Submit list of criminal cases against ‘Savukku' Shankar: Madras High Court
The direction was issued while ordering notice to the three top officials and directing them to file their counter affidavit to a writ petition filed by Mr. Shankar alleging police interference in the functioning of Savukku Media (One Person Company) Private Limited.
During the course of hearing of the writ petition, the judge criticised journalists who conduct parallel media trial in criminal cases just for sensationalisation and go to the extent of dictating to the police and even the judges as to how a case should be handled, without waiting to see the outcome of those cases.
Asking the YouTuber's counsel to advise his client, the judge said, journalists could not misuse the fundamental right to speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution and begin throwing mud on each and every institution in the country right at the preliminary stage of inquiry/investigation.
'We have to take the weapon (of Article 19) for a good cause, not for blackmailing. It is a stark reality that some of the journalists are blackmailing people... You cannot expect police and courts to act as per your dictum.... This is not the way... You are misguiding the people by doing all this,' the judge said.
In his affidavit, Mr. Shankar had accused the Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police A. Arun of subjecting him and his employees to various 'unlawful actions' since February this year just because he had been exposing police atrocities, misconduct and inaction through his YouTube channel.
The petitioner said that he had gone to Prayagraj in Uttar Pradesh by road in February this year, along with his crew members, to cover the Kumbh Mela. Then, a team of 20 personnel from the Telangana police intercepted their car and took them to the Ramayampet police station for inquiry.
The entire crew comprising the driver and cameraman was detained for about two hours on February 8 and was allowed to go only on payment of ₹1,000 for not being in possession of Pollution Under Check (PUC) certificate. He alleged that the harassment was meted out to them at the behest of Greater Chennai police.
The petitioner said that he had immediately sent an e-mail to the Home Secretary complaining about the Chennai police tracking his movements and subjecting him to harassment. He also stated that in May, the motorcycles belonging to his cameraman and visual editor were seized by the police on petty charges.
Hence, he made a second complaint to the Home Secretary on May 23 since the latter was the chairperson of the State Police Complaints Authority constituted under the Tamil Nadu Police (Reforms) Act of 2013 and was the appropriate authority to look into complaints of police highhandedness.
Further, stating that he had made a similar complaint to the DGP too on June 21; the petitioner sought a direction to the Home Secretary and DGP to take appropriate action on his complaints and forbear the Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police from interfering with the functioning of Savukku Media.
However, Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran, representing the Home Secretary, contended that the complaints lodged by the writ petitioner would not strictly fall under the purview of the 2013 Act. He also stated that he would make all his submissions in writing by way of a counter affidavit within two weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
Delimitation not part of election process, its administrative action: Goa court
The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court recently dismissed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 9(2) of the City of Panaji Corporation Act, which authorises the Director of Municipal Administration, and not the State Election Commission, to delimit municipal court held that the power of delimitation is administrative in nature and not part of the election process, concluding that 'no case is made out' to strike down Section 9 (2).advertisementThe petitioner, Menino Da Cruz is a two-time elected corporator from Ward 19 of the Corporation of the City of Panaji. His lawyer Rohit Bras De Sa argued that the 2005 amendment violated Articles 243-K (Panchayat elections and 243-ZA (Municipalities elections) of the Constitution and Section 11 (outlines the commission's role in the corporation's elections) of the Act. The advocate submitted that vesting delimitation powers in the Director undermined the independence of elections, as delimitation affects fair representation and must be carried out under the supervision of the Election also flagged the lack of statutory guidelines and alleged that the process had been misused by delegating powers to revenue officers like the State of Goa, represented by Advocate General Devidas Pangam, countered that delimitation is not part of the "conduct of elections" as envisaged under Article 243-ZA. Pangan argued that administrative tasks such as demarcating wards can legally be performed by government with the advocate general's submissions, the bench of Justices Bharati Dangre and Nivedita Mehta observed, 'according to us, demarcation of wards into Cities for the purpose of election is not a part of conduct of 'election' and, therefore, in our view, do not fall within the scope of the functions exclusively assigned to the State Election Commission'The bench held that merely because a provision is 'susceptible to misuse' cannot be a ground to declare it unconstitutional. "It is settled position of law that a validity of a statute or a provision cannot be struck down only on a ground of its susceptible misuse and only it would result into harsh situations in its application," added the bench.- Ends
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
What qualities define a transformational leader?
One of the difficulties with leadership is the urge to showcase rapid progress, visible achievements and quick wins. This is exacerbated in an increasingly polarized world of politics for elected leaders, pressures of the stock market for CEOs and the presence of social media. The cocktail that ensues gets us into a spiral of instant gratification. It is true that we need to keep our eyes on early visible success, yet large-scale, sustainable change, something we call transformative change, asks for a long view of time. In the beginning, it may look like no progress at all. Sometimes, the wheels reverse before they move forward. This means that the leader must understand the fact that this will be long-haul; the leader must explain that to people and mentally prepare their followers. This is done when you publish the road map, show the point of departure, the point of arrival and state the time it may take as best as you can. But this is not a one-time formality. It requires a series of periodic conversations. It is an ongoing dialogue. Only then do people internalize the idea of the long haul. You address your leaders in the conference room on the road ahead. Then you step out and talk to their teams in the cafeteria. You go home at night and write an email on the same subject in a first-person voice for the larger organization. You seek out an op-ed space in a leading daily to hold up the same narrative. Then, you do a podcast that carries your message on to YouTube. You post it on X and Insta to reinforce it, till the road ahead becomes a narrative of the people. And all the while you are communicating, you are inviting people to ask you questions. You practise deep listening, you demonstrably incorporate the voice of a silent majority as you move from one phase to the other. It is a lot of hard work. Because transformative change is a long-haul undertaking, it is also important to conserve energy. An important part of it is to choose your battles carefully. It is necessary to know what to tackle and when and what to give up. Sometimes, one must have the courage to leave the battle to stay alive for a future war. And to know the futility of picking up skirmishes. Transformative leaders know when to confront and when to step aside. All problems need not be solved, but all opportunities must be intently examined and only some doggedly pursued. Transformative leaders are ideologically driven. It is the source of their conviction. A big problem however is confusing ideology with dogma. They must know when to be flexible, when to embrace change. They must allow people and events to mould them, and that plasticity is an important quality. It is this mouldability that signals openness. People do not like to follow close-minded leaders. The mindset of being ideologically driven without being caught in dogma allows emergence. It is the process of 'letting come' as [MIT professor and writer] Otto [Scharmer] says, enabling us to allow opportunities to present themselves, to emerge from the environment. These hold the key to breakthrough ideas. Those who do not practise emergence and appreciate its power, cannot deliver long-acting change because things around them are constantly shifting. Leaders who undertake transformative change must have a deep sense of self-worth. Without becoming egoistic, they need to see themselves as a valuable resource life has chosen for itself. Their work is an obligation to others. Over the long haul, there are many challenges of course. There are days when the revolution looks dead. There are days when a trusted ally changes loyalty. Or people deliver subversive compliance. The transformative leader has to be okay with all that and be resilient, knowing that tomorrow will be another day. Amid all of it, surprising new sources of energy emerge, and hitherto unknown alliances come forward. A big part of this journey is self-doubt. It is normal to experience occasional self-doubt. It is even good because it keeps us humble. And finally, the transformative leader is not an ascetic, not someone with complete Karmic detachment. They must laugh; they must make others laugh. They must have fun and they must nourish themselves with hope, faith and love. That is when pain, purpose and perseverance come together and enormous new possibilities open up. Excerpted with permission from Penguin Random House India. The book is out on 17 July. Write to us at feedback@
New Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
OBC Advisory Council meeting begins on July 15, boost for CM Siddaramaiah's morale
BENGALURU: Amid speculation over leadership change, the AICC Backward Classes Advisory Council meeting which Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah is hosting here on Tuesday and Wednesday, is likely to boost his image as the OBC face of the party at the national level. Interestingly, Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, apparently to identify himself with OBCs, had recently said that Vokkaligas and Lingayats are included in the OBC list at the Centre. The meeting will begin at the KPCC headquarters on Tuesday, and resume at a private hotel on the second day. It will discuss the caste census in the light of the Centre announcing that the national census would include caste, as LoP in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi has been vociferous about the caste census. A discussion on Article 164(1) of the Constitution, with reference to Jharkhand, Odisha, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, is also part of the agenda. The meeting being held under his leadership is likely to boost Siddaramaiah's morale. A host of OBC leaders from across the country, Congress Working Committee (CWC) members and Pradesh Congress Committee presidents are expected to take part as special invitees. They include Tamradhwaj Sahu, Jagdish Thakore, Manickam Tagore, Girish Chodankar, Manikrao Thakre, Yashomati Thakur, Keshav Mahto Kamlesh, Devendra Yadav, Gaurav Gogoi, Jitu Patwari, Capt Ajay Singh Yadav and Madhu Gaud Yashki, among others. A host of OBC leaders from across the country, including former chief ministers Ashok Gehlot, Bhupesh Baghel, V Narayansamy and Dr M Veerappa Moily, senior leaders BK Hariprasad, Sachin Pilot and others are expected to take part. AICC OBC cell chief Dr Anil JaiHind is the convener of the Advisory Council and Jitendra Baghel is the secretary. The other members of the council, including Kamleshwar Patel, Gurdeep Singh Sappal, Srikant Jena, Ajay Kumar Lallu, Mahesh Kumar Goud, Amit Chavda, Arun Yadav, Ponnam Prabhakar, V Hanumantha Rao, S Jothimani, Adoor Prakash, Vijay Namdevrao Wadettiwar, Dhanendra Sahu, Subhashini Yadav and Hina Kaware, are also expected to participate.
