Life insurance ownership at an all-time high of 78% - Axis Max Life India Protection Quotient 7.0
Axis Max Life is launching the India Protection Quotient 7.0 under the unified narrative of 'Bharosa Talks' that will spotlight India's evolving financial and protection mindset. Through this platform, Axis Max Life aims to amplify real voices across demographics—urban, rural, salaried, gig workers, and retirees—offering authentic insights into how India views protection, planning, and long-term security. As financial anxieties shift over time and aspirations evolve, Bharosa Talks will serve as a critical pulse for industry, regulators, and policymakers to understand emerging consumer priorities.
As per IPQ 7.0, urban India's Protection Quotient has climbed to 48, up from 35 in 2019, marking continued progress in the country's financial preparedness. Life insurance ownership has reached an all-time high, with 78% of urban Indians owning one or more products, while the Knowledge Index has improved to 63 up by two points, indicating increased awareness and understanding of life insurance.
In a post-pandemic recovery milestone, urban India's financial security has hit 68%, surpassing the pre-pandemic peak of 66% (IPQ 1.0), and rebounding strongly from a pandemic low of 57%. For the first time in seven editions, 'Cover' has overtaken 'Premium' as the key consideration in term life insurance purchase, with 3 in 4 urban respondents prioritizing coverage over cost.
In IPQ 7.0, Metros have seen a 3-point jump in the Protection Index on the back of increased ownership of life insurance (from 83% in IPQ 6.0 to 86% in IPQ 7.0) and improved sense of financial security (from 69% in IPQ 6.0 to 71% in IPQ 7.0). Tier-1 cities have also seen a significant improvement across parameters like Knowledge Index (from 58 in IPQ 6.0 to 62 in IPQ 7.0), Life Insurance Ownership (up from 73% in IPQ 6.0 to 77% in IPQ 7.0), and Security Levels (from 63% in IPQ 6.0 to 67% in IPQ 7.0).
Prashant Tripathy, CEO and Managing Director, Axis Max Life Insurance said, 'India Protection Quotient, as part of 'Bharosa Talks' has evolved into a powerful barometer of India's financial resilience, acting as a catalyst for driving India's protection narrative forward. This year's record Protection Quotient, alongside all-time high life insurance ownership, reflects a decisive shift in consumer priorities — from cost sensitivity to genuine protection needs. Yet, the widening gender gap in financial security calls for deeper, more inclusive interventions. At Axis Max Life, we remain committed to strengthening this momentum, driving awareness, and building a more comprehensively protected India.'
NOTES TO THE EDITOR:
The following findings reveal insights that highlight urban India's shift in attitude and approach towards financial preparedness studied by India Protection Quotient 7.0:
1. FINANCIAL PREPAREDNESS OF URBAN INDIANS
Urban India's Protection Quotient Climbs to 48; Life Insurance Ownership Peaks at 78%
Urban India continues its upward journey in financial preparedness, with the Protection Quotient rising from 35 in IPQ 1.0 to 48 in IPQ 7.0. Life insurance ownership has reached a new high of 78%, reflecting growing adoption and trust in life insurance products. The Knowledge Index has also shown sustained progress, climbing from 39 in IPQ 1.0 to 63 in the latest edition—indicating deeper awareness and understanding among consumers. In a significant post-pandemic recovery milestone, Security Levels have now surpassed pre-COVID figures, reaching 68%, a notable improvement from the dip to 57% during the pandemic. These trends reflect not just recovery, but a renewed focus on long-term financial protection across urban India.
Significant Increase in Financial Protection across town-classes; South Zone Remains Most Financially Prepared
South India retains its seven-year lead, driven by increased term insurance (33% to 37%) and savings product ownership (42% to 46%). West India has significantly closed the gap, achieving the highest term plan ownership ever recorded in IPQ history (41%). The North also improved its Protection Quotient through better term plan uptake (28% to 31%). The East, however, remains behind with stagnant ownership despite growing awareness (53% to 57%). Encouragingly, a significant increase in life insurance ownership has been seen across town-classes including Metros, Tier 1, and Tier 2 cities, with Tier 2 cities showing notable progress (62% to 66% in life insurance ownership), marking a steady rise in penetration beyond urban cores.
Children's Future Drives Financial Planning
Saving for a child's education (61%) and marriage expenses (44%) continues to top urban India's list of financial priorities. These long-term goals have seen a noticeable rise compared to IPQ 6.0, underlining a growing commitment to family-oriented financial planning. Retirement planning (37%) and buying a house (36%) follow as the next big objectives. This shift signals a sharper focus on long-term stability over short-term or discretionary spending.
2. URBAN OUTLOOK TOWARDS TERM INSURANCE
Term Insurance Awareness Rises to 74%, But 1 in 4 cite cost concerns
Despite a notable rise in awareness and ownership of term insurance, from 70% to 74% and 31% to 34% respectively, high premiums continue to deter many from adoption. For nearly 1 in 4 individuals, term insurance affordability remains a significant hurdle, with an increase in those citing lack of funds as a barrier (21% to 25%). While saving and ULIP products also witnessed a modest uptick in awareness and ownership, the data suggests that improving accessibility and addressing financial constraints is key to driving wider term plan adoption.
Online Purchase Channels Gain Ground on the Back of Affordability and Ease
Online platforms are steadily emerging as a preferred mode for term insurance purchase, with adoption rising from 18% in IPQ 6.0 to 22% in IPQ 7.0. The digital channel's appeal lies in its cost-effectiveness, access to comprehensive policy information, and quicker, more convenient transactions. With ease of comparison and seamless access to support, online purchase is fast becoming a go-to option for today's digitally savvy insurance buyers.
3 in 4 prioritize cover over cost, with 56% confident in their protection
For the first time in seven editions, cover has surpassed premium as the primary consideration for term life insurance purchase, with 3 out of 4 individuals now prioritizing cover over cost. Additionally, 56% of respondents believe their current term plan offers adequate protection for their family's future.
3. DEMOGRAPHIC INSIGHTS
MEN & WOMEN: Working Men's IPQ Rises Sharply, While Working Women Show Modest Growth Amid Higher Financial Anxieties
This year marks a divergence in protection levels among working men and women. While men saw their Protection Quotient rise to 50 (from 47), working women's Protection Quotient remained at 48. Women reported lower financial security for key life milestones such as retirement, children's education, and marriage. Their heightened concerns about inflation, medical expenses, and the loss of a breadwinner emphasize the need for more gender-sensitive financial strategies.
GEN-Z & NON MILLENIALS: Gen-Z leads with strong mid-term financial planning; 2 in 3 own life insurance
Gen-Z has emerged as a standout cohort, boasting a Protection Quotient of 41, with two-thirds owning life insurance products. They surpass non-millennials in purposeful planning, showing strong intent toward mid-term goals such as buying a house, a car, or planning vacations. Their disciplined saving behavior and willingness to invest reflect a growing sense of financial independence and a modern approach to balancing lifestyle and security.
SALARIED VS SELF-EMPLOYED: Salaried Class Leads in Protection Quotient; Self-Employed Show Security Gains but Lag in Insurance Ownership
Salaried individuals continue to lead with a Protection Quotient of 52, driven by gains across knowledge, ownership, and security. Term insurance ownership for the Self-Employed rose by 2 points, bolstered by improved financial confidence and adoption of market-linked products. However, savings capabilities dipped, with a 3-point drop in the ability to save from household budgets, highlighting ongoing financial stress in this segment.
Read more at - https://www.axismaxlife.com/maxlife-ipq
About India Protection Quotient
Instituted in 2019, India Protection Quotient is an annual Survey by Axis Max Life Insurance in association with Kantar aimed to understand the pulse of the Indian consumers in the financial protection space. Launched with the underlying objective to increase penetration of Term insurance as the most fundamental and economical form of life insurance, the survey aims to reveal the state of Urban Indians with regards to current financial security levels, changing savings & investment patterns, key anxieties & triggers of financial protection in a contemporary world. India Protection Quotient is a proprietary tool developed by Axis Max Life in partnership with Kantar to gauges the degree to which Indians feel protected from future uncertainties on a scale of 0 to 100. It is based on the attitudes, mental preparedness around future uncertainties, awareness, and ownership of life insurance product categories (Term, endowment and ULIP).
Disclaimer:
The study is conducted in top 25 Urban metro, Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities; hence, its findings are representative of metro, Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities of Urban India only.
The information collected through this survey and the results published are intended for general guidance and informational purposes only. Axis Max Life disclaims any liability for any loss, damage, or decisions arising from the use of this survey or the results provided.
About Axis Max Life Insurance
Axis Max Life Insurance Limited, formerly known as Max Life Insurance Company Ltd., is a Joint Venture between Max Financial Services Limited ('MFSL') and Axis Bank Limited. Axis Max Life Insurance offers comprehensive protection and long-term savings life insurance solutions through its multi-channel distribution, including agency and third-party distribution partners. It has built its operations over two decades through a need-based sales process, a customer-centric approach to engagement and service delivery and trained human capital. As per the annual audited financials for FY2023-24, Axis Max Life Insurance has achieved a gross written premium of INR 29,529 Cr.
About Kantar
Kantar is the world's leading marketing data and analytics business and an indispensable brand partner to the world's top companies. We combine the most meaningful attitudinal and behavioural data with deep expertise and advanced analytics to uncover how people think and act. We help clients understand what has happened and why and how to shape the marketing strategies that shape their future.
Note to the Reader: This article is part of Hindustan Times' paid consumer connect initiative and is independently created by the brand. Hindustan Times assumes no editorial responsibility for the content, including its accuracy, completeness, or any errors or omissions. Readers are advised to verify all information independently.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
26 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US trade team postpones India visit for BTA talks
Synopsis The upcoming round of India-US trade agreement talks has been postponed amidst escalating trade tensions. The US has imposed tariffs on Indian goods, including a penalty for trade with Russia. India is hesitant to grant greater market access in agriculture, while states express concerns about the potential impact on their farmers and economies. Agencies New Delhi: The visit of American trade negotiators to New Delhi for the sixth round of the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) later this month, is postponed, officials visit was scheduled for August 25-29. 'No new date is decided yet,' said an two sides aim to conclude the first tranche of the BTA by fall this year. The rescheduling of the visit assumes significance as the US has announced a steep 50% tariff on Indian goods. While the 25% tariff on Indian goods entering the US came into effect August 7, the additional 25%, announced as penalty for buying crude oil and military equipment from Russia, will come into effect August 27. The US has pressurred India for greater market access in politically sensitive areas such as farm and dairy, which India has opposed to protect the interests of its farmers. The US remains India's largest trading partner and the commerce and industry ministry is in touch with exporters and export promotion councils to assess the impact of the 25% tariff already in effect. Several inter ministerial committees have also been set up to understand the sectoral impact of the tariffs ad states governments are also looking at how they can facilitate exports to the US were $33.53 billion in April-July FY26, which is 17.8% higher than $27.57 billion in April-July BTA negotiations were launched in March 2025 and five rounds of talks have happened till month, Kerala government had flagged its 'grave concern' over the India-US BTA negotiations citing risks to crops such as coconut, rubber, pepper, cardamom, tea and coffee. It said that any pact impacting agriculture necessitates consultations with state governments to avoid severe socioeconomic and ecological consequences and urged them to 'refrain from signing the agreement'.
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Political Line newsletter: Cow Economy, and Diplomacy
Culture influences market and diplomacy. But how much is too much on this count? A slice of the stalemate in trade talks between India and the U.S. is related to the U.S. demand for opening up India's farm sector. The U.S. wants to export more of its dairy and poultry products to India. India resists this demand. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said he would make personal sacrifices, if required, to ensure that farmers are protected. The proportion of population dependent on agriculture reveals one of the most striking differences between India and the United States, highlighting their vastly different economic structures and development stages. India has nearly half of its workforce engaged in agriculture, while the United States has only less than two percent directly employed in farming — representing a 32-fold difference in agricultural employment dependency. In India's case, agriculture contributes roughly 18 percent of GDP but nearly half of the population is dependent on it. Farmers are a powerful political constituency in both India and the United States. Food is also a question of national security. Post-Covid fears related to self-sufficiency in critical areas have further strengthened the case for national food markets insulated from global disruptions. India's resistance to allowing American farm produce in its market rests on three reasons. The first, as mentioned above, is that too many people are dependent on agriculture, and opening up the sector to American products could render them vulnerable. The second is national security. The third concerns apparently cultural reasons — American cows may be fed meat products such as chicken waste, and this is unacceptable to India. Milk and other products from a cow whose food chain is not clearly plant-based do not meet Indian standards. Whether such determination is consistently applied across all milk produced within India is beside the point. Cultural reasons are relevant to market decisions in all societies. For instance, some Muslim countries or shops may not sell pork; among the GCC countries, pork is available in the UAE and Bahrain, while in others it is not. In large parts of India now, beef is legally banned; in many parts, such as southern India, West Bengal, and the northeastern states, it is widely consumed by all social groups including Hindus. Cultural barriers to global trade are not new in India. Crossing the seas was once taboo — Gandhi had to do penance to be readmitted to his Modh Vaniya caste, which had ostracised him for doing so. Of the three issues at play in trade in agriculture, perhaps the easiest to change is the competency of the sector. But the cultural politics around the cow and the requirements of the agriculture sector often come into conflict. At least 20 out of 28 states have some form of laws to protect cows, which effectively translates into restrictions on the trade and transportation of cattle, including buffaloes. In the last decade or so, many states have enforced these laws aggressively, and vigilantes targeting even legal cattle trade often go scot-free. Simultaneously, a whole network of rent-seeking has emerged in the guise of cow protection, as the state spends massive amounts to shelter unproductive cows that farmers do not want to keep. It is not the case that meat production has ended; India's export of buffalo meat has been growing in the last three years at around four percent annually. What has happened is that cattle and leather trade have been pushed into a grey zone of legality, inflicting costs and losses for all involved and creating new rent-seeking opportunities. You can read about a sample of such restrictions here. Farmers are paying a huge price for this — on the one hand, the difficulty in disposing unproductive cattle, and on the other, the problem of free-roaming cattle destroying their crops. Cow protection in India was linked historically to farming practices of an earlier era. Those factors have changed due to technology and other developments. Yet, productivity in India's agriculture sector remains entangled in the religious association many people have with cows. The cow has long functioned as a symbol in Hindu-Muslim rivalry in the subcontinent. Hindu leaders such as Dayananda Saraswati made cow protection a tool for popular consolidation antagonistic to Muslims in the 19th century. Some Muslim leaders, such as Pir Abu Bakr in Bengal in the early 20th century, argued that cow sacrifice was an essential practice of Islam. Whether cow sacrifice is indeed an essential practice of Islam has been the subject of several litigations in independent India as well. While India grapples with global uncertainties created by political and technological upheavals, it might also make sense to review its priorities at home. The Fear of the Future People Prime Minister Narendra Modi has now raised the spectre of a demographic threat to India in his Independence Day speech. He said there was a conspiracy to change the demographic profile of India. You can read The Hindu editorial on this speech here. Does demographic composition determine the character of a nation? Leaving that question for a future discussion, here are some quick adjacent thoughts. Variations in population growth across communities and geographies pose challenges for governance and national identity. It is one thing to say that everyone is an individual citizen regardless of social location, faith, or ethnicity. But India's governance structure acknowledges the principle of group identities while providing special protections for religious and linguistic minorities, Dalits, backward classes, tribes, etc. Collective identities are not anathema to India's constitutional scheme; in fact, they are central to it. Political contestations have historically been framed in India around the numerical strength of communities. That history warrants discussion separately, but to cite a well known example, the 15% and 7.5% reservations for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities, respectively, were based on their proportion in the population. As the proportion of their population changes, so will their representation. This will be among the issues in the next delimitation of parliamentary constituencies in India. Currently, there are two distinct divergences in population growth in India. First, the north-central regions have higher birth rates than peninsular and western India. Second, Muslims have a higher birth rate than Hindus. Among Hindus, upper castes have lower birth rates compared to other groups. While the BJP and its supporters try to highlight the Hindu-Muslim divergence in population growth, many others, particularly parties in the South, are more worried about the regional divergence in population growth. It is this regional divergence that makes the next delimitation an unsettling prospect for many regions. Population management has to be a secular task, and all communities should participate in it. While the BJP constantly talks up an Islamic demographic threat, there are Muslim actors who acknowledge and even amplify it. Last year, a Muslim Minister in West Bengal said Muslim population was growing fast and would soon become a majority. The ruling Trinamool Congress distanced itself from the statement. Federalism Tract: Notes on Diversity This article by Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. K. Stalin discusses how India is home to many nationalities and emphasizes the importance of linguistic diversity as a defining feature of India. It argues that in a true federal system, states should not have to protest, litigate, or plead for their rightful share of revenues. Governors are taking their role as chancellors of State universities too seriously, which is roiling the higher education sector. Read our editorial on the ongoing conflicts between Governors and State governments over university governance here. The drive against unauthorised immigrants from Bangladesh is creating rifts within India, as any Bengali-speaking individual can end up as a target of police action.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Dixon Tech, China's HKC form ₹370 cr JV for display module manufacturing
Domestic electronics contract manufacturer Dixon Technologies has formed a Rs 370 crore joint venture for display modules manufacturing with Chinese company HKC Overseas. The Dixon Technologies-HKC Overseas joint venture is for manufacturing and selling of LCD and TFT-LCD modules that are used in electronic devices like TV, mobile phones etc for display, a regulatory filing said on Saturday. "Dixon Technologies (India) Ltd has entered into a Term Sheet with HKC Corporation Ltd to form a joint venture for manufacturing of Liquid Crystal Modules, thin film transistor liquid crystal display modules, assembly of end products such as smartphones, TVs, monitors and auto displays and selling HKC branded end products in India," the filing said. HKC Overseas Ltd will acquire 26 per cent stake in Dixon Display Technologies Pvt Ltd (DDTPL) for USD 10.998 million, about Rs 95.5 crore and Dixon will acquire 74 per cent stake in the JV for USD 31.3 million, about Rs 274 crore in two tranches. "The company, HKC and DDTPL have executed the SSHA (share subscription and shareholders' agreement) on August 16, 2025," the filing said. Dixon has been on a spree of forming joint ventures with Chinese technology companies. Last month, the company had announced a JV with Chinese electronic component firms -- Chongqing Yuhai Precision Manufacturing Co Ltd and the Indian arm of Kunshan Q Technology -- for manufacturing and sales of electronic components used in electronic devices like mobile phones and laptops, among others. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
