OpenAI condemns Robinhood's ‘OpenAI tokens'
'These 'OpenAI tokens' are not OpenAI equity,' said OpenAI's newsroom account on Wednesday. 'We did not partner with Robinhood, were not involved in this, and do not endorse it. Any transfer of OpenAI equity requires our approval—we did not approve any transfer. Please be careful.'
OpenAI's statement is a response to Robinhood's announcement earlier this week that it would started selling so-called tokenized shares of OpenAI, SpaceX, and other private companies to people in the European Union.
Robinhood says the launch represents an attempt to give everyday people exposure to equity in the world's most valuable private companies via blockchain. Hours after announcing these token sales, Robinhood's stock price shot to an all-time high.
But stock in private companies like OpenAI and SpaceX are not available to the public. That's what makes them private. They sell shares to investors of their choosing.
So OpenAI is openly disavowing Robinhood's effort.
In response to OpenAI's condemnation, Robinhood spokesperson Rouky Diallo told TechCrunch that OpenAI tokens were part of a 'limited' giveaway to offer retail investors indirect exposure 'through Robinhood's ownership stake in a special purpose vehicle (SPV).'
That suggests Robinhood owns shares of a SPV that controls a certain number of OpenAI's shares. Like the tokens, shares of SPVs are not direct ownership of shares, either. They are ownership in a vehicle that owns the shares. In one way or another, Robinhood seems to be tying the price of its new tokenized product to the OpenAI shares in that SPV. But shares prices in an SPV can also differ from prices of an actual share of stock, as well.
In Robinhood's help center, the company notes that when buying any of its stock tokens, 'you are not buying the actual stocks — you are buying tokenized contracts that follow their price, recorded on a blockchain.'
'While it is true that they aren't technically 'equity,' […] the tokens effectively give retail investors exposure to these private assets,' said Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev in a post on X on Wednesday. 'Our giveaway plants a seed for something much bigger, and since our announcement we've been hearing from many private companies that are eager to join us in the tokenization revolution.'
OpenAI declined to comment further. Robinhood did not respond to TechCrunch's additional questions about its SPV.
Private companies are known to push back against anything that could influence how their equity is valued. In recent months, humanoid robotics startup Figure AI sent cease-and-desist letters to two brokers running secondary markets that were marketing the company's stock. Of course, these situations are different, but most startups don't want people to believe that they've authorized share sales if they haven't.
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tom's Guide
a minute ago
- Tom's Guide
The Apple vs Google war is over — they need to join forces to survive against OpenAI
As I was watching the Made by Google event yesterday (August 20), I couldn't help but notice that Rick Osterloh, Google's senior VP of platforms and devices, made a not-so-subtle dig at Apple. When discussing the state of AI on phones with host Jimmy Fallon, Osterloh noted that there's been 'a lot of broken promises.' Ahem. He's referring, of course, to Apple's long-delayed new version of Siri. You know, the one that's supposed to be more personal, more contextual and let you voice control your apps. That's not coming until 2026. Meanwhile, Google is already there (and then some) with Gemini on the Pixel 10. And it just unveiled a dizzying array of AI features that put Apple to shame. For both Apple and Google to remain relevant in the OpenAI era, I'd argue that they need to come together and combine their strengths — hardware and AI — with a partnership (not a merger). Or they could both be left behind. Some of my favorite new AI features coming to Google phones include Ask Photos. You can just tell your phone (or type) what changes you want to see in your images and — presto! — the Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro Fold will just do it for you. Another AI wow comes in the form of Magic Cue. No more jumping between apps to get the info you need. If you call to change your plane reservation the info will pop right up on the call screen. Or if someone asks for you to share photos from your recent hiking trip, a button will show up in your chat and take you right to them. Apple doesn't have anything like these features in iOS 26, and I doubt anything this impressive will be coming with the iPhone 17 lineup. Although I hear we're getting a bigger camera bar on the iPhone 17 Pro and a super skinny iPhone 17 Air! The problem for Google is that its phone market share is tiny — like really tiny. In July Canalys reported that the Pixel's market share was a whopping 3% in the U.S. And that's a 13% increase year over year. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Part of the issue is that Google's hardware prowess is nowhere near as good as its software smarts. Just take a look at the new Pixel 10 Pro Fold. It's super smart and achieves IP68 water and dust resistance. But it's way chunkier than the new Galaxy Z Fold 7. Apple is better at industrial design, and I can guarantee you that the iPhone Fold hardware will be superior should it arrive next year as expected. So while this may sound insane I think Apple and Google should team up. And I'm serious when I say that it could be a matter of survival. Looming on the horizon for both Google and Apple is OpenAI, which is teasing its first hardware device that's expected to launch this year. It's not going to be a phone, but when you have 800 million weekly users of ChatGPT — and that new device is being designed by none other than famed ex-iPhone designer Jony Ive — there's serious cause for concern. When you have 800 million weekly users of ChatGPT — and your new device is being designed by none other than famed ex-iPhone designer Jony Ive — there's serious cause for concern. To be fair, the new GPT-5 has seen some backlash, so Sam Altman is human after all. But it is indeed a powerful model and blew away Gemini in our GPT-5 vs Gemini face-off. OpenAI has become synonymous with AI, and Google is playing serious catch-up. One recent report says that ChatGPT's market share is 60% among AI chatbots, compared to just 13.5% for Gemini. Apple isn't even on the list. For Apple's part there's been reports that Tim Cook is willing to spend big to partner to acquire AI technology or companies to jumpstart its efforts, and names like Perplexity and Claude have been floated. But I feel like Apple's best bet is to latch on to Gemini right now before it's too late. So what would that mean? The U.S. Federal Trade Commission would never approve a merger like this between two giants. It would become an instant monopoly. But I do think Apple should form a strategic partnership with Google so that iPhone users could take full advantage of Gemini and all of Google's other AI features. Yes, Google has come under scrutiny by the Justice Department for the billions it's been paying Apple to make Google the default search engine on iPhones. But this would not be a one-way or even an exclusive deal, necessarily. What I'm envisioning here would give Google more access to Apple's services and break down the walled garden. Maybe in exchange for access to Gemini and other AI goodies on the iPhone, Android phones could gain access to iMessage, iCloud, AirDrop and more. Maybe AirPods could magically pair with Pixel phones and other Android phones. And Apple could possibly open things up so that iPhone users could replace Siri with other AI assistants so it didn't look as though this was an exclusive arrangement. Let alternatives like Claude and Perplexity in, too, along with Gemini. Right now Siri works with ChatGPT, and you can argue that it only does cool things when it invokes OpenAI's assistant. It might not seem like it right now, but Google and Apple face existential threats. Apple is losing market share to the likes of Samsung, which is pushing harder into foldable phones. And there's a very real risk of the smartphone itself becoming less relevant at the hands of new devices like smart glasses and whatever OpenAI is cooking up with Ive. And Google is just not great at hardware (sorry!), as a whole generation of people turns to ChatGPT first instead of search engines. And imagine how much better a pair of Apple glasses would sell with Gemini inside than whatever Google is developing right now. So Apple and Google — both long-term enemies — need to become friends. Fast. Or it could be game over for them both. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.


Forbes
3 minutes ago
- Forbes
TCV's Top European Investor John Doran Relocates To Silicon Valley
Revolut investor John Doran helped setup TCV's Europe operates but is now relocating to help head up its Bay Area headquarters. TCV Spotify, Netflix, and Zillow investor TCV was one of the first growth equity funds to set up an European operation. Now, John Doran, who helped open the fund's London office as a general partner, is now relocating to San Francisco to head up its operations. Doran has made a string of late-stage bets on fast-growing startups like British digital bank Revolut which was last valued at $45 billion, Swedish fintech Klarna and classified marketplace Adevinta since joining TCV in 2012. He became the fund's co-managing partner, along with TCV cofounder Jay Hoag in 2022. The move also lines up the next stage for the fund, which just celebrated its 30th anniversary and is one of the oldest of Silicon Valley's so-called crossover funds, investing in larger startups and public tech companies. Hoag continues to co-lead the fund and make investments, but Doran has emerged as the successor for the veteran investor. 'Having John here will be huge because he's very hands-on and brings a global perspective to America,' said Hoag. 'I think we really want to up our game for the next 10, 20, 30 years at TCV. I doubt I'll be celebrating the 60th anniversary in 30 years. But someone here will.' Doran's relocation doesn't mark a retreat from Europe for TCV, with partners Michael Kalfayan and Muz Ashraf now leading the London office. 'The technology market here is incredibly deep and vibrant, and with the AI revolution there's a ton of innovation happening,' Doran told Forbes . 'We see tremendous opportunity here in what's been our traditional headquarters.' Doran is one of three partners who call the shots on new investments, along with partner Woody Marshall, who is known for his 2013 bet on Spotify, now worth $144 billion, and Hoag, whose initial 1999 bet on Netflix led to TCV owning a 43% stake in the company at the time of its 2002 IPO. The streamer has ballooned to a $512 billion market cap in the two decades since, with Hoag as a board member throughout. A new wave of AI startups have helped revitalize San Francisco, but the intense competition poses a challenge for investors like TCV, which has $22 billion in assets. Rival growth funds have made huge investments in loss-making AI model builders like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Elon Musk's xAI that have soared in valuation over the last 18 months. For now, TCV has reservations about the economics of some AI players but is making bets in the application layer, like AI tracking tool Arize. Meanwhile, its existing portfolio companies are investing heavily in AI. 'It feels like a lot of this money going into AI won't have a return associated with it, but a small number will be phenomenal,' warned Hoag. 'As a growth investor, we have to identify the next generation of magical companies like Netlifx, Spotify, or Revolut.' TCV does have the dry powder to fund new AI investments after raising a new $3 billion fund last year, one of the largest fundraises for a tech-focused fund, despite broader funding challenges in the ecosystem. Pitchbook data shows that fund raising from U.S. venture capitalists collapsed to $76 billion in 2024 from its peak of $188 billion in 2021. Venture capitalists rarely disclose fund performance but TCV is backed by several public sector funds like California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) that do publish summaries of investment returns. CalPERS data shows that its investment in TCV's X fund had generated a net internal rate of return (IRR) of 21.5% and was one of the pension fund's top performing private fund investments. Software company Carta tracks investment data from over 2,500 venture funds, including earlier stage and higher risk funds, and found that funds that started investing in 2019 had a median IRR of 6.7%. CalPERS also invested in TCV's XI fund in 2021 that's currently showing a -1.5% net IRR, which is behind the Carta average of -0.9% for the cohort of funds that started investing in 2021. Other CalPERS tech fund bets from the same vintage have also undershot but it is hard to gauge long-term performance in the early innings of funds that often have a life span of more than ten years. TCV declined to comment but sources close to the fund said that it returned over $4 billion of capital to its backers in 2024 alone, and over $15 billion since 2020, with the latter period marked by a severe drought of initial public offerings and takeovers that left investors, and their backers, often starved of liquidity. Bumper initial public offerings from Coreweave, Chime and Figma this year could signal more potential exits on the horizon for tech investors like TCV. The Menlo Park-based fund has already had one of its investments Hinge Health go public this year in a $3 billion initial public offering (albeit at a 52% lower valuation than its last round in 2021), while Klarna filed to go public on the New York Stock Exchange earlier this year, and Revolut was reportedly in talks to raise at a $65 billion valuation earlier this year. More from Forbes Forbes This Top VC Wants To Use Main Street America As An AI Lab By Iain Martin Forbes For AI Startups, A 7-Day Work Week Isn't Enough By Richard Nieva Forbes Thwarted By Regulators, Vindicated By Wall Street: Design Startup Figma's CEO Is Now A Multi-Billionaire By Iain Martin
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
German journalists press Pro7 investors not to sell to Berlusconi's MFE
BERLIN (Reuters) -Germany's DJV journalists' association appealed on Thursday to investors in ProSiebenSat.1 not to sell their shares to Italian suitor MFE, warning it could impose a "right-wing populist agenda" on the German media company. Owned by the family of late Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, MFE is courting ProSieben shareholders to sell over the next two weeks as it seeks to build a pan-European television company to compete with U.S. streaming giants. "It is in the hands of the shareholders to save jobs at the private broadcaster network and prevent a shift to the right," DJV head Mika Beuster said in a statement. "We need more journalism, not more agitation," he added. MFE declined to comment on the allegations of a right-wing populist agenda. ProSieben management gave up its resistance and advised shareholders to accept MFE's bid after it raised the offer earlier this month, but the Italians' move has caused some unease in Berlin. In comments to Reuters in July, German culture minister Wolfram Weimer said ProSieben's journalistic independence must be preserved. He planned to meet Italian media magnate Pier Silvio Berlusconi, the late politician's son, to discuss the issue. MFE said earlier this week it had managed to secure 43.6% of ProSieben shares by the end of the initial acceptance period for its tender offer, shy of a majority.