UN's Albanese hails 30-nation meeting aimed at ending Israeli occupation of Palestine
Francesca Albanese will say the two-day gathering in Bogotá, Colombia, starting on Tuesday and including China, Spain and Qatar, comes at 'an existential hour' for Israel and the Palestinian people.
The aim of the conference is to set out steps the participating countries can take to implement a UN general assembly motion mandating member states to take measures in support of Israel ending its unlawful occupation of Palestine.
The motion set a deadline of September 2025 to implement a July 2024 international court of justice advisory opinion that Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories was unlawful.
The ICJ said in its advisory opinion that 'Israel's security concerns do not override the principle of the prohibition of the acquisition of territory by force' and called on it to end its occupation 'as rapidly as possible'. It said UN member states had an obligation 'not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by Israel's illegal presence in the occupied Palestinian territory'.
The UK has yet to say what steps if any it is required to take in response to the ICJ opinion.
The Colombian president and conference host, Gustavo Petro, says the meeting will show that the world is finally moving from condemnation of Israel's military action to collective action to bring it to a halt.
The aim is to agree a detailed plan of political, economic and legal actions, but there are range of views over how far states can go politically or legally to isolate Israel, a country that feels secure so long as it maintains US support.
The Hague Group was initially brought together by South Africa and Colombia, but since then support has grown and it now includes Algeria, Brazil, Spain, Indonesia and Qatar.
Albanese, the UN special rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territories, is determined to show that the US state department sanctions will not cow her.
'For too long, international law has been treated as optional – applied selectively to those perceived as weak, ignored by those acting as the powerful. This double standard has eroded the very foundations of the legal order. That era must end,' she will say in Bogotá.
'The world will remember what we, states and individuals, did in this moment – whether we recoiled in fear or rose in defence of human dignity. Here in Bogotá, a growing number of states have the opportunity to break the silence and revert to a path of legality by finally saying: enough. Enough impunity. Enough empty rhetoric. Enough exceptionalism. Enough complicity. The time has come to act in pursuit of justice and peace – grounded in rights and freedoms for all, and not mere privileges for some, at the expense of the annihilation of others.'
Albanese will say that the UN charter and universal human rights instruments must remain everyone's compass. 'I trust that more states will align their policies with these fundamental principles as we move forward in this existential hour – for both the Palestinian and the Israeli people, and the integrity of the international legal order itself,' she will say.
The sanctions on Albanese were imposed by the US state department for what it called her 'shameful promotion' of action by the international criminal court against the US and Israel.
Albanese will directly address the sanctions in Bogotá. 'These attacks shall not be seen as against me personally. They are a warning to everyone who dares defend international justice and freedom. But we cannot afford to be silenced – and I know I am not alone,' she will say. 'This is not about me or any other single individuals but about justice for the Palestinian people at the most critical juncture in their history.'
In an article for the Guardian published last week, Petro framed the stakes of the conference. 'We can either stand firm in defence of the legal principles that seek to prevent war and conflict, or watch helplessly as the international system collapses under the weight of unchecked power politics,' he wrote.
A Hague Group conference in January attended by only nine nations committed to implementing the provisional measures of the international court of justice, issued on 26 January, 28 March and 24 May 2024.
In practice this meant measures such arms embargos against Israel by preventing the docking of vessels at any port, if applicable, within their territorial jurisdiction.
Varsha Gandikota-Nellutla, the executive secretary of the Hague Group, said: 'We meet in Bogotá with a twin imperative: to end Israel's impunity and sever the cords of complicity. The international court of justice has already made its rulings, deeming Israel's continued presence in the Palestinian territories as unlawful. There is no absence of legal clarity.
'States will now deliberate how to enforce their obligations – from ceasing arms exports and preventing harbour for vessels carrying military equipment to ensuring justice for all victims.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on plastic pollution: global action is desperately needed to deal with this scourge
Plastic pollution has reached the most remote and inaccessible parts of our beleaguered planet. It has been found in Greenland's ice cap, near the summit of Mount Everest, and in the deepest depths of the western Pacific Ocean. Nature programmes have sounded the alarm over a human-made crisis that has become an environmental scourge and a serious threat to our health. Yet global production of plastics is on course to triple to more than a billion tonnes a year by 2060, after increasing by more than 200 times over the past 75 years. This gloomy backdrop should inject a sense of urgency into UN-convened talks in Switzerland this week, aimed at agreeing a binding global plastics treaty. In 2022, when 173 countries committed to work towards such an accord, there was widespread relief that at last a multilateral route was to be taken towards solving a quintessentially global problem. Sadly, as delegates gather in Geneva, there are reasons to be fearful. As major oil-producing countries seek to circumvent the consequences of the green transition, the fossil fuel-based manufacture of plastics has become a key battleground. During five rounds of negotiations, over three years, a 'petrochemical bloc' led by Russia and Saudi Arabia has stalled and obstructed attempts to agree a reduction in production. And as a recent investigation by the Guardian laid bare, corporate capture of the talks has also become a significant problem. Industry lobbyists have sought to dominate and divert the debate, promoting implausible panaceas in the form of new recycling technologies and other mitigating measures. The return of Donald Trump to the White House is unlikely to improve the prospects of a truly ambitious reset. On the first day of his second term Mr Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris climate agreement, signalling his contempt for multilateralism and his unflinching backing for big oil. There are already signs that in Geneva the US plans to align itself with fellow fossil-fuel producers in resisting any attempt to agree to a reduction in virgin plastic production. Given such headwinds, the scale of the crisis bears reiteration. Ahead of this week's talks, an expert review published in the Lancet described plastics as 'a grave, growing and under-recognised danger to human and planetary health'. Thanks to television series such as Blue Planet II, the grievous impact on blighted marine ecosystems is relatively widely understood. But plastic production also contributes more than 3% of annual global greenhouse emissions. Most insidiously, its ubiquitous presence in everyday life means that chemical additives and pollutants find their way into human bodies. According to the Lancet report, health-related damages globally add up to £1.1tn a year, with infants and children particularly vulnerable. Carrying on with business as usual, while seeking unlikely technological fixes, will not be good enough. A cap on global production is desperately needed, though achieving that in Geneva looks like a tall order. At last November's talks in South Korea, more than 100 countries supported legally binding reductions but negotiations collapsed without an agreement. A consensus of sorts may be found on the need to eliminate harmful chemicals from future manufacture, and phasing out single-use plastics, which account for half of the 400m tonnes produced every year. That would at least be a start. After years of obfuscation and delay, something tangible must emerge from Switzerland.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Gaza latest: Netanyahu mulls 'full Gaza takeover' - as Hezbollah leader sends Israel warning
Full occupation 'feels catastrophic' for starvation crisis in Gaza Humanitarian workers are running on barely one meal a day, according to the chief of global aid group Mercy Corps. We caught up with Tjada D'Oyen McKenna, who told us "the food situation remains dire" in Gaza, where her colleagues often only eat lentils or bread once over a whole day. "And they wake up every morning wondering where their next meal will come out or if something will run out there," she told our chief presenter Mark Austin. Virtually the entire population, she added, is dependent on aid at this point. And as Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly gears up for a full occupation of the territory, McKenna warned the already horrific conditions could actually get worse. "From a humanitarian point of view, this feels very catastrophic," she said, on the prospect of full occupation. "It's become virtually impossible for us to move around safely to do our jobs. A record number of humanitarians have been killed. "So, any further action that decreases humanitarian access, that makes it more difficult for us to serve people, that leads to more attacks on the very, very frail health system... that only accelerates the catastrophe that we're seeing." Watch her full remarks in the video below... Netanyahu to discuss Gaza occupation plans with cabinet in 48 hours - report According to Israeli media, Benjamin Netanyahu's top security team will discuss the occupation of Gaza on Thursday. Earlier today, Netanyahu held a three-hour limited security meeting weighing up the options in the territory - see our 16:54 post. That was ahead of a full meeting of the security cabinet, which Israeli broadcaster Channel 12 says will take place on Thursday. Reports suggest it will begin at 6pm (4pm UK time). Underpinning all of this is Netanyahu's reported decision to press ahead with a full occupation of Gaza. As our international correspondent Diana Magnay explains in the post below, it's not clear how that would look or how it would help to achieve Netanyahu's stated aims for the war. Gaza's humanitarian situation 'could get even worse' in full occupation The security meeting in Israel this evening comes amid reports of growing divisions on the way forward between Benjamin Netanyahu and his top military officials. Our international correspondent Diana Magnay said a full occupation of Gaza - which Netanyahu is reportedly considering - was not part of his stated goals for the war. "And will it actually achieve the objective of destroying Hamas? Not necessarily," she said. It's also not clear how this would actually work, with questions around whether this would involve a fully-fledged military administration, which carries legal obligations. "They would have to provide food, clean water, clean the streets, start reconstruction, all of these things that the people of Gaza so desperately need," she added. "But if they do go ahead, I think you can expect even more civilian casualties and a worsening - if that is even possible - of the humanitarian situation, which, as we've seen in the last few weeks and months, is already terrible." Watch her full analysis below... Hezbollah warns 'missiles would fall' on Israel if it attacks Lebanon In a development beyond Gaza but still very much tied to the war, Hezbollah's chief has threatened Israel directly. In a televised speech, Naim Qassem said the militant group and the Lebanese army - which is not part of Hezbollah - would defend themselves if Israel engages in "large-scale aggression". "This defence will lead to missiles falling inside the Israeli entity, and all the security they have built over eight months will collapse within an hour," he added. After Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, Hezbollah opened fire on Israeli positions, declaring solidarity with the Palestinians. But much of Hezbollah's command was killed by Israel, which sent troops into Lebanon's south after nearly a year of trading strikes. In recent weeks, the US and Lebanon - whose government is separate to Hezbollah - have been in talks on roadmap to fully disarm Hezbollah. This would be in exchange for Israel ending its strikes and withdrawing its troops from five points in southern Lebanon. The original proposal included a condition that Lebanon's government pass a cabinet decision pledging to disarm the group. In public, Hezbollah has refused to hand over its arsenal in full, but the group has privately considered scaling it back. Netanyahu's security meeting ends after three hours An update now from the "limited" Israeli security meeting we reported earlier - see 16:22 post. Benjamin Netanyahu's office has released this brief statement: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held a limited security discussion today that lasted about three hours, in which the chief of staff presented the options for continuing the campaign in Gaza. The IDF is prepared to implement any decision made by the Political-Security Cabinet. The full security cabinet meeting is expected later this week as Netanyahu and his team reportedly plan for a "full occupation" of Gaza. In pictures: Palestinians gather water as shortages continue to take hold of Gaza These are some of the latest images coming out of Gaza, specifically from Deir al Balah, in the centre of the strip. They show Palestinians gathering water at distribution points amid shortages and widespread fears of growing starvation. Top Israeli officials meeting to discuss Gaza military plan - reports Israel's prime minister has called a limited security meeting today, according to media in the country, which is happening now. Channel 12 reports Benjamin Netanyahu has convened this meeting ahead of a full security cabinet gathering later this week. According to the broadcaster, the meeting will include: Defence minister Israel Katz; IDF chief of staff Lt Gen Eyal Zamir; Strategic affairs minister Ron Dermer; and IDF operations directorate head Maj Gen Itzik Cohen. Zamir is reportedly expected to present Netanyahu with several options for continuing the war in Gaza. This comes after the prime minister reportedly decided on the full occupation of Gaza. The goal of this meeting is to finalise a plan to present later this week at the broader cabinet meeting, Channel 12 added. 'Complete defeat of enemy still necessary', says Netanyahu Benjamin Netanyahu has visited IDF recruits at a base near Tel Aviv According to the prime minister's office, he told the new additions: "It is still necessary to complete the defeat of the enemy in Gaza, release our hostages and ensure that Gaza never again constitutes a threat to Israel. "We are not giving up on any of these missions." This comes as he set his mind on the full occupation of Gaza - see our 6:32 post. He shared pictures of the visit on social media. Norway reviewing its mega sovereign wealth fund's Israeli investments A review is under way in Norway to ensure its near-$2trn sovereign wealth fund does not include investments in Israeli companies contributing to the occupation of the West Bank or the war in Gaza. That follows a report by the Aftenposten daily revealing the fund had built a stake in an Israeli jet engine group providing services to Israel's armed forces, including the maintenance of fighter jets, in 2023-24. Norway's Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere told public broadcaster NRK the fund's investment in the Bet Shemesh Engines Ltd (BSEL) group is worrying. "We must get clarification on this because reading about it makes me uneasy," he said. BSEL has not yet responded to a request for comment. Italy 'favours recognising Palestinian state' - but won't make decision now Italy's foreign minister and deputy prime minister says the government "favours recognising a Palestinian state". Antonio Tajani said, however, that decision was"not possible now because it doesn't exist". "Recognising Palestine when it doesn't exist is a legal fiction," he added. "It's not a political choice." It follows the UK, Canada and France announcing that they are planning to recognise Palestine as a state from September in a major policy shift. The three countries have said they will make the formal announcement at the UN General Assembly - but the UK and Canada said the move could be stopped if Israel meets several conditions. Tajani also addressed reports Benjamin Netanyahu has decided on the full occupation of Gaza. "Hamas has enormous responsibilities and is trying to raise the price," he added. "They need to go away, but I don't believe the right response is to invade Gaza. "We risk more deaths, and that's unacceptable."
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
How did John Oliver become the moral compass of the US?
Some time ago, an acquaintance sent me a cryptic text message. 'Thought of you after I saw one of your recent articles,' they said. 'Thank you for saying it.' I write columns regularly. Some are about vaginas; some are about the genocide in Gaza. Was this person thanking me for drawing attention to the desperate plight of people on eBay who are prepared to pay five times the original sales price for Gwyneth Paltrow's delisted This Smells Like My Vagina candle? Or were they referencing Gaza? I suspected the latter, but there was no way of immediately knowing – which often feels par for the course when it comes to the conversation around Gaza. The Trump administration has cracked down on pro-Palestinian speech to such a draconian degree that even within a private text message, some people are too terrified about jeopardising their career or immigration status to speak up. Many lawmakers and parts of the media seem to have lost the ability to communicate in plain English when it comes to Palestine. I have seen long articles handwringing about the desperately complicated situation of starving kids which don't mention the word 'Israel' once. I have lost count of the number of articles talking about 'starvation stalking Gaza' that circle endlessly around exactly how this starvation has come about. Gaza is almost completely destroyed. There is now a growing consensus that a genocide is under way, and since a plan for the mass displacement of Palestinians to make space for a 'Gaza riviera' was discussed in the Knesset, more people are beginning to speak up. Nevertheless, Gaza-related atrocity denial is so widespread in the US, and the climate of fear around speaking about Palestine so pervasive, that an influential person voicing an unequivocal criticism of Israel's conduct will still make the news. See, for example, John Oliver. The Last Week Tonight host made headlines this week after he opened his most recent show with a clear-eyed analysis of the human-made famine in Gaza. 'Look, 'Gaza is starving' is a sentence that's objectively true, but it's also slightly misleading because it's too passive,' Oliver said. 'Gaza is being starved by Israel.' I'm glad to see Oliver spelling this out. But it is enraging that it is a late-night host speaking with clarity rather than editorial boards, cable news anchors or politicians – many of whom seem to treat mass starvation as an unfortunate and unintentional consequence of war rather than a deliberate act. One CBS video from last December, for example, is headlined: 'Hunger spreads virtually everywhere in Gaza amid Israel-Hamas war.' As the Al Jazeera Journalism Review argues, many headlines in major US outlets have similarly described the situation as a 'food crisis' rather than an intentional blockade. Meanwhile, the rightwing Free Press – which CBS is reportedly mulling buying for up to $250m partly because of its 'pro-Israel stance', according to the FT – described media reporting around starvation in Gaza as part of 'a highly effective campaign of information warfare' against Israel perpetrated by Hamas. And while experts have been warning about famine risks in Gaza since December 2023, an analysis of US media coverage by the watchdog Fair shows most outlets barely covered the situation until it became undeniably grim. 'The conditions of famine have been out in the open for well over a year, and yet it was considered barely newsworthy in US news media,' it says. Oliver isn't the only late-night host speaking up. Indeed, from the shenanigans of the Trump administration to the starvation of Gaza, late-night hosts (and children's entertainer Ms Rachel) seem to have become the moral voice of the US. The Daily Show's Jon Stewart has also been outspoken about Gaza. 'I have a moral clarity about what I'm seeing,' said Stewart, who is Jewish, in an episode last week where he was speaking to the Jewish Currents editor-at-large, Peter Beinart. 'I feel like a crazy person. I feel as if I'm watching something that is so self-evidently inhumane and horrific. And to be told that I have to shut up because I risk the Jewish state by speaking out? I would say the opposite. I think they're putting the likelihood of a surviving Jewish state much more at risk with this type of action.' And then there's Stephen Colbert's The Late Show on CBS. Colbert hasn't spoken about Gaza a huge amount, although he did criticise the crackdown on student protests, saying: 'Even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as they are peaceful, students should be allowed to protest. It's their first amendment right.' He has, however, been very outspoken about Trump. Last month, he said Paramount Global (which owns CBS) deciding to pay a large settlement to Trump over content in a CBS show, 60 Minutes, amounted to a 'big fat bribe'. Three days later, his show was cancelled – many suspect because Paramount higher-ups wanted to stay in Trump's good books to get a merger approved. This seems to have worked. Trump has said: 'I absolutely love that Colbert was fired.' I bet he does. Late-night hosts seem to be doing far more than certain other influential voices when it comes to speaking truth to power. None of this is funny – but when comedians become the most vocal truth-tellers, it's possible your country has become a joke. Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian US columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
