CalMac seeks to recover costs for Caledonian Isles repairs
The Caledonian Isles was taken out of service in January of last year for substantial work which was estimated to cost £5m, with its return to the route between Ardrossan, North Ayrshire and Brodick on the Isle of Arran expected last June.
But its return has been considerably delayed, with CalMac chief executive Duncan Mackison saying last month it is 'impossible to say' when it will return.
A hull deformity was discovered after repairs were done by Cammell Laird in Birkenhead near Liverpool, which has had a knock-on effect which has prompted CalMac to begin proceedings to recover at least some of the money spent.
In a statement, a spokesman for the operator said: 'Following an investigation into the cause of the hull deformity, action is under way to recover costs.
'As this is commercially sensitive and subject to legal proceedings, we cannot comment further.' PA Media The ferry has been out of service since last year (Jeff J Mitchell/PA)
The long-running saga of the Caledonian Isles is yet another issue which has hit transport to Scotland's west coast islands in recent years, along with the major delays and cost overruns to two ferries being built at the Ferguson Marine shipyard in Port Glasgow.
The Glen Sannox entered service in January, while the Glen Rosa is not expected until next year, with projected costs rising from £97m when the contract was signed to more than £400m.
The loss of the Caledonian Isles has also meant there have been no sailings from Ardrossan in months.
While the MV Isle of Arran has been re-shuffled to take over the route from Monday for the next two weeks, both the Glen Sannox and the Glen Rosa are too big for the port in the North Ayrshire town and as such have been sailing from Troon, further down the coast.
Locals fear the impact of losing the ferry service on the local economy, while islanders on Arran have also expressed concerns.
The Scottish Government has said it is looking at buying the port from operator Peel Ports to make necessary upgrades to allow the ferries to dock there, but talks are said to have stalled.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
a minute ago
- Daily Record
Scots warned of 'deadly' ten minute response time for firefighters to put out blazes
EXCLUSIVE: A Fire Brigades Union chief has warned response times for emergency calls will soar if cuts are pushed through. Scots have been warned of a 'deadly' rise in firefighter response times and more people perishing in blazes. Fire Brigades Union chief John McKenzie said he feared planned cuts will increase the time taken for firefighters to attend emergencies to ten minutes. He said: 'Inevitably people will lose their lives as a result of these cuts. That's black and white. There's no hiding from that.' The Scottish Fire and Rescue Service launched a consultation recently that could see fire stations closing and fire engines being taken away from some areas. Edinburgh, Glasgow and Monifieth near Dundee could all see stations close in a bid to save money. McKenzie told the Record the median response time of first arrival had increased from six minutes and fifty one seconds to eight minutes and twenty seconds in a decade. He claimed the 'budget driven' cuts could see this soar to ten minutes, with disastrous impact for businesses and homeowners: 'Eveything we've seen tells us that response times will continue to increase. So at some point inevitably they will reach ten minutes and beyond that.' 'If you own a business and it is affected by fire, if you live in a house and it goes on fire, if you are involved in a road traffic collision or car accident, on average you will be waiting longer.' McKenzie, the FBU's regional secretary for Scotland, said the cuts mean people will be in greater danger: 'There will inevitably be members of the public who will either become seriously injured or lose their lives, who otherwise wouldn't have. And the reason for that is response times increasing.' He continued: 'We have made it crystal clear that there can be no further cuts to the fire service in Scotland. We have already moved past a level of cuts that is unsustainable for maintaining public safety. 'The service needs more money.' McKenzie said firefighters are 'hurt' at not being able to provide the level of service needed: 'Our members are really angry.' He also accused the SFRS and SNP Government, which funds the service, of not taking responsibility: 'Passing the buck doesn't put more firefighters in fire engines.' 'There is no grey area here. It is for the Scottish Government to fund the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service.' Labour MSP Pauline McNeill said: "Stripping away essential fire cover is indefensible. Every minute matters in a fire and delays cost lives. Firefighters are being asked to do more with less in life-threatening situations, and yet the service is on its knees as a result of SNP cuts. 'It is vital that the Scottish Government listens to these warnings and ensures Scotland's Fire and Rescue Service has the resources it needs to keep people safe.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Scotland's firefighters do an amazing job and the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) remains fully ready and able to respond to any emergency incidents that occur – with public safety paramount. 'The Scottish Government is providing £412.2 million to support SFRS in 2025-26 - an above-inflation increase of £18.8 million. Scotland has more firefighters per capita than other parts of the UK, with funding increasing substantially year-on-year since 2017-18. 'The SFRS has been clear that the changes proposed in its current review are so it can adapt to the changing risks and demands of communities and ensure firefighters are in the right place at the right time. We encourage local communities to contribute to shaping Scotland's fire and rescue services through the SFRS online consultation and public engagement sessions.' Stuart Stevens, Chief Officer of the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, said: 'We have an opportunity for the first time since our national service was formed in 2013 to review how we provide our emergency service every minute of the day, every day of the year. 'Building a modern fire and rescue service that is fit for purpose is the reason we are bringing these proposed changes forward. 'We recognise that these 23 options represent a significant level of change. However, we have a duty to ensure that the right resources are in the right locations to meet new risks that exist within today's communities.' He added: 'These options have been developed over many months involving staff, trade union representatives and other stakeholders. 'There will be a 12-week period to give people time to submit their views on the changes. 'We would encourage as many people as possible to participate in public consultation process.'
The Herald Scotland
13 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Festival seeks tourist tax help as it faces hike in costs
Although the city council has predicted it will generate an additional £50m a year by 2028, the city's festivals do not know if they will see any direct investment. Read more: In a wide-ranging interview with The Herald, EIF chief executive Francesca Hegyi, said the rising costs faced by the city's major cultural events were no longer viable under current levels of funding support and financial pressures. The EIF, which currently gets around £1.9m a year from the city council, has been on standstill funding from the city council since 2019 when it was hit with a nine per cent funding cut. The Edinburgh International Festival got underway last week. Picture: Andrew Milligan/PA Ms Hegyi called for a 'mindshift' in how the festivals are treated by the city council and the Scottish Government, and for greater collaboration between the cities major cultural events. She suggested they could work together to explore broadcast partnerships and a shared box office system, which could help the festivals attract new commercial sponsorship. Francesca Hegyi, chief executive of the Edinburgh International Festival, wants the event to get some form of rebate for the accommodation it books in future. (Image: Gordon Terris/Herald & Times) Under the city council's plans for the introduction of the visitor levy, it will affect bookings for stays of up to five days from July 24 next year – just days before Edinburgh's 2026 summer festivals seasons will get underway. The Herald told earlier this month how Edinburgh's festivals, venues and performers were being urged to book accommodation a year in advance to avoid the tourist tax. Event organisers, venues and artists are being urged to take advantage of a "window" before the start of October, when the five per cent levy will start to be added to accommodation bills for the 2026 summer festivals season. The EIF meets the accommodation costs of artists and crew working at the event, but is not expected to finalise its programme until the end of the year. Ms Hegyi told The Herald: 'I actually think there is a massive opportunity around visitor Levy, actually, and I'm generally quite positive about it. 'Anything that increases the pot available to the city, for infrastructure, for communities, for festivals, and arts and culture in general, has absolutely got to be a good thing. 'I think the significance of the visitor levy shouldn't be understated because, to my knowledge, the first major source of new revenue that's come along for many years. 'The devil is in the detail about how it will work. The one hesitation I have about it is that, as it currently stands, this festival will between £50,000 and £60,000 worse off because we will be charged the levy when we book accommodation for our visiting artists and crew. The only certainty I have right now is that the festival is going to be worse off." Edinburgh's festivals are represented on an independent advisory group which will produce recommendations on how income raised through the visitor levy should be spent. Under current proposals – which will affect hotels, self-catering properties and short-term lets – 35 per cent of the funds raised will be distributed across 'culture, heritage and events.' Ms Hegyi added: 'I would hate for us to be out of pocket as a result of the visitor levy. What I would like the council to consider is some sort of rebate mechanism for those cultural institutions and attractions which are the reason why visitors come to the city. 'I understand exemptions are difficult, but it would be really helpful if a rebate could be considered. It would just be perverse if a scheme that's meant to benefit cultural organisations ended up costing them money.' The EIF was forced to scale back this year's programme due to uncertainty over its future Scottish Government funding. A long-awaited decision was put back from October to January after the government refused to sign off a budget for its arts agency, Creative Scotland, before setting out its own spending plans last December. The EIF's core government funding, which had been pegged at around £2.3m for more than a decade, was increased to £3.25m for the current financial year and £4.25m annually for the following two years. The city council's funding for the EIF is expected to remain just over £1.9m until at least 2027-28 under a three-year programme to support festivals, events and cultural venues in the city. However the council has instigated a new 'Festivals City Leadership Group,' which also involves the Scottish Government, to help tackle the biggest challenges faced by the city's major cultural events. Ms Hegyi said: 'One of the topics this group is look at is the whole question of accommodation and what we can do collectively to ensure that the festivals can be affordable in future. 'I think there is acceptance from everyone around the table that the status quo just isn't viable anymore. 'The idea that the festivals are sustainable in the long run under the current support mechanisms and what is being asked of festivals has gone. 'I think there's an acknowledgment that we've got to move on. 'For public funding agencies, that's about considering how they value the festivals in the round. 'What I'd like to see is a mindshift in the way that festivals are considered and treated, That's not necessarily about money. "One of the challenges we all need to get grips with is the inherent fragmentation of the festivals. We're all different, separate and independent. We'll always be that way. "But I think we probably could and should do more to coordinate to make it easier for residents and visitors who want to engage with the festivals in some way, and have a single front door to buy tickets. "There is an appetite among some of the festivals to think in that way so we can be more coordinated. Our chances of attracting new forms of income - whether through broadcast partnerships or commercial partnerships - on a scale that isn't possible with an individual festival. "One of the good things that has happened in the last year is that with the Creative Scotland settlements we've finally been able to move out of crisis mode, start to look a bit further ahead and start to dream a little bit." The Herald has teamed up with to make the purchase of tickets for the Edinburgh Festival Fringe so much easier. To buy tickets, click here
Scotsman
18 hours ago
- Scotsman
Report for 'doomed to fail' minimum income guarantee cost £1.3m as SNP exercise branded 'waste of time'
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers spent £1.3 million on a report into introducing a new welfare system despite knowing the scheme was 'doomed to fail'. The Scottish Government commissioned an expert panel to look at how it might implement a policy of bringing in a minimum income for all Scots. Findings from the Minimum Income Guarantee Expert Group included giving single parents in Scotland up to £28,000 in benefits without working. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A general view of the Scottish Parliament building in Edinburgh | PA However, sources close to the project insist there is little appetite to introduce the scheme, branded an 'absurd' policy by opposition parties. Now figures, released under Freedom of Information rules, show the costs for the expert group's final report were £280,000. The group was supported by a government secretariat of five civil servants, making their salary costs over the time of generating the report around £260,000 a year. It took from August 2021 to May 2025 - three years and ten months - to develop the findings. This is despite the fact the Holyrood Government does not have devolved all the reserved powers necessary to introduce a minimum income guarantee. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A recommendation of the report is the Scottish and UK governments should set up a "co-operation commission" to work out what powers would be needed. An SNP insider said the report was a 'waste of time' and 'doomed to fail'. The source said: 'This report is going to be used as a springboard for charities to lobby government for a minimum income guarantee - despite the fact it is impossible to see how we could afford to pay for it. 'We've paid a significant sum for a report we don't agree with and that was doomed to fail, are now likely to distance ourselves from and now are going to be lobbied to implement it. It's not just a waste of time and money, but also a disappointment for the charities involved.' On publication of the minimum income guarantee report, Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said the Government would consider the findings after the Holyrood recess. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad SNP Minister Shirley-Anne Somerville hoped to sort housing emergency (Picture: Jeff) Shadow finance secretary Craig Hoy said the report was a 'shocking waste of taxpayers' money'. He said: 'Especially when it was to explore a half-baked policy that everyone knew would be unaffordable and damaging. It's typical that the SNP's reaction is now to try to bury the issue and dodge responsibility. 'They should immediately rule out a minimum income guarantee – an absurd and eye-wateringly expensive policy that they have no powers to introduce. But they also owe Scots an explanation for why they ever devoted public money and civil servants' time to this idea, and a detailed account of how so much taxpayers' cash was wasted on this ridiculous report.' The Scottish Government initially declined The Scotsman's FOI request but, on appeal, gave a partial response. Using the pay bands of each civil servant in the secretariat, the salary costs per year would amount to around £260,000 annually. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A plan to bring in a minimum income for all Scots has been under consideration for several years. Supporters claim it would make for a fairer society with a reduced level of poverty if every Scot had a definite basic income, with the suggestion it would 'would effectively end poverty for those in receipt'. Opponents, however, claim it is too expensive a policy to implement and raise concerns that people would not work if they did not have to earn additional income. The report from the independent expert group, which included representatives from 16 groups such as social mobility organisations, universities and charities, recommended the base income be £11,500 for a single adult. A couple would receive £20,000 while a couple with one child or a lone adult with two children would receive £28,000. As their earnings rose to exceed the minimum income threshold, the payments would taper off. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The group laid out a series of plans to be rolled out over the next decade that would pave the way for Scotland to introduce a minimum income guarantee from 2036. At the launch of the report in June, Satwat Rehman, one of the members of the group and chief executive of One Parent Families Scotland, said: 'A minimum income guarantee would provide a lifeline, ensuring no single-parent household falls below a dignified minimum income – whether in or out of work, studying or training – and ensure families and children thrive and not just survive.'
