logo
Britain ‘vulnerable' after Labour reversals, warns credit ratings giant

Britain ‘vulnerable' after Labour reversals, warns credit ratings giant

Yahoo7 hours ago
Britain's public finances have been left 'vulnerable' by Sir Keir Starmer's about-turn on welfare cuts, the world's largest credit ratings agency has warned.
S&P Global said the inability to make 'modest cuts' to the welfare budget showed Rachel Reeves faced a 'formidable political challenge' to keep spending under control.
'In our view, it remains to be seen whether the Government succeeds in following through on its wider plans for keeping public spending in check as announced in the June 2025 spending review,' the agency told clients.
A failure to rein in runaway public spending could leave Britain ill-prepared for future potential financial crises.
S&P warned that the Government had shown an inability to tackle spending, including the proposed £5bn welfare cut, meaning it had 'very limited budgetary room for manoeuvre'.
The agency said high spending would also keep government borrowing costs higher for longer as the UK's credit rating would not improve until its finances were in check.
It said: 'We consider the UK's fiscal position as vulnerable and one of the key constraints on our 'AA' sovereign rating. We expect that UK budgetary consolidation will remain a slow process.'
Sir Keir was forced to gut planned welfare reforms to avoid an embarrassing defeat in the Commons on Tuesday. The 11th-hour climbdown means the legislation will deliver no savings and will blow a £5bn hole in Ms Reeves's budget.
S&P Global said the episode had brought into question whether the Chancellor could balance the nation's books as planned. The credit ratings agency expects the UK deficit to be reduced only slightly from 5.9pc of GDP last year to 5.5pc this year.
Ratings agencies are used by the world's investors to assess the creditworthiness of borrowers, including countries. The industry is dominated by just three companies, of which S&P Global is the world's biggest. As such, its verdict on Britain's finances is hugely influential.
S&P's update does not suggest it is considering changing the UK's current credit rating. However, it will be seen as a warning to the Government about the urgency with which it must tackle the public finances. It comes a day after major bond investor Legal & General warned that repeated policy changes from Labour had shaken investors' faith in the Government's plans.
The cost of government borrowing on Friday remained higher than before Tuesday's vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill.
The yield on 10-year UK gilts – a benchmark for the cost of servicing the national debt – stood at 4.53pc, compared to 4.45pc before Tuesday's vote.
Jack Meaning, an economist at Barclays, said extra spending on benefits and anticipated cuts to the growth outlook meant 'the Chancellor's fiscal rules [were] highly likely to be breached at the autumn Budget'.
'The fragility of the fiscal position has come into focus, making tax increases in the autumn almost inevitable,' he said, predicting an extension to the long freeze to income tax thresholds.
Salman Ahmed, at investment giant Fidelity International, by contrast said the Chancellor may put off balancing the books in the autumn and instead hope for growth to come to the rescue.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palestine Action terror ban comes into force after late-night legal action fails
Palestine Action terror ban comes into force after late-night legal action fails

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Palestine Action terror ban comes into force after late-night legal action fails

A ban against Palestine Action has come into force, designating it as a terror group after a late-night legal bid to delay it failed. It makes membership of, or support for, the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7 million worth of damage. In response to the ban, a group of around 20 people are set to gather and sit in front of the Gandhi statue in London's Parliament Square on Saturday afternoon, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries. They will hold signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' The newly proscribed group lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday to temporarily stop it being banned, less than two hours before the move came into force at midnight. Earlier that day Huda Ammori, the group's co-founder, unsuccessfully asked the High Court to temporarily block the Government from designating the group as a terrorist organisation, before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident. They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977. Lawyers for Ms Ammori took her case to the Court of Appeal on Friday evening, and in a decision given at around 10.30pm, refused to grant the temporary block. Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, made a bid to have the case certified as a 'point of general public importance' to allow a Supreme Court bid, but the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr said they would not get to the Supreme Court before midnight. The judge added that any application should be made before 4pm on Monday and refused a bid to pause the ban coming into effect pending any Supreme Court bid. In an 11-page written judgment, Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Edis said: 'The role of the court is simply to interpret and apply the law. 'The merits of the underlying decision to proscribe a particular group is not a matter for the court…Similarly, it is not a matter for this court to express any views on whether or not the allegations or claims made by Palestine Action are right or wrong.' They also said: 'People may only be prosecuted and punished for acts they engaged in after the proscription came into force.' In his decision refusing the temporary block, High Court judge Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, for Ms Ammori, told the Court of Appeal that the judge wrongly decided the balance between the interests of her client and the Home Office when deciding whether to make the temporary block. She said: 'The balance of convenience on the evidence before him, in our respectful submission, fell in favour of the claimant having regard to all of the evidence, including the chilling effect on free speech, the fact that people would be criminalised and criminalised as terrorists for engaging in protest that was not violent, for the simple fact that they were associated with Palestine Action.' She also told the Court of Appeal that Mr Justice Chamberlain 'failed properly to consider' that banning the group 'would cause irreparable harm'. Ms Ni Ghralaigh said: 'There was significant evidence before him to demonstrate the chilling effect of the order because it was insufficiently clear.' She continued that the ban would mean 'a vast number of individuals who wished to continue protesting would fall foul of the proscription regime due to its lack of clarity'. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the Court of Appeal that Mr Justice Chamberlain gave a 'detailed and careful judgment' and that the judge was 'alive' to the possible impacts of the ban, including the potential 'chilling effect' on free speech.

AirAsia's $12.3B Power Move Could Reshape Global Budget Travel
AirAsia's $12.3B Power Move Could Reshape Global Budget Travel

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

AirAsia's $12.3B Power Move Could Reshape Global Budget Travel

AirAsia parent Capital A has just inked a potential $12.3 billion memorandum of understanding with Airbus (EADSY) for 50 A321XLR jetswith options for 20 more. The deal, unveiled as Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim wrapped up his diplomatic tour of France and Italy, is more than just a fleet refresh. It's a long-range play on global low-cost dominance. These jets, which could begin arriving by 2028, are designed to fly farther than any narrowbody aircraft, making once-uneconomical routes across Asia and beyond suddenly viable. This order allows us to have a narrowbody fleet that can cover the world, said CEO Tony Fernandes. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with EADSY. Fernandes hinted that the A321XLR's economics could unlock expansion into India, China, and other parts of Asia-Pacificmarkets where widebodies are often too costly. But the ambitions don't stop there. AirAsia plans to launch a Gulf hub this year and is setting its sights on select European routes. The airline is also in discussions with Airbus to potentially exit its earlier A330 widebody order, signaling a full pivot toward a more nimble, fuel-efficient fleet. At the same time, Capital A is evaluating a secondary listing in Hong Kong as part of its broader strategic roadmap. Anwar's Europe visit wasn't just ceremonialit was deal-making diplomacy in motion. Alongside the commercial jet talks, Malaysia announced defense equipment purchases from Italy and France, reinforcing its security posture while boosting trade ties. In 2024, MalaysiaFrance trade hit $3.63 billion, with momentum continuing into 2025. For investors, this Airbus agreement could mark the start of a new chapter for Capital A's regional dominanceand possibly its global ambitions. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Nvidia (NVDA) Nears $4 Trillion as Huang Looks Beyond Chips -- Toward Robots
Nvidia (NVDA) Nears $4 Trillion as Huang Looks Beyond Chips -- Toward Robots

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Nvidia (NVDA) Nears $4 Trillion as Huang Looks Beyond Chips -- Toward Robots

Nvidia (NVDA, Financials) isn't just the chip king anymore; it's turning its gaze toward something even bigger humanoid robots. As the company brushed up against a $3.89 trillion market cap this week, CEO Jensen Huang took the stage in Paris and said it plainly; robotics, he believes, could become the largest industry in the world. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NVDA. That might sound ambitious; then again, so did AI a few years ago and Nvidia now dominates that space too. At the VivaTech conference, Huang introduced AEON: a full-stack humanoid robot developed with Sweden's Hexagon (HXGBY, Financials). It's not a mock-up or sci-fi concept; it's built, operational, and aiming straight for real-world deployment. Forecasts are starting to catch up. Nvidia's robotics and automotive division brought in $1.7 billion in fiscal 2024; analysts now expect that number to hit $7.55 billion by the early 2030s. If AEON gains commercial ground and it might those projections could prove too modest. Earlier this year, things looked shakier. U.S. chip export curbs to China sparked some turbulence; Nvidia stock dipped, and traders got nervous. But the pause didn't last; the stock is now up 19% for the year and once again holds the crown as the world's most valuable public company. The bigger story? That crown might soon be gilded in robotics, not just silicon. There's also seasonality working in Nvidia's favor. Historically, Q3 tends to be quiet a 4% average gain. But Q4 is where things pop; Nvidia has averaged a 23% rally in the final quarter, according to Dow Jones data. That pattern, paired with the robotics momentum, could set the stage for a breakout into even higher valuation territory. Nvidia is already in a class of its own a company that not only scaled the AI summit, but may now have the tools to build entirely new mountains. Other tech giants are maturing; Nvidia still has untouched runways. Robotics may be the next trillion-dollar catalyst and Huang knows it. As of this week, Nvidia is just $50 billion shy of Microsoft's (MSFT, Financials) all-time market cap peak. That number could fall by next week; or even tomorrow. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store