logo
Why it's time to let new moms vote by proxy

Why it's time to let new moms vote by proxy

Yahoo03-04-2025
Let's be real: We love to say we're living in the modern age, but when it comes to how we treat new mothers in Congress, we're stuck in the 1950s. Case in point? Representative Brittany Pettersen brought her four-week-old newborn across the country because—despite just having given birth—she had to be physically present in Washington, D.C. to cast a vote.
And all of this? Totally preventable.
Welcome to the urgent case for proxy voting for parents in Congress. And this week, House Republicans are fighting against two new mom congresswomen—one Democrat, one Republican's efforts to allow new parents the right to vote by proxy while recovering from birth.
Rep. Brittany Pettersen, a Colorado mom of two (including that brand-new baby), has lived the challenge of legislating with a newborn firsthand—and she's had it. 'There are medical reasons when you're pregnant and close to your term and you can't fly for votes and up through giving birth and recovering and taking care of your newborn and 24/7 care,' she told Motherly in an interview this week. 'We are perfectly capable of modernizing the way that we do things to account for situations like this. It's unacceptable that we are so far behind the times.'
Unacceptable is an understatement. When Pettersen flew with her newborn son Sam for that vote, she did it not because she wanted to—but because there was no alternative. 'I was devastated with the choice in front of me,' she said. 'There was no way that I was not going to be here, but I was devastated… I could not leave my newborn baby for days.'
Related: Why pregnant lawmakers deserve remote voting
This, in a job that already requires being in two places at once—home with your kids and at the Capitol with your colleagues.
Proxy voting is a practical solution to an outdated problem. It simply allows a representative to cast their vote without being physically present. Revolutionary? Hardly. Common sense? Completely.
Vote Mama founder Liuba Grechen Shirley put it plainly: 'Our political system was designed by older, wealthy, white, land-owning men at a time when women couldn't even vote. For moms, it's even harder—votes are called at unpredictable times… No proxy voting means flying across the country right after giving birth to cast a vote.'
She's not being hyperbolic. That's the literal truth of how our democracy works—or doesn't—for moms.
To date, only 13 voting women in the entire history of Congress have given birth while serving. Pettersen is the thirteenth.
Since America's founding, hundreds of millions of women have given birth. Yet only 13 have been serving in Congress while doing it.
Why? Because the system was made to keep mothers out.
Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla) was the twelfth. Now, she and Pettersen are working together across the aisle to fix it. 'This is reflective of when we actually get to know each other… when we see each other as other human beings,' Pettersen said. 'When we come together on issues… it's about being moms and going through the rare experience of being pregnant and giving birth while in Congress.'
They know that proxy voting is just the beginning.
So what happens when more moms do make it to Congress?
'We can completely reshape the policies and priorities of the United States and actually meet the needs of families,' says Pettersen.
Liuba Grechen Shirley agrees: 'Legislators legislate based on their lived experience. When moms lead, they prioritize investments in families, education, and the economy in ways that actually work for people.'
But without structural reforms, most moms won't make it to the floor—literally.
Grechen Shirley outlines a few of the policies that would change that:
Paid leave for legislators (yes, even Congress doesn't have this!)
On-site childcare and childcare reimbursements
Changing tables and pumping rooms in government buildings
Campaign funds for childcare
And, of course, proxy voting
'These aren't radical ideas—they're significant, barrier-breaking reforms,' she says. 'There are more millionaires in Congress than moms.'
Let that one sink in.
The usual suspects defending the status quo. 'We're hearing arguments about unconstitutionality. We're hearing arguments like 'show up for work or don't run for Congress,'' Pettersen said. 'It's the same stuff we've heard as women for our existence… I can't believe how many people say that women shouldn't be in Congress.'
That's not just sexism—it's sabotage. Because when mothers are excluded from leadership, so are their priorities.
The pandemic proved we can rethink work. It showed us that flexibility isn't a luxury—it's a lifeline. And yet here we are, still forcing women to choose between healing from childbirth and casting a vote that could impact millions of lives.
Pettersen's advice? 'Reach out to your members of Congress and ask them to support our resolution… Support other women who are running for office. Encourage other moms to step up and run. This is how we're going to change things.'
It's time to let moms vote—from wherever they need to be.
Related: Congress introduces massive bill to improve mothers' health: 'This crisis demands urgent attention'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas State Rep. Refuses To Leave Capitol Amid Democrat And Republican Showdown
Texas State Rep. Refuses To Leave Capitol Amid Democrat And Republican Showdown

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas State Rep. Refuses To Leave Capitol Amid Democrat And Republican Showdown

A Texas state representative has refused to leave the state capitol amid a contentious battle between Republicans and Democrats. State Rep. Nicole Collier of Fort Worth (D) told news outlets she was protesting the Republican House speaker's insistence that she and other Democratic lawmakers be under surveillance by state troopers ahead of Wednesday's meeting of the legislature. Related: 'I don't know how long I will be here,' Collier wrote in a statement to the Fort Worth Report on Monday. 'Instead of DPS officers looking for pedophiles, they have been assigned to follow Democratic state representatives around only to ensure their return to the Capitol on Wednesday (when the House reconvenes). I sure hope the public feels safe without those officers on beat.' Related: Collier's insistence on remaining in the state capitol, located in Austin, comes after Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) threatened to arrest Democrats who attempted to block Republicans from their racially biased redistricting efforts by leaving the state for two weeks. The redistricting effort, unsurprisingly pushed by President Donald Trump, would allow Republicans to gain an extra five congressional seats ahead of the midterm elections. After many of the Democratic lawmakers returned to the state, the Texas House of Representatives reached a quorum on Monday, meaning it had enough members present to conduct business. The end of their walkout followed California Democrats' decision to move forward with a vote in November on temporarily redrawing maps to neutralize Republican efforts to gerrymander. It also comes after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's (R) special session was canceled on Friday. Upon the Texas Democrats' return to the House on Monday, Burrows then reportedly required them to be escorted by Department of Public Safety officers until Wednesday, when the House reconvenes. 'Members who have not been present until today, for whom arrest warrants were issued, will be granted written permission to leave only after agreeing to be released into the custody of a designated [Department of Public Safety] officer appointment under the rules of the house,' he said, also explaining that the officers would then 'ensure' that the members would return Wednesday morning, according to NBC News. Related: 'For those still absent, civil arrest warrants remain in force,' he added. In a statement to NBC News, Collier said she was a 'political prisoner' for not falling in line with Republican 'surveillance protocol.' 'I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts,' she said. Related: U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) weighed in on the matter in an online post: 'As a former Texas State Rep, let me be clear: LOCKING Rep. Nicole Collier inside the chamber is beyond outrageous. Forcing elected officials to sign 'permission slips' & take police escorts to leave? That's not procedure. That's some old Jim Crow playbook.' 'Texas Republicans have lost their damn minds,' she added. HuffPost reached out to representatives for Collier and Burrows for comment but did not immediately hear back. Related... Texas Dems Throw In The Towel Gavin Newsom Launches Plan To Offset Texas Gerrymander Texas State Rep. Isn't Backing Down From Fighting 'Overtly Racist' Redistricting Map Newsom Warns Trump California Can 'Neutralize' His Texas Redistricting EffortsSolve the daily Crossword

Congresswoman Files Hundreds Of Stock Trades Late, Including Palantir Stock Up Over 600%
Congresswoman Files Hundreds Of Stock Trades Late, Including Palantir Stock Up Over 600%

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Congresswoman Files Hundreds Of Stock Trades Late, Including Palantir Stock Up Over 600%

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Efforts to ban members of Congress from buying and selling stocks could continue to rise with several recent disclosures violating the STOCK Act. A new filing by a member of Congress lists hundreds of trades since March 2024. Here's the latest. What Happened: One of the hottest stocks for members of Congress to buy in 2025 has been Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ:PLTR), a company that has won numerous government contracts and may pose a conflict of interest for members serving on government committees who invest in the stock. Congresswoman Lisa McClain (R-Mich.) previously served on the Committee on Armed Services and the Subcommittee on Cyber, Information Technologies, and Innovation. Trending: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — The Congresswoman recently disclosed hundreds of stock trades in an Aug. 13 filing. While some of the hundreds of stock purchases and sales happened in the months of August and July 2025, many of the trades were dated back to periods in 2024. The purchases in the filing went all the way back to March 2024, as reported by the Benzinga Government Trades page. Among the notable transactions were multiple trades involving Palantir stock. Here are five trades disclosed in the filing and the highest price for PLTR stock on that particular day: June 6, 2024: Bought $15,000 to $50,000 in PLTR stock, stock high $23.95 August 14, 2024: Bought $15,000 to $50,000 in PLTR stock, stock high $31.37 October 23, 2024: Sold $50,000 to $100,000 in PLTR stock, stock high $43.68 November 7, 2024: Bought $100,000 to $250,000 in PLTR stock, stock high $56.47 June 17, 2025: Bought $1,000 to $15,000 in PLTR stock, stock high $141.69 Palantir stock trades at $177.17 at the time of writing, significantly higher than the prices above. In fact, Palantir stock is up 639.7% from the first purchase in June 2024 based on the highest price point of the day. The stock is also up at least 464.8% from the August 2024 purchase price and up 213.7% from the November 2024 price. It is unknown whether McClain sold the entire positions bought in June and August 2024 in the October 2024 sale, which was reported at between $50,000 and $100,000. Palantir stock is also up 25% from the latest purchase in June 2025. Benzinga reached out for comment and did not hear to a report from the Detroit News, the trades in the filing were conducted by McClain's husband Mike. "She promptly filed the necessary paperwork immediately after being made aware of the transactions made in managed accounts and remains committed to transparency and adherence to all House financial disclosure rules and regulations," spokesman Mason Devers told the Detroit News. The transactions were reported outside the 45-day disclosure window, which could result in fines of $200 for the Congresswoman. What's Next: McClain's late filings come after Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) introduced the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments Act, or PELOSI Act, based on the first letter of each of the main words. The name targets Congresswoman and former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). The bill made its way out of committee and could come before Congress for a vote. Benzinga recently polled readers to gauge their stance on a potential ban on Congress members trading. 'Should members of Congress be allowed to buy and sell stocks, options and ETFs?' Benzinga asked. These were the results: They should not be allowed to trade stocks, options or ETFs: 43% They should be allowed to trade as long as they report within 24 hours: 24% They should only be allowed to trade ETFs and mutual funds: 14% They should be allowed to trade as long as they report in 45 days: 11% They should only be allowed to trade stocks: 8% The poll found that 43% of readers support an outright ban on members of Congress trading stocks, options, or ETFs. Eleven percent voted to leave the current rules unchanged, with a 45-day disclosure window. Read Next: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? Photo: Shutterstock This article Congresswoman Files Hundreds Of Stock Trades Late, Including Palantir Stock Up Over 600% originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Gavin Newsom Surges in 2028 Presidential Primary Poll
Gavin Newsom Surges in 2028 Presidential Primary Poll

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Gavin Newsom Surges in 2028 Presidential Primary Poll

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Support for California Governor Gavin Newsom as a possible Democratic presidential candidate in 2028 has surged over the past four months, a new poll shows. Newsweek tried to contact Newsom via email for comment after normal business hours. Why It Matters The poll indicates support for the more aggressive position Newsom has taken in standing up to President Donald Trump, particularly over a plan by Republicans in Texas to redraw their state's congressional seat map in the hopes of winning more seats in midterm elections next year. The battle to become the 2028 presidential election candidate will likely set the new direction for the Democratic Party as it struggles with net favorability at what one recent poll showed to be a three-year low. Newsom has not formally announced his candidacy. What To Know The new poll, conducted by Echelon Insights, has Newsom in second place among potential Democratic candidates with 13 percent support, behind former Vice President Kamala Harris with 26 percent. The survey was taken from August 14 to August 18 with a 3.6 percent margin of error among 1,057 registered voters. A poll published by Echelon Insights in April had Newsom only in sixth place with 4 percent, behind former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, both on 7 percent. Harris was again in first place with 28 percent. In the new poll, Buttigieg was in third place with 11 percent and Ocasio-Cortez in fourth place with 6 percent. The California governor has been punching back at Trump over the past few weeks, particularly in the war of words over redistricting. Meanwhile, his press office has turned its social media feed into a stream of all-caps posts, pop culture parodies and AI-edited meme content, aimed squarely at mocking Trump in style while countering Republican initiatives. California Governor Gavin Newsom holds a news conference at Downey Memorial Christian Church in Downey, California, on July 16, 2025. California Governor Gavin Newsom holds a news conference at Downey Memorial Christian Church in Downey, California, on July 16, 2025. Patrick T. Fallon / AFP/Getty Images Meena Bose, the executive dean of Hofstra University's Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs, told Newsweek last month that polls this far out from a primary were "informative but not necessarily instructive," largely indicating name recognition or reflecting a stated interest in running in 2028. Newsom and Buttigieg both have public visibility but a more solid idea of who is running – and who is leading – will develop after the midterms and change after debates and early contests, Bose said, adding that whether Ocasio-Cortez is a viable candidate will be seen after the midterms. There is also a big question over whether Harris will stand after her loss to Trump last year. In her first interview since she left office on January 20, she told Stephen Colbert that she would not run for California governor in 2026, but denied it was so that she could run for a "different office" — the implication being another run for the presidency. Newsom has already been on the ascent since February in early 2028 polling in the aftermath of the deadly Los Angeles County fires. Online betting website Polymarket said this week that his chances of beating Ocasio-Cortez to win the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028 are increasing. The site showed Newsom on 21 percent and leading Ocasio Cortez by 7 percentage points in a hypothetical matchup that also includes other high-profile Democrats. This is 3 percentage points more than earlier this month, when Newsom was 4 percentage points ahead of Ocasio-Cortez. Polymarket showed Harris on only 5 percent. Ocasio-Cortez has also not formally announced her candidacy for the 2028 race. What People Are Saying Strategist Mike Madrid, a political consultant and co-founder of the Lincoln Project, an anti-Trump political action committee, previously told Newsweek about Newsom: "People thought his career was over. Now, he's in the top three in every poll." "Democrats are looking for a fighter. It's not about ideology anymore. You can be centrist or progressive — what matters is that you stand up and hit back. The more aggressive Newsom gets, the more support he builds." Trump told reporters in June: "He's done a terrible job. I like Gavin Newsom. He's a nice guy but he's grossly incompetent, everybody knows." What Happens Next Typically, most candidates do not begin announcing presidential runs until after the midterm elections.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store