Family First Center of Lake County licensed as behavioral clinic; ‘We … address all of their needs — mentally, spiritually and emotionally'
Rachael Chenier, Family First's executive director, said the new designation enables the organization to bill Medicaid and private insurance companies for what it provides to community members for services like counseling, wellness, substance abuse, holistic help and more.
'We take a holistic approach to enable people to be mentally and emotionally stable,' Chenier said. 'We take a thorough approach and address all of their needs — mentally, spiritually and emotionally.'
The Family First Center in Waukegan officially became a Certified Behavioral Clinic on May 1 in its effort to help community members and their families put their lives on a firm footing after experiencing setbacks.
Among the services available through Family First are counseling, group counseling and case management, as well as holistic health services like yoga, meditation and participation in a wellness circle.
With an ultimate goal of a strong family, Family First strives, 'to nurture, educate and provide opportunities within the community by placing emphasis on rebuilding the family, repairing division and developing strategies to empower change to create a strong family support system,' according to its mission statement.
Many Hernandez, Family First's director of operations, said the services are multidimensional, helping people care for their body, spirit and emotions. When more is necessary, it is added to the mix offered.
'We address all their needs,' Hernandez said. 'This is the holistic approach — to be mentally, emotionally and financially stable so the whole family is intact.'
In the past, Chenier said Family First financed its operations with grants, donations and events. None of those activities will stop, but the addition of funding from Medicaid and private insurance companies will go a long way toward helping more people.
Becoming a certified behavioral clinic is important for many of the people who live in Waukegan, North Chicago, Zion and other parts of northeast Lake County. Too often, people wait until the situation becomes too acute.
'The African American and Latino population in this area uses the emergency room at the hospital as their primary care location,' Chenier said. 'All of our services are bilingual. We want to increase the awareness of our services so people know to come to us.'
Should a community member need individual counseling, Family First Center founder Evelyn Chenier, Rachel's mother and the director of mental health services, gets involved. Evelyn Chenier is a PhD psychologist and licensed counselor.
Should an individual need medication to treat a mental health condition, Everly Chenier said the person is referred to Lake Behavioral Hospital or the Lake County Health Department. She also does play therapy with children.
'It helps with defining issues,' Evelyn Chenier said. 'When you see them play, it can help (to understand) anxiety or anger issues.'
Taking a holistic approach, Rachael Chenier said there are times people need help where part of the remedy is available elsewhere. A township — Waukegan, Zion, Benton, Avon or Warren — can help with emergency financial situations like rent or utilities. PADS Lake County helps with homelessness.
Unlike many behavioral clinics, Family First officials do not just wait for people to come to them. Hernandez said Family First goes into the community to let people know about what is available and how the organization can help.
'We meet people where they are,' Hernandez said. 'We go all around the county. We let people know all our services are in one location. We take our services out into the community. We call it unity in the community.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans respond to data showing 10M will soon lose Medicaid coverage
(The Center Square) – Democrats are sounding the alarm over a new analysis showing that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will cause millions of Medicaid recipients to lose their current coverage. According to the Congressional Budget Office's newest estimate, Medicaid reforms in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will result in roughly 10 million people losing eligibility for their current health care plan by 2034. 'This latest analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office confirms that the deeply unpopular One Big Ugly Law is also deeply unfair,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said in a response statement. 'The American people deserve better than this cruel Republican budget scam.' Republicans, however, have pointed out that the breakdown of the numbers offers a different perspective. Out of the 10 million affected, 5.3 million are able-bodied adults without dependents. Under the OBBBA, they could still remain on Medicaid, so long as they participate in work-related activities at least 80 hours per month. The work requirements would not apply to pregnant women; minors and seniors; foster youth under 26; Tribal members; the medically frail; those already meeting TANF or SNAP work requirements; caregivers with young dependents; or the currently and recently incarcerated. Another 3.7 million current Medicaid recipients set to lose coverage will still have access to some other form of government-sponsored health insurance. These individuals are primarily dual enrollees in Medicare and Medicaid, or those who are erroneously enrolled in Medicaid in more than one state. The former group would lose Medicaid but could retain Medicare, while the latter would be eligible to claim their Medicaid coverage only in their actual state of residence. The remaining 1 million impacted individuals are noncitizens who do not meet immigration status requirements for Medicaid enrollment. Those noncitizens have nonetheless received coverage under taxpayer-funded, state-sponsored Medicaid programs. 'The prolonged lie exacerbated by Democrats that 17 million individuals will lose health care coverage from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act has finally been dispelled,' House Committee on Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., said Monday. 'It's easy to scare people with coverage loss estimates, but the facts are clear – the vast majority of these individuals are either choosing to lose coverage or aren't actually eligible for Medicaid, and nearly all are eligible for other forms [of] coverage.' Overall federal spending on Medicaid will still grow by 30% over the next decade, provided that Republicans refrain from further enrollee-reducing changes in another 'big, beautiful bill,' which GOP leaders are considering. Solve the daily Crossword
Indianapolis Star
17 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Texas AG sues Eli Lilly for allegedly bribing medical providers to prescribe Lilly drugs
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing Eli Lilly, alleging the Indianapolis pharmaceutical company offered kickbacks to medical providers in exchange for prescribing more than a dozen of the company's drugs, including blockbuster GLP-1 weight loss drugs Mounjaro and Zepbound. Eli Lilly offered illegal incentives to Texas medical providers, including a "free nurse" program and reimbursement support services, to steer providers to provide the company's drugs, Paxton alleges in a lawsuit filed August 11 in a Texas district court. Lilly, one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies, denied the allegations in an August 12 statement to IndyStar. The Lilly programs mentioned in the suit offered free trainings for nurses and medical providers, which helped Lilly market their drugs when they launched, the suit says. According to Paxton's office, many Texas residents prescribed these drugs were on state Medicaid, so these actions violated the Texas Health Care Program Fraud Prevention Act. 'Big Pharma compromised medical decision-making by engaging in an illegal kickback scheme,' Paxton said in a news release. 'Eli Lilly fraudulently sought to maximize profits at taxpayer expense and put corporate greed over people's health. I will not stand by while corporations unlawfully manipulate our healthcare system to line their own pockets.' A spokesperson for Eli Lilly said the company denies the allegations and plans to defend against them in court. It's not the first time Paxton has taken a stab at Lilly in the courts. In October, Paxton sued insulin manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers, including Lilly, Express Scripts and CVS, for allegedly concocting a conspiracy to increase insulin prices. Health Choice Alliance LLC, a New Jersey based company, joined Texas as a plaintiff. Health Choice has sued Lilly in the past, alleging the company engages in kickbacks. 'Multiple courts and the federal government have rejected claims by this same corporate relator against Lilly as meritless," a Lilly spokesperson said in a statement. "In fact, the United States government determined that 'the relators' allegations lack sufficient factual and legal support' in a prior case, explaining that 'federal healthcare programs have a strong interest in ensuring that, after a physician has appropriately prescribed a medication, patients have access to basic product support relating to their medication.' We intend to vigorously defend against these allegations.' At the heart of the Texas lawsuit is a class of drugs named GLP-1s prescribed for diabetes and weight loss. Named for the gut hormone receptor the drug targets, injectable GLP-1s have exploded in popularity since Zepbound hit the market in late 2023. Weight loss drugs: Eli Lilly closer to breakthrough weight loss drug; shares tumble as some question results The kickback lawsuit against Lilly is one way Paxton is protecting Texas patients "from corporate schemes that undermine the integrity of the healthcare system," according to his office.
Health Line
18 hours ago
- Health Line
6 Ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Could Limit Healthcare Access
The tax and spending bill approved by Congress last month will cut $1 trillion from health-related programs over the next decade. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' will hit Medicaid hardest with $790 million chopped from its budget. Experts say these reductions will greatly impact health programs across the country, particularly those serving rural communities, children, and lower-income households. The so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed by President Donald Trump in early July, will impact virtually every health-related program in the United States. The bill, officially known as House Resolution 1, is expected to reduce federal spending on health-related programs by $1 trillion between now and 2034. It's estimated that those cuts will cause at least 10 million people to lose health insurance coverage during the next nine years. It calls for a reduction in funding for food assistance programs and rural hospitals, as well as reduced funding for Planned Parenthood services, which have been temporarily blocked by a federal judge. Some of these impacts will take years to be felt. Other provisions, however, could directly affect people's lives in the next year or two. 'It is the biggest cut to our social safety net in history,' Liz Fowler, PhD, a distinguished scholar in Health Policy and Management at the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University in Maryland, said in a news release from the college. Here's a look at six key areas affected by spending reductions outlined in President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Medicaid bears the brunt of the cuts Federal funding for Medicaid is expected to be reduced by more than $790 billion over the next decade. More than 70 million people currently receive Medicaid benefits, but various factors could significantly reduce this estimate. Work requirements will mandate that most 'able-bodied' recipients between the ages of 19 and 64 will be required to work, receive work training, volunteer, or be in school for at least 80 hours per month while receiving benefits. The new work requirements take effect on January 1, 2027. As many as 5 million people could lose health insurance due to this requirement, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF). More frequent eligibility checks will require states to verify beneficiaries' eligibility for Medicaid more often, causing some recipients to be removed from the program. Immigration restrictions will reduce the number of foreign-born residents receiving benefits. The cuts may also affect hospitals, as Medicaid is responsible for 20% of revenue at these medical facilities nationwide. Experts also point out that people who are no longer on Medicaid will not seek preventive care and end up in hospital emergency rooms due to more serious medical issues. 'Cutting Medicaid means millions lose access to basic care, leading to sicker patients, overwhelmed ERs, and rising costs for everyone,' said Kanwar Kelley, MD, a specialist in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery, obesity medicine, and lifestyle medicine as well as the co-founder and chief executive officer of Side Health. 'Lack of access to preventive care leads to a sicker population, which leads to more medical expenses,' Kelley told Healthline. Impacts to Medicare Medicare is a federal program founded in 1965 that provides health insurance coverage to people 65 years and older. About 66 million Americans are enrolled. Trump's bill does not directly mention Medicare cuts, but there are measures that could impact recipients. Under a 2010 budget mechanism law known as PAYGO, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the Trump bill could trigger more than $500 billion in Medicare cuts between 2026 and 2034, KFF reports. The Center for Medicare Advocacy notes the bill will also reduce the number of people eligible for Medicare. They say some non-citizens who meet Medicare eligibility requirements through work history or residency length will no longer be covered. In addition, the bill imposes a nine-year ban on implementing improvements to Medicare Savings Programs that help lower-income Medicare beneficiaries pay for premiums and out-of-pocket costs. Older adults who are enrolled in both Medicaid and Medicare could hit with a double impact. 'The [bill] will affect this [older] age range by reducing access to care,' Kelley said. 'Creating restrictions based on work requirements and new regulations for exemptions will exclude many in this age group from qualifying. Those in this age range will have a harder time re-entering the workforce to continue their coverage.' Fewer people enrolled in Obamacare The bill will make it more difficult for people to join or remain in programs offered by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. This difficulty will be due to several changes. They include: Requiring enrollees to update their information regularly. This may include updating income, immigration status, and other details each year. Requiring individuals to manually reenroll every year during open enrollment. Last year, 10 million people were automatically reenrolled. Shortening the open enrollment period by a month. That period will now end on December 15 rather than January 15. For the current plan year, 40% of people signed up after December 15. Some immigrants will also no longer be eligible for ACA coverage. In addition, financial assistance that helps people afford insurance in ACA marketplaces will be allowed to expire at the end of this year. The Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University predicts these changes will cause ACA premiums to rise by 75% next year. Kelley agrees that premiums will likely go up, causing a cascade of events. 'Removing or cutting these subsidies will lead to more expensive plans offered on the marketplace. By raising these prices, many will choose to live without health insurance and risk catastrophic medical debt,' he said. 'Making access to healthcare harder for individuals creates gaps in care for patients, which is crucial in screening for life-altering illnesses.' Strains on rural hospitals The bill does provide rural hospitals with $50 billion over the next five years to help reduce the effects from the cuts in Medicaid spending. However, the Center for American Progress reports that funding will not be nearly enough to make up the difference. The organization states that slightly more than 2,000 rural hospitals receive $12 billion per year in net revenue from Medicaid. At some rural hospitals, Medicaid represents 40–50% of their revenue. The organization added that children, non-elderly adults, and people with disabilities would be the people in rural areas most affected. Kelley agreed that the effects could be far-reaching. 'This loss of funding will hit rural hospitals hard, leading to closures and increasing healthcare disparities in marginalized neighborhoods,' he said. The Center for American Progress also notes that rural hospitals have low operating margins. They project that more than 300 rural hospitals could be at risk of closure. 'Rural communities already face challenges with adequate staffing and medically necessary equipment as they usually operate on tight margins with the subsidies,' Kelley said. 'Reducing the number of providers will lead to closures, which forces those in the community to travel farther for their regular and emergency care.' Fewer families will receive food assistance The bill would cut $120 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) over the next decade, according to estimates. About 40 million people currently receive assistance from the SNAP program. The League of Women Voters projects the cuts could impact 22 million families. Kelley said the impact is beyond just food. 'Food insecurity leads to bad health outcomes,' he said. 'Cutting programs directed at addressing hunger will lead to increased rates of obesity, diabetes, and poor nutrition in kids.' 'Hunger in children leads to poor educational outcomes. Cutting SNAP and other food programs will lead to children going to school hungry, seniors skipping meals, and families making decisions between food and other necessities, including health,' Kelley added. Cuts to Planned Parenthood The bill impacts Planned Parenthood operations by banning people from using Medicaid at healthcare non-profit facilities that provide abortion services outside of cases of rape, incest, or when the pregnant person's life is in danger. Planned Parenthood estimates that the new law could close nearly 200 of its facilities. About 60% of those centers are in medically underserved communities. In addition, the organization states that more than 1 million people could lose access to afford healthcare services such as STI testing and birth control. Miller Morris, MA, MPH, is a women's health researcher and founder of Comma, a service focusing on menstrual health. She notes that a court injunction has temporarily blocked the bill's ban on Medicaid use at reproductive health clinics like Planned Parenthood. However, she said if the provisions are eventually upheld, they could have far-ranging effects. 'If the court's injunction were to be lifted, the defunding of Planned Parenthood would mean fewer resources for all the preventative and primary care services they offer, leading to reduced access for millions of women, especially those in low-income and rural communities,' Morris told Healthline. 'This reduction in Medicaid funding will see catastrophic consequences for the millions of women who rely on Planned Parenthood and similar low-cost organizations for vital, life saving care,' she added.
