Democrats want a liberal Joe Rogan to help them win elections. I'm right here.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Donald Trump appears on Joe Rogan's podcast
With the election days away, Donald Trump was in Texas for a sit-down interview on the podcast 'The Joe Rogan Experience' with Joe Rogan.
I've been told scores of wealthy Democratic donors are eager to identify and recruit a 'liberal Joe Rogan' who will do for their party's candidates what the actual Joe Rogan apparently did for President Donald Trump in the 2024 election.
After giving it 15 seconds of careful thought, and as a devout believer in forced authenticity, I formally accept what I assume is a multimillion-dollar offer and proudly take on the title of 'the left's Joe Rogan.'
Before detailing my plans as America's next great 'progressive influencer/podcaster/talentless middle-aged white guy who somehow became popular,' let me refresh your memory on how we got here.
Democrats think they can buy authenticity and create a liberal Rogan
It's generally believed a big part of Trump's success in his 2024 campaign to retake the White House stemmed from the fact that, as the New York Times recently wrote, "he cultivated an ecosystem of supporters on YouTube, TikTok and podcasts.'
In particular, Trump won over younger male voters by chatting with bro-centric influencers like Rogan and Theo Von.
Opinion: What's an oligarchy? With Trump's 'Big, Beautiful' bill, we're living in one.
Because Democratic strategists tend to be extremely bad at their jobs, they've concluded the party's best path forward is to spend millions of dollars creating a similar left-wing-influencer ecosystem that will allow liberal candidates to 'connect' with 'desirable demographics' in 'authentic' ways that seem 'organic' and not 'created by Democratic strategists.'
Cool.
Democrats are flailing to find something that simply doesn't exist
The Times reported that the Democratic donor network American Bridge plans to launch a company called AND Media. The 'AND' stands for 'Achieve Narrative Dominance,' which certainly sounds better than 'This Will End Badly,' or TWEB Media.
Based on an AND Media business plan it reviewed, the Times reported: "Hoping to move away from 'the current didactic, hall monitor style of Democratic politics that turns off younger audiences,' AND Media will focus on directly funding influencers and co-producing their content.'
Nothing says 'we can nail the youth vote' quite like the phrase 'didactic, hall monitor style.'
Liberals would be served better by getting out and meeting people
I mean, they could sink millions of dollars into hosting community town halls throughout the country that connect actual Democratic candidates with actual voters to…you know…talk. And they could spend more millions blasting ads on every available platform that show people exactly how unhinged and self-enriching the current administration is, and how it's actively defying court orders while trying to slash Medicare, Medicaid and SNAP benefits and punish educational institutions that don't follow the government's ideology.
Opinion: I wrote a speech for Trump's Golden Dome defense. Get ready to feel something.
But none of that sounds like something the bros would do, so probably better to spend the money creating a podcast sponsored by 'LibBlast!,' the new progressive energy drink getting chugged by liberal influencers like me.
Which brings us back to me. I'm clearly the perfect pick to become the liberal Joe Rogan.
Introducing the progressive Joe Rogan - me!
He's 57, I'm 54, so we both have that 'older dad who's cool' vibe that apparently works in the manosphere.
I am, of course, liberal, so that box comes pre-checked.
Rogan, as host of 'Fear Factor,' made people eat bugs. I once ate a chocolate-covered cricket, so I'd call that about a tie.
And like Rogan, I have few truly redeeming qualities, so why not let me babble in front of a microphone with little concern whether the words I'm uttering offend people or make any sense?
Where are all my disaffected young white men at?
Let's get this started. All insecure men who were born on third base and feel bitter that the world hasn't walked them to home plate yet, please get ready for a fresh, totally organic and extremely rich voice that will make you feel seen.
OK, there's a possibility this won't work exactly as intended. Rogan and other right-wing influencers, it seems, derive their power from pandering to disaffected straight white men angry they have to share power and clout with other men and…gulp…sometimes even women. They're anti-woke, and the left is, inherently, kinda woke.
I'd love to take Democratic donor money, but it ain't gonna work
So if you're looking for the left-wing Joe Rogan, you're going to get a high-profile liberal white dude who's woke, smart, and kind of emo, in a self-assured sort of way. You'd basically be getting MSNBC's Chris Hayes, who already exists and isn't accomplishing what Democratic strategists envision such a figure would accomplish.
So I'm again drawn back to the whole 'maybe we should just spend a ton of money on getting out there and talking to people and being ourselves and clueing folks in to all the very bad things Republicans are doing' idea.
Of course, that probably wouldn't get me my $50 million contract to be the progressive answer to Joe Rogan. But it would save the country from having another random dude spouting off on the internet, pretending he's something more than just a salesman for sports drinks and men's hair growth products.
Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @rexhuppke.bsky.social and on Facebook at facebook.com/RexIsAJerk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Roasters Shun Coffee From Brazil After 50% Tariffs Kick In
(Bloomberg) -- American coffee buyers are shunning fresh deals with top grower Brazil after President Donald Trump's 50% tariff took effect this month. Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds Companies are avoiding new contracts and looking for wiggle room in existing ones to avoid having to pay the higher levies, according to a dozen brokers, roasters and exporters contacted by Bloomberg. Some US buyers are asking for extended shipping timelines in the hopes that tariffs may be eased later, according to Brazil's exporter group Cecafé. Deals between the US and Brazil have 'totally stalled,' said coffee broker Thiago Cazarini. 'No one's really buying anything.' About a third of America's unroasted coffee typically comes from Brazil, a country Trump has been immersed in a trade conflict with, in part due to what he calls the 'politically motivated persecution' of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. A political ally of Trump's, Bolsonaro faces trial for an attempted coup against the government of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who defeated Bolsonaro in a 2022 election. Trump first announced 10% tariffs on Brazil and other countries in April, before imposing 50% levies on the South American agricultural power that kicked in on Aug. 6. One roaster, Florida-based Zaza Coffee, gets about a quarter of its beans from Brazil and currently has 14 to 16 weeks left of those supplies. After the beans are used up, the company is looking to replace them with coffee from Central America, Peru and Mexico, said JP Juarez, Zaza's director of coffee innovation. 'We have a certain window within this 14 weeks that maybe something can change in the case of the tariffs,' Juarez said. But 'in the scenario of keeping the tariffs at those levels, probably we are not going to ask for Brazilian coffee.' Many roasters are reluctant to change longstanding blends on what could turn out to be a short-term policy. The country's dominant share makes its beans nearly irreplaceable, with few alternative origins able to match its volumes, according to Christian Wolthers, chief executive officer of Florida-based importer Wolthers Douqué. Roasters may also not want to alter the profile of the blends customers are accustomed to. Brazil is the world's top exporter of arabica, which is considered smoother than robusta and is the only bean used by coffeehouse chain Starbucks Corp. 'Roasters have blends that they like to keep as consistent as they can in any given cost environment,' Rabobank analyst Jim Watson said. Even so, coffee trade between the US and Brazil may continue to slow, in line with a trend seen so far this year. The Cuban-style coffee brand Café Aroma is among the roasters 'working to import coffees where the applicable tariff has more predictability,' vice president Bernadette Gerrity said. It's also buying more coffee futures to help protect against higher costs. Colombia, Vietnam and Honduras are the next biggest sources of coffee for the US in terms of quantity, according to the Department of Agriculture. Vietnam primarily produces robusta, a cheaper variety that most Americans only know from instant coffee. US imports of those beans could climb to 'historical highs' as tariffs on the nation are only 20%, according to Laleska Moda, market intelligence analyst at Hedgepoint Global Markets. The US could also boost imports from Indonesia and Uganda, which have substantially lower tariffs than Brazil, she said. Limited offers for Honduran coffee are already priced 30 to 40 cents per pound above the futures market, while Colombian exporters haven't been offering prices at all in case the market surges later, said Tomas Araujo, a senior trader at StoneX. A shift away from Brazilian beans in the US would likely divert more of those supplies to Europe, offering relief for buyers there that are seeking traceable beans to comply with the bloc's upcoming deforestation rules, according to Dave Behrends, head of trading at Sucafina SA. More beans would also go to the growing coffee market in China, leaving US roasters facing a pricier market. While New York-based Gregorys Coffee is lucky to have had its last shipment from Brazil arrive on Aug. 2 before the higher tariffs kicked in — leaving it supplied until mid-November — it will eventually need to import another batch it already contracted at the higher rate, said CEO Gregory Zamfotis. The company, as well as other smaller roasters, are bracing for the impact. 'Absorbing a 10% tariff is nearly impossible for a small business to do entirely on its own,' said Daria Whalen, the director of coffee at San Francisco-based Ritual Coffee Roasters. 'Some of that has to be passed to customers — and 50% feels staggering and insurmountable.' --With assistance from Anuradha Raghu. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Yosemite Employee Fired After Flying Trans Pride Flag ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats need to start using AI to help save democracy
As American democracy unravels at the hands of President Trump and his enabling congressional and Supreme Court majorities, millions of Americans are desperate to identify whatever possible countermeasures remain to slow the country's descent into fascism. The outcome of the 2026 midterms is unlikely to produce meaningful change, even if the Democrats take control of the House. Without a cooperative Senate, it will be impossible either to pass legislation or secure a conviction on impeachment charges. Oversight hearings can bring public attention to things like rampant corruption, but the threats Trump poses to the rule of law and democracy are already well-known. The courts can only do so much. There's another emerging tool, however: artificial intelligence. Trump seems to understands the transformative power of AI. Last month, the administration announced an ' AI Action Plan ' for 'winning the AI race.' Among other measures, it promises to remove 'onerous Federal regulations that hinder AI development and deployment, and seek private sector input on rules to remove.' As part of this initiative, the General Services Administration and OpenAI announced earlier this month that the company will be 'providing ChatGPT to the entire U.S. federal workforce' under a 'first-of-its-kind partnership.' Participating agencies will pay a nominal cost of $1 each for the first year to enable federal employees to 'explore and leverage AI.' The company is also 'teaming up with experienced partners Slalom and Boston Consulting Group to support secure, responsible deployment and trainings.' Last week, the AI company Anthropic likewise announced it had struck the same deal with GSA to enable federal agencies' access to its Claude model. The Trump administration's effort to streamline the federal government with AI models makes some sense. Research has shown that generative AI — particularly large language models, which consume vast amounts of data to understand and generate natural language content — can enhance government efficiency in data processing, analysis and drafting, among other potential advantages. But AI systems also increase the risk of widespread government surveillance, personalized misinformation and disinformation, systematic discrimination, lack of accountability and inaccuracy. According to a recent academic paper, 'although many studies have explored the ethical implications of AI, fewer have fully examined its democratic implications.' Trump's alliance with OpenAI head Sam Altman goes back to start of his second term, when he announced a $500 billion joint venture with OpenAI, Oracle and Softbank to build up to 20 large AI data centers. Trump called the venture 'Stargate.' The deal's details are murky, including who will have access to Stargate and how it will possibly benefit taxpayers. Although a spokesman for OpenAI told Fox News Digital that 'Sam Altman sort of planted a flag on democratic AI versus autocratic AI,' let's not forget that Altman is not a government official or employee. As a legal matter, it is unclear whether these ' fast-tracked ' deals will fully comply with traditional oversight and procurement laws and procedures. No major AI company is currently approved under the Federal Risk And Authorization Management Program, for example, which is the process for authorizing the use of cloud technologies by federal agencies. According the GSA website, the program aims to ensure 'security and protection of federal information' by imposing strict cybersecurity controls to protect against data breaches, hacking and unauthorized access, and requiring ongoing monitoring and reporting. Given that the GSA is reportedly working on 'developing a separate authorization' for generative AI systems like ChatGPT and Claude, the potential threats to national security and private citizens' personal information are significant. The Trump administration's lack of transparency also risks creating a black-box government run by proprietary algorithms that the public cannot inspect — centralizing control over federal AI in two companies whose interests clearly lie in market dominance, not the public good. This is why these kinds of decisions are best made through established legal procedures — including the Federal Competition in Contracting Act (requiring fair and open competition), the Privacy Act of 1974 (limiting how agencies can collect and disclose personal data), the Federal Records Act (requiring the proper retention and archiving of public records) and the Administrative Procedure Act (requiring public comment and input into major policy decisions). For now, OpenAI has promised that its 'goal is to ensure agencies can use AI securely and responsibly. ChatGPT Enterprise already does not use business data, including inputs or outputs, to train or improve OpenAI models. The same safeguards will apply to federal use.' This promise from Altman's company is no substitute for actual legal standards enforced by the federal government. Whether AI tools embedded in federal government systems could one day be used to sway elections to favor Trump and his cronies is a vital question. For now, what's clear is that Democrats need to get into the AI game, and fast. A Democratic political action committee called the National Democratic Training Committee recently unveiled on online course entitled 'AI For Progressive Campaigns,' which is designed to teach candidates how to use AI to help create social media content, draft speeches, craft voter outreach messaging and phone-banking scripts, conduct research into their constituencies and opponents, and develop internal training materials. The founder and CEO of the group, Kelly Dietrich, stated that 'thousands of Democratic campaigns can now leverage AI to compete at any scale.' This effort, although laudable, does not go far enough to capitalize on AI's potential to help outmaneuver authoritarianism in the U.S. There's much more that might be done, including using AI to educate citizens on the benefits of democracy, how institutions work and the facts underlying important issues; to create large-scale, moderated public deliberation and consensus around divisive issues; to detect and alert the public to manipulated media, thus combatting misinformation and disinformation and fostering public trust in an alternative to Trump; and to create and implement effective messaging strategies for alternative visions for the future of the country. AI could be American voters' best friend, not their enemy. It just needs to be asked.
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Republican: ‘We've gotten lucky' with Mamdani
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said Monday his party has 'gotten lucky' with the Democrats' nominee for New York City mayor as Zohran Mamdani makes his case ahead of the November election. 'We've gotten lucky — bad for America, good for Republicans — with Mr. Mamdani in New York,' Kennedy told NewsNation's Leland Vittert. 'If I didn't know better, I would think he was a Republican plant. If I didn't know better, I'd think that Republicans had created Mr. Mamdani in a petri dish in a genomics lab.' 'He's clearly from what I call the Gary Busey wing — the cray cray wing — of the Democratic Party. That's bad for New York, but it's certainly good for Republicans,' the Pelican State Republican added, mentioning the actor turned reality star. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, recently shocked political observers with his win over political heavyweight and former Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the Big Apple's primary. Cuomo is now running as an independent against Mamdani. While Mamdani has faced criticism from within the party, some Democrats have defended his rise. In a Sunday interview, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) pushed back against Democratic criticism of the mayoral candidate. 'I don't know why they're attacking him. I think it's stupid when maybe we're not in 100 percent agreement, right? But he has some ideas that are clearly, you know, attracting people. It's OK to say, 'I disagree with this, this and this, but I agree with that,'' Gallego said. 'But the idea that we're again, we're just going to throw out people that are really bringing in new ideas to the fold, exciting people just because they're slightly to the right or to the left of us, I think, is dumb,' he added. The Hill has reached out to Mamdani's campaign for comment.
