misuse of video outtakes on social media has become a growing concern recently, with netizens editing clips to malign public personalities, distort narratives and mislead audiences. With content zipping around social media almost instantaneously, an innocent moment can be turned into a controversy almost immediately. Unfortunately, FMT found itself a victim of this recently, with our popular Malay news presenter Nur Hailee Izzati unwittingly putting herself in the spotlight. Hailee had on May 30 posted a seemingly harmless outtake of herself laughing as she struggled to begin reading a news item that made mention of the prime minister. Unfortunately, the video clip was misused by a netizen who edited it to include a disparaging caricature of the prime minister, making it appear as though FMT and Hailee were mocking him. As a result, Hailee was forced to issue an apology, which she readily did. Misused video outtakes can cause grave reputational damage which may be hard to undo. The consequences can also be severe, with both FMT and Hailee receiving instant backlash from all corners, bringing harm to the brand and jeopardising careers. Ultimately, media outlets like FMT and journalists like Hailee must exercise care in what they do both in their professional and personal capacities. Meanwhile, netizens, many of whom are now themselves content creators, must do their part by consuming and using content ethically to maintain proper digital discourse. That is a tough ask, and can only be achieved if everyone plays their part. FMT and Hailee regret the manipulation of one of our unused video clips in a way that has brought ridicule to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. We sincerely apologise to him and to all our readers and viewers.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Appeals court to hear Anwar's interim stay to suspend trial on Tuesday
On Wednesday, Justice Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's application to refer eight questions to the Federal Court as they failed to cross the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. (Bernama pic) PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal will hear Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's application for an interim stay of the trial of a civil suit filed by a former research assistant on Tuesday, pending the outcome of an appeal. Lawyer K Rajasegaran, who appeared for Anwar, said the date was fixed following case management before a court deputy registrar this afternoon. Rajasegaran said the court also fixed July 21 to hear a permanent stay application of the trial until the outcome of Anwar's appeal to set aside the High Court's refusal to refer eight legal questions arising from the suit. Anwar had wanted the Federal Court to determine whether a sitting prime minister could be given protection from 'frivolous and politically motivated' suits while holding office. In the stay application filed yesterday by Messrs Zain Megat & Murad, the solicitors said there existed special circumstances to suspend the assault suit scheduled to begin in the High Court on June 16. They said the appeal to refer the legal questions to the Federal Court would be nugatory if the trial proceeded. 'The adjournment in the High Court is of utmost importance and is necessary to preserve the principles of justice, equality and constitutional integrity,' they said. They said the postponement would allow for complex and high-impact constitutional questions to be properly determined and interpreted. On Wednesday, Justice Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed Anwar's reference application, when it ruled that all eight questions posed failed to cross the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. She said none of the articles cited in the Federal Constitution, as argued by Anwar's lawyers, gave rise to any real, substantial and justiciable questions of law that require a determination by the apex court. Roz Mawar had ordered for the trial of Yusoff Rawther's suit to begin at 9am on June 16 as scheduled. The prime minister wanted the apex court to rule whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from a suit filed by Yusoff four years ago. The suit relates to events which allegedly took place before Anwar took office on Nov 24, 2022. Yusoff, a grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris, claims he was assaulted at Anwar's home in Segambut in October 2018. He is seeking general, special, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as interest, costs and other relief deemed fit by the court. Anwar denies the claim and has filed a countersuit.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Why squeeze high Petronas dividend amid profit slump, Hamzah asks
Bersatu deputy president Hamzah Zainudin said a looming 10% jobs cut in Petronas could have been avoided if the government had adjusted the dividend amount. PETALING JAYA : Opposition leader Hamzah Zainudin has questioned the government's move to collect RM32 billion in dividends from Petronas, despite the company reporting a sharp decline in profits this year. Hamzah said the dividend payout for 2025 matches that of the previous year, even though Petronas recorded a 32% drop in profits in 2024, after a 21% decline in 2023. He said maintaining such a high payout raises questions about the government's fiscal priorities, especially as more than 5,000 Petronas employees (about 10% of its workforce) are expected to lose their jobs in a restructuring exercise. 'The government must clearly explain the rationale behind maintaining the RM32 billion dividend without taking into account Petronas's profit slump and the welfare of its employees. The rakyat deserves to know, is this what the government considers fair fiscal management?' he said in a statement. Hamzah said the layoffs could have been avoided if the government had adjusted the dividend amount in line with Petronas's financial performance, rather than pushing the company to deliver the same amount. Yesterday, Petronas announced plans to reduce its workforce and freeze hiring until December 2026 as part of a restructuring aimed at cutting costs amid falling crude prices. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim today said most of those affected by the retrenchment are contract workers. In February, finance minister II Amir Hamzah Azizan said that Petronas's commitment to paying RM32 billion in dividends to the government remained unchanged. However, he said that the payout would depend on Petronas's financial performance and the outlook of the oil market. Separately, Bersatu vice-president Radzi Jidin reminded the government that the loss of jobs, whether of permanent staff or contract staff, would leave a big impact on them and their families. 'Humanity must always be at the heart of our actions,' Radzi said in a Facebook post.
