
EXCLUSIVE I paid £25 for a quick fix to get a better tan - but I've been left with irreversible damage on my face
Jen Atkins, 32, from Grimsby, won Miss Great Britain in 2020. But after using a £25 nasal spray that arrived with little more than a leaflet for instructions, she was left with dark, patchy marks on her skin that no treatment has been able to reverse.
'I just wanted to look good - no matter what the consequences were,' she told FEMAIL. 'Now I regret it so much.'
Nasal tanning sprays, which are currently illegal in the UK and carry several health warnings, contain an artificial substance called Melanotan II, which stimulates the body's production of melanin and makes the skin look darker.
Jen had tried tanning injections in the past but disliked needles. So when a nasal tanning spray landed in her Instagram inbox, it seemed like an ideal solution - and she had no idea that the spray would have lasting consequences for her body.
'It made me feel important,' she said. 'Especially back then - I didn't used to get offers from companies. Tanning was right up my street.'
The spray came with vague instructions and no real warning. 'I wish I'd looked into it. I never asked anyone, I just accepted it,' she admitted.
'I remember taking it one morning just before work. It said it would work even without sunbeds. But I felt so ill - I could barely drive. I felt like I was going to be sick, my face felt sunburnt.'
Despite the reaction, she tried it again the next day. 'It was even worse,' she said. 'I had to stop using it. It made me feel so funny.'
Soon after, Jen went on holiday to Mexico - and that's when the pigmentation started to appear. 'It developed so quickly. It was such a shock. I tried to do everything to stop it - I wore suncream, a hat. It's never gone since.'
The marks - darkened, uneven patches across Jen's forehead - have now been present for over four years.
'I've tried creams, facials, exfoliants. It's horrific. Even with concealer you can still see it,' she said. 'When I started playing football, this girl said, "You've got some muck on your forehead." That was really hurtful. I had to explain it wasn't muck.'
Jen says she didn't go to a doctor initially - she simply hoped the marks would fade, but they didn't.
'Someone pointed it out to me in a restaurant and said, "Don't worry, it happens." I thought - what happens?' she said. 'I knew straight away it was because of the nasal spray.'
Although she's since made the permanent switch to fake tan, Jen says the damage has been lasting, both physically and emotionally.
However, she's overcoming her embarrassment to share her story with the world in the hope of deterring others from using such sprays to enhance their bronzed hue, and has made television appearances in recent months.
'It took so much for me to go on This Morning and talk about it,' she said of her recent TV appearance. 'It's embarrassing, but I want to spread awareness. I don't even go on sunbeds anymore.'
Jen had built a life in the public eye - as a model, a pageant winner and a country singer. Now, she says, all of that has been put on hold.
'Since I won Miss Great Britain, I've barely done anything,' she said. 'It really affected my confidence. There are points now where I'm just so self-conscious. When something makes you feel that way, it makes you question everything else.'
'Because it's right on my face, I can see people staring. It makes me feel so awkward - I'm not confrontational enough to ask what they're looking at. I used to model all the time. Now I do absolutely none of it, out of fear.'
The impact on her career has been profound. 'I work an admin job now, and I'll probably do that until I die,' she said.
'I used to be a country singer - I released music, I did gigs - but I've just not had the confidence to do that again. I still write songs, but they don't leave my house.'
'I feel like what I achieved in life was because of how I used to look,' Jen continued. 'I do think I've got a good personality, but I think my looks helped me. Meeting people, modelling, travelling for work. Even with singing - it helps.'
Despite her success, Jen says she never thought of herself as particularly gifted. 'I've got little bits of talent that are not great. I'm an okay singer, but I've never been really good at anything. It was just a mixture of stuff that got me places.'
Now, she wants young women to understand the risks of these quick-fix beauty products. Nasal tanning sprays, many of which are illegally sold online and contain Melanotan II, are not approved for use in the UK.
Melanotan II stimulates melanin production and, while it can darken the skin, it's not properly regulated. Users are often unaware of the correct dosage, the long-term side effects or how the chemical might interact with their body.
These sprays can cause nausea, vomiting, increased blood pressure and, as in Jen's case, changes to skin pigmentation.
Because they are largely untested and unregulated, the risk factors remain unknown - particularly when taken without medical supervision.
In May, the Chartered Trading Standards Institute issued an urgent warning against the use of tanning sprays, or any other tanning product that is 'inhaled or ingested'.
The Melanoma Fund has also warned that use of the products 'may also encourage abnormal skin cell changes in response to UV exposure'.
The CTSI also raised the alarm on the growing trend of people using flavoured nasal tanning sprays, drops and gummies.
They warned that 'unscrupulous' sellers on Facebook and TikTok were posting pictures of the products available in child-friendly flavours such as peach, bubblegum, grape, strawberry and lime.
The regulator said it feared they could become the latest 'must have' products among young people 'leading to a youth epidemic as we saw with disposable vapes'.
Susanna Daniels, chief executive of the skin-cancer charity Melanoma Focus, said: 'We're becoming increasingly concerned about the use of both nasal tanning sprays and tanning injections and their potential links with melanoma skin cancer.
'These unregulated and illegal products not only pose serious health risks but also encourage harmful behaviours, particularly among young consumers.
'We urge the public to consider the long-term impacts on their health and avoid using these substances altogether.'
'Don't rush into it,' Jen warned. 'Do your research. We only have one body, and a lot of these products can affect you in irreversible ways. Make sure you know what you're putting into your body.'
Jen also believes social media and influencer culture have played a huge part in fuelling demand for unsafe beauty products.
'One hundred per cent,' she said. 'I used to be a massive fan of Love Island, but I haven't watched it the last three years because it annoys me. I think we've lost the meaning of the word influencer.'
'I always wanted to be an influencer. But people want it now for the wrong reasons. We're supposed to use our following to promote good things.
'These days, people will promote anything if they're paid or get free stuff. They don't care what they're promoting, it's about self-importance, money and fame, and it's a shame.
'I could have promoted that nasal tan,' she added. 'There are so many who will post anything, no matter how damaging it could be to their followers.'
While she's no longer in the spotlight, Jen says the experience has changed her relationship with beauty and how she treats her body.
'I look after myself more now,' she said. 'I haven't used sunbeds in about three years. It's made me realise that things can happen to you - even if you think they won't.'
'More than anything,' she added, 'it's just made me really self-conscious.'
Jen's story, while concerning, is not the only frightening consequence of using tanning nasal sprays.
Last year, Edith Eagle, from King's Lynn, Norfolk, revealed how the £25 spray she bought to enhance her bronze glow almost killed her.
The mother-of-four, who works as a chef, was left unable to breathe when her face ballooned as the tanning spray she bought online 'poisoned' her on holiday.
Ms Egale woke up on the second day of her family holiday last April with a swollen face and struggling to breathe. Hospital staff acted quickly and treated her with a high dose of steroids and discharged later that day. But she said it took more than a week for her symptoms to subside
Edith woke up on the second day of her holiday with a swollen face, which left her unrecognisable to family, and struggling to breathe. The 'frightening' incident saw her rushed to hospital.
She was treated with a high dose of steroids after being rushed to the nearest hospital on the Canary island.
Shocking pictures of the incident show her lying in a hospital bed.
Edith, who also owns a wedding venue with husband Carl Fox, 54, believes she suffered an allergic reaction to something in the spray, and is urging others to avoid using similar products.
She said the ingredients weren't listed on the label of the product, meaning she doesn't know what she was allergic to.
She used the tan after step-daughter Kayla Fox, 33, suggested getting nasal spray as a way of getting a quicker tan.
'I googled it and saw it pop up online and ordered it,' Edith said. 'I think I paid £25 for the bottle. I like being tanned because I prefer not using makeup. I always liked looking fresh-looking with a tan.
'On the first day, we were so brown, I've never experienced anything like it. I was very tanned after one day.
'But the next morning, I woke up and realised I couldn't breathe properly. I then noticed I was completely swollen. I was so out of breath and had to concentrate so much on breathing. It was really difficult to breathe.
'My neck was so swollen that my necklace was tight. I was just swollen everywhere. I realised it must be an allergic reaction.'
She added: 'There's no ingredients on the bottle — you don't know what you're putting in the body.'
Edith contacted the hotel reception who called a taxi to drive her to the nearest hospital, where she was fast-tracked through the emergency department.
Hospital staff have her a high dose of steroids and discharged her later that day.
But she said it took more than a week for her symptoms to fully subside.
'I said to the consultant the only thing I've done differently this week is take this nasal spray,' she said.
'I've never had an allergic reaction in my whole life to any foods or anything. I think it was definitely the spray.
'I wouldn't be standing here if the hospital staff hadn't acted so quickly. I was rushed straight through. It was so frightening.'
Since the incident she has seen other people post about similar reactions to tanning nasal sprays on social media.
Ms Eagle said she could have 'died that day'.
'If they hadn't been so hands-on that day in the hospital, I wouldn't be here to tell the tale,' she said.
'I will never again buy anything like this again - especially from the internet. How they can sell sprays with no ingredients listed is so worrying. I'd rather not have a tan.
'It was frightening for my family to see me like that. I feel grateful to be alive.
'Please don't make the same mistake as me. If this can save someone's life then I would rather suffer for anyone else before they make a stupid decision like me! I blame myself,' she added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Cosmetic cowboys' to be banned from carrying out Brazilian butt lifts
'Cosmetic cowboys' will be banned from performing high-risk procedures under new Government plans. The crackdown follows incidents in which patients have been maimed, and deaths linked to poor care and rogue operators. Under the measures, only qualified healthcare professionals such as doctors and nurses will be able to deliver procedures such as Brazilian butt lifts. These will only be able to be carried out by providers regulated by the health regulator, the Care Quality Commission. Clinics administering Botox and fillers will have to meet new standards and be licenced by councils. Under-18s will be banned from high risk procedures, such as injectables, amid concerns that children needed to be protected from 'dangerous beauty trends on social media'. Health officials said the steps aimed to protect the public from 'rogue operators' with no medical training, who often provided 'invasive' procedures in homes, hotels and pop-up clinics. The move would also reduce the cost imposed upon the NHS to fix botched procedures, the Department of Health and Social Care said. Karin Smyth, the health minister, said: 'The cosmetics industry has been plagued by a wild west of dodgy practitioners and procedures. There are countless horror stories of 'cosmetic cowboys' causing serious, catastrophic damage. 'This Government is taking action to protect those seeking treatments, support honest and competent practitioners, and root out the cowboys as part of our Plan for Change. 'This isn't about stopping anyone from getting treatments – it's about preventing rogue operators from exploiting people at the expense of their safety and keeping people safe. We're giving them peace of mind and reducing the cost to the NHS of fixing botched procedures.' Those who break the rules on high-risk procedures could face sanctions from the watchdog and financial penalties. The department said it would launch a consultation next year, seeking views on the range of procedures that should be covered by the new restrictions. Last month, the Chartered Trading Standards Institute warned that fat injections, Brazilian butt lifts, Botox and fillers are being offered by untrained people in places such as public toilets. There have also been concerns about rising numbers of people poisoned by fake Botox, leaving consumers struggling with breathing and swallowing problems, and slurred speech, after suffering from botulism. Millie Kendall, the chief executive of the British Beauty Council, said: 'Any measures that increase protection for the general public and professionalise the industry will help instil confidence, as well as helping to prevent the normalisation of horror stories that have become synonymous with our sector.' Ashton Collins, the director of Save Face, a register of accredited practitioners, said: 'I am delighted that the Government has recognised the significant and potentially fatal risks posed by highly dangerous procedures like liquid Brazilian butt lifts and has made it a priority to implement restrictions to protect public safety. 'I have seen first-hand the devastating impact these procedures can have on the lives of victims and their families, none more so than the family of Alice Webb.' Webb died last year, aged 33, after suffering complications from having a non-surgical Brazilian butt lift, which involved cosmetic fluid being injected into her buttocks. The mother-of-five worked in the beauty industry and lived in Gloucestershire.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Man, 45, died ‘taking de-worming drug for animals after seeing fake claims online it could cure cancer'
A MAN died after taking a de-worming drug for animals as he believed it would cure cancer, an inquest heard. Lee Redpath, 45, was rushed to hospital with signs of liver failure after dosing himself with an anti-parasitic drug called fenbendazole across a three-week period. 7 7 7 He tragically died in Addenbrooke's Hospital, in Cambridge, on April 29. Lee had ordered the drug, believing it to be safe, from a supplier in Ukraine. The 45-year-old saw fake social media posts which claimed fenbendazole could be a cancer cure - despite it being banned for human use. It's designed to be used against a number of gastrointestinal parasites in animals including giardia, roundworms, hookworms, whipworms, tapeworms and pinworms. However, even A-list celebrities have promoted the drug for humans, including actor Mel Gibson. He told Joe Rogan earlier this year how three of his friends were cured of stage four cancer after taking it with the anti-parasitic Ivermectin. The inquest, held in Lawrence Court, Huntingdon, Cambs, heard how Lee believed the de-wormer could prevent cancer. His long-term partner Lauren Laul gave evidence at the inquest. She told how her boyfriend believed it was safe to use and popular in the States. 'He saw it online, thought it was safe, people in America are using it," said Lauren. 'He didn't have medical assistance taking it so I think some sort of warning should be made. 'I am seeing it advertised online and people can get it themselves like Lee did and unknowingly be killing themselves because they didn't have all the information.' Lauren also suggested Lee may have been taking them for as long as two years before his death. Dr Gwilym Webb, a consultant hepatologist at Addenbrooke's warned fenbendazole had 'no proven benefit for preventing or treating cancer in humans.' 7 7 7 He told the inquest Lee was not eligible for a liver transplant due to alcohol misuse in the three months before. But a post-mortem concluded Lee's liver failure was due to the fenbendazole. Assistant coroner for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, Caroline Jones, concluded Lee died of liver and renal failure due to fenbendazole induced liver injury on a background of alcohol related cirrhosis. 'I was satisfied as to the toxic effects of fenbendazole and that it was this that was the primary cause of the injury," she told the inquest. 'It is a potent anti-worming treatment which was taken at far higher relative doses than had ever been envisaged and over a far longer time scale. 'During his admission he advised doctors that he had been taking the drug fenbendazole, which he purchased online from a supplier in the Ukraine after seeing videos about its supposed anti-cancer properties. 'It was thought likely fenbendazole was the primary cause of the acute injury. Lee's conditions deteriorated despite treatment but he was not a candidate for transplant. 'He improved briefly but on April 27 his condition worsened, it was recognised Lee's organs were failing and he passed away at 6.06 pm on April 29. 'While Lee may have taken fenbendazole with good intentions to improve his health, it constituted a deliberate act with the unintended consequence of his death.' Lauren urged the coroner to write a prevention of future deaths report, but Miss Jones denied her request. The coroner said there was not "sufficient evidence", although she was "concerned" about people buying the drug online. Lee's death was recorded as misadventure. 7


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Patients whose lives were ruined after being ‘needlessly given cancer drug for years' sue NHS trust
More than 20 patients who say their quality of life was wrecked when they were needlessly given a highly toxic cancer drug are suing the NHS trust involved. Some people were prescribed temozolomide – which should normally be used for only six months – for more than a decade during treatment by the University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust. They say the overprescribing left them with side-effects including secondary cancers and crippling fatigue. Earlier this year the Care Quality Commission was looking into at least 14 cases, but lawyers say more are emerging all the time. An investigation by lawyers Brabners found that, over the past two decades, numerous patients with brain and spinal tumours under the care of Professor Ian Brown were routinely exposed to prolonged and in some cases 'unnecessary' use of the chemotherapy drug, which has severe side-effects including extreme fatigue, confusion, sickness and seizures. The time periods temozolomide was given for allegedly ran contrary to medical and scientific guidelines. Standard NHS procedure is to use the drug over six months, and the drug manufacturer advises it be used for up to 12 months. One man said he was prescribed it for nearly two years longer than necessary, suffering extreme fatigue and low mood as a result. A woman in her twenties said she was misdiagnosed with cancer, receiving the drug needlessly for about eight years. Some patients are now having treatment for secondary cancers allegedly linked to overuse of temozolomide, the lawyers claim. Others claimed its prolonged use left them unable to pursue career ambitions and normal day-to-day activities because the chemotherapy was debilitating, with a long recovery time. Some reported loss of fertility or abnormal blood test results. The legal team says data shows that the trust's spending on the drug of £3.6m from 2009 to 2024 is 10 times that of other NHS oncology departments. The lawyers are now calling for an extended patient safety review and independent investigation, focusing in particular on treatment received by patients under Prof Brown dating back to 2006. The trust has been conducting an internal patient safety review, covering 2017 to 2023, when Prof Brown retired. A patient who identified only as Michael received an extra 22 cycles of temozolomide at the trust, despite his scans being stable. Prof Brown was not present during consultations, and Michael said he was always seen by a clinical nurse specialist. After suffering extreme fatigue and low mood, he learnt through news reports of mistreatment –not from the trust – that he should not have remained on treatment for so long, according to his lawyers. Another patient, identified only as Becky, says she received at least 100 cycles of the drug unnecessarily after being misdiagnosed with a brain tumour. Fiona Tinsley, head of medical negligence at Brabners, said: 'The extent of this scandal, and the physical and mental impact it has had on Prof Brown's patients cannot be underestimated.' She added: 'We believe there are many more patients out there who haven't yet come forward and some who may have sadly passed away. 'While we welcome the ongoing investigations being undertaken by the General Medical Council and Royal College of Physicians, we believe a full independent inquiry is necessary – including an extension of the trust's own review back to 2006 – not only to ensure justice for victims, but that processes are put in place to better identify and prevent such failings happening again.' A spokesperson for the trust told The Independent: 'We have comprehensively reviewed and spoken to all individuals who were receiving temozolomide (TMZ) treatment at the end of 2023 to ensure appropriate support and care plans are in place. 'A glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumour with fewer than two per cent of patients surviving longer than 10 years. This is an extremely complex condition and all modes of treatment – surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy – carry the risk of complications and side-effects. 'National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) guidelines recognise that clinicians can exercise professional judgment appropriate to individual circumstances when offering treatment to patients. 'We have commissioned the Royal College of Physicians to conduct an independent review of a representative cohort of patients who received greater than 12 cycles of adjuvant TMZ between 2017 and 2023. 'As this process is ongoing, it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage." It's understood that CQC inspectors have been in touch with the trust to understand the details, and seek assurances that patients are not at risk. The regulator will be reviewing more information to judge whether it needs to be involved.