Nursing chief 'can't recall' seeing risk assessment that led to suspension of nurse who had complained about trans doctor using female changing room
Gillian Malone said she perceived that allegations about Ms Peggie confronting transgender medic Dr Beth Upton were 'unacceptable'.
Ms Peggie was suspended after she complained about having to share a changing room with Dr Upton at the Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife - where they both worked - on Christmas Eve 2023.
She was placed on special leave and then suspended after Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment and cited concerns about 'patient care'.
Ms Peggie has lodged a claim against Fife health board and Dr Upton, citing the Equality Act 2010, including sexual harassment; harassment related to a protected belief; indirect discrimination and victimisation.
On Thursday, Ms Malone, told the tribunal she perceived a Datix report from January 3, 2024 regarding a conflict on Christmas Eve to be 'a discriminatory allegation'.
She said she had no role in the investigation, that she had never met Ms Peggie, and had no awareness of 'tension' between either the nurse or Dr Upton.
But she said she was aware of the nurse's concerns due to an email from August 2023.
Ms Malone told the tribunal the decision to suspend Ms Peggie was made following a risk assessment carried out by Esther Davidson, the nurse's line manager, however when asked if she had seen the risk assessment, she said: 'I can't recall.'
Giving evidence, she said: 'When I read content of Datix I thought the comments were concerning.
'At this time they were allegations, I did believe there was behaviour in there which could constitute bullying and harassment which were of concern and could require investigation.'
She added: 'Within original Datix there is a comment that there has been other work-related incidents.'
During cross-examination by Ms Peggie's barrister, Naomi Cunningham, Ms Malone - the most senior staff member to appear at the tribunal - said she agrees there are two biological sexes and that sex is a 'medically salient fact'.
Ms Cunningham read from an email sent by an HR worker, which said: 'We discussed suspension being last resort and options to mitigate risk...
'Esther felt it would be almost impossible to keep them apart so spoke to Gillian Malone... she believes there is a patient safety issue due to seriousness of the allegation and therefore wishes to suspend.'
Ms Cunningham said: 'It looks as though you were essentially behind the decision to suspend.'
Ms Malone said: 'It was Esther who completed the risk assessment.'
She was also asked about an email titled 'Formal Complaint' sent by Dr Upton on June 11.
Ms Cunningham then suggested the reason Ms Peggie was suspended was 'because she had told Dr Upton she wasn't happy about him using the women's changing room'.
Ms Cunningham said: 'That is the first documentary trace shown to the tribunal of the document 'Formal Complaint' which contains earlier incidents, being passed on to anyone from hospital management at all. Do you say that document was already in the hands of somebody, either as a printed out statement or sent as an email, before June 11?'
Ms Malone said: 'I'm not aware of that.'
Ms Cunningham said: 'Do you agree that if the tribunal finds that the reason for suspension was about the incident on Christmas Eve and wasn't about the prior allegations relating to patient care, that wasn't sufficient justification for suspension?'
Ms Malone said: 'The justification for suspension was based on a risk assessment which wasn't undertaken by me.'
Asked to identify what she perceived to be most unacceptable in the allegations made by Dr Upton, Ms Malone replied: 'I find it unacceptable that any colleague would confront another colleague in the manner described.'
She added that Ms Peggie should have raised concerns through her line manager rather than 'face-to-face on Christmas Eve'.
Ms Cunningham said: 'If the tribunal finds that the claimant didn't ask about his genes, would you say otherwise that was a point she was entitled to make, that he shouldn't be there? If she said to Dr Upton 'I don't think you should be here because you're a man', even if she didn't say anything about chromosomes?'
Ms Malone said: 'I think that was already raised back in August, I wouldn't have expected that to be face-to-face on Christmas Eve.'
Ms Cunningham added: 'I'm suggesting that by challenging Dr Upton's presence in the changing room she was complaining he was harassing her; it was her rejection of that harassment which gave rise also to the disciplinary and suspension, it was her refusal to tolerate what he was doing.'
Ms Malone said: 'It was the manner in which she raised it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
6 hours ago
- Times
The NHS must accept the reality of sex
The Supreme Court's ruling on the definition of sex in the Equality Act ought to have been the final word in a particularly ugly chapter of public discourse. Four months on from that landmark verdict, however, not enough has changed for the women who have suffered most from the capture of the public sector by gender extremism. It is time for ministers, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), to lay down the law that too many public bodies are still ignoring. Just look to Fife, whose NHS trust is still spending exorbitant sums of public money fighting an employment tribunal against a nurse, Sandie Peggie, who refused to share a female changing room with a transgender doctor. Ms Peggie, a working-class woman whose NHS career was curtailed after 30 years for standing up for the existence of biological sex, has been dragged through the mud for daring to object to a male-bodied colleague watching her deal with a menstrual flood. It was always absurd and offensive that Ms Peggie should be disciplined for expecting single-sex changing facilities. Now the law has been clarified, there should be no reason for the NHS to persist in wasting public money on tribunals brought by working women subjected to similar indignities. In Darlington, a group of nurses who similarly objected to a transgender colleague changing in their single-sex space will fight a full tribunal from October; others, including Jennifer Melle, who was racially abused by a trans-identifying male paedophile she called 'mister', have been suspended. • Trans doctor Beth Upton lamented lack of guidelines on changing rooms Enough is enough. The public sector in general and the health service in particular cannot be allowed to treat the law as optional. It is time for ministers to assert their authority. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has been admirably assertive in his dealings with the trans lobby in banning the prescription of puberty blockers to children. Now he must show the same initiative in forcing hospitals, NHS leaders and the NHS Confederation to abide by their legal obligations to female staff and patients. Mr Streeting must also ensure that the Scottish government duly falls into line. It now falls to the EHRC to state those obligations beyond reasonable doubt. The watchdog has dragged its feet on providing new guidance to ministers. It need not be difficult. The EHRC should state that trans women must not be allowed in single-sex spaces. And when it comes to women's sport, the guidance must be clear that transgender competitors cannot take part. The Supreme Court ruling has finally settled the question of what defines sex; the EHRC must now ensure it is understood and delivered across all parts of society, with statutory underpinning. • Janice Turner: Class snobbery is at heart of NHS gender war Once that guidance is submitted to ministers, it must be implemented without delay. Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary and equalities minister, showed admirable courage in overruling wrong-headed Labour MPs to appoint Mary-Ann Stephenson as the next chairwoman of the commission — someone who has three decades of experience in human rights law and will lead in the vein of Baroness Falkner of Margravine. The rest of her cabinet colleagues must back Dr Stephenson too. The era in which careers could be destroyed, reputations traduced and taxpayers' money wasted denying objective reality on sex and gender should have ended with the Supreme Court ruling. It is long past time for ministers to impose their authority in the name of sanity.
Times
10 hours ago
- Times
Nearly half of doctors in Scotland witness care failings every week
Almost half of Scotland's doctors witness patient safety being compromised at least once a week, the medical regulator has said. The General Medical Council (GMC) found that 46 per cent of clinicians north of the border see care failings weekly, a higher proportion than elsewhere in the UK. Backlogs in accident and emergency departments, resulting in thousands of patients stuck on trolleys for hours queueing for beds, are thought to be one of the issues driving potential errors. Dr Iain Kennedy, chair of the British Medical Association in Scotland, described the findings as extremely alarming and said that the doctor workforce was operating at 'dangerously low levels'. The latest GMC survey showed a reduction in the number of doctors noting safety incidents weekly in England, Wales and Northern Ireland since 2023 — but an increase in Scotland. Its report, published on Thursday, said: 'In 2024, Scotland fared worse than the UK average in some areas — most notably on patient safety.' Dr Sandesh Gulhane, a GP and health spokesman for the Scottish Conservative Party, said emergency measures such as treating patients in corridors had become routine. He added that staff did not always have access to the life-saving equipment they needed and were more prone to making mistakes because of the pressures, compromising patient safety. 'Nearly two decades of chronic SNP mismanagement has brought our health service to its knees and patients are being put in danger as a result,' he said. The GMC, which serves to protect the public by ensuring high standards of medical training and practice UK-wide, analyses staff experiences on the frontline of the NHS every year. Last year 450 doctors in Scotland participated in the survey and a total of 4,700 were involved UK-wide. Asked if they found it difficult to provide sufficient care for a patient at least once a week, 42 per cent in Scotland said they did, compared with 39 per cent in England. Across the UK 40 per cent of doctors said they had witnessed patient safety or care being compromised at least once a week — 6 per cent less than in Scotland. Clinicians in Scotland also felt less empowered to bring about improvements with 40 per cent saying they could not influence change, compared with 35 per cent for the UK as a whole. Just 37 per cent felt supported by non-medical managers, while the figure was 42 per cent UK-wide. Kennedy said: 'BMA Scotland has been warning for some time that doctor workforce provision in Scotland's NHS is at dangerously low levels, which leads to patients having to wait far too long for treatment and doctors who are stretched to breaking point.' 'There is a major question over how waiting lists can be tackled and how any extra capacity in the health service can be delivered when there are not enough consultants to keep up with current demand and while GP practices are struggling to deliver the services their patients deserve. This is a result of the devastating impact of years of underinvestment which has left many GP practices unable to take on more GPs due to a lack of funding.' He added that it was alarming to see from the survey that 22 per cent of doctors in Scotland were likely to consider moving overseas. This was compared with 27 per cent in the UK as a whole. Dame Jackie Baillie, a health spokeswoman for Scottish Labour, said: 'There are exceptional staff in our NHS who work diligently to care for patients. They are the ones raising the alarm about patient safety, so this is a wake-up call for the Scottish government who are far too complacent.' Fiona Hunter, vice-president of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine Scotland, said: 'This survey is a barometer of how clinicians are feeling, and what they are experiencing at work — and it reveals a saddening and shocking reality. She said the failures were not the fault of the clinicians. 'They are battling in a struggling system, and despite their best efforts, sadly some patients are being put at risk,' she said. 'The Scottish government must listen to the voices of those in this report — and heed the alarm bells so clearly sounding. Our members, their colleagues, and our patients across the country deserve so much better.' A Scottish government spokesman said: 'Patient safety is paramount and we will ensure any concerns raised by the GMC are fully considered and addressed. 'We want doctors to feel their voices are heard — our Future Medical Workforce project will collect direct feedback from physicians in the coming months to help shape future reforms in training and recruitment and ensure being a doctor is a sustainable and fulfilling career path.'
BBC News
11 hours ago
- BBC News
Extra-strong nicotine pouches packaged like children's sweets
Extra-strong nicotine products designed to appeal to children – including some which have ripped off the logos of popular sweet brands – are being openly sold in shops, BBC Scotland has found.A Disclosure reporter, filming undercover, bought nicotine pouches which mimic the name and branding of the well-known 'Millions' sweets in a shop in the east end of shop worker who sold the pouches claimed they contained 100mg of nicotine, which would make them about 10 times the strength of a later showed a lower level of 17mg, which would still be defined as extra strong by most legitimate manufacturers. Trading Standards said they were concerned about products with a "worrying child appeal" as well as flavours and "eye-catching packaging" that mimicked there is no law restricting the age of sale for nicotine pouches, so any child can legally enter a shop and buy the addictive products. No strength restrictions The pouches are small, pillow-like sachets that contain nicotine - a chemical found in tobacco which acts as a are no restrictions on the strength of the nicotine in the are placed under the top lip, against the gum and deliver a nicotine hit which can be stronger than cigarettes or vapes. The pouches are significantly less harmful than cigarettes, and because chemicals do not enter the lungs, they may carry fewer risks than people use them as a way to quit smoking, though they are not recommended by the Pike, from the Chartered Institute of Trading Standards, said it was "outrageous" that products were mimicking popular sweet brands in a bid to target children. For the BBC Disclosure documentary Nicotine Pouches: What's the Problem?, a reporter was secretly filmed buying a tub of orange-flavoured Millions pouches for £ shop worker who sold the product told her: "They're special."The product did not have all of the required hazard warnings, nor did it have traceable manufacturer design on the tub featured photos of the Millions sweets, made by Scottish confectionery manufacturer Golden Casket told the BBC they had no connection to nicotine pouches and were "appalled" their branding was being used in this brand called 'Candys', with pictures of Gummy Bears, was also for makers of the Candys brand did not respond. Ms Pike told the BBC: "Millions sweets are clearly a product for children and there is no reason to link them with nicotine pouches unless you want to attract children."If this was alcohol, there would be an outcry. A child coming across that would think it's for them and nicotine is a highly addictive substance."Retailers should be more responsible for what they are offering in their communities."Prof Crawford Moodie, of the University of Stirling, has been researching the marketing of tobacco and nicotine products for said: "It makes you question what these companies are trying to do. I mean, clearly, they don't have consent to do that."But the fact that companies are putting these on the market and retailers are quite happy to sell them shows that we are not in a good place with respect to controlling the nicotine pouch market and protecting young people in particular."There's very little in the packaging to tell you that they're not sweets and the potential for abuse and detrimental effects for young people are clearly there."When contacted by the BBC, the retailer said it had now taken the Millions product off its shelves. The Disclosure programme spoke to young people who said they had used started taking them two years ago when he was 15 in school and became addicted. He said he had never tried smoking or vaping was the packaging, how the different flavours were advertised and seeing his friends take the pouches, that made him want to try them said: "I think it was just something different."It went from one a day to three a day to - at my highest - I was using probably 15 a day."If I didn't take them, I'd just get withdrawals and just feel demotivated and like I didn't want to do anything until I took another one." Nicotine pouches are currently unregulated and can be sold legally to Tobacco and Vapes Bill is going through the House of Lords but there are calls for government to speed up the legislation to shut down bill will ban the sale of nicotine pouches to under-18s and will restrict things like where they can be positioned in shops as well as limiting flavours, strengths, packaging and how they are advertised."We are receiving widespread reports from across the UK that these nicotine pouches are being sold to children," said Ms Pike, Trading Standards' lead officer for tobacco and vaping."Parents are getting in touch assuming we can take action and are shocked when we tell them we can't. "At the moment it's perfectly legal and there's nothing we can do."The BBC contacted several of the biggest manufacturers of nicotine pouches and all of them supported forthcoming American Tobacco said its pouches "should never be used by those under-age", manufacturer Phillip Morris said nicotine pouches had proved "hugely successful" for adults to quit cigarettes, and Japan Tobacco International said "minors should never use or access nicotine-containing products".
