
Once It Was Mostly a Taco Website. Now It's Covering L.A. ICE Raids.
Investigative reporter Lexis-Olivier Ray captured video of police firing pepper balls at protesters and media outside a federal building in downtown Los Angeles. The next day, law enforcement shot pepper balls at him and other journalists, he said. In five years of covering protests and civil unrest in the city, he had never seen anything like that.
'It was shocking,' said Ray, 35. He doesn't know how many times he was hit but his backpack was riddled with pepper ball residue. 'There was a complete disregard that we were press.'
L.A. Taco was once a small website 'celebrating the taco lifestyle,' and a year ago faced the possibility of shutting down. But it's become an impactful and (for now) financially viable L.A. newsroom, going deep in the trenches as more than 1,600 people were arrested or detained by ICE in Southern California in June, according to Cal Matters.
'The journalism gets better year after year,' said Los Angeles Times columnist Gustavo Arellano. 'And now in this moment when L.A. needs as many eyes on the streets as possible, L.A. Taco has become indispensable.'
'This is the issue, not just right now but, honestly, of a generation,' he said of the city's immigration concerns. '… People are freaked the hell out and they don't know what to do.'
During the first week of providing nonstop news coverage, L.A. Taco Editor in Chief Javier Cabral said in a letter to readers that nothing would prevent the team from providing street-level journalism. Not a 'non-lethal projectile' or threatening comments on social media or the 'vivid' nightmares that kept him from getting any rest. And he thanked everyone who signed up for a paid membership.
'Your support means the world to our small team of six journalists, who care deeply about our city, friends, family, loved ones and neighbors and do it regardless of the low pay, constant threats and instability of an increasingly AI world,' he wrote.
News was coming in at such a rapid pace that Cabral announced L.A. Taco's coverage would pivot to a 'social media first approach.' It's risky because the site doesn't make money on social media. Its leaders had already been struggling to figure out how much content should go on social and how much should stay on their website behind a paywall, said Memo Torres, L.A. Taco's director of content, social media and engagement.
'This crisis of ICE raids threw everything out the window,' said Torres, 44. The team decided it was most important to 'do service journalism and … get the information out as quickly as possible.'
Since the first ICE raids, Torres has been sharing video from staff, the public and other media outlets with L.A. Taco's more than 500,000 followers on Instagram, TikTok and X, once information is verified. Most afternoons, Torres produces a short-video series titled the Daily Memo that he opens like a war correspondent reporting during the Blitz.
'It's Wednesday, July 2nd, the 27th day of the ICE siege of L.A.,' Torres said in one.
The recap of that day's events started with 'really depressing' footage of a man pleading for someone to help him while men wearing tactical vests dragged him into an unmarked car. It also included reports of arrests from the San Fernando Valley to West Los Angeles.
'If you were hoping that ICE was going to disappear after 30 days … well, think again,' Torres said.
L.A. Taco multimedia reporter Janette Villafana said what's unique about coverage from smaller newsrooms such as CALÓ News, LA Public Press and her own is that hyperlocal journalists understand the community because they are a part of it.
'We're communicating and building relationships and, more than anything, trust – whether it's regarding ICE or anything else,' said Villafana, 33.
L.A. Taco was founded nearly 20 years ago by publisher Alex Bloomingdale, deputy editor Hadley Tomicki and artist Colin Browne as a blog, Bloomingdale said. It celebrated 'the things we love about the city (mostly tacos, weed, and graffiti at the time),' according to its website.
'You would laugh more at the title than you would actually read or remember what they published,' Arellano said.
That changed in 2017 when journalist Daniel Hernandez became editor and relaunched it as a site with more local news. He left for the Los Angeles Times two years later and was replaced by Cabral, 36, who has been a food editor at Vice, a restaurant scout for famed critic Jonathan Gold and an intern at OC Weekly when Arellano was its editor.
A year ago, Cabral and Bloomingdale announced they had furloughed most of the staff and that L.A. Taco would shut down due to declining revenue unless they could secure donations and persuade people to pay for content that still also includes coverage of music, art events and, yes, tacos. They set up a fundraising drive and went from 1,500 to 3,500 subscribers. Subscription plans range from $59.99 to $999 a year, and all include free tacos.
'The response was immediate and incredible when we were honest about the situation,' said Bloomingdale, who goes by Blazedale on L.A. Taco. 'We were able to end the furlough after one day.'
Its recent reporting brought in 800 subscribers in the month of June, plus donations and social media fans. Eva Longoria pledged a dollar-to-dollar match for a $25,000 July fundraising drive. Bloomingdale said not only will L.A. Taco break even this year for the second time in its history, he expects the business, which has an annual budget of $500,000, to turn a profit.
'We're dreamers and we keep putting our earnings back into the company in the form of journalists, content and events,' including the annual Taco Madness festival, which is in its 16th year, he said. 'We have ambitions to create a new kind of media company, but we're doing it in a very DIY style.'
People have suggested that L.A. Taco transition from a for-profit to a nonprofit newsroom, making it more appealing to wealthy donors looking to give a large contribution for a tax deduction. It's not happening, Cabral said. L.A. Taco's readers have always come through, 'no matter how bad or unsustainable it got,' he said. 'We'd rather go out swinging than sell our editorial soul.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
China's AI strategy relies on frenzy and frenemies
Wandering through the halls of China's top artificial intelligence this week, I overheard heated debates on some of the thorniest issues facing the sector: How do we solve the problem of interoperability if hundreds of companies are launching their own AI agents? Which large language models are the most developer-friendly to build apps on? Are humanoids tools or companions? Held on the banks of the Huangpu river in Shanghai, the World Artificial Intelligence Conference convened thousands of people — as well as scores of robots — and brought to life all the passions and pitfalls of the current state of AI in China. It also put into stark contrast the chasm between the strategy pushed by Beijing and the one touted by the White House. It's the first major gathering since DeepSeek's breakthrough reasoning model launched earlier this year, driving intense competition at home and proving China can go toe-to-toe with Silicon Valley. With that exuberance came the crowds of challengers, present in so many domestic industries, encouraged by government support and an open-source ecosystem that allows firms to quickly learn from rivals. When one of the so-called Little Dragons, Moonshot, released a massive open-source model that excelled at coding tasks, Alibaba Group was able to update their own Qwen model within about a week to improve benchmarks at the same skills that sent Kimi-K2 viral. Beijing likes to say this approach democratizes access to AI by offering the world the ability to freely build atop its tools, and it gives local developers an edge. China's current AI frenzy represents the best and worst of classic capitalism: The competition propels innovation at a rapid clip, but not all of the companies will survive over the next five or 10 years. During the summit, state-backed media touted how the country has now released 1,500 large AI models — the biggest share globally — and is home to more than 5,000 AI companies. Yet the domestic rivalries on display were overshadowed by a broader, geopolitical contest for supremacy. China's big gathering kicked off just days after U.S. President Donald Trump pledged that that America will "do whatever it takes to lead the world in artificial intelligence.' After unveiling a so-called AI Action Plan, he went on to declare that America is the country that started the AI race and "is going to win it.' In Shanghai, Premier Li Qiang headlined opening night by announcing that China will organize the launch of an international body to jointly develop the technology, with the goal of preventing it from becoming "an exclusive game for a small number of countries and enterprises.' It dovetailed with this year's conference theme: "Global solidarity in the AI era.' China is willing to share its development and products with the world, Li said, especially in the Global South. Still, what these world leaders say is one thing, what they do is another. Trump's declaration of doing whatever it takes to win follows his decision to hand a major gift to Chinese AI firms. Washington reversed course on semiconductor restrictions, allowing Nvidia's highly sought-after H20 chips to resume sales on the mainland. The policy U-turn was announced in the midst of, and likely influenced by, ongoing trade talks. It also came after Nvidia Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang lobbied for his company to be able to keep its multibillion-dollar slice of the lucrative China market. And as much as Li pitches "solidarity,' it's unclear how many countries will ultimately choose to align with China. Yet it's a far cry from Washington's "America First' AI policy goals and signals that Beijing's that approach relies on convincing the world to use its plethora of low-cost AI products being rapidly released. Fresh access to Nvidia processers is giving the industry new momentum and the increasingly crowded field is driving down prices. Compare the two and China's plan seems more strategic in the long run. One of the forums on Sunday featured a Zoom appearance from pioneering AI godfather Yoshua Bengio, who warned that the U.S.-China competition was dangerous and that development was progressing so rapidly it may become impossible for humans to control. Bengio has a point. But is anybody listening? Ambitions of AI acceleration from both sides of the Pacific suggest not. Catherine Thorbecke is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech.

Nikkei Asia
3 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
China's Instagram used to steer Taiwan public opinion: Taipei official
Xiaohongshu, known as China's Instagram, has more than 300 million active users and is popular among young people in Taiwan. © Reuters MINA ASHIKAWA TAIPEI -- Chinese social media app Xiaohongshu is a tool used by the Communist Party to steer ideological leanings in Taiwan toward China, a Taiwanese official said, warning that it could affect the thinking of young people on the island. "The Chinese Communist Party believes that if more young people in Taiwan use Xiaohongshu, it will lower the hurdles to controlling Taiwan," said Shen Yu-chung, deputy minister of Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council, which oversees the island's China policy. Shen spoke to Nikkei and other media.

Japan Times
16 hours ago
- Japan Times
Australia adds YouTube to teen social media ban, tearing up exemption
Australia said on Wednesday it will add YouTube to sites covered by its world-first ban on social media for teenagers, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the Alphabet-owned video-sharing site and potentially setting up a legal challenge. The decision came after the country's internet regulator last week urged the government to overturn a YouTube carve-out, citing a survey that found 37% of minors reported seeing harmful content on the site. "Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement. "I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs." The decision broadens the ban due to take effect in December. YouTube says it is used by nearly three-quarters of Australians age 13 to 15, and it should not be classified as social media because its main activity is hosting videos. Since the government said last year that it would exempt YouTube due to its popularity with teachers, platforms included in the ban such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok have complained. They contend that YouTube has key similarities to their products including letting users interact and recommending content through an algorithm based on activity. The reversal, meanwhile, sets up a fresh dispute between Australia and Alphabet, which threatened to withdraw some Google services from Australia in 2021 to avoid a law forcing it to pay news outlets for content appearing in searches. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media," a YouTube spokesperson said by email. Last week, YouTube said it had written to the government "urging them to uphold the integrity of the legislative process". Australian media reported YouTube threatened to challenge the ban in court, although YouTube did not confirm that. The relevant law, which passed in November, says only that social media platforms must take reasonable steps to keep Australians age under 16 out or face a fine of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars. The government is due to receive a report this month on tests of age-checking products, and it has said those results will influence how the ban will be enforced.