UAE says 'yes' to Lebanon again — can Beirut turn the page?
Report by Toni Mrad, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian
The United Arab Emirates will lift its travel ban on Lebanon starting May 7, a move expected to revitalize the country's tourism sector and positively impact the broader economy.
This places responsibility on the Lebanese state to strengthen security and stability by increasing security measures in areas frequented by visitors and deploying regular patrols.
Beyond that, the decision could also pave the way for increased Emirati investment across several sectors in Lebanon, according to the country's ambassador to the UAE, Fouad Dandan.
Dandan said Emirati investors are exploring opportunities in food security, including the purchase or lease of agricultural land in Lebanon, which offers a favorable climate and fertile soil — a more accessible alternative to distant markets.
They are also considering industrial production through the establishment of factories that would export Emirati goods to European markets, taking advantage of Lebanon's strategic location on the Mediterranean.
Other areas of interest include port management and operations, particularly at the Port of Tripoli, as well as renewable energy, a sector in which the UAE is already a regional leader.
Emiratis are also looking into opportunities in artificial intelligence and data centers, drawing on Lebanese expertise in digital infrastructure.
In addition, fashion and jewelry design remain attractive sectors, with Lebanese creatives long recognized as leaders in the field.
Still, the full potential of these opportunities depends on Lebanon's ability to continue implementing essential judicial and financial reforms while preserving security — the cornerstone of any serious investor confidence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
10 hours ago
- LBCI
As threats grow on border, Israel questions value of UN peacekeepers in Lebanon
Report by Amal Shehadeh, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian Israeli officials have described the international forces operating in southern Lebanon as ineffective, as the Israeli lobby, in coordination with Washington, pushes within the United Nations not to renew the mandate of these forces, according to security officials. According to a security report, Israel's view of the international forces has shifted. It no longer believes their presence in southern Lebanon is preferable to their absence, especially since, in Israel's view, these forces have failed to deter Hezbollah's strength. Reports also note that indirect coordination — conducted through countries allied with Tel Aviv — with the army has proven effective. The actions of the Lebanese army on the ground have become more significant than what the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) can deliver. Israeli officials concluded in internal discussions and security assessments that the combination of security concerns and political interests now leans toward joining the U.S. position, which opposes renewing the mandate — or at least calls for expanding UNIFIL's powers. More importantly, according to a senior security official, current deliberations are focusing on how to restore full freedom of action for Israel to protect its northern border. The official warned that even if UNIFIL's mission is terminated, Israel will not abandon the northern front, and the Israeli military is prepared for any scenario. Through indirect cooperation with the Lebanese army and with intelligence and technological capabilities, Israel will be able to effectively respond to growing threats along the border. This evolving Israeli stance toward both UNIFIL and the Lebanese army raises questions about the credibility of Israel's earlier claims that the Lebanese army was incapable of fulfilling its duties — a position that now appears inconsistent unless Tel Aviv seeks to drive a wedge between the army and Hezbollah supporters in Lebanon.
Nahar Net
17 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Reports: US, Israel mulling end to UNIFIL's presence
by Naharnet Newsdesk 09 June 2025, 13:18 U.S. officials are considering pulling American support from UNIFIL, the United Nations peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon, in a bid to cut costs associated with its operations, the Israel Hayom newspaper reported Sunday evening, with US sources later confirming to The Times of Israel that the option was on the table. Should the U.S. move ahead with its decision to pull support from the U.N. body, Israel will back the decision, Israel Hayom reported, both out of a desire to align itself with the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump and in light of the Israeli security establishment's 'cooperation with the Lebanese army since the ceasefire in November,' the Times of Israel said. According to Israel Hayom, the presence of the Lebanese Armed Forces in southern Lebanon has proven relatively effective in 'beating back the threat of Hezbollah' and keeping the group from rearming itself, making 'redundant' much of UNIFIL's operations in the region. Sources familiar with the matter told The Times of Israel that the U.S. has not yet made up its mind regarding its future support for UNIFIL, but that it wants to see major reforms, which could mean pulling support. As UNIFIL's mandate is granted through a U.N. Security Council resolution each year, the U.S. could simply veto the next resolution, due to be put forward in August. UNIFIL has been operating in southern Lebanon since 1978, when it was created to oversee the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the area following the end of Israel's first invasion of south Lebanon. The U.N. peacekeeping force expanded its mission following the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah, allowing peacekeepers to deploy along the Israeli border to help the Lebanese military extend its authority into the country's south for the first time in decades. Aimed at ending the 2006 war, Resolution 1701 also called for a full cessation of Israeli-Hezbollah hostilities and the disarmament of Hezbollah. UNIFIL's mandate has been renewed annually ever since, although critics have questioned the efficacy of the force. Following the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, which put an end to more than a year of hostilities with Hezbollah, including two months of all-out war, the Lebanese Army moved into southern Lebanon to enforce the terms of the ceasefire, which itself is based on Resolution 1701. The resolution requires Hezbollah to withdraw its fighters north of the Litani River — about 30 kilometers (19 miles) from the border — and dismantle all military infrastructure in southern Lebanon. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam told the Wall Street Journal last month that his government had achieved 80 percent of its objectives regarding the disarmament of Hezbollah and other militias in the country's south. At the same time, the Israeli army has continued to launch strikes on Hezbollah operatives and infrastructure, alleging violations of the truce agreement. According to the Israeli army, over 180 Hezbollah operatives have been killed since the truce came into effect.
Al Manar
19 hours ago
- Al Manar
E3, US Misusing I.A.E.A. to Achieve Own Political Objectives: Iran
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei has criticized the United States and three European countries – namely France, Britain, and Germany – for misusing the International Atomic Energy Agency (I.A.E.A.) for their own political gains. During his weekly press briefing on Monday, Baqaei responded to a question raised about the West's push for an anti-Iran resolution at the I.A.E.A.'s Board of Governors meeting in Vienna this week. He said that the Islamic Republic had taken steps in the past one or two years in cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog but the three European countries and the United States often abused the agency for their own political purposes. According to the spokesperson, the I.A.E.A. decided to first prepare a report under the political pressure and influence from the Western countries, and subsequently the same countries abused that report. He underlined that Iran's interactions with the agency, from the very beginning, had been based on its commitments arising from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement. France, Britain, and Germany, and the United States are reportedly seeking a draft resolution that accuses Iran of 'non-compliance' with safeguards obligations for the first time in almost 20 years, an issue that was declared closed within the framework of the 2015 deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Tehran has already warned that any such move will be met with a serious and decisive response. Enrichment a non-negotiable issue Regarding the issue of Iran's continued uranium enrichment, Baqaei said that the Islamic Republic did not need licenses in this regard and would not allow others to impose their will on Iran's right to enrichment. He pointed that enriching uranium does not necessarily mean having a weapons program, arguing that many countries, including some close allies of the United States, are enriching without having a weapons program. Enrichment is an integral part of the nuclear fuel cycle, which has been developed after decades of effort and dedication of Iranian scientists, he said, adding that 'This right is explicitly recognized for member states and is non-negotiable under Article 4 of the NPT.' Iran's nuclear program is peaceful Referring to a recent I.A.E.A. report, Baqaei said that the agency did not mention any non-compliance or deviation in Iran's nuclear program from the peaceful path. He stated that the report itself has several problems as it was drafted with political goals and in order to make excuses for Iran's nuclear program, but there is no mention of Iran's program being non-peaceful. The spokesperson said the position of the Islamic Republic is quite clear that the country, as a responsible member of the NPT, remains committed to continuing the peaceful path. He also touched on Israeli propaganda against Iran's nuclear program, saying that the issue has been affected by the hype created by the regime. He said that Iran's nuclear program has been under the most stringent monitoring mechanisms of the I.A.E.A. Baqaei accused European countries of piling up pressure under the pretext of lack of transparency simply following Israeli narratives. 'If you look at the history of the issue, as I mentioned before, the Zionist regime first claimed in 1984 that Iran was seeking to produce nuclear weapons. Now 40 years have passed since then and the status of the JCPOA is also clear to everyone.' U.S. proposal for Iran Addressing a question related to the U.S. proposal that was conveyed to Iran by Oman on May 31, the Foreign Ministry spokesperson did not give the details but said the proposal neither had the characteristics of active and bilateral negotiations nor was it the outcome of the indirect Iran-U.S. talks held so far. Baqaei emphasized that any plan that does not take into account the rights and interests of the Iranian nation, whether in the field of nuclear energy or with regard to ensuring the effective lifting of oppressive sanctions, is unacceptable to the country and shows a lack of seriousness in the negotiations. He noted that Iran will present its own reasonable, logical, and balanced proposal to the other side through Oman once it is finalized. Europe deviated from diplomatic path Referring to anti-Iran stance and rhetoric by some European countries, the Foreign Ministry spokesperson said that 'the confrontation with European countries cannot in any way create an incentive for cooperation.' He underlined that Iran had clearly stated from the beginning that it is ready to resolve outstanding issues through talks but the European parties not only failed to present constructive proposals, but also withdrew from the diplomatic process for other reasons. According to the spokesperson, a destructive and unconstructive approach was seen when European countries called for the I.A.E.A. report and then drafted a resolution to push during the agency's Board of Governors this week. He warned that the Western countries would be responsible for the consequences of their actions as Iran would take proportionate and reciprocal steps. Referring to activating the 'snapback' mechanism, Baqaei said that the issue should not be exaggerated too much as Iran's nuclear program is completely peaceful and there is no excuse or legal basis to put the Iranian nuclear issue on the Security Council's agenda. Slamming ban on Iranians entering the U.S. Addressing President Donald Trump's executive order to ban citizens of certain countries, including Iran, from entering the U.S., Baqaei said that the move is discriminatory and racist and is completely condemnable both from the perspective of human rights and moral obligations. He said that since the majority of the population affected by this regulation is Muslim, Trump's decision is based on the nationality and religion of individuals. 'Countries and governments are not allowed to enact laws based on the nationality, race, religion or ethnicity of individuals as such policies violate the fundamental principles of equality and justice and represent an inhumane and illegal approach,' he added. Genocide amid international silence The Foreign Ministry spokesperson, once gain deplored the ongoing Israeli genocide against Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip. Unfortunately, the silence and inaction of international institutions, including the United Nations Security Council (U.N.S.C.), has emboldened the regime to continue massacring people in Gaza and the West Bank, he said. Referring to the U.S. veto of a U.N.S.C. resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza last week, Baqaei pointed that Washington's stance once again proved its backing for Israel and granting its officials impunity for gross human rights violations. He called on the international community to take serious and urgent action to stop the sad and horrific situation the Palestinians are going through for the past two years.
