&w=3840&q=100)
Trump stokes Harvard feud with threat to revoke tax-exempt status
Experts say that revoking Harvard's tax-exempt status would be a long process through the Internal Revenue Service and likely the courts - and that it could take years
Bloomberg
By Amanda Albright, Elizabeth Rembert, Akayla Gardner and Brooke Sutherland
President Donald Trump said Harvard University would lose its tax-exempt status, stepping up his attack on the Ivy League school with a threat that was decried as out of his jurisdiction.
Trump made the announcement after weeks of threatening a change to the school's tax-free treatment. Experts say that revoking Harvard's tax-exempt status would be a long process through the Internal Revenue Service and likely the courts — and that it could take years.
'We are going to be taking away Harvard's Tax Exempt Status. It's what they deserve!' Trump wrote in a post early Friday morning.
Under federal law, the president, vice president or their employees cannot direct an IRS official to 'conduct or terminate an audit or other investigation of any particular taxpayer with respect to the tax liability of such taxpayer.'
It was unclear if Trump's announcement stemmed from his decision or that of the tax agency.
'I can't understand how the president is operating as if he has the power to direct this. He doesn't and is specifically prohibited from doing this,' said Steven Bloom, assistant vice president for government relations at the American Council on Education.
The power to revoke tax benefits lies with the IRS and it's a lengthy process that begins with an examination, he said. Harvard would also have the opportunity to remedy any issues, according to Bloom.
Tenenbaum Law Group, a Washington, DC-based law firm that represents nonprofits, said in an April 28 report that federal tax-exempt status cannot be taken away with a 'stroke of a pen.'
'Those procedures require individual case-by-case IRS audits of each organization, with ample opportunity for the entity to defend itself, and including multiple routes of appeal,' the law firm said.
Painful Blow
Conservatives have targeted Harvard and other elite universities in recent years over accusations of ideological bias and allegations of a rise in antisemitism amid campus protests against the war in Gaza. Trump and other Republicans have accused the institutions of promoting liberal agendas and so-called 'wokeness.'
The White House, IRS and Treasury Department declined to comment.
'The government has long exempted universities from taxes in order to support their educational mission,' a Harvard spokesperson said in an emailed statement.
The school said that the action would result in diminished financial aid for students and the abandonment of critical medical research programs. 'The unlawful use of this instrument more broadly would have grave consequences for the future of higher education in America,' the statement said.
Some 1,700 private colleges operate as nonprofits given their contributions to society. They receive that benefit as part of a section of the tax code, which specifically mentions education as being a purpose that can receive the exemption.
Stripping Harvard's tax-exempt status completely would deal a painful financial blow to the university. Harvard's tax-exempt status affords the school a variety of benefits, such as not having to pay traditional property taxes on educational buildings. It can sell bonds that pay interest that's exempt from federal taxes, which lures investors and helps lower borrowing costs.
A Bloomberg News analysis estimated that Harvard's tax benefits totaled at least $465 million in 2023.
Trump's fight with Harvard has escalated since the university rejected the administration's demands to reform campus policies, arguing they went far beyond their stated efforts of combating antisemitism and threatened the school's independence. The administration has frozen billions of dollars in funding that supported projects including ALS and tuberculosis research, and Harvard sued several US agencies and top officials in response.
'There's a process that has to be followed that would probably take a number of years,' said James Repetti, a law professor at Boston College who spoke in an interview before Trump's announcement. 'It would likely take a long time to work its way through the courts,' Repetti said.
The IRS has revoked a college's tax-exempt status before, in a process that took years. Bob Jones University in South Carolina lost its federal tax-exemption in 1976, because of its policies banning interracial dating. The decision was upheld by the Supreme Court in 1983. Bob Jones University dropped the policy in 2000 and regained its tax benefits in 2017.
Analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co. pointed to the Bob Jones precedent in an April research note saying that if the IRS did move to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status, 'we would expect immediate legal action, that could take years to resolve, extending beyond the current administration's term in 2028.'
Strong Balance Sheet
As the wealthiest school in the country, Harvard has a lot of firepower available to fend off surprise blows. It's armed with pristine credit ratings and a $53 billion endowment. In fiscal 2024, the school raked in $6.5 billion of revenue and enjoyed a $45 million surplus.
Harvard has also recently taken steps to shore up more cash through a $750 million taxable bond sale. Officials from the endowment have previously discussed selling about $1 billion of private equity fund stakes.
Earlier this week, the university released long-awaited reports on antisemitism and anti-Muslim bias that painted a scathing picture of how students treated each other in the wake of the Hamas attack against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
'I'm sorry for the moments when we failed to meet the high expectations we rightfully set for our community,' Harvard President Alan Garber said in a letter accompanying the reports.
Garber has acknowledged the need to tackle antisemitism, noting that he's experienced it directly while serving as the university's leader, and said Harvard is committed to working with the administration.
In recent weeks, the school placed the Harvard Undergraduate Palestine Solidarity Committee on probation and forced the faculty leaders of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies to leave their posts. Harvard also suspended a partnership with Birzeit University in the West Bank and renamed its diversity, equity and inclusion office as Community and Campus Life.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
US orders partial evacuation of Iraq Embassy, says dependents of troops can leave locations across Middle East
US missions in Baghdad and Erbil started evacuating most of their diplomats in response to unspecified security threats Wednesday, reports claimed. 'President Trump is committed to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In keeping with that commitment, we are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies. Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq,' the State Department said in an emailed statement. Defense secretary Pete Hegseth authorized the voluntary departure of US military dependents across the Middle East, Politico reported. The sudden move came after Iran's defense minister threatened to strike American based in the region if negotiations over Iran's nuclear program fail. Iran has repeatedly said its nuclear ambitions are focused on peaceful purposes like energy production. But Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday that "if a conflict is imposed on US bases are within our reach." The Baghdad embassy has already been on limited staffing, and the order will not affect a large number of personnel, according to the AP. The State Department is also authorizing the departure of nonessential personnel and their family members from Bahrain and Kuwait, giving them the option to leave the country.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
What the Harvard investigation means for the future of diversity in US higher education
A new congressional investigation into Harvard University's faculty hiring practices is drawing national attention—and raising questions about the future of diversity efforts in US higher education. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now With President Donald Trump leading a broader political campaign against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, the Harvard case could be a turning point for how universities approach hiring across the country. Recently, nine Republican members of the US House Committee on Education and the Workforce sent a letter to Harvard President Alan M. Garber, alleging that the university may be violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by considering race and gender in its hiring decisions. As reported by the Harvard Crimson , lawmakers demanded documents and internal policies that relate to hiring practices, with a deadline of June 25, 2025. Focus on race and gender in hiring under legal scrutiny The investigation was triggered in part by leaked internal documents, published by conservative activist Christopher F. Rufo. These materials included a 2023 Harvard guide that encouraged faculty search committees to "consider reading the applications of women and minorities first" and give such candidates a "second look," especially when placement goals were in place. As noted by the Harvard Crimson , the guide also recommended monitoring racial and gender diversity in applicant pools. The letter also cited interview prompts reportedly used by Harvard since 2021. Candidates were asked to define diversity, explain its role in their careers, and describe challenges in diverse environments. As quoted by the Harvard Crimson , lawmakers said these practices raise serious concerns under Title VII, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race or sex. A national precedent for other universities Higher education experts believe the investigation could set a precedent that pressures other US universities to revise or roll back DEI-related hiring practices. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Following a Title VII complaint filed by Andrea R. Lucas, acting chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Harvard Medical School removed several diversity-focused programs and quietly deleted a public pledge on inclusive hiring. The timing of the probe also follows the US Supreme Court's 2023 decision ending race-based affirmative action in college admissions. While that ruling focused on Title VI, the Republican lawmakers argued—according to the Harvard Crimson —that "the principle of equal treatment under the law certainly applies to Title VII as well." More scrutiny likely as politics meets policy With multiple investigations already underway into Harvard's conduct, including probes into campus antisemitism and research ties with China, lawmakers appear poised to increase pressure on elite institutions. As the Harvard Crimson noted, this marks the reemergence of the House Education and the Workforce Committee as a powerful force in congressional oversight. For many in academia, the Harvard investigation is not just about one university—it may be a signal of shifting legal standards and political realities for higher education across the US.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Oil Surges as US Orders Partial Evacuation of Iraqi Embassy
Oil surged as the US government ordered a partial evacuation of its embassy in Iraq amid rising security risks. West Texas Intermediate futures jumped 4.9% to settle above $68 a barrel, the largest gain since October, as the Trump administration reduced embassy staff in Iraq and permitted military service-members' families to leave the region in response to ongoing security concerns. The UK Navy also issued a rare warning to mariners that higher tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping. The developments compounded speculation about possible supply disruptions in the Middle East after AFP reported that Iran threatened to target US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out. 'Iranian rhetoric has turned notably more hostile, and these threats are being substantiated by real-world developments,' said Rebecca Babin, a senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth Group. 'While geopolitical rallies are often seen as selling opportunities, this situation carries the added complexity of potential Israeli military action if negotiations break down, which is keeping traders more cautious about selling into the rally.' Elsewhere, President Donald Trump told the New York Post he's 'less confident' about whether he can convince Tehran to agree on shutting down its nuclear program. He also posted on social media that a trade deal with China was 'done,' subject to the approval of President Xi Jinping. Oil had been weighed down by expectations that a trade war between the world's two largest economies would hurt demand and that a deal with Iran would bring back sanctioned barrels, adding to rising OPEC supplies. Prices have recovered in recent sessions, supported by easing trade tensions and the outlook for summer demand. A monthly report from the US Energy Information Administration underscored the oil market's current uncertainties. While the agency expects supply to eclipse demand by 800,000 barrels a day this year, the most since it began publishing a forecast for 2025, it also doesn't see US crude production topping last month's levels before the end of next year, a sign that lower prices are curbing some supply. Signs of market tightness have also appeared along the futures curve. Earlier this week, the February-March WTI spread flipped to backwardation — where near-term prices are higher than longer-dated ones — for the first time since April, with several subsequent months following suit earlier today, signaling concerns about oversupply are easing. To get Bloomberg's Energy Daily newsletter in your inbox, click here. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.