Dutch are first to buy US arms for Ukraine under Nato scheme
THE HAGUE : The Netherlands will buy €500 million (US$577 million) of US weapons for Ukraine, becoming the first Nato member to fund a full package under a new scheme to speed deliveries from American stockpiles, the defence ministry said.
The purchase will be under the Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) mechanism launched by US President Donald Trump and Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte last month.
Under the scheme, countries pay Washington for defence systems and munitions in US warehouses that are then shipped to Ukraine, which has been battling a Russian invasion since February 2022.
'The Netherlands is now taking the lead in supplying military equipment from American stockpiles,' Dutch defence minister Ruben Brekelmans said on X.
'By supporting Ukraine with determination, we are increasing the pressure on Russia to negotiate.'
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky thanked Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof in a call on Monday evening.
'These weapons are badly needed,' Schoof posted on X, highlighting the near-daily drone and missile attacks by Russia.
The Dutch package includes US Patriot missile parts and other systems tailored to Ukraine's front-line requirements, according to the defence ministry.
Brekelmans called the Russian air strikes 'pure terror' and warned that Moscow's advance into Ukrainian territory could pose a broader threat to Europe.
'The more Russia dominates Ukraine, the greater the danger to the Netherlands and our Nato allies,' he said.
Washington is releasing military support for Ukraine in US$500 million tranches under the PURL mechanism.
While other allies have pledged to join the initiative, the Netherlands is the first to transfer funds.
It has already pledged tanks, drones, ammunition and support for F-16 training and delivery to Ukraine.
Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte welcomed the move, calling it a vital first step under the new framework. 'Great to see the Netherlands taking the lead and funding the first package of US military equipment for Ukraine,' he said on X.
'I thank Allies for getting Ukraine the equipment it urgently needs to defend against Russian aggression.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Palm falls on lower edible oils at Dalian
JAKARTA: Malaysian palm oil futures opened lower on Thursday as the market tracked lower edible oil prices at the Dalian exchange. The benchmark palm oil contract for October delivery on the Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Exchange lost 26 ringgit, or 0.59 per cent, to 4,409 ringgit (US$1,051.26) a metric ton in early trade. Dalian's most-active soyoil contract fell 0.14 per cent, while its palm oil contract declined 0.09 per cent. Soyoil prices on the Chicago Board of Trade were also down 0.13 per cent. Palm oil tracks price movements of rival edible oils, as it competes for a share of the global vegetable oils market. China announced preliminary anti-dumping duties on Canadian canola imports on Tuesday, which will be effective from Thursday, escalating a year-long trade dispute that began with Ottawa's imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicle imports last August. Malaysia raised its September crude palm oil reference price, a change that increases the export duty rate to 10 per cent, a circular on the Malaysian Palm Oil Board website showed on Wednesday. Oil prices edged higher on Thursday, regaining ground after a sell-off in the previous session, with the upcoming meeting between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin raising risk premiums in the market. Stronger crude oil futures make palm a more attractive option for biodiesel feedstock. The ringgit, the palm's currency of trade, strengthened 0.26 per cent against the dollar, making the commodity more expensive for buyers holding foreign currencies. Palm oil still targets a range of 4,388-4,400 ringgit per metric ton, as it failed to break strong resistance at 4,455 ringgit, Reuters technical analyst Wang Tao said. The US dollar was under pressure on Thursday as traders piled into wagers that the Federal Reserve will resume cutting interest rates next month, powering Bitcoin to a record high, while a blistering rally in regional stocks took a breather.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Bitcoin hits record high above US$124,000
TOKYO: Bitcoin hit a record high on Thursday during early Asian trading, surpassing US$124,000, driven by favourable US legislation and a rise in US equities. The cryptocurrency rose above its previous July record, briefly exceeding US$124,500 before retreating. US stocks ended higher Wednesday, with the S&P 500 index and the tech-heavy Nasdaq reaching new heights this week, contributing to the cryptocurrency's rise. Bitcoin's value has recently soared, fuelled by US regulatory changes under US President Donald Trump, a strong backer of the crypto sector. Its price has also been boosted by large holders of cryptocurrency, referred to as "whales". "The crypto market is enjoying a period of highly favorable fundamentals," said Samer Hasn, senior market analyst at "President Donald Trump has moved to end restrictions that previously prevented banks from doing business with companies flagged for reputational risk concerns, a category in which crypto firms were often unfairly placed," he added. Trump may also be inclined to "accelerate the integration of cryptocurrencies into the national financial system and lift additional restrictions, given his and his family's growing involvement in the sector", Hasn said. Trump's media group and Tesla, the electric carmaker owned by tech billionaire Elon Musk, are among an increasing number of companies buying huge amounts of bitcoin.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Trump won't walk away from Alaska with a ceasefire — Phar Kim Beng
AUGUST 14 — When Donald Trump meets Vladimir Putin in Alaska this August, expectations of a signed ceasefire agreement in the Russia–Ukraine war will likely prove misplaced. The obstacles are structural, not personal, and the political theatre of the summit cannot disguise the fact that the fundamental parties are not aligned — starting with the absence of Ukraine as a formal participant in the talks. Without Kyiv's direct involvement, no arrangement to transform roughly one-quarter of Ukraine's eastern territories into a so-called 'safe buffer zone' can hold. This is not a neutral security measure; it is a geopolitical carve-out that Moscow might see as a fait accompli, but which Kyiv would treat as illegitimate. The fact that more than half a million Russian soldiers have reportedly perished and large swathes of both occupied and unoccupied territory remain mined only complicates the picture. Russia has no strategic interest in inheriting a wasteland, and Ukraine has no incentive to formalise losses under such dangerous conditions. The NATO factor Adding to the difficulty, NATO's largest European powers — notably France and Germany — are not buying into the premise of a Putin-friendly peace. Their pledge to raise defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035 signals long-term strategic resistance to Russian expansionism. This is not 1938, and the political mood is the opposite of Munich's ill-fated appeasement. Their military build-up reflects a collective decision to fortify Europe's eastern flank, not to bargain away Ukrainian territory in the name of expediency. This means even if Trump and Putin agree on a provisional framework, European resolve will act as a brake. No NATO consensus will emerge behind an agreement that concedes strategic depth to Moscow without robust verification and enforcement measures. Then there is Beijing. T-shirts with images of Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump are displayed for sale at a gift shop in central Moscow, Russia, August 12, 2025. — Reuters pic China has already made clear it will not allow Russia to lose to the United States, and this is more than diplomatic rhetoric. The statement aligns with Beijing's broader grand strategy — a multipolar order in which a weakened Russia would tilt the global balance in Washington's favour. This strategic commitment emboldens Moscow, making it less likely to compromise in ways that would give the US or NATO a clear win. As long as China's economic and diplomatic umbrella remains open over Russia, Putin will calculate that time is on his side. This makes any substantive concession in Alaska highly improbable. The most likely outcome In reality, the best Trump can hope for is an agreement to keep talking. The East Asian Summit in Kuala Lumpur later this year could serve as the next venue for high-level dialogue. While the EAS is not designed to address European conflicts, it gathers the US, Russia, China, and ASEAN under one roof — creating a multipolar stage where ongoing discussions can be framed as progress without the pressure of immediate resolution. For Trump, this would still be a face-saving result. He could present the Alaska meeting as a breakthrough in getting adversaries to engage directly, while leaving room for further negotiations in a setting that dilutes NATO's centrality and includes Asian powers with vested interests in global stability. Why there will be no ceasefire in Alaska The absence of Ukraine, NATO's hardening stance, and China's strategic alignment with Russia form a triangular blockade to any rapid deal. These are not conditions that yield an enforceable ceasefire. At most, Alaska will produce another handshake moment and a promise to meet again — a symbolic gesture, not a settlement. The war will continue, the battle lines will remain, and the mines will still be in the ground. Trump may leave Alaska with headlines, but not with peace. * Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies and Director of the Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies at the International Islamic University of Malaysia. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
