Complaint laid against early childhood advocate for 'deliberately misleading' parents, sector
Photo:
RNZ Insight/John Gerritsen
An organisation representing early childhood centre owners and managers has filed a complaint against a sector advocate, who the Ministry of Education says is causing confusion in the sector.
Dr Sarah Alexander runs an advocacy website called the 'Office of Early Childhood Education'.
Until recently the organisation had a group called the 'Early Childhood Advisory Committee' - which is the exact same name as an Education Ministry entity.
The Early Childhood Council has filed a complaint against Alexander alleging her organisation is deliberately misleading the sector.
The Commerce Commission said it would be speaking to Alexander to remind her of the obligations under the Fair Trading Act.
The Ministry of Education told RNZ that Alexander was not affiliated with central government and some elements of her advocacy work had caused confusion in the sector.
Since RNZ contacted Alexander, some of the wording on her website has changed.
Alexander said she stood by the work of her organisation and had not been contacted by either the Commerce Commission, or the ECC.
The Early Childhood Council claimed Alexander and her website - the 'Office of Early Childhood Education' (OECE) - was "deliberately misleading" and confusing parents and childcare centres.
The website publishes newsletters and articles about the sector and ECE centres, and states that Alexander is the "Chief Advisor".
Until recently it said the "Office" was the "lead public advisor on early childcare and education".
The website says it is the "national body for the sector and leading authority on ECE", and represents "all stakeholders and parts of the sector".
It has a "specialist ECE newsroom" with paywalled articles, some of which include details of coronial inquests and criticisms of childcare centres and policies.
The earlier version of the OECE website.
Photo:
Screenshot/Office of Early Childhood Education Website
The updated version of the OECE website.
Photo:
Screenshot/Office of Early Childhood Education Website
Before it was changed not long ago, the OECE organisation had a group called the "Early Childhood Advisory Committee" (ECAC), which is the identical name of a Ministry of Education entity.
"This is not connected to the Ministry's official Early Childhood Advisory Committee. The Ministry has noted that the naming of this internal OECE group has caused some confusion within the sector," ministry deputy secretary of policy Andy Jackson said.
"The Ministry's ECAC has a different membership and mandate and operates under formal terms of reference to provide advice on government initiatives and the operation of early childhood education at a national level."
The Ministry of Education said the OECE website was an independently operated advocacy organisation that published opinion and commentary on the sector, and was not affiliated with central government.
"It is not a government agency, statutory body, or formally affiliated with the Ministry of Education (MoE)," the Ministry's deputy secretary of policy Andy Jackson said.
"The 'Chief Advisor' title held by Dr Sarah Alexander is not a government-appointed role, nor is it a position within the Ministry."
Jackson said officials regularly engaged with a range of groups across the ECE sector.
"From time to time, we meet with Dr Alexander and members of the OECE's ECAC to share information and respond to queries," he said.
The Early Childhood Council has filed a complaint against Alexander alleging her organisation is deliberately misleading the sector.
Photo:
Screenshot/Office of Early Childhood Education Website
The Ministry of Education said Alexander was a member of the Ministry's Early Learning Regulatory Advisory Group, which is an unpaid advisory body of around 15 sector representatives.
"Dr Alexander's involvement allows her to contribute perspectives on early learning policy, but it does not represent a leadership or decision-making role within the Ministry," Jackson said.
Alexander told RNZ she never said the OECE had a decision making role.
"But we do provide advice to the Ministry and have done for many years. Until the end of last year, the OECE and MoE had bi-monthly meetings," she said.
Alexander said the Ministry has never had an issue with the name of the OECE's advisory group.
"In fact, some Ministry officials have said anyone can have an early childhood advisory group - there is no trademark or anything illegal about this," Alexander said.
The new 'ECE Advisory Committee' page.
Photo:
Screenshot/Office of Early Childhood Education Website
Early Childhood Council chief executive Simon Laube said while the name change was "really encouraging", there were still things the Council considered were "deliberately misleading".
"They are not an 'office' at all. Our complaint to the Commerce Commission still stands, we will be very, very interested to see what they make of it," he said.
Laube felt Alexander was causing concern and confusion in the sector.
"Using things like 'Office of' and calling yourself 'Chief Adviser'... leads many people to think that they are a government department, when they're not," he said.
The Commerce Commission said it would contact Alexander.
"Following our assessment, the Commission will be contacting Office of Early Childhood Education to remind them of their obligations under the Fair Trading Act," general manager of competition, fair trading and credit, Vanessa Horne said.
Alexander said she had not been contacted by either the Commerce Commission, or the ECC.
She said her organisation's advice was based on years of research and consultation with practitioners, academics and other experts in the field.
Others in the sector are also worried about Alexander's OECE website, and her advocacy work.
Montessori Aotearoa NZ chief executive Cathy Wilson told RNZ that while Alexander's heart may be in the right place, her claim on the website that "The OECE is the national body for the early childhood sector and public advisor on ECE in Aotearoa NZ" was false.
"She is not the voice of the sector. She's absolutely not representing any peak body whatsoever," she said.
Wilson said she regarded some of the material produced by the OECE as fearmongering.
She said while the changes Alexander had made to her website were promising - the organisation's name was still a problem.
"She still is inferring that she speaks for the ECE sector, that inference hasn't gone away," Wilson said.
Childcare centre owner and advisor to advocacy group Advocates for Early Learning Excellence Kelly Seaburg said despite the changes, many in the sector still had serious concerns about Alexander's advocacy work and website.
"She isn't truly engaging with the sector in a meaningful way. It's just very one sided and that concerns me.
"If you are putting yourself out to be an expert leader, someone who's in touch with what's actually happening on the ground, but when I see some of their recommendations, they don't seem to be in touch with reality," she said.
Seaburg urged media organisations to be careful when interviewing people and double check the facts, as well as ensure a story had been thoroughly researched.
Dr Sarah Alexander is called the 'Chief Advisor' on the OECE website.
Photo:
Screenshot/Office of Early Childhood Education Website
Alexander has been
interviewed by RNZ
when she represented the 'The Office of Early Childhood Education', and in her former role with the now-closed 'Child Forum'.
The Ministry of Education told RNZ it respected the right of individuals to advocate on issues they felt strongly about, but it was important that such advocacy was conducted respectfully, particularly when it involved the experiences of others.
"Responsible advocacy should avoid using personal or sensitive situations to advance individual agendas and instead focus on supporting informed, constructive dialogue across the sector," Jackson said.
Laube said over the past six months the ECC had worked with a number of childcare centres who felt targeted by Alexander, who wrote stories on her website or commented publicly on cases.
He said the OECE had published critical articles about providers on their website, questioning their childcare practices.
"She went after them. It's very, very stressful for providers because their reputations are everything - they rely on parents trusting them with their children every day.
"I've had people completely in tears. It can be really traumatic for the provider," Laube said.
The Ministry said early learning services were encouraged to refer to the Ministry's official communication channels - such as the ECE Bulletin - for accurate and up-to-date information on government decisions and guidance.
Alexander said she stood by the mahi she and the OECE did.
She said the OECE had a code of conduct that they encouraged all ECE services to follow, and their objectives were highlighting what was best for tamariki, ensuring high-quality care and education and a well-functioning early childhood sector.
"We dig deeper. We do OIAs. We ask questions. We draw on research and evidence. We analyse data. We identify lessons that can be learnt and changes that could help to improve," she said.
In response to RNZ's questions about the allegations of targeting childcare centres, Alexander said there was a huge cost to teachers and on children and families when the owner or operator had "not properly fulfilled their obligations, leaving things to go wrong".
"The ECC may like to consider the very high costs to children, families and teachers, and ensure their centre owners comply fully with regulatory requirements and provide a safe and quality care and learning environment for children always," she said.
"The business lobby in the ECE sector is strong, and it's important that the sector has other groups that advocate for best practice, outside of business interests," she said.
The ECC told RNZ they were an incorporated society that filed annual reports and was transparent about its work and membership.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
19 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Less building consents being given out
housing politics about 1 hour ago Residential building consents are still heading south with 11 out of 16 regions around the country rubber stamping fewer builds compared to last year. Labour has accused the government of effectively hammering a nail in the coffin of building industry by slashing the number of state houses Kainga Ora is building, contributing to a "huge slow down in construction". The Building Minister has said their maths is all wrong. Building industry analyst Mike Blackburn spoke to Lisa Owen.


Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Netanyahu has 'lost the plot': Luxon
By Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira of RNZ The Prime Minister says the war in Gaza is "utterly appalling" and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has "lost the plot". Christopher Luxon's comments came on a tense day in Parliament, where Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick was 'named' for refusing to leave the House following a heated debate on the government's plan to consider recognising Palestinian statehood. Speaking to media, Luxon said Netanyahu had "gone too far". "I think he has lost the plot and I think that what we're seeing overnight - the attack on Gaza City - is utterly, utterly unacceptable" he said. Luxon said Israel had consistently ignored pleas from the international community for humanitarian aid to be delivered "unfettered", and the situation was driving more human catastrophe across Gaza. "We are a small country a long way away, with very limited trade with Israel. We have very little connection with the country, but we have stood up for values, and we keep articulating them very consistently, and what you have seen is Israel not listening to the global community at all. "We have said a forcible displacement of people and an annexation of Gaza would be a breach of international law. We have called these things out consistently time and time again. "You've seen New Zealand join many of our friends and partners around the world to make these statements, and he's just not listening," the prime minister said. The government is considering whether it will join other countries like France, Canada and Australia in recognising Palestinian statehood at a UN Leaders Meeting next month. Luxon said recent attacks could "extinguish a pathway" to a two-state solution. "I'm telling you what my personal view is, as a human being, looking at the situation, that's how I feel about." he said. Labour leader Chris Hipkins has called the war an "unfolding genocide", echoing the comments made by former prime minister Helen Clark, who visited the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and the Palestinian territory this week. "She's used the words 'unfolding genocide', and yes, I do agree with that. That's a good description of the situation at the moment." Hipkins said calling it an "unfolding genocide" meant that we were not "appointing ourselves judge and jury" because there was still a case to be heard before the International Court of Justice. "Recognising that there is an unfolding genocide in Gaza is an important part of the world community standing up and saying, we're not going to tolerate it. "We should recognise that there is now a growing acknowledgement around the world that there is an unfolding genocide in Gaza, and I think we should call that for what it is, and the world community needs to react to that to prevent it from happening," Hipkins said.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Mayor Wayne Brown renews call for Auckland bed tax
Wayne Brown has long campaigned for a bed tax on visitors to help fund destination marketing and events. Photo: 123RF Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown is asking the government to reconsider its opposition to a bed night levy, during what he says are tough times for the city. Brown has long campaigned for a bed tax on visitors to help fund destination marketing and events. In a statement, he told RNZ he supported Auckland Business Chamber chief executive Simon Bridges' call for the government to do more for the economy . "There is no reason why the government couldn't make a bed night levy an urgent priority and have it in place by next year. The sector wants it, and so do most Aucklanders. "Auckland contributes nearly 40 percent to GDP. When Auckland does well, the country does well. "An unemployment rate of 6.1 percent for the largest city is bad for the rest of New Zealand. It's nearly twice the national average and a sign growth isn't happening fast enough." He said his 2025 manifesto highlighted other key opportunities for growth in the city's technology, housing and tourism sectors. Wayne Brown. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi "The underlying problem is that we have a low-productivity economy, and we aren't exporting enough to the world. I've already outlined a plan for Auckland to lead New Zealand on a path to prosperity. "I recently kicked off the Auckland Innovation & Technology Alliance to drive investment to strengthen Auckland's position as a competitive tech and innovation hub. I thank Shane Reti for also establishing a new Advanced Tech Institute here in Auckland . "I'm working closely with Chris Bishop to make land use in Auckland more efficient so that we can enable faster growth. I acknowledge that removing the barriers to innovation and incentivising businesses to invest more in technology will take a bit longer. This is the key to fixing our economy. "However, an immediate stimulus would be provided by the introduction of a nationally consistent bed night levy to help us grow the visitor economy here and all over the country." More to come... Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.