Xiaomi Gears Up to Launch YU7 SUV in Beijing
The YU7 represents Xiaomi's second foray into the electric vehicle market, following the SU7 sedan. Designed to compete with established models like Tesla's Model Y, the YU7 is built on Xiaomi's Modena platform and offers both rear-wheel-drive and all-wheel-drive configurations. The vehicle measures 4,999 mm in length, 1,996 mm in width, and 1,600 mm in height, with a wheelbase of 3,000 mm.
Performance specifications indicate that the YU7 will be available in multiple trims. The rear-wheel-drive variant is powered by a single 235 kW motor, while the all-wheel-drive version combines a 220 kW front motor with a 288 kW rear motor, delivering a total output of 508 kW. The top speed for the high-performance model is reported at 253 km/h.
Battery options include a 96.3 kWh lithium iron phosphate pack supplied by FinDreams and a 101.7 kWh nickel manganese cobalt pack from CATL. Depending on the configuration, the YU7 offers a CLTC range between 670 km and 835 km. The vehicle supports both AC Type 2 and DC CCS charging standards and features adaptive air suspension, with wheel options ranging from 19 to 21 inches.
Interior features are expected to include a panoramic sunroof with triple-layer silver coating, providing 99.9% UV protection and 97.6% heat insulation. The cabin is designed to accommodate five passengers comfortably, with a focus on integrating Xiaomi's HyperOS for seamless connectivity across devices.
See also AGRIBARON Sets Sights on Southeast Asia's Blockchain Gaming Surge
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
14 hours ago
- Arabian Post
BitBridge to Buy Bitcoin and Launch Public Listing by 2025
BitBridge has announced plans to begin acquiring Bitcoin for its balance sheet, with the intention of going public by the end of the third quarter of 2025. The company, which is positioning itself as a key player in the cryptocurrency sector, aims to tap into the growing demand for digital assets by developing an ecosystem centred around Bitcoin. This will include offering BTC-backed loans, potentially reshaping the landscape of crypto-finance. The company's move to purchase Bitcoin signals a strategic shift towards greater exposure to digital currencies and aligns with the broader trend of institutional investment in crypto assets. With the recent volatility in the cryptocurrency market, BitBridge is positioning itself to capitalise on the emerging financial opportunities in the blockchain space. Going public under the ticker symbol #BTTL, BitBridge will offer investors the chance to access a growing market for Bitcoin-backed services and investment vehicles. The decision to acquire Bitcoin directly for its balance sheet highlights a growing trend among crypto-focused firms to integrate the asset into their operations as a long-term investment and financial instrument. This development also mirrors actions taken by large corporations, including payment giants like Tesla, which have previously added Bitcoin to their balance sheets. ADVERTISEMENT Alongside the balance sheet expansion, BitBridge is laying the groundwork for an innovative platform that will offer Bitcoin-backed loans. This new service aims to provide an alternative to traditional lending, leveraging the liquidity of Bitcoin to offer credit solutions for crypto holders. These loans, secured by Bitcoin, could appeal to both individual and institutional clients who may be looking to unlock value from their holdings without selling their digital assets. The potential for Bitcoin-backed loans to disrupt traditional lending models has garnered attention from experts in the fintech space. By collateralising loans with Bitcoin, borrowers can access liquidity while retaining ownership of their crypto assets. This could prove especially attractive in an environment where cryptocurrency adoption is growing, and more individuals are seeking ways to integrate their holdings into the broader financial system. One of the critical aspects of BitBridge's strategy will be its approach to regulatory compliance. As governments around the world begin to refine their stance on cryptocurrency, BitBridge's ability to navigate the regulatory landscape will be crucial for its success. The company's move to offer Bitcoin-backed loans will likely draw increased scrutiny from financial regulators, especially as concerns grow over the potential risks associated with crypto-backed lending. BitBridge is also positioning itself within a competitive space, with several established players already offering similar services. However, the company's focus on Bitcoin as a core asset distinguishes it from others in the market, potentially allowing it to tap into a niche but growing sector of the cryptocurrency market. In addition to its focus on Bitcoin, BitBridge has emphasised the importance of security and transparency in its operations. As the crypto ecosystem continues to evolve, concerns about cybersecurity and the protection of assets remain top priorities for both investors and users. BitBridge's commitment to building a secure and transparent platform is likely to play a significant role in attracting users who are wary of the risks associated with the crypto space.
Tahawul Tech
19 hours ago
- Tahawul Tech
Tesla found partly liable for fatal 2019 Autopilot crash
A Florida jury has found automotive company Tesla partly liable for a 2019 crash in which a Model S sedan using self-driving software killed a pedestrian and severely injured another. Plaintiffs had argued the assistance software, called Autopilot, should have alerted the driver and activated the brakes before the crash. Tesla had maintained the driver, George McGee, was at fault and called the verdict 'wrong' in a statement to the BBC, while vowing to appeal. The result means the company will have to pay as much as $243m (£189m) in punitive and compensatory damages. The verdict marks a setback for Tesla and CEO Elon Musk, who has touted self-driving technology as critical to the company's future. Shares of Tesla dipped following the news and were nearly 2% lower when US markets closed. Following the verdict, plaintiffs attorneys said Mr Musk had misrepresented the capabilities of the company's Autopilot driver assistance software. 'Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans', said attorney Brett Schreiber in a statement to the BBC. Mr Schreiber said Tesla and Mr Musk had long propped up the company's valuation with 'self-driving hype at the expense of human lives.' 'Tesla's lies turned our roads into test tracks for their fundamentally flawed technology,' he added. The company was sued by the family of Naibel Benavides Leon, 22, who was killed when she was struck by the Model S at a T-intersection in the Florida Keys in 2019. Her boyfriend Dillon Angulo suffered life-long injuries and was also involved in the suit. The court heard the driver, Mr McGee, lost sight of the road when he dropped his phone as he was approaching the intersection, causing his car to continue through it and crash into an SUV parked on the other side. The two victims were standing nearby. Neither Mr McGee, nor the Autopilot software, hit the brakes in time to prevent the crash. After a three-week trial, the jury awarded $329m in total damages, including $129m in compensatory damages and $200m in punitive damages aimed at deterring Tesla from harmful behaviour in the future. Tesla will be responsible for paying one-third of compensatory damages – $42.5m – and the entirety of the $200m in punitive damages, but according to the company, punitive damages are likely to be capped at a lesser amount. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology', Tesla said in a statement. Tesla said evidence at the trial showed the driver was solely at fault because he was speeding with his foot on the accelerator, which overrode Autopilot, while looking for his phone and not at the road. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash,' Tesla said. 'This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' While there have been other federal lawsuits involving Autopilot during fatal crashes, the Florida case that culminated on Friday was the first federal one to go to a jury. Last year, Tesla settled a lawsuit over a 2018 crash that killed an Apple engineer after his Model X collided with a highway barrier while operating the company's Autopilot software. In 2023, a California state jury found Tesla was not at fault in a case in which it was alleged that Autopilot had led to a death. At trial, Mr McGee said his concept of Tesla's Autopilot was that 'it would assist me should I have a failure' or 'make a mistake,' and that he felt the software had failed him. Mr McGee has settled a separate lawsuit with the plaintiffs for an undisclosed sum. Tesla has long faced scrutiny over its Autopilot and self-driving technology, and critics hailed the jury's decision. 'Tesla is finally being held accountable for its defective designs and grossly negligent engineering practices,' said Missy Cummings, a robotics professor at George Mason University. The verdict comes as Tesla is battling weakening sales stemming in part from Mr Musk's political activities. Source: BBC News Image Credit: Tesla
Zawya
20 hours ago
- Zawya
Autopilot verdict deals Tesla a 'black eye', threatens Musk's robotaxi ambitions
SAN FRANCISCO - A court verdict against Tesla last week, stemming from a fatal 2019 crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, could hurt its plans to expand its nascent robotaxi network and intensify concerns over the safety of its autonomous vehicle technology. A Florida jury ordered Musk's electric vehicle company on Friday to pay about $243 million to victims of the crash, finding its Autopilot driver-assistance software defective. Tesla said the driver was solely at fault and vowed to appeal. The verdict follows years of federal investigations and recalls related to collisions involving Tesla's autonomous-vehicle technology, and comes as CEO Elon Musk seeks regulatory approval to rapidly expand the robotaxi service across the U.S. "The public perception of this verdict or things like this are going to fuel pressure on regulators to say, 'We just can't let this stuff be launched without a lot more due diligence'," said Mike Nelson, founder of Nelson Law and an expert on legal issues in the mobility sector. Tesla could have a tough time convincing state regulators that its technology is road-ready, threatening Musk's goal of offering robotaxis to half the U.S. population by year end, legal experts and Tesla investors said. Expanding its robotaxi service is crucial for Tesla as demand for its aging lineup of EVs has cooled amid rising global competition and a backlash against Musk's far right political views. Much of Tesla's trillion-dollar market valuation hinges on his bets on robotics and artificial intelligence. Success in the self-driving realm will require winning the confidence of regulators and potential customers on the full-self driving (FSD) software that underpins Tesla's robotaxis, analysts said. "The timing (of the verdict) for Tesla in light of the FSD rollouts and robotaxis is awful," said Aaron Davis, co-managing partner at law firm Davis Goldman. "Now there's essentially an opinion that some aspect of Tesla's business is not safe and maybe the safety that the company advertises isn't what it's cracked up to be." The FSD is an advanced version of Autopilot. Autopilot, which was been updated since 2019, controls speed, distance and lane centering on highways, while the FSD can operate on city streets, helping the vehicle make automatic turns and change lanes. "This case does not have direct implications for Tesla's FSD roll-out," analysts at Piper Sandler said in a note on Sunday, citing the modern iterations of the software. A spokesperson on behalf of Tesla acknowledged the company had received a request for comment from Reuters but had not provided one by the time of publication. REGULATORY ROAD AHEAD Perfecting autonomous vehicles has been harder than expected. The high costs of hardware, years of trial and error, and regulatory hurdles have forced many players to close shop or pivot, including General Motors' Cruise unit. Musk, however, has pursued what he calls a simpler and cheaper path, relying only on cameras and AI instead of pricey sensors such as lidars and radars used by Alphabet's Waymo, Amazon's Zoox and others. After years of missed deadlines, Musk rolled out a small robotaxi trial in June with about a dozen Model Y crossover SUVs in Austin, Texas, each overseen by a human safety monitor in the front passenger seat. While Musk has said Tesla was being "super paranoid about safety", he has also pledged to expand the service fast and make it available for half of the U.S. population in the next five months - a stark contrast to Waymo's cautious years-long rollout. Until Tesla's entry, Waymo was the only U.S. firm to operate a paid, driverless robotaxi service. Tesla is currently awaiting approvals in several states, including California, Nevada, Arizona and Florida. California's department of motor vehicles declined to comment on the impact of the verdict on regulatory approval. Nevada said it held talks with Tesla about a robotaxi program several weeks ago, while Arizona said it was still considering Tesla's request for certification. Both did not comment on the verdict. Florida did not respond. Tesla has typically either won other Autopilot litigation or resolved the case with the plaintiffs out of court. The Florida verdict stands out. Several such cases are pending. The case involved a Model S sedan that went through an intersection and hit the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it. The driver had reached down to retrieve a dropped cellphone and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign before the crash. The jury found that Tesla's Autopilot had a defect and held the company partially responsible, despite the driver admitting fault. "It's going to take time to get regulators to move forward and time being more than the end of the year," said Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, a Tesla investor. "From an image standpoint, it's a black eye."
