Gilchrist pushes against climate denial, launches grant program to aid Michigan's climate efforts
Kicking off the third annual MI Healthy Climate conference, focused on advancing Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's plan to reach 100% carbon neutrality by 2050, Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist continued to call for climate action amid an uncertain federal landscape.
While climate change denial may be at its peak within American culture, those committed to climate action must also be at the peak of their strength, Gilchrist said.
'Republicans at the federal and the state level are attacking climate action. They are committing to rolling back investments that have been made, that have been committed, that have been promised to people and communities here in the state of Michigan, to the tune of putting $14 billion of investment at risk that will raise energy prices on Michiganders,' said Gilchrist, who is a Democratic candidate for governor in 2026.
However these threats emphasize the importance of climate efforts at the state and community level, Gilchrist said.
Pulling from his past as a basketball player, Gilchrist said that sometimes the best defense is a good offense, framing the fight against climate change as an opportunity for change, growth, innovation and leadership.
As Michigan leads the nation in clean energy job growth, and more clean energy adjacent businesses are growing in the state than ever before, Gilchrist pointed to these changes as an opportunity for Michigan to do more.
As part of that effort Gilchrist announced the MI Healthy Climate Challenge, offering several millions of dollars in grants to projects that will help the state meet its goal of carbon neutrality.
The program will include multiple competitions through 2026, with the first competition, Solar for Savings, offering $8.875 million in grants for residential and community solar pilot projects and upgrades to equipment and energy storage. The challenge is open and will accept entries through 5 p.m. on July 30, 2025. Applications are available at Michigan.gov/MHCChallenge.
Pilot programs supported by the competition are intended to lower energy costs, improve resiliency against power outages and create the groundwork for the MI Solar For All program, a $156 million federally-funded initiative to provide low-income communities and households access to solar energy.
According to a statement from the Department of Environment Great Lakes and Energy, which is sponsoring the conference, future competitions will focus on improving access to loans for environmental efforts, helping communities and partners leverage federal tax credits and unlocking large-scale financing for high-impact climate projects. Though eligibility will vary, the challenge aims to include a wide range of participants such as local governments, community lenders, schools, faith organizations, nonprofits and solar providers.
During last year's MI Healthy Climate Conference, Gilchrist announced the Michigan Climate Justice Challenge, offering $11 million in grant and technical assistance to help Michigan communities in competing for federal funding. The state also announced a mobility challenge aimed at improving access to Michigan's national parks through innovations in small-scale electric shuttles and automated driving systems, multimodal electric charging hubs and micro-mobility like scooters and e-bikes.
'All that is to say, we've laid a foundation… We've tested some things out,' Gilchrist said.
'Now that we know when something works a little bit, we have to scale it up quickly so it can work a lot in every group, in more markets in more communities, in more circumstances,' Gilchrist said, emphasizing the importance of inviting people from all of Michigan's communities to participate in efforts to combat climate change and build up the state's clean energy and mobility economy.
'We cannot get where we need to go if we don't bring everybody along with us,' Gilchrist said, telling attendees that by building a better connected, more inspired group, the state can begin to realize the clean energy and climate future it deserves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
In: EV incentives. Out: Sales mandates.
Presented by With help from Camille von Kaenel and Noah Baustin EV COMPLICATIONS: California drivers don't want to lose their electric vehicle tax incentives, but even voters in one of the bluest states are wary about reviving plans to phase out gas cars. Voters are split down the middle on whether California should stick to its guns on its Trump-blocked plans to phase out sales of gas cars by 2035, according to an exclusive POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll. Only 46 percent of the more than 1,400 registered voters surveyed said they support the policy, while 47 percent said no. Yes, there was an obvious partisan split: 60 percent of Democrats said they backed the phase-out, compared to 40 percent of independents and 31 percent of Republicans. But the results offer a note of caution for Gov. Gavin Newsom, who directed the California Air Resources Board to start writing new vehicle emissions rules after Republicans revoked the state's sales mandates for cars and heavy-duty trucks in June. 'None of us really like the idea of government intervening to take something away from us,' said Dan Sperling, a former CARB member and director of the University of California, Davis' Institute for Transportation Studies. 'That's even the most liberal of us.' Poll respondents are more bought into Newsom's plan to backfill the soon-to-be-defunct $7,500 federal EV tax credit. Nearly two-thirds — 64 percent — said they would support state-funded tax incentives once the federal subsidy ends Sept. 30, as part of the Trump administration's ongoing attacks on clean energy policy. That question again showed a partisan divide, with 80 percent of Democrats saying they back the approach, compared to 60 percent of independent voters and just 43 percent of Republicans. But the overall result bolsters Newsom's push to backfill incentives that the Biden administration used to coax drivers off fossil fuels, as he suggested using cap-and-trade revenues to fund last year and directed state agencies to consider in a June executive order. But Jack Citrin, a veteran political science professor at UC Berkeley and partner on the poll, said a closer look at the poll results shows that Democrats need to keep affordability in mind. He pointed to the fact that 28 percent of respondents said they'd only support new EV incentives if gas prices aren't impacted and another 20 percent said they should be reserved for low-income buyers, reflecting the fact that cost of living was the top concern of voters polled. And 64 percent of respondents said gasoline prices are putting a significant, extreme or moderate burden on their household budgets. 'That reflects a concern with the cost of all of this,' Citrin said. 'Yes, we're for environmental protection. Yes, we're for all of this, just as long as it doesn't cost a lot.' The poll comes the same day that state agencies released a joint report with recommendations for countering Trump's assault, calling on lawmakers to bolster tax incentives, improve charging infrastructure and regulate facilities that attract polluting trucks, but offering few specific timelines or dollar figures. California Air Resources Board Chair Liane Randolph framed the report — which Newsom asked for in his June order — as a first step in the state's defense against a hostile federal government. 'Clean air efforts are under siege, putting the health of every American at risk,' she said during a press briefing. 'California is continuing to fight back and will not give up on cleaner air and better public health.' Sperling called the report a surprisingly 'modest document' and said it lacks the specificity he hoped to see. 'The word I would use is disconcerting,' Sperling said when asked about where California stands in its fight against Trump. — AN Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! INVEST OR TRADE: The cap-and-trade legislative games are off to the races. Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin, who's leading the Assembly's cap-and-trade working group, began circulating on Tuesday her draft legislative language to extend the state's signature climate program through 2045. The proposal, obtained by POLITICO, would also make moderate changes to how the carbon market is run and make several multiyear appropriations of its revenues for wildfire, water, air and energy programs. It's the first detailed proposal to come out of the Legislature and follows Newsom's May proposal to reauthorize the program largely as-is. Lawmakers are now staring down a three-week sprint to resolve their differences and pass a bill on cap and trade, which is not only the regulatory backstop that ensures California meets its climate targets but also a multibillion-dollar revenue engine that's brought in lower-than-expected revenues amid uncertainty about its fate after its 2030 expiration. That uncertainty is set to continue. Ahead of the California Air Resources Board's next quarterly auction scheduled for Wednesday, prices on California's carbon market 'barely responded' to news of the Assembly's proposed amendments, according to Alicia Robinson, CEO of Elevate Climate, a carbon market analytics firm. 'While the Assembly's draft language indicates forward progress, market participants seem to need less talk and more walk before they double down on buying allowances,' she said. Broadly, the proposal — which Irwin is planning to insert into her AB 1207 in the coming weeks — seeks a middle ground between business groups advocating for more free emissions permits in the name of lowering costs and environmental groups advocating for fewer free permits in the name of furthering emissions reductions. It instructs CARB to conduct its own analysis of the risk of businesses — and emissions — leaving the state as a result of the program, and to distribute free allowances accordingly. It also proposes letting businesses offset some of their emissions through investments in carbon dioxide removal technology and natural and working lands and would keep surplus permits off the market to prop up weaker-than-expected auctions. Nick Miller, a spokesperson for Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, said in an email that the proposal 'reflects the Assembly's core values: advancing climate ambition while prioritizing affordability for California working families and businesses.' The Senate working group led by Sen. Monique Limón, meanwhile, has been circulating a draft framework, also obtained by POLITICO, to reduce free allowances over time and add a new border adjustment tax to insulate in-state industries. Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday. — CvK THE DELTA BETWEEN THEM: The war of words over a controversial proposed tunnel to route water south around the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta is heating up. Newsom on Tuesday touted the Delta Conveyance Project as the 'most promising action' to protect the state's water delivery system from more extreme storms and droughts, higher temperatures and sea level rise. The occasion: His administration's first-ever report on adapting the State Water Project to climate change released Tuesday. The other occasion: the trailer bill he's backing — with no legislative sponsor yet — to streamline the tunnel's construction. In a now-familiar dance, environmental groups and Delta region lawmakers who oppose the 45-mile-long tunnel's construction because of its impacts on the local ecosystem immediately panned the report, while water agencies that would get its water praised it. The report also lists other strategies to climate-proof the State Water Project, which delivers water to 27 million Californians. Among them: correcting subsidence that's eating away aqueduct capacity, developing 2 million acre-feet of storage south of the Delta, using advanced weather forecasts to manage releases from Oroville Dam and permitting a physical barrier in the Delta to prevent saltwater from creeping up during low water years. — CvK TALK IT OUT: Three Assembly policy committees are coming together tomorrow for an oversight hearing on transportation fuels that will put representatives from oil, labor and environmental justice groups at the table amid a push to overhaul drilling regulations and avert two refinery closures. The joint Natural Resources, Transportation and Utilities and Energy committee hearing should offer an inside look at negotiations on a draft bill from Newsom that would boost oil drilling in Kern County — a proposal that's won plaudits from oil companies and enraged groups that say California is backtracking on its climate goals. The speaker list includes Zach Leary, senior director at the Western States Petroleum Association; Cesar Aguirre, co-director of Central California Environmental Justice Network's air and climate justice team; Mike Smith, chair of the United Steelworkers' national oil bargaining program; and Jeremy Martin, Union of Concerned Scientists' director of fuel policy. The committees will also hear from Benicia Mayor Steve Young, whose city is facing the planned closure of a Valero refinery, and Notre Dame professor Emily Grubert, who's studied clean energy transitions around the country. CARB's Randolph, California Energy Commission Vice Chair Siva Gunda and California Department of Conservation Director Jennifer Lucchesi will also speak. — AN HOT STUFF: It's August, California is about to be hit with a prolonged heat wave, and energy leaders are braced to protect the state's grid. Sound familiar? In August 2020, similar conditions forced the California Independent System Operator to launch rolling electricity blackouts as the grid was overwhelmed with demand from air conditioners across the state. Two years later, Newsom was forced to send out a statewide emergency alert pleading with residents to turn off their appliances during a September temperature spike. As 2025's heat wave approaches, energy officials are confident (mostly) that the state is out of the woods (almost). 'We are cautiously optimistic about the summer,' the CEC's Gunda said at a Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee hearing Tuesday. 'Even under the conditions that we've experienced in 2020 and 2022, we don't expect any shortfalls in the grid,' Gunda said. 'This is because of the storage capacity that has come online.' After the 2020 blackouts, Californians, from the state's utilities to residents putting the tech in their garages, went on a battery-building bonanza, adding over 12,000 megawatts of energy storage to the grid, bringing the CAISO portfolio to about 13,500 MW. The additional storage helps grid managers supply enough energy to meet demand during the early evening, the trickiest time of the day as solar production plummets at the same time that residents arriving home turn on their appliances. 'Still, a long lasting West-wide heat wave coincident [with] a big potential fire could still put us on the edge, and that's something we want to watch carefully,' Gunda said. — NB PEAK OF THE FIRE: California's No. 1 — in homes at fire risk. The state has nearly 1.3 million homes at moderate or higher wildfire risk, representing $800 billion in reconstruction costs, according to a new report released Tuesday by property data and analytics company Cotality. Second-place Colorado has 318,000 homes at similar risk, representing $142 billion. California also claims eight of the 15 metropolitan areas with the most homes at risk: Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, Sacramento, San Francisco, Oxnard, Redding and Chico. — CvK — Suisun City is considering annexing thousands of inland acres from the tech-billionaire backed company California Forever to stay afloat amid rising seas. — See where forecasters are scheduling extreme heat and red flag warnings in California starting Thursday. — The House Oversight Committee is investigating whether the California High-Speed Rail Authority knowingly misrepresented the project's numbers in order to obtain federal funding.
Wall Street Journal
29 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Elon Musk Pledged to Start a Political Party. He Is Already Pumping the Brakes.
The billionaire Elon Musk is quietly pumping the brakes on his plans to start a political party, according to people with knowledge of his plans. Musk has told allies that he wants to focus his attention on his companies and is reluctant to alienate powerful Republicans by starting a third party that could siphon off GOP voters.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democratic Texas lawmaker passes 24-hour mark on state House floor after refusing GOP demand for law enforcement escort
Democratic Texas state Rep. Nicole Collier has now spent over 24 hours on the Texas House floor in protest after refusing a Republican demand to be placed under the watch of the state Department of Public Safety. When Texas House Democrats returned to the Capitol in Austin on Monday, after having fled the state earlier this month in order to prevent a vote on a controversial Republican redistricting plan, House Speaker Dustin Burrows put constraints on their movements. Burrows announced that the Democrats could only leave the House floor if they received written permission and agreed to be under law enforcement escort until the chamber reconvenes on Wednesday morning. The Democrats who skipped out on previous attempts to meet quorum for a special session to approve the redrawn congressional maps will have an around-the-clock DPS escort to ensure their presence when the House convenes Wednesday, a legislative aide told CNN. Democrats had fled to blue states — including Illinois, New York and Massachusetts — as they faced civil arrest warrants pushed by GOP officials in Texas to force them back into the House chamber. The majority of the Democrats complied with the law enforcement escort, showing reporters what they called 'permission slips' they received to leave the House floor and pointing to the officers escorting them around the Capitol. But Collier refused to enter into that agreement and has been confined to the House floor since returning. She can only leave the floor to return to her office under the watch of a law enforcement officer, an aide said, and cannot leave the state Capitol unless she agrees to outside supervision. State Reps. Gene Wu and Vince Perez, who signed the 'permission slips' to leave with a police escort yesterday, stayed on the House floor with Collier through the night, the aide said. Rep. Perez left early this morning but Wu remained in the chamber with Collier. Wu posted a photo on X Monday evening detailing some of their snacks for the long stretch ahead - dried peaches, freeze dried grapes, popcorn and ramen. 'My constituents sent me to Austin to protect their voices and rights,' said Collier. 'I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts. My community is majority-minority, and they expect me to stand up for their representation. When I press that button to vote, I know these maps will harm my constituents — I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination.' Texas Democrat Beto O'Rourke celebrated Collier's protest on Monday, writing on social media, 'A true hero, refusing to submit, fighting these fascists by herself if she has to. We are with you Nicole!' Burrows said in a statement, 'Rep. Collier's choice to stay and not sign the permission slip is well within her rights under the House Rules.' The Texas House Speaker said that he is 'choosing to spend my time focused on' important legislation. The Texas House established a quorum Monday afternoon, for the first time since most members of the Democratic minority fled the state 15 days earlier to prevent it from having the two-thirds quorum necessary to advance new congressional maps aimed at creating five more Republican-leaning seats ahead of next year's midterm elections. Early in their boycott, Burrows had signed civil arrest warrants for those Democrats. But DPS officers could not carry out those warrants because the Democrats were out of state. At President Donald Trump's urging, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Republicans who control the state House and Senate launched the effort to redraw the state's congressional districts mid-decade — a break from most states' typical practice of redistricting once a decade, after the completion of the US Census. It's part of the party's effort to hold onto its narrow House majority in next year's midterm elections — one that also includes lobbying GOP officials in Indiana and Missouri to change their maps to turn Democratic-held seats into favorable ground for Republicans, and could see the party add more GOP-leaning seats in Ohio, which is required by state law to redistrict. The Texas effort has set off a nationwide gerrymandering arms race. In California, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has vowed retribution, proposing a measure that would trigger new maps that could help Democrats pick up five more seats in the state — but only if Texas moves forward with its redistricting plan. This story and headline have been updated with additional details.
