logo
What's the Best Driverless Vehicle Stock? (Hint: It's Not Tesla or Alphabet)

What's the Best Driverless Vehicle Stock? (Hint: It's Not Tesla or Alphabet)

Yahoo15 hours ago
The autonomous vehicle market could reach $4.45 trillion by 2034, which equates to a blistering compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 36% over a decade.
Nvidia offers an end-to-end AI-powered driverless tech platform.
Nvidia is already profiting from the burgeoning driverless vehicle space, unlike most companies working in this sphere.
10 stocks we like better than Nvidia ›
Alphabet's (NASDAQ: GOOG)(NASDAQ: GOOGL) Waymo unit is widely considered the front-runner in the driverless vehicle space, while Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) generates the most publicity in this realm, with its CEO touting that it will be the first to "solve autonomy."
But, currently, the best driverless vehicle stock is Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA). The artificial intelligence (AI) technology leader isn't a pure play on autonomous vehicles, but neither is Alphabet, nor Tesla, nor most of the companies involved in this burgeoning market.
Competition is fierce in the driverless vehicle space because this market promises to be humongous. Eventually, all the world's cars and trucks and probably most other forms of transportation will be autonomous. The big unknown is when fully autonomous vehicles will be legal across the United States and in other countries.
Autonomous vehicle market sizes and growth projections vary a lot depending upon what's included in the market and by source. One growth projection that falls in the middle of the range between conservative and extremely optimistic is by Precedence Research, which estimates the autonomous vehicle market will reach $4.45 trillion by 2034, which equates to a blistering compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 36% over the next 10 years.
Don't get hung up on exact growth projections by any single source. The main point is that regardless of what's included in the market definition (cars and trucks, just cars, just the driverless vehicle tech and not the vehicle), growth projections across sources for the next 10 years and even longer are extremely robust. Most sources peg CAGRs in the low-30 percentages to the high-30s percentages.
Nvidia offers companies developing driverless vehicles or driverless vehicle technology in general a complete end-to-end solution. Its core offerings include:
A data center AI supercomputer (DGX system): Used for training self-driving AI models. The company's AI chips -- graphics processing units (GPUs) -- comprise the core of this system.
A simulation platform (Omniverse): Used for simulating various scenarios that driverless vehicles could encounter on the roads. Omniverse is also used by some automakers for building digital twins of their factories to help increase efficiency.
An in-vehicle AI supercomputer (DRIVE AGX): These systems act as the "brains" of a vehicle. They process the massive amount of incoming data from the vehicle's various sensors and make driving decisions. They also can power a vehicle's cockpit. Nvidia's GPUs comprise the core of this system. These systems are used for "AI inferencing," which is the deployment of a trained application.
Companies can pick and choose what Nvidia tech they use in their driverless vehicle development programs. Tesla, for instance, uses Nvidia's tech for training its self-driving AI models, but doesn't use Nvidia's in-vehicle AI supercomputer. Tesla has been developing its own AI chip for inside its vehicles because the company believes it will provide it with a competitive advantage.
However, many companies use all Nvidia's driverless vehicle tech offerings. Some companies, however, do not fully disclose all the AI-powered driverless tech they are using.
There are two main reasons Nvidia is a fantastic way to invest in driverless vehicles:
This advantage brings to mind the proverb "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush."
By investing in Nvidia, investors have a company that is already profiting from the driverless vehicle space, rather than a company that just has potential, no matter how great that potential might be. (Though we don't know exactly to what degree Nvidia profits because it doesn't break out its profits by categories.)
Moreover, it seems highly likely that these profits will explode in size in the coming years because so many companies are developing with Nvidia's driverless vehicle tech. And a good number of them have inked well-defined partnerships that involve using Nvidia's tech inside each vehicle, or each vehicle of a certain model or models, they produce starting at a certain model year.
Meanwhile, Alphabet's Waymo, Tesla, Rivian, and countless other companies are spending money -- and huge sums of money, at that -- in their efforts to develop driverless vehicle technology, including for robotaxis in some cases.
Sure, Tesla is generating revenue when a Tesla vehicle buyer elects to purchase its "supervised full-self-driving" package, but we can bet that revenue pales compared to how much it's spending developing its autonomous driving tech.
Likewise, the same holds true for Waymo, which is now generating some substantial revenue from its paid robotaxi rides. As of April, it was providing more than 250,000 paid rides a week -- a fivefold increase from a year ago -- as management shared on the company's Q1 2025 earnings call. But the company's "other bets" category -- of which Waymo is widely assumed to be by far the largest component -- had an operating loss of $1.2 billion.
Here's an extremely powerful quote from CFO Colette Kress from Nvidia's quarterly earnings call in August 2024:
Automotive was a key growth driver for the quarter as automaker developing autonomous vehicle technology is using Nvidia in their data centers. [Emphasis mine.] Automotive will drive in revenue across on-prem[ises] and cloud consumption and will grow as next-generation AV [autonomous vehicle] models require significantly more compute.
Take this in: Every automaker that's developing driverless vehicle tech (and nearly all of them are) was using Nvidia's tech for AI training purposes as of last August. "Every"! This word should be music to the ears of Nvidia stock investors.
Kress' "multibillion dollars" refers to just revenue included in the company's data center platform. It doesn't include driverless vehicle tech revenue in Nvidia's auto and robotics platform, which includes sales of DRIVE AGX. Nor does it include the Omniverse offering for simulation, as this revenue falls into the professional visualization platform.
The number of companies that are developing autonomous vehicles or autonomous vehicle systems using Nvidia's tech must be in the thousands and includes automakers, truck makers, robotaxi developers, Tier 1 auto suppliers, software companies, and others.
But here's a sampling of major companies that are known to be using Nvidia's autonomous vehicle tech for both AI training and AI inferencing: Toyota (the best-selling automaker in the world), General Motors (the U.S.'s top-selling automaker), Mercedes-Benz, and Volvo Cars.
Moreover, the news for Nvidia investors gets even better: Nearly every larger Chinese EV maker -- including Warren Buffett-backed BYD Company and Nio -- has partnered with Nvidia to provide its driverless vehicle tech inside their vehicles, or at least in some models, in addition to using Nvidia's tech for AI training. These are big wins because the Chinese EV makers have recently been gaining significant EV market share in China and Europe. The more vehicles they produce, the more DRIVE supercomputers they will need to buy from Nvidia.
I think it speaks volumes to the quality of Nvidia's AI-powered driverless vehicle tech that brands that have long been renowned for their focus on safety (Volvo Cars) and top-quality engineering (Mercedes-Benz) have partnered with Nvidia to put DRIVE AGX systems in their vehicles, in addition to using Nvidia's tech for training and simulation.
Higher-end vehicle brands are less likely to chance using anything but what they consider the best technology in their vehicles, as their ability to get premium prices for their vehicles depends heavily on maintaining their good reputations.
In short, not only is Nvidia stock the best overall AI stock, but also the best driverless vehicle stock.
Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025
Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Beth McKenna has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends BYD Company and General Motors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
What's the Best Driverless Vehicle Stock? (Hint: It's Not Tesla or Alphabet) was originally published by The Motley Fool
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gov. Stein signs P.A.V.E. Act into law, paving the way for transit transformation in Mecklenburg County
Gov. Stein signs P.A.V.E. Act into law, paving the way for transit transformation in Mecklenburg County

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gov. Stein signs P.A.V.E. Act into law, paving the way for transit transformation in Mecklenburg County

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — Governor Stein officially signed six new bills into law on Tuesday morning, including one that could reshape transportation in Mecklenburg County for years to come. One of the most talked-about measures is , short for Public Access to Valuable Equity. This legislation opens the door for a November ballot referendum, where Mecklenburg County voters will decide whether to approve a one-cent local sales tax to invest in a more modern, accessible, and sustainable transportation system. MORE: NC Gov. Stein hosts news conference to sign 6 bills into law 'Today is a game-changer for our region,' Shannon Binns, Executive Director of Sustain Charlotte, said in a written statement. 'For years, we've dreamed of giving residents the chance to fund more frequent buses and trains, safer bike lanes, sidewalks, and safer streets for all. With Governor Stein's signature, that dream moves from the advocacy stage to the ballot box. When Mecklenburg County prospers with better mobility, every family, no matter their zip code or income, gains access to opportunity, cleaner air, and a higher quality of life.' 'This is more than a transportation bill, it's a generational opportunity to shape how ourregion grows and connects,' Shelly Cayette-Weston, President of Business Operations forCharlotte Hornets/Hornets Sports and Entertainment said in a written statement. 'This is a powerful example of how local and state leaders can work together to create bold solutions.' The P.A.V.E. Act gives Mecklenburg County the authority to: Put a one-cent sales tax proposal before voters this November Use funds to improve roads, expand public transit, and enhance bike/pedestrian infrastructure Tackle traffic congestion while reducing air pollution from vehicles It also makes changes to local tax laws, including updates to the county's 'U-Drive-It' vehicle tax and existing transportation-related sales tax rules, to support this effort. MORE: After Mecklenburg County's transportation bill passes Senate, do Charlotte residents support the tax hike? The measure was and earned bipartisan support in the General Assembly before arriving on Governor Stein's desk. If voters say yes this fall, the new tax could generate hundreds of millions of dollars for projects aimed at: Expanding bus and light rail service Building sidewalks and protected bike lanes Supporting Vision Zero initiatives to make streets safer Reducing tailpipe emissions, the leading source of local climate pollution For Mecklenburg County residents, that means shorter commutes, cleaner air, and more transportation options, especially in underserved neighborhoods. MORE: Officials detail plans to improve Mecklenburg County bus stops, but they need a one-cent sales tax to do it Now that the P.A.V.E. Act is law, it's up to the Mecklenburg Board of County Commissioners to place the referendum on the November 2025 ballot. If they do, voters will have the final say on whether to approve the sales tax and launch what advocates call a 'transformational investment.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump slams Elon Musk as megabill drops AI protections and hits snags in Senate
Trump slams Elon Musk as megabill drops AI protections and hits snags in Senate

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump slams Elon Musk as megabill drops AI protections and hits snags in Senate

President Trump slammed Elon Musk's subsidies, and Republican senators struck down a plan to shield artificial intelligence from state regulations. These two middle-of-the-night developments on Tuesday reinforced a growing schism between Trump and Silicon Valley supporters over his "big, beautiful bill." The first development came at 12:44 a.m. ET, when Trump responded to Tesla (TSLA) CEO Musk's ongoing critiques of the package, focusing on the government grants that Musk's companies receive. "Without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," wrote the president in a Truth Social post, adding, "perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this?" The president was referring to the government efficiency group that Musk ran until recently. The president's missive came after Trump's signature legislation underwent key changes in recent days that set off many in the tech industry, Musk most of all, with new measures to tax green energy companies and further support for fossil fuels, as well as a growing price tag. The divide between many in Silicon Valley and the "big, beautiful bill" has been evident for over a month. It appeared set to deepen further when, a few hours later, a closely watched artificial intelligence provision was stripped from the bill itself. This plan, which had many Silicon Valley supporters, was meant to shield the quickly growing AI industry from state and local regulations. But the idea now appears to be dead after Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee turned against a compromise plan Monday evening and stripped it from the bill. It wasn't close in the end, with the Senate voting 99-1 to adopt Blackburn's subsequent amendment in a count that wrapped up a little after 4:00 a.m. ET. Trump's overall package also appears to be teetering Tuesday morning after a series of overnight developments saw two key Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine — uncommitted to vote yes. Those two senators could join two Republicans already committed to voting no, which would be enough to sink the package. The drama between the president and the world's richest man has been up and down for weeks, but it escalated Monday afternoon when Musk offered new electoral threats against Republicans. Musk had already amplified Democrats' critiques and talked about the need for a new political party. He offered a striking promise Monday afternoon that lawmakers who vote for the bill "will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Musk, of course, was the biggest donor during the 2024 campaign, spending at least $288 million, most of which was offered in support of Trump. Trump reiterated his critiques of Musk Tuesday morning, speaking to reporters and saying of Musk's objection to losing EV subsidies, "Elon can lose a lot more than that." The president also called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) a "monster that might have to go back and eat Elon." And when asked by a reporter if he would consider deporting Musk, he demurred: "We'll have to take a look." What is unclear for the days ahead is how much the Trump-Musk fight will impact the actual chances of the bill's passage, with Senate amendment votes ongoing. Musk is clearly focused on a debate likely coming later this week, when the House is set to take up the amended measure if it passes. The House is where a vocal bloc of fiscal conservatives — who often vote as part of the "Freedom Caucus" — warily supported a previous version of the bill, saying a previous smaller price tag was too big. Musk even tagged some of these House Republican lawmakers in some of his latest posts, which continued throughout the night with dozens of messages. Musk also responded to Trump's comments about his subsidies by saying his companies like Tesla and SpaceX ( would be fine and that oil and gas subsidies should be removed as well. The back-and-forth over AI also came to a head overnight after the House passed a plan in May that included a complete ban on state regulations of AI for a decade. The little-noticed measure gained wider attention in the weeks that followed, with many of Trump's most loyal supporters opposing it. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene even admitted that she hadn't been aware of the provision when she voted yes. The Georgia lawmaker then announced her opposition and plans to vote no if this "violation of state rights" stayed in the bill. Trump himself doesn't appear to have taken a position on the measure, but it had the backing of his Silicon Valley-aligned aides, most notably the vocal support of AI and crypto czar (and longtime venture capitalist) David Sacks. But Republican opposition grew, and Sen. Blackburn of Tennessee became a leading voice of opposition in the Senate. She entered into negotiations over the issue and appeared to have found a compromise in recent days around the idea that instead of a decade-long ban, the provision would be amended to be a "temporary pause" of five years. States would be strongly discouraged from regulating AI, as lawmakers linked it to access to millions of dollars in AI infrastructure and deployment funding. But even that wasn't enough. Blackburn renounced the compromise, said a moratorium "could allow Big Tech to continue to exploit kids, creators, and conservatives," and teamed with a top Democrat to strike the provision entirely. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (a former Trump press secretary) congratulated Blackburn on the move in a post the senator quickly reposted. "This is how you take on big tech!" Sanders wrote. This story has been updated with additional developments. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio

Deadline Approaching: Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith
Deadline Approaching: Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith

Business Wire

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

Deadline Approaching: Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith

BENSALEM, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Law Offices of Howard G. Smith reminds investors of the upcoming deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the case filed on behalf of investors who purchased Reddit, Inc. ('Reddit' or the 'Company') (NYSE: RDDT) securities between October 29, 2024 and May 20, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'). IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN REDDIT, INC. (RDDT), CONTACT THE LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ONGOING SECURITIES FRAUD LAWSUIT. Contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith to discuss your legal rights by email at howardsmith@ by telephone at (215) 638-4847 or visit our website at What Happened? On May 1, 2025, after market hours, Reddit released its first quarter 2025 financial results, marking a third consecutive quarter with slowdown in daily active user growth. On this news, Reddit's stock price fell $4.96, or 4.2%, to close at $113.83 per share on May 2, 2025, thereby injuring investors. Then, on May 19, 2025, Wells Fargo analysts downgraded Reddit's stock, stating that Google's AI features would likely cause 'permanent' disruptions to user traffic for Reddit, and that traffic to Reddit from Google Search would continue to decline and ultimately hurt Reddit's advertising revenue. On this news, Reddit's stock price fell $5.24, or 4.6%, to close at $107.99 per share on May 19, 2025. Then, on May 21, 2025, Baird analysts downgraded Reddit's stock, citing similar concerns as Wells Fargo. On this news, Reddit's stock price fell $9.79, or 9.3%, to close at $95.85 per share on May 21, 2025, thereby injuring investors further. What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) changes in Google Search's algorithm and features like AI Overview were causing users to stop their query on Google Search; (2) these algorithm changes were materially different than prior instances of reduced traffic to the Reddit website; (3) Defendants were aware that the increase in the query term 'Reddit' on search engines was because users were getting the sought after answer from Google Search without having to go to Reddit, and not because they intended to visit Reddit; (4) this zero-click search reality was dramatically reducing traffic to Reddit in a manner the Company was unable to overcome in the short term; (5) Defendants, therefore, lacked a reasonable basis for their outlook on user rates and advertising revenues; and (6) as a result, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. If you purchased or otherwise acquired Reddit securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than August 18, 2025 to ask the Court to appoint you as lead plaintiff if you meet certain legal requirements. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you wish to learn more about this class action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: Law Offices of Howard G. Smith, 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112, Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020, Telephone: (215) 638-4847 Email: howardsmith@ Visit our website at: To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store