
Crypto exchange Bullish valued at nearly $13.2bln in blowout NYSE debut
The parent of crypto news website CoinDesk raised $1.11 billion in its IPO, valuing the company at $5.4 billion — another sign of mainstream adoption in a market that recently topped $4 trillion.
"Bullish came out with an attractive initial valuation, and investors responded by aggressively bidding it up during the pre-IPO process," said Jeff Zell, senior research analyst at IPO Boutique.
The stock opened at $90 and was trading over 150% its IPO price of $37 in afternoon trading. It went as high as $118, before paring gains slightly to trade at $92.60.
A string of regulatory wins under a pro-crypto White House, corporate treasury adoption and ETF inflows have prompted investors to embrace the once-scorned digital asset class, driving bellwether bitcoin to record highs.
Exchange operator Gemini and asset manager Grayscale are also among the crypto firms that have confidentially filed to go public.
"We've gone public today, and there's a slew of others that are going to follow us, and I think that is net beneficial, because it gives people more options in terms of how they access this asset class," Bullish President Chris Tyrer told Reuters in an interview.
Bullish is close to concluding a two-year process to obtain a virtual currency license known as a "BitLicense" in New York, which would allow the company to operate in the state, Tyrer said.
The BitLicense requires companies to comply with requirements related to know-your-customer, anti-money laundering and capital.
Peter Thiel-backed Bullish plans to convert a significant portion of the IPO proceeds to stablecoins — a slice of the crypto space that has boomed since U.S. President Donald Trump signed the Genius Act, creating a regulatory regime for the dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies.
INSTITUTIONAL FOCUS
Bullish's debut marks a rare U.S. listing by a crypto exchange, joining larger retail-focused rival Coinbase, which became the first crypto player to be included in the benchmark S&P 500 index in May.
Founded in 2020, Bullish targets institutional clients, whose crypto holdings are expected to rise as a new White House order aims to allow alternative investments in 401(k) retirement plans.
"A pure institutional strategy positions Bullish for more stable, recurring revenue than exchanges reliant on retail volumes, which tend to be cyclical and sentiment-driven," said Michael Hall, co-chief investment officer and founding partner at Nickel Digital Asset Management.
Bullish CEO Tom Farley was previously the president of the NYSE.
"For a sector still overcoming reputational headwinds, that kind of leadership experience can be a differentiator in securing institutional mandates," Hall said.
(Reporting by Ateev Bhandari and Atharva Singh in Bengaluru and Hannah Lang in New York; Editing by Shilpi Majumdar, Devika Syamnath, Tasim Zahid and Alan Barona)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
6 hours ago
- The National
What Kodak's woes can teach us about Big Tech, capitalism and brand resilience
, once among the most recognisable companies in the world, is blaming "misleading media reports" for causing concern after its second-quarter financial results. Although Kodak reported a gross profit of $51 million this week, the Rochester, New York-based company included a "concern assessment" that unnerved investors, employees and customers. The assessment warned various conditions "raise substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue". Kodak, which declared bankruptcy in 2012 and emerged in 2013, has tried to climb back to relevance amid a vastly changed photography, imaging and chemical market. It said reporters misinterpreted the company's disclosure. "Media reports that Kodak is ceasing operations, going out of business or filing for bankruptcy are inaccurate and reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of a recent technical disclosure the company made to the Security and Exchange Commission," read a statement posted to Kodak's LinkedIn page. Kurt Jaeckel, a senior communications director with Kodak, told The National that the warning "is essentially a required disclosure because Kodak's debt comes due within 12 months of the filing". Mr Jaeckel said the 133-year-old company is confident it will be able to pay its debts by using $300 million from "the reversion and settlement" of Kodak's pension fund. Yet Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth in Boston, told The National that despite Kodak recently suggesting otherwise, the company's future is still very much in doubt. "Any time you ever hear a company say there are questions about continuing to be an ongoing entity, it's almost a known quantity, it's theta-complete," he said. Mr Hogan said that Kodak – which at its peak employed more than 140,000 workers, but now employs about 3,400 – is struggling to recover from its failure to adapt to digital photography, the decline of film and other market factors. Despite emerging from bankruptcy protection in 2013 and turning to commercial print, advanced materials and chemicals, the company's earnings and overall financial reality leave a lot to be desired. "When your debts and liabilities are going to be larger than the other side of your balance sheet, that's when you sort of turn the lights out and close the doors," Mr Hogan said. Teachable moment for Big Tech? The story of Kodak's rise and fall are almost cliched at this point. The firm's domination of consumer photography through film and camera products, but inability to adjust to digital photography are well documented, although as Mr Hogan says, superficially researched to some extent. In 1975, a Kodak employee by the name of Steven Sasson invented what many to be the first digital camera. Although bulky and initially impractical, the technology showed promise, but Kodak failed to see a future in which digital cameras would destroy the profitable film industry it dominated. It shelved Mr Sasson's digital camera project, and sealed the company's fate when digital cameras started to outsell film cameras. Yet what many often fail to factor in is that even if Kodak supported Mr Sasson's invention, smartphones – not necessarily digital cameras – changed photography forever. As Mr Hogan says, sometimes the rules of economics and time make a company's demise inevitable. Nothing lasts forever. "Going from the top of the leaderboard to being shown the door is something that inevitably happens," he said, adding that if competition and market forces do not cause company dominance to erode, sometimes government regulators step in and break up that dominance. "It's the evolution of capitalism and it's just how things work." He said that even companies like Nvidia, which is experiencing unprecedented success, inevitably falter, and there is not one single moment it can be pegged to. Much like Nvidia, Kodak was once considered an invincible darling of S&P 500. Its stock price, as of the writing of this article, hovers at $5 a share. Mr Hogan also said that although there are optimists who try to compare Kodak's recent struggles to that of Apple, which was nearing irrelevance in the mid-1990s only to come roaring back, those comparisons are ill-conceived. Apple's struggles occurred while the computer industry was still finding its footing and the company was relatively young, whereas Kodak was already past its prime when its downfall began. "It's clearly a fallen angel that's not coming back," Mr Hogan said. Kodak's brand remains strong despite struggles Although Kodak has financially meandered for more than a decade, at this point, the company's logo and name still carry weight. Throughout many parts of the world, and particularly in the Middle East, Kodak signs remain prominent outside print and photo shops. Timothy Kneeland, a professor of history, politics and law at Nazareth University in western New York, said that the company's contributions to chemical and photography breakthroughs helped to give the US brand unprecedented recognition. "Overseas, Kodak is loved," he said. "You can still see retail stores with Kodak branding and merchandise." Prof Kneeland also said when Kodak was ascending to its peak of influence, the company made it a priority to send representatives overseas to promote its film, lenses and cameras, giving the brand a significant advantage over competitors. "Kodak became the standard for film," he said, adding that the company's prolific TV advertisements boasting of capturing "Kodak moments" with cameras, made it a household name for billions. Robert Thompson, a professor of pop culture, television, radio and film at Syracuse University 's Newhouse School of Public Communications, said that in the 1960s, '70s and '80s, Kodak's products and advertising worked so well that the brand almost took on a generic quality, similar to how people refer to tissues as Kleenex or adhesive bandages as Band-Aids. "Their advertising essentially taught people how to use what was once just an emerging technology of photography," he explained. Prof Thompson said Kodak's advertising messages were easily transferable to other parts of the world. He said the now beleaguered company but resilient brand and logo offer a lesson to others at the centre of the current artificial intelligence boom, such as OpenAI and Anthropic. "They turned photography into something that was part of the daily activities of a huge portion of the population," Prof Thompson said. "AI is obviously a big deal too, but Kodak is admirable because it took technology and turned it into an aspirational product enjoyed by billions."


Tahawul Tech
7 hours ago
- Tahawul Tech
floodwater sensors Archives
"@Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides @OpenAI to reach number 1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation". Learn more about Musk's displeasure with Apple below. #xAI #Apple #tahawultech


Tahawul Tech
7 hours ago
- Tahawul Tech
5G deployment Archives
"@Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides @OpenAI to reach number 1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation". Learn more about Musk's displeasure with Apple below. #xAI #Apple #tahawultech