
Will Russia benefit from the Israel-Iran war?
Hours after the US launched strikes on Iranian nuclear sites early Sunday morning, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced that he would hold 'serious consultations' with key ally Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin on Monday.
"In this new dangerous situation ... our consultations with Russia can certainly be of great importance," Russian state media reported Araghchi as saying after landing in the Moscow on Sunday night.
As the two men met face to face, Putin condemned the "absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran" from the US and said that Russia was "making efforts to provide assistance to the Iranian people".
But even as the Kremlin denounces the attacks on its long-term strategic ally, a continued conflict brings potential opportunities for Russia.
Iran announced on Sunday it would close the Strait of Hormuz, a water passage on Iran's south coast through which around one-fifth of the world oil trade passes. Doing so is likely to send global oil prices soaring, giving a boost to Moscow's sanctions-hit economy.
But most importantly for Russia, while the US – and the world – has their eyes trained on Israel and Iran, Putin's war in Ukraine has slipped down the agenda.
The United States becoming embroiled in a prolonged conflict could also have a material impact on Ukraine's future defence capabilities.
US President Donald Trump has not clarified whether he intends to continue attacks on Iran. But supporting Israel in the long term may well mean that 'the US will have to provide Israel with missiles, air defence and interceptors ', said the International Crisis Group's senior Russia analyst, Oleg Ignatov.
'That means these will not go to Ukraine and, of course, that is in Russia's interest.'
There are also the moral implications of the US joining an attack on Iran under the shaky legal pretext that it was a pre-emptive act of self-defence – the same justification that Western leaders have denounced Putin as using for invading Ukraine in 2022.
In the longer term, if the US becomes involved in another 'unwinnable Middle East war, then that actually hastens America's decline that President Putin has now been predicting for years', said Kadri Liik, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations and an expert on Russia.
'Performative diplomacy'
The deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, on Sunday even hinted at an Iranian nuclear retaliation against the United States, backed by Russia. Trump had 'pushed the US into a new war' in which 'a number of countries' were ready to 'directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads', he wrote on social media.
But such a step seems unlikely.
While Iran has supported Russia's war in Ukraine by providing drones and other military equipment, so far the Kremlin has offered no military help to Iran – despite a sweeping strategic partnership agreement signed just months ago in which the two countries agreed to help each other counter common "security threats".
As long as Russia's military resources are concentrated in Ukraine, Putin seems to have little appetite for conflict in Israel and Iran and has pitched himself as an informal peace broker – while rejecting the possibility of acting as an official mediator.
"We are simply suggesting ideas … if they turn out to be attractive to both sides, we will only be happy," he said when discussing the conflict at an economic forum in Saint Petersburg on Friday.
Realistically, the Russian leader holds little influence over outcomes in Israel or Iran. 'Russia is not strong enough to shape the new order emerging in the Middle East, and maybe not best positioned to gain from it,' said Liik.
But that doesn't mean he won't try. 'Putin is very tactical, and he will try to make gains from the situation,' Ignatov said.
One best-case scenario for Russia is a short-term conflict in which the Kremlin offers what limited military defence it can currently provide to Iran in exchange for a pledge from Tehran to avoid striking US bases in its proximity.
Such an arrangement would both increase Iran's reliance on Russia and ward off the risk of a spat with the US. 'Russia can say it doesn't want escalation, but it is ready to help Iran and defend itself. That seems logical,' Ignatov said.
It would also be an extension of what Liik calls Putin's policy of 'performative diplomacy' towards the United States while he pursues his own goals in Ukraine.
'Russia pretends to be helpful, it pretends to be engaged in diplomatic processes … while not actually giving in an inch on their maximalist demands and playing for time,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Iran attacks US base in Qatar, Trump says ‘it's time for peace'
Iran announced it had launched missiles at a US base in Qatar Monday in retaliation for American strikes on key nuclear facilities, with US President Donald Trump shrugging off the response as "very weak" and saying it was now time to make peace. A US defence official said no one was hurt in the attack -- which Trump said Iran had given advanced notice of -- and oil prices sank afterwards as traders breathed a sigh of relief at what one analyst called the "somewhat measured" response. Qatar, which lies 190 kilometres (120 miles) south of Iran and is home to the largest US military facility in the Middle East, said its "air defences successfully intercepted a missile attack targeting Al Udeid Air Base". Iran's National Security Council confirmed having targeted the base "in response to the US aggressive and insolent action against Iran's nuclear sites and facilities". 07:33 In its statement, the council said the number of missiles used "was the same as the number of bombs that the US had used", in a signal that it had calibrated its response to be directly proportional. After more than a week of Israeli strikes on nuclear and military targets across Iran, the United States joined its ally's campaign on Sunday, carrying out attacks on three key Iranian nuclear facilities, including on an underground uranium enrichment facility at Fordo using massive bunker-busting bombs. "Iran has officially responded to our Obliteration of their Nuclear Facilities with a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform after the attack, thanking Tehran "for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured". Adding that Iran had "gotten it all out of their 'system'," he said: "Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region, and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same." The New York Times, citing Iranian officials, reported that the response had been designed to allow "all sides an exit ramp", drawing a parallel to a similar Iranian attack on a US base in Iraq following Washington's assassination of top Iranian general in 2020. With international concern mounting that Israel 's campaign in Iran could lead to a regional spillover -- concern that only intensified after the US strikes -- French President Emmanuel Macron said after the Iranian retaliation that "the spiral of chaos must end". 'Right to respond' Iran's security council maintained that its "action does not pose any threat to our friendly and brotherly country, Qatar". But Qatari foreign ministry spokesman Majed Al-Ansari said his country "reserves the right to respond directly in a manner proportional to the nature and scale of this blatant aggression". Its much larger neighbour Saudi Arabia, historically a rival of Iran, condemned Tehran's attack and offered "all its capabilities to support the sisterly State of Qatar in any measures it takes". AFP reporters heard blasts in central Doha and in Lusail, north of the capital, on Monday evening, and saw projectiles moving across the night sky. The US defence official said Al Udeid was "attacked by short-range and medium-range ballistic missiles", and Ansari said it had been evacuated as a precaution ahead of time. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps said six missiles had hit the base, according to state media. 42:55 Iranians gathered in central Tehran on Monday night to celebrate the attack, images on state TV showed, with some waving the flag of the Islamic republic and chanting "Death to America". Earlier in the day, Qatar had announced the temporary closure of its airspace in light of "developments in the region", while foreign embassies there including that of the United States had warned their citizens to shelter in place. After the attack, Qatar said "the security situation in the country is stable, and there is no cause for concern". Tehran strikes Just as Iran was announcing the new attacks, blasts were heard in the north of Tehran, according to an AFP journalist, who reported yellow flashes typical of Iranian air defences in the sky over the capital shortly before 9:00 pm (1730 GMT). Earlier in the day Israel reported carrying out what it said were its most powerful strikes yet on Tehran. Iran, in turn, fired missile barrages at Israel. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said the military hit sites in Tehran including Evin prison, which Katz said "holds political prisoners and regime opponents", as well as command centres for the domestic Basij paramilitary and the Revolutionary Guards. Iranian media and the Israeli military said Israel also struck Fordo on Monday "in order to obstruct access routes" to the site. Israeli strikes on Iran have killed more than 400 people, Iran's health ministry has said. Iran's attacks on Israel have killed 24 people, according to official figures. China urged both Iran and Israel to prevent the conflict from spilling over, warning of potential economic fallout. Oil prices fall Oil prices sank more than six percent on Monday after the attack. Around 1815 GMT, futures for West Texas Intermediate fell 6.5 percent to $69.96 a barrel, while Brent oil futures dropped 6.4 percent to $72.07 a barrel, its lowest level in 10 days. John Kilduff of Again Capital described the Iranian action as "somewhat measured". "This is a face-saving measure by the Iranians and hopefully the diplomatic off-ramp will be taken," Kilduff said. On Sunday, after the Pentagon stressed the goal of US intervention was not to topple the Iranian government, Trump had openly toyed with the idea. "If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???" Trump posted on his Truth Social platform.

LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Macron says the US strikes on Iran lack legal basis
French President Emmanuel Macron on Monday, June 23, said US strikes on Iran were not legal, but that France supported the objective of keeping Tehran from developing nuclear arms. "While we can consider there being legitimacy in neutralizing nuclear structures in Iran given the objectives we share... There is no legality in these strikes," Macron told reporters during a visit to Norway. "We have consistently believed from the beginning that this can only be achieved through diplomatic and technical means," the French president said, speaking alongside Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store. Store echoed the sentiment. "International law has some clear principles on the use of force. It can be granted by the Security Council or it can be in pure self defense," he said, noting that this meant the strikes were "outside the realm of international law." The French president also voiced his opposition to any intention of a regime change in Iran through military means. "Every time we've made this choice, whatever the legitimacy of the initial approach ... we made a mistake," he said, adding that such actions had not led to increased stability in the past. Macron added that Israeli strikes on Iran's Evin prison had nothing to do with Israel's "stated objectives" of destroying the nuclear program and had endangered civilians. Macron also warned of the economic impact on the global economy in the event of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz. "The consequences for the global economy, especially China and many others, would be massive, and I think it would prompt a lot of reactions," the president said.


France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Bluff and last-minute orders: Trump's path to Iran decision
The next evening he left the White House for a fundraising dinner at his New Jersey golf resort, and much of the world seemed to believe that there was still space for diplomacy. In reality, Trump was already on the verge of making his mind up. A few hours after his arrival at Trump National Golf Club Bedminster on Friday night, the first B-2 stealth bombers took off from a US airbase. The next day, while the bombers were still in the air, Trump made the call on attacking three Iranian nuclear facilities, in the first direct US military strike on Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. "The president gave the final order to the Secretary of Defense on Saturday," a senior White House official told AFP on condition of anonymity. "In the week leading up to the strike, the president was continuing to pursue diplomacy, mainly through Special Envoy (Steve) Witkoff's efforts, while the Pentagon was simultaneously preparing the operation," added the official. 'Misdirection' Trump's "two weeks" gambit appeared to be part of a broader campaign of what Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called "misdirection," which included several B-2s flying in the opposite direction as a decoy. Trump, the tycoon who prides himself as an expert on the "art of the deal," had ladled on the strategic ambiguity all week. First he flew home early from the G7 summit for talks with his national security team. Then he unleashed a barrage of bellicose social media posts against Iran's supreme leader. On Wednesday he said that "I may do it, I may not" when asked about striking Iran. Finally, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt read out a statement from Trump in the White House briefing room on Thursday, saying there was a "substantial" chance of talks and that he would decide "whether or not to go within the next two weeks." It played into a frequent criticism of Trump for setting two-week deadlines on everything from Ukraine to health care and then ignoring them. But behind the scenes, Trump was increasingly determined, US officials said. Trump had opposed Israel attacking Iran right up until it did so on June 13 -- but afterwards he openly admired Israel's success and was talking daily to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel's achievement of air superiority over Iran presented Trump with a unique opportunity to hit the nuclear program that he had railed against since his first term. Trump was "briefed daily on the Israelis' efforts and the operation itself as he decided whether to move forward," the senior White House official said. The US commander-in-chief held daily meetings with his National Security Council in the White House's basement Situation Room as he pondered his options. And to head off opposition in his "Make America Great Again" movement to another Middle Eastern "forever war", he reportedly met his influential former aide Steve Bannon. 'Highly classified' In public, Trump and the White House took pains to keep things under wraps. The normally talkative Trump said nothing to reporters as he returned to the White House on Saturday night, just one minute after his scheduled 6 pm arrival. The timing was precise for a reason. The first B-2 bomber dropped its bombs just 40 minutes later, at 6:40 pm US time, or 2:10 am Sunday Iranian time. The last submarine-fired Tomahawk missiles struck at 7:05 pm. Trump announced the "very successful" strikes in a Truth Social post at 7:50 pm. The White House then released pictures of a pensive looking Trump in the Situation Room, wearing his red "Make America Great Again" baseball cap. "This was a highly classified mission with very few people in Washington knowing the timing or nature of this plan," US Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine said on Sunday. But the tough decisions are far from over for Trump, who was meeting his top team again on Monday in the Oval Office. How will he respond to Iran's retaliation on Monday? If the US strikes did not completely destroy Iran's nuclear sites as he claimed, will he launch more? Above all, will Trump go further than striking Iran's nuclear plants? "If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???" Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday.