Democrats want a liberal Joe Rogan to help them win elections. I'm right here.
Democrats want a liberal Joe Rogan to help them win elections. I'm right here. | Opinion I mean, they could sink millions of dollars into hosting community town halls throughout the country that connect actual Democratic candidates with actual voters to…you know…talk. But nah.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Donald Trump appears on Joe Rogan's podcast
With the election days away, Donald Trump was in Texas for a sit-down interview on the podcast 'The Joe Rogan Experience' with Joe Rogan.
I've been told scores of wealthy Democratic donors are eager to identify and recruit a 'liberal Joe Rogan' who will do for their party's candidates what the actual Joe Rogan apparently did for President Donald Trump in the 2024 election.
After giving it 15 seconds of careful thought, and as a devout believer in forced authenticity, I formally accept what I assume is a multimillion-dollar offer and proudly take on the title of 'the left's Joe Rogan.'
Before detailing my plans as America's next great 'progressive influencer/podcaster/talentless middle-aged white guy who somehow became popular,' let me refresh your memory on how we got here.
Democrats think they can buy authenticity and create a liberal Rogan
It's generally believed a big part of Trump's success in his 2024 campaign to retake the White House stemmed from the fact that, as the New York Times recently wrote, "he cultivated an ecosystem of supporters on YouTube, TikTok and podcasts.'
In particular, Trump won over younger male voters by chatting with bro-centric influencers like Rogan and Theo Von.
Opinion: What's an oligarchy? With Trump's 'Big, Beautiful' bill, we're living in one.
Because Democratic strategists tend to be extremely bad at their jobs, they've concluded the party's best path forward is to spend millions of dollars creating a similar left-wing-influencer ecosystem that will allow liberal candidates to 'connect' with 'desirable demographics' in 'authentic' ways that seem 'organic' and not 'created by Democratic strategists.'
Cool.
Democrats are flailing to find something that simply doesn't exist
The Times reported that the Democratic donor network American Bridge plans to launch a company called AND Media. The 'AND' stands for 'Achieve Narrative Dominance,' which certainly sounds better than 'This Will End Badly,' or TWEB Media.
Based on an AND Media business plan it reviewed, the Times reported: "Hoping to move away from 'the current didactic, hall monitor style of Democratic politics that turns off younger audiences,' AND Media will focus on directly funding influencers and co-producing their content.'
Nothing says 'we can nail the youth vote' quite like the phrase 'didactic, hall monitor style.'
Liberals would be served better by getting out and meeting people
I mean, they could sink millions of dollars into hosting community town halls throughout the country that connect actual Democratic candidates with actual voters to…you know…talk. And they could spend more millions blasting ads on every available platform that show people exactly how unhinged and self-enriching the current administration is, and how it's actively defying court orders while trying to slash Medicare, Medicaid and SNAP benefits and punish educational institutions that don't follow the government's ideology.
Opinion: I wrote a speech for Trump's Golden Dome defense. Get ready to feel something.
But none of that sounds like something the bros would do, so probably better to spend the money creating a podcast sponsored by 'LibBlast!,' the new progressive energy drink getting chugged by liberal influencers like me.
Which brings us back to me. I'm clearly the perfect pick to become the liberal Joe Rogan.
Introducing the progressive Joe Rogan - me!
He's 57, I'm 54, so we both have that 'older dad who's cool' vibe that apparently works in the manosphere.
I am, of course, liberal, so that box comes pre-checked.
Rogan, as host of 'Fear Factor,' made people eat bugs. I once ate a chocolate-covered cricket, so I'd call that about a tie.
And like Rogan, I have few truly redeeming qualities, so why not let me babble in front of a microphone with little concern whether the words I'm uttering offend people or make any sense?
Where are all my disaffected young white men at?
Let's get this started. All insecure men who were born on third base and feel bitter that the world hasn't walked them to home plate yet, please get ready for a fresh, totally organic and extremely rich voice that will make you feel seen.
OK, there's a possibility this won't work exactly as intended. Rogan and other right-wing influencers, it seems, derive their power from pandering to disaffected straight white men angry they have to share power and clout with other men and…gulp…sometimes even women. They're anti-woke, and the left is, inherently, kinda woke.
I'd love to take Democratic donor money, but it ain't gonna work
So if you're looking for the left-wing Joe Rogan, you're going to get a high-profile liberal white dude who's woke, smart, and kind of emo, in a self-assured sort of way. You'd basically be getting MSNBC's Chris Hayes, who already exists and isn't accomplishing what Democratic strategists envision such a figure would accomplish.
So I'm again drawn back to the whole 'maybe we should just spend a ton of money on getting out there and talking to people and being ourselves and clueing folks in to all the very bad things Republicans are doing' idea.
Of course, that probably wouldn't get me my $50 million contract to be the progressive answer to Joe Rogan. But it would save the country from having another random dude spouting off on the internet, pretending he's something more than just a salesman for sports drinks and men's hair growth products.
Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @rexhuppke.bsky.social and on Facebook at facebook.com/RexIsAJerk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump was convicted of 34 felonies a year ago. He's still battling the case
One year ago today, a jury of 12 New Yorkers convicted Donald Trump for falsifying business records as part of an alleged hush money scheme to influence the 2016 election. The conviction left an indelible mark on Trump -- making him the first president or former president to be found guilty of a crime -- and his fight to erase that legacy continues to this day. On June 11, a federal appeals court in Manhattan is set to hear oral arguments in the president's renewed legal fight to move his criminal case from state to federal court. MORE: Timeline: Manhattan DA's Stormy Daniels hush money case against Donald Trump Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg opposes the move -- arguing that a case can't be removed to federal court after conviction -- but Trump's lawyers have argued the "unprecedented criminal prosecution of a former and current president of the United States belongs in federal court." Trump was found guilty on 34 felony counts after prosecutors alleged that he engaged in a "scheme" to boost his chances during the 2016 presidential election through a series of hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels and the falsification of New York business records to cover up that alleged criminal conduct. "I did my job, and we did our job," Bragg said following Trump's conviction. "There are many voices out there, but the only voice that matters is the voice of the jury, and the jury has spoken." Ten days before Trump was sworn in as president last November, New York Judge Juan Merchan sentenced him to an unconditional discharge -- without prison, fines or probation -- saying it was the "only lawful sentence" to prevent "encroaching upon the highest office in the land." "I won the election in a massive landslide, and the people of this country understand what's gone on. This has been a weaponization of government," Trump told the court during his sentencing. Trump continues to vehemently deny any wrongdoing, and his lawyers have argued that his conviction relied on evidence and testimony that related to his official acts as president, including social media posts from his official Twitter account as president and testimony from his former communications director Hope Hicks. The trial took place one month before the Supreme Court delivered a landmark ruling expanding the scope of presidential immunity, and Trump's lawyers have argued that the evidence would have not been permitted based on the high court's ruling. Trump's lawyers attempted to use that argument to throw out the case before Trump's January sentencing, but the argument was rejected by Judge Juan Merchan, two New York appeals courts, and the Supreme Court. "The alleged evidentiary violations at President-Elect Trump's state-court trial can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal," the Supreme Court said in a brief unsigned opinion, though four justices said they would have granted Trump's application. For Trump's criminal defense, he relied on then-defense attorneys Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, who now serve as the deputy attorney general and principal associate deputy attorney general. Earlier this week, Trump announced that he plans to nominate Bove -- who led a purge of career law enforcement officials before the Senate confirmed his nomination to help run the DOJ -- to the United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit. MORE: Trump sentencing transcript: Listen to Trump's entire hush money sentencing hearing With his former defense attorneys now working for the government, Trump earlier this year tapped the elite Manhattan law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell to handle his criminal appeal. Lawyers with the Department of Justice also filed an amicus brief in the case this week to argue that the case should be heard -- and thrown out -- by a federal court because the jury's conviction relied on evidence that was covered by presidential immunity. "That President Trump's defense in fact takes the form of a new constitutional immunity announced by the Supreme Court after his trial ended, rather than a new statute enacted by Congress, should if anything cut in the President's favor," lawyers with the Department of Justice argued in a brief submitted on Tuesday. The appeal -- as well as the ongoing appeal of Trump's $83 million judgment in the E. Jean Carroll civil case and half-billion-dollar civil fraud case -- is proceeding on uncharted legal grounds as Trump wields the power of the presidency in his defense. He has characterized the prosecutors who pursued the cases against him as politically motivated, and has touted his electoral victory last November as a political acquittal. "The real verdict is going to be Nov. 5 by the people," Trump told reporters as he left court following his conviction last year. "And they know what happened here, and everybody knows what happened here." Trump was convicted of 34 felonies a year ago. He's still battling the case originally appeared on
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump agencies tell Congress what to chop in 22 percent budget slashing
Federal agencies began sending the nitty-gritty of President Donald Trump's budget proposal to Congress on Friday, detailing which programs he wants Republicans to cut deeply — or wipe out entirely — when they vote to fund the government in September. Expanding upon the so-called skinny budget the White House transmitted to Capitol Hill earlier this month, the new documents detail the White House's ambitions for spending cuts across government agencies. They show which accounts the president wants GOP lawmakers to target as Trump seeks non-defense funding cuts of more than 22 percent in the upcoming fiscal year and a flat military budget. In 'budget in brief' documents, agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency, along with the departments of Education and Health and Human Services, detailed their requests to cut billions of dollars from their budgets. The White House is expected to post more detailed budget documents later. Among the proposed cuts to most federal departments, the administration is asking Congress to slash $12 billion from federal education programs, $5 billion from agriculture efforts and a total of more than $60 billion from health, housing and community development work. Senior GOP members of both the House and Senate have already scorned Trump's initial budget request, heightening the conflict between Republicans on Capitol Hill and those in the Trump administration as Congress races to head off a government shutdown in four months. Just how deeply congressional Republicans are willing to cut federal programs will start to become clear next week, when House GOP appropriators plan to debut the first of a dozen annual funding bills. That includes the measure that covers agriculture programs and the Food and Drug Administration, and the bill that funds programs supporting military construction and veterans. The White House has not threatened to veto funding bills that exceed the president's request. But Trump's budget chief has said the administration hasn't ruled out continuing to use 'impoundment' to withhold congressionally approved funding the president doesn't want to spend. 'Impoundment is still on the table and something we will consider,' White House budget director Russ Vought said this week on Fox Business, repeating what he said earlier this month at the time of the skinny budget's release. That threat has irked Republican lawmakers who argue that the tactic is illegal under the 51-year-old law created to prevent presidents from undermining the 'power of the purse' Congress is granted under the Constitution. Whatever government funding legislation makes it to Trump's desk in the fall will first need the support of several Democrats in the Senate, where Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is under pressure to hold the line against drastic cuts after caving in March to help advance the stopgap Republicans unilaterally crafted after abandoning bipartisan negotiations. Attracting Democratic support in the Senate is likely to require higher funding levels that prompt Republican opposition on the other side of the Capitol, House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole acknowledged this month. 'Anything they do to get Democratic support in the Senate — which they have to do under their own rules — will almost certainly cost me Republican support over here,' said the Oklahoma Republican. That was not the case earlier this year when House Republicans mustered near-unanimous GOP support in their chamber to pass a funding patch through September, but several House Republicans have already warned leaders that they wouldn't back another stopgap this fall. Lawmakers in both parties also want to pass updated funding levels, while locking in earmarks to ensure federal cash flows to specific projects in their districts. 'I don't want to do it again,' Cole told reporters this month about the prospect of another continuing resolution. 'I want to deal.'
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump conducts the weirdest exit interview in history as Musk departs the White House — for now
Elon Musk's exit interview began like any other. The boss heaped praise on the departing employee while demonstrating a tenuous grasp of exactly what it is he did. The employee vastly inflated his achievements, and the pair made vague promises to stay in touch. From there, it veered into a freewheeling discussion about transgender mice, Musk's alleged prolific use of horse tranquilizer, nuclear war between India and Pakistan, and a potential pardon for Sean 'Diddy' Combs, should he be convicted. Now that Musk's legally limited 130-day term as a 'special government employee' is over, the most destructive professional partnership since Emperor Palpatine and Darth Vader shacked up in the Death Star has finally come to an end. Trump and Musk, the powerful bromance that shook the world, are taking a break — for now at least. The hour-long farewell, in front of the world's press, came just hours after a New York Times exposé alleged the world's richest man had taken so much Ketamine during the 2024 presidential campaign that he was unable to control his bladder. Musk did little to calm those rumors as he turned up sporting a black eye (the result of mutual combat with his five-year-old son, he says), wearing a cap, a 'Dogefather' t-shirt, and at one point rolling his head around to stare at the ceiling as the president spoke. Sitting at the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office, Trump lauded his friend standing beside him for the savings he claimed to have made, which are almost certainly exaggerated. 'You know the kinds of things that he's found, and his people have found… They found things that are pretty unbelievable. I have to say that the numbers that we're talking about are substantial, but they're going to be very much more substantial with time,' Trump said. He praised the Tesla founder and CEO for delivering a 'colossal change in the old ways of doing business in Washington.' Musk indeed shattered norms by ignoring outdated hiring practices that prize experience and expertise and instead placing 19-year-old hackers with nicknames like 'Big Balls' in charge of government departments. Or as President Trump put it: 'DOGE has installed geniuses with an engineering mindset and unbelievably talented people in computers.' The world's richest person also broke new ground by becoming one of the most deadly bureaucrats in the history of the U.S. government, killing an estimated 15,000 people with his deep cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development. Trump could not have been more effusive in his praise, placing Musk's four-month stint as a cost-cutting consultant in the ranks of America's great heroes, somewhere between Miracle on the Hudson's Sully Sullenberger and Captain America. 'Elon's service to America has been without comparison in modern history," Trump said, noting the huge sacrifice Musk had made by having to endure people being mean to him online. 'He willingly accepted the outrageous abuse and slander and lies and attacks, because he does love our country,' Trump went on. Anyone hoping for an end to the friendship that ended thousands of government careers would be sorely disappointed. 'Elon is really not leaving,' Trump said. 'He's going to be back and forth, I have a feeling. It's his baby, and I think he's going to be doing a lot of things.' Musk agreed. "I expect to continue to provide advice, whatever the President would like advice... I expect to remain a friend and an advisor, and certainly, if there's anything the President wants me to do, I'm at the President's service," he said. But for now, Musk is returning to his many businesses, which are all simultaneously suffering from significant brand damage due to their association with him. In one particularly awkward moment, Musk batted away a question from a journalist concerning Friday's published allegations about his drug use, which reportedly included Ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms and Adderall, in addition to ketamine. 'Is the New York Times — is that the same publication that got a Pulitzer Prize for false reporting on the Russiagate? Is that the same organization? I think it is,' he said, theatrically turning to Trump. 'I think it is.' But Musk couldn't leave without first reeling off a list of excuses for why he didn't achieve what he set out to do. He claimed he could cut $1 trillion from the federal budget before September 30 by ending "waste, fraud, and abuse," but now even his own likely cooked numbers have failed to meet that target. 'Obviously, at times, when you cut expenses, those who are receiving the money, whether they receive whether they're receiving that money legitimately or not, they do complain, and you're not going to hear someone confessing that they receive money inappropriately. Never,' he said. He even saw fit to appropriate Hannah Arendt's famous "banality of evil" quote to draw a bizarre comparison with government spending and Nazi Germany. 'It's the banal evil of bureaucracy. It's sort of the frankly, largely uncaring nature of bureaucracy,' he went on. And perhaps more ominously for anyone who relies on USAID for their lifesaving HIV medication, or anyone with a job in the U.S. government, or anyone who needs government healthcare to survive, Musk promised that his mission would continue. 'The DOGE team will only grow stronger over time, the DOGE influence will only grow stronger. I liken it to a sort of Buddhism, it's like a way of life,' he said, demonstrating a clear lack of understanding about Buddhism and life. In other words, this Rasputin for the McKinsey age is not going anywhere.
