
Big brands are staying quiet this Pride Month
For the last several years, Pride Month was a splashy marketing event for big brands. Stores adorned windows with rainbow flags, displayed LGBTQ-themed t-shirts and coffee mugs at their entrances, changed their logos on social media accounts, and spotlighted donations to LGBTQ rights groups.
But this Pride Month, many retail chains and brands are going quiet.
Companies are treading lightly, avoiding prominent campaigns and visible public support. Thirty-nine percent say they plan to scale back public Pride Month engagements this year, according to a survey of more than 200 corporate executives by Gravity Research, a risk management advisory. That includes sponsoring Pride events, posting supportive messages of LGBTQ rights on social media and selling Pride-themed merchandise.
Consumer brands are wary of provoking right-wing customers and activists, and they fear reprisals from President Donald Trump's administration. Federal agencies have threatened to investigate companies with diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
Many businesses are tightening their advertising spending due to economic uncertainty over Trump's tariffs. But businesses cited pressure from the Trump administration as the primary reason for changing their Pride Month approach, according to the survey.
'It's clear that the administration and their supporters are driving the change,' said Luke Hartig, the president of Gravity Research. 'Companies are under increasing pressure not to engage and speak out on issues.'
The subdued approach marks a shift for businesses, which used to turn the annual June celebration of LGBTQ Americans into a branded holiday. It's part of a broader pivot in corporate America, with many businesses scrapping some of their programs to advance diversity in the workplace under pressure from the Trump administration and Republican activists.
Advocates for gay, lesbian and transgender Americans say the Trump administration's opposition makes it harder for businesses to compete, innovate and attract talent. They also warn that companies risk losing business by downplaying support for their growing number of gay, lesbian and transgender customers and workers. The proportion of American adults who identify as LGBTQ has risen to 9.3% of the population.
'By weaponizing federal agencies like the EEOC and the Justice Department to intimidate companies that support LGBTQ+ inclusion, this administration is creating an anti-business, anti-worker atmosphere,' said Eric Bloem, the vice president of corporate citizenship at the Human Rights Campaign Foundation.
Many businesses have stopped participating in the Human Rights Campaign's scorecard on corporate policies and benefits for LGBTQ employees due to backlash.
'Companies that show up only when it's convenient, or backtrack the moment there's political pressure, risk losing trust and credibility,' Bloem said.
Companies are actively preparing for Pride-related backlash this year from conservative activists and consumers.
Sixty-five percent of companies in Gravity Research's survey said they were preparing strategies to respond to blowback. A growing number of chains, including Walmart, Target, Kroger, have also been warning investors about the risks of consumer boycotts over corporate positions on social issues.
Anger from the right over Bud Light and Target's marketing efforts, in particular, has had a chilling effect on corporate strategies for Pride Month.
Bud Light sales tanked in 2023 after the company's partnership with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney sparked anti-trans backlash and boycotts. Bud Light's tepid response also angered LGBTQ rights advocates.
In 2023, activists and customers on the right attacked Target on social media for its LGBTQ-themed merchandise during Pride Month. Target employees faced threats over items such as bathing suits designed for transgender people, and the company removed them from stores. Misinformation spread on social media that the swimsuits were marketed to children, which they were not.
The backlash led to a drop in sales and lawsuits from Republican-aligned legal groups.
Last year, Target sold Pride products in fewer stores and offered the full merchandise collection online.
Target is again taking a muted approach to Pride Month this year.
In 'select stores,' Target is selling a 'multi-category collection including home, pets, books, vinyl and adult apparel and accessories' to celebrate Pride, the company said in an email to employees viewed by CNN. Target is selling the full Pride product selection online.
'We are absolutely dedicated to fostering inclusivity for everyone – our team members, our guests, our supply partners, and the more than 2,000 communities we're proud to serve,' a Target spokesperson said. 'As we have for many years, we will continue to mark Pride Month by offering an assortment of celebratory products, hosting internal programming to support our incredible team and sponsoring local events in neighborhoods across the country.'
But Target's Pride merchandise is limited and displayed less prominently in stores than in previous years, said one Target senior leader who spoke under the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. Target store employee and customer excitement for Pride Month has dissipated as a result of the company's shift, according to the senior leader.
'It feels like we have catered to the direction of the administration,' this person said.
Other companies are also dialing back public pronouncements, donations and merchandise in support of Pride Month.
Last year, Kohl's launched a 'Pride capsule collection' of merchandise and donated $100,000 to The Trevor Project, a suicide prevention and crisis intervention organization for LGBTQ youth.
'As we use this month to embrace love in all forms, we simultaneously create more spaces for members of the LGBTQIA+ community to live out loud,' Michelle Banks, Kohl's-then chief diversity, equity & inclusion officer, said in a news release. (Banks is now Kohl's chief inclusion and belonging officer.)
Kohl's has not announced any Pride Month plans this year and did not respond to CNN's requests for comment.
Macy's last year touted that it hosted a donation campaign for The Trevor Project, spotlighted LGBTQ-owned brands, and set up displays in select Macy's windows and at local Pride marches nationwide.
Macy's is supporting Pride events this month in a similar way, including participating in Pride events nationwide and raising money for The Trevor Project. But unlike previous years, the company is not making official announcements about its plans.
Nordstrom, Gap and several other brands that highlighted their Pride Month efforts last year appear not to have repeated them this June. The companies did not respond to CNN about their plans.
But a quieter marketing approach to Pride Month does not necessarily mean companies are abandoning support for LGBTQ employees or customers.
'I do see there's pivoting happening (for Pride Month). What I don't see is corporates walking away from the LGBTQ community,' said Sarah Kate Ellis, president of advocacy group GLAAD. 'They don't want to be caught in the crosshairs of this presidency, and they don't want to become the headline like Target or Bud Light.'
Many companies are instead working behind the scenes to engage their LGBTQ employees and strengthen employee recruitment and retention strategies.
Just 14% of companies reported plans to reduce internal engagement during Pride Month, according to Gravity Research. Corporate employees are providing counter-pressure to keep brands active on LGBTQ issues.
'Companies are going deeper and wider, rather than supporting an event,' Ellis said. 'They're finding better ways to thread their work supporting the LGBTQ community into their organizations.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
City of Albuquerque raises Pride flag over Civic Plaza
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – Pride Month is here, and the City of Albuquerque is showing its support to the local LGBTQ community. City leaders gathered at Civic Plaza Tuesday morning to raise the multicolored pride flag. They said it's important to promote inclusion, equity, and love. Mexican gray wolf Asha gives birth to litter of pups 'Anytime we get a chance to stand up for ourselves and ourselves as marginalized citizens, it's alwasy a great day for me…we are here to support each other, no matter what struggles we're going through, no matter what walks of life we are, we are here for support,' said Board President Raymon Sierra-Lopez, Albuquerque Pride. The annual Pride parade is set for Saturday morning in Nob Hill with a Pride festival to follow at Civic Plaza. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Carbon Capture Efforts Slow as Trump Targets Clean Energy Projects
Since U.S. President Donald Trump took office, the number of applications for carbon capture projects has nosedived, signaling a slowdown in the efforts to commercialize the relatively new technology to remove carbon from the air. Since the Trump Administration signaled it would be axing clean energy subsidies and tax credits, the nascent carbon capture sector, led by some of the biggest U.S. oil firms, has faced increasing uncertainty about the viability of many a result, the application process for Class VI wells, which are used to inject carbon dioxide (CO2) into deep rock formations, has stalled this year. The number of submitted Class VI applications plummeted by 55% to just four in the first quarter of 2025, compared to an average of nine applications per quarter over the last two years, according to data from Enverus Intelligence Research. The January-March quarter saw the fewest applications submitted in three years—since the first quarter of 2022, Enverus said in a report last no Class VI permits were approved in the first quarter of 2025, compared to three approvals in the fourth quarter of 2024 under the Biden Administration. At the end of 2024, Enverus expected about 40 approvals to go through this year. Now it sees only 14 Class VI wells approvals. The revised expectation is 'mostly attributed to updated approval times from Class VI regulators while they wait on applicants for responses to notices of deficiency and requests for additional information during the review process,' said Brad Johnston, an analyst at Enverus Intelligence Research. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) aims to review complete Class VI applications and issue permits when appropriate within approximately 24 months. However, the waiting time was about 30 months as of 2023, also due to a rush of applications at the time. Several U.S. states have requested – and received – the so-called Class VI well primacy, or primary enforcement authority delegated by the EPA, to issue permits. These include North Dakota, Wyoming, West Virginia, and Louisiana, with Texas moved into the Proposed Rulemaking Phase in the EPA's approval process for state primacy. A 2 million metric ton per annum (mtpa) carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in Louisiana has recently received a draft permit from the state's Department of Energy and Natural Resources. This was the first such permit issued since the state obtained Class VI primacy over a year ago, Enverus said. But overall, lengthy permitting times and the many unknowns regarding clean energy incentives and tax credits under the Trump Administration have cooled enthusiasm about carbon capture technology among U.S. companies. One notable exception was Occidental, which is pursuing direct air capture (DAC) technology that is different from carbon capture and storage. In a first-of-its-kind approval in April, Occidental and its subsidiary 1PointFive received Class VI permits from the EPA to sequester carbon dioxide from their STRATOS DAC facility, currently under construction in Ector County, many carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects reached the end of the road after U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright terminated last week 24 awards to projects, primarily CCS and decarbonization initiatives. The Department of Energy found that 'these projects failed to advance the energy needs of the American people, were not economically viable and would not generate a positive return on investment of taxpayer dollars.' The awards to projects would have used $3.7 billion in taxpayer-funded financial assistance by DOE. 'While the previous administration failed to conduct a thorough financial review before signing away billions of taxpayer dollars, the Trump administration is doing our due diligence to ensure we are utilizing taxpayer dollars to strengthen our national security, bolster affordable, reliable energy sources and advance projects that generate the highest possible return on investment,' said Secretary Wright. Under Secretary Wright's memo on responsible financial assistance, DOE evaluated each of these 24 awards and 'determined that they did not meet the economic, national security or energy security standards necessary to sustain DOE's investment.' In response, the Carbon Capture Coalition, which includes companies and conservation policy organizations, said that the cancellation of the projects 'is a major step backward in the nationwide deployment of carbon management technologies.' 'Moves like this risk ceding America's energy and technological leadership to other nations,' the coalition added. The tax credit for carbon capture remains, for now, but some analysts say it's not enough to help the industry take off. The $85 per metric ton tax credit 'is and continues to be insufficient to justify widespread deployment of post-combustion carbon capture', Rohan Dighe, an analyst at Wood Mackenzie, told the Financial Times. The limitations to transferability of the credits after 2027 will also kill many small projects, Brenna Casey, a carbon capture associate at BloombergNEF, told FT. The carbon capture market could soon reach a point in which only the oil majors could afford to be active in it. But even majors such as ExxonMobil have conditioned their investments in low-carbon energy solutions on favorable policy and regulation. At the end of 2024, Exxon said it is pursuing up to $30 billion of low-emission opportunities between 2025 and 2030, but 'execution of these opportunities is contingent on the right policy and regulation as well as continued technology and market development.' By Tsvetana Paraskova for More Top Reads From this article on
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth Orders Renaming Of Navy Ship Honoring LGBTQ+ Icon Harvey Milk: Reports
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Navy to rename the USNS Harvey Milk honoring the slain LGBTQ+ rights icon and military veteran, according to reports. The timing of the name change, which was reported on the third day of Pride Month, was intentional, a person familiar with the plans told which was the first to report Hegseth's order. When reached for comment, chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell wouldn't confirm the name change but said Hegseth is focused on aligning military institutions with President Donald Trump's views. 'Secretary Hegseth is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the Commander-in-Chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos. Any potential renaming(s) will be announced after internal reviews are complete,' Parnell said. A memo obtained by shows that the name change is scheduled to be announced June 13 aboard the USS Constitution. Milk was the first openly gay man elected to public office in California. He served less than a year on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors before being assassinated in 1978. Prior to his career in politics, Milk joined the Navy during the Korean War and served until 1955 when he was forcibly discharged because of his sexual orientation. The USNS Harvey Milk was named in his honor in 2016, while President Barack Obama was still in office. It was one of several ships named for civil rights icons that year. Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, who represents much of San Francisco in Congress, reacted to the reported name change, calling it a 'shameful, vindictive erasure of those who fought to break down barriers for all to chase the American Dream.' 'Our military is the most powerful in the world – but this spiteful move does not strengthen our national security or the 'warrior' ethos,' she said in a statement. 'Instead, it is a surrender of a fundamental American value: to honor the legacy of those who worked to build a better country.' CBS News also reported Tuesday that the Navy is considering changing the names of ships honoring the late Supreme Court justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Thurgood Marshall, Harriet Tubman, Dolores Huerta and Cesar Chavez, among other civil rights icons. Hegseth, Bedeviled By Leaks, Orders More Restrictions On Press At Pentagon China Knocks Hegseth's 'Cold War Mentality' After He Calls The Country A Threat Pete Hegseth's 'Incredibly Problematic' Pentagon Event Raises Serious Concerns