
Baby Boomers' housing wealth swells to record £2.9 trillion
Homeowners aged 60 and over in the UK hold over half (a record £2.89 trillion) of the nation's owner-occupied housing wealth.
Baby Boomers' share (56 per cent) contrasts with the younger generation's 6 per cent share.
Over-75s account for almost a quarter (23 per cent) of the total housing wealth.
While holding substantial wealth, the over-60s still have around £60 billion in outstanding mortgage borrowing.
Savills suggests providing more retirement housing and downsizing incentives to free up equity and help younger generations enter the housing market.
Baby Boomers hold more than half of the UK's housing wealth

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Rate of women being hired into top jobs falls for third year running
This has left the rate of female hires into senior roles back where it was in 2020, according to the figures. The data also showed that while more UK women are now in top management roles than they were in 2019 – at 30.9% last year versus 27.6% in 2019 – the progress has slowed significantly in the past two years, rising by just 0.3 percentage points. The figures suggest it becomes more difficult for older generations to reach senior management, with 19.4% of so-called baby boomers – those born between 1946 and 1964 – in these roles compared with 28.9% for gen X, 36.7% for millennials and 39.3% for gen Z. The statistics, compiled by analysing the group's 43 million-strong membership base across the UK, also show that, as of March, women made up 45.8% of hires in the UK, down 4.6% year-on-year. Globally, the figures paint a similar picture, revealing that less than a third of senior leadership roles are held by women (30.9%) despite making up almost half (43.2%) of the worldwide workforce. This 'drop to the top' is most pronounced in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (Stem) sector, where only around one in eight (12%) of leadership positions are held by women, according to LinkedIn. It is calling for the Government and businesses to promote hiring based on skills rather than qualifications to help ensure women do not get left behind, in particular amid the shift towards artificial intelligence (AI). Janine Chamberlin, head of LinkedIn UK, said: 'Just as AI is reshaping the workplace and demanding more adaptable, collaborative leadership, we're seeing women's progress into senior roles stall for the third year running. 'Women are 20% more likely to have that multi-domain experience, working across different industries and functions, which creates exactly the kind of flexible, agile leaders businesses need for AI transformation. 'Yet we're locking them out of leadership precisely when we need those skills most.' The online giant believes that a skills-based approach to hiring – through prioritising skills over qualifications in recruitment – could broaden the talent pool for women by 6.3 times globally.


The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Rate of women being hired into top jobs falls for third year running
The rate of women being hired into UK leadership roles has fallen for the third year in a row, with increasing barriers to top jobs as they advance through their careers, according to figures from LinkedIn. The professional networking site revealed that women were hired into just more than a third – 36.8% – of leadership positions in the year to March 1, down 2.1% year-on-year. This has left the rate of female hires into senior roles back where it was in 2020, according to the figures. The data also showed that while more UK women are now in top management roles than they were in 2019 – at 30.9% last year versus 27.6% in 2019 – the progress has slowed significantly in the past two years, rising by just 0.3 percentage points. The figures suggest it becomes more difficult for older generations to reach senior management, with 19.4% of so-called baby boomers – those born between 1946 and 1964 – in these roles compared with 28.9% for gen X, 36.7% for millennials and 39.3% for gen Z. The statistics, compiled by analysing the group's 43 million-strong membership base across the UK, also show that, as of March, women made up 45.8% of hires in the UK, down 4.6% year-on-year. Globally, the figures paint a similar picture, revealing that less than a third of senior leadership roles are held by women (30.9%) despite making up almost half (43.2%) of the worldwide workforce. This 'drop to the top' is most pronounced in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (Stem) sector, where only around one in eight (12%) of leadership positions are held by women, according to LinkedIn. It is calling for the Government and businesses to promote hiring based on skills rather than qualifications to help ensure women do not get left behind, in particular amid the shift towards artificial intelligence (AI). Janine Chamberlin, head of LinkedIn UK, said: 'Just as AI is reshaping the workplace and demanding more adaptable, collaborative leadership, we're seeing women's progress into senior roles stall for the third year running. 'Women are 20% more likely to have that multi-domain experience, working across different industries and functions, which creates exactly the kind of flexible, agile leaders businesses need for AI transformation. 'Yet we're locking them out of leadership precisely when we need those skills most.' The online giant believes that a skills-based approach to hiring – through prioritising skills over qualifications in recruitment – could broaden the talent pool for women by 6.3 times globally.


Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Thanks Bank of Mum and Dad – now get out of my life
Let's cut a long story short. Last year, my parents gave me a deposit on a flat in London. I'm very grateful for said deposit, which took me out of the rubbish rental market and granted me financial independence. I have used the money wisely, as promised. I have not run off with the cash, or spent it on booze, drugs, expensive modern art or any of the tosh I am told to buy on Instagram daily. My parents trusted me because, despite occasionally writing pieces critical of their generation, they know me to be a sensible, level-headed 24-year-old. Or at least, most of the time. And the money was a gift. Made with one eye on inheritance tax, as all sensible middle-class house deposit gifts are, but without strings attached. But this is not always the case. The Bank of Mum and Dad is coming under ever-increasing pressure. More than 170,000 people received money from their parents last year – to the tune of £55,572 each – estate agent Savills has estimated. There's a lot of familial obligation wrapped up in those numbers. In a housing market where more than half of buyers are accepting money from their parents to get on the ladder, the promise of a deposit can be an effective bargaining tool. When The Telegraph writes about these generous gifts, we are inundated with emails from parents who want to give away their money – but also keep it. Some set up complicated loan agreements or trusts which can't be touched until certain conditions are met, while others split ownership across multiple generations. There are many ways in which parents look to protect their cash, even when it's not really theirs any more. All of these options are much more thorny than a simple gift. When I hear divorce lawyers explain that increased demand for prenuptial agreements is driven by parents looking to protect the money they've given to grown-up offspring, my stomach churns. Isn't that the very best way to ensure your children never want to speak to you again? So a plea. If you, as a parent, are thinking about helping your adult offspring on to the ladder, a truly honourable gesture, remember that this does not mean they revert to being dependent children. Resist the temptation to add strings – for the sake of familial peace – and crucially, remember that today's young people are hardly the first generation to receive a helping hand. Fair enough if you've made it clear that the money is a loan and repayment is expected. But a gift with reservations is no real gift. If you aren't prepared to hand over the cash with a decent dollop of trust, then maybe you'd be better off keeping the money.