logo
The Vatican has held sacred belongings for a century. Now their Indigenous owners want them back

The Vatican has held sacred belongings for a century. Now their Indigenous owners want them back

CNN29-05-2025
Inside Vatican City, the home of Pope Leo, lies a vast collection of Indigenous artifacts that some people say shouldn't be there.
The collection includes thousands dozens of colonial-era objects, including a rare Inuvialuit sealskin kayak from the western Arctic, a pair of embroidered Cree leather gloves, a 200-year-old wampum belt, a baby belt from the Gwich'in people and a beluga tooth necklace.
They are relics of a time of cultural destruction, critics say, taken by the Roman Catholic Church a century ago as trophies of missionaries in far-off lands.
Pope Francis promised to return the artifacts to communities in Canada as part of what he called a 'penitential pilgrimage' for abuses against Indigenous people by the Church. But several years on, they remain in the Vatican's museums and storage vaults.
Indigenous leaders are now urging Pope Leo to finish what Francis started and give the artifacts back.
'When things were taken that weren't somebody else's to take, it's time to return them,' said Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, the National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations.
Calls to repatriate the artifacts began gaining steam in 2022, when a group of First Nations, Inuit and Métis delegates visited Rome for long-awaited talks with Pope Francis about historical abuses at Canada's church-run residential schools.
While there, the delegates were given a tour of some of the Vatican's collection and were astonished to see treasured relics stored thousands of miles away from the communities who once used them.
'It was quite an emotional experience to see all of these artifacts – whether they be Métis, First Nations of Inuit artifacts – so far away,' said Victoria Pruden, President of the Métis National Council, which represents the Métis Indigenous people of northwestern Canada.
Following that visit – and Francis's subsequent trip to Canada, where he apologized for the Church's role in residential schools – the late pontiff pledged to return the relics.
Leo, who held his inaugural mass on May 18, has not yet commented publicly on the issue. Vatican Museums did not respond to questions from CNN about whether it plans to repatriate the artifacts.
How the artifacts came to be in the pope's possession requires a trip back to the era of Pope Pius XI, who led the Catholic Church from 1922.
Pius was known for promoting the work of missionaries, and in 1923 sent a call out to orders worldwide to gather evidence of the church's vast reach.
'He said: Send in everything related to Indigenous life. Send in sacred belongings. Send in language materials. Send in Indigenous people, if you can manage it,' said Gloria Bell, an assistant professor of art history at McGill University.
'There were thousands of belongings stolen from Indigenous communities to please the greed of Pope Pius XI,' said Bell, who documented the exhibition in her book 'Eternal Sovereigns: Indigenous Artists, Activists, and Travelers Reframing Rome.'
The church's collection of Indigenous artifacts was compiled at a time when the cultural identity of Canada's Indigenous people was being erased.
The Canadian government had made it compulsory for Indigenous children to attend residential schools – boarding schools largely run by the Catholic Church designed by law to 'kill the Indian in the child' and assimilate them into White Christian society.
In these schools, Indigenous children were not allowed to speak their language or practice their culture and were harshly punished for doing so. Thousands of children died from abuse or neglect, with mass graves still being found decades after the last residential school closed in 1998.
Even as this injustice unfolded, their cultural belongings and artifacts were being displayed in the 1925 Vatican Mission Exposition, a 13-month long exhibit promoting the Church's influence around the world, which drew millions of visitors.
The Vatican has claimed the artifacts were gifts to the Pope. But Bell says that's a 'false narrative' which doesn't consider the context in which the objects were acquired.
'This acquisition period was a really assimilative period in Canadian colonial history,' Bell said.
The artifacts were never returned. A century later, many of the cultural objects and artwork remain at the Vatican, either in storage or on display at the Vatican's Anima Mundi Ethnological Museum.
While it's not known exactly how many Indigenous artifacts are in the Vatican's collection, the number is in 'the thousands,' Bell said. Indigenous leaders told CNN they don't have a full inventory of what sacred items are housed there.
Laurie McDonald, an elder from Enoch Cree Nation who grew up on an Indigenous reserve in Maskêkosihk, Alberta in the 1950s and 1960s, knows what it's like to have your culture taken from you.
'We were forbidden as a nation to use our cultural regalia, our cultural tools, or our medicines, and if we were caught, we were reported to the Indian agent,' said McDonald, referring to the Canadian government official responsible for assimilation policy.
McDonald was just 11 years old when he was forcibly taken from the home he shared with his grandmother and sent to Ermineskin Indian Residential School, one of Canada's largest residential schools. Two weeks in, he tried to escape, but became caught on a barbed wire fence and a staff member ripped him off, leaving scars.
In 2022, McDonald returned to the site of his former school to witness Pope Francis's historic apology on behalf of the Catholic Church.
'I am deeply sorry,' Francis said, looking out over the land of four First Nations. 'I humbly beg forgiveness for the evil committed by so many Christians against the Indigenous Peoples.'
Pope Francis's apology on behalf of the Catholic Church was deeply meaningful for many Indigenous peoples in Canada. But reconciliation is a long process, and Indigenous leaders say they hope Leo will continue what Francis started – first and foremost, by returning the artifacts.
McDonald said the objects represent stories and legacies which should have been passed down generations.
'Those may have been simple stuff to you, but to us, they were very, very important,' he said.
During his visit to Canada in 2022, Francis said local Catholic communities were committed to promoting Indigenous culture, customs, language and education processes 'in the spirit of' The United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, according to CBC.
Article 12 of UNDRIP says Indigenous peoples have the right to use and control their ceremonial objects, and states shall endeavor to return them.
Asked again in 2023 about repatriating the Indigenous artifacts, Francis told reporters aboard his plane, 'This is going on, with Canada, at least we were in agreement to do so.' He invoked the seventh commandment – 'thou shall not steal' – in expressing his support for restitution.
In recent years, museums around the world have increasingly returned items in their collections that were stolen or potentially acquired unethically to their countries of origin.
Last year, new regulations came into effect in the US requiring museums and federal agencies to consult or obtain informed consent from descendants, tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations before displaying human remains or cultural items.
In 2022, Pope Francis returned three fragments of the Parthenon sculptures to Greece in a move he described as a 'gesture of friendship,' according to the BBC.
However, a 2024 investigation by Canadian newspaper the Globe and Mail found that the Vatican had not returned a single Indigenous-made item to Canada in recent years, except for a 200-year-old wampum belt which was loaned to a museum in Montreal for just 51 days in 2023.
Pruden, of the Métis National Council, said Francis 'really moved things forward by embracing (UNDRIP).' She and other Indigenous leaders hope to soon see the artifacts returned.
'What a beautiful homecoming it would be to welcome these gifts that were made by our grandmothers and our grandfathers,' Pruden said, calling the objects 'very important historical pieces that have a story to tell.'
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney discussed the return of the artifacts in a meeting with Canadian Catholic Cardinals in Rome this month ahead of Leo's first mass, Jaime Battiste, a member of parliament who was also at the meeting, told the Canadian Press.
Woodhouse Nepinak said it's 'an uncomfortable and tough issue, but it has to be done.'
'You want to right the wrongs of the past. That's what we want to do for our survivors, for their families, for the history of what happened here and to make sure that the story never dies out.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jack Mintz: Mamdani's socialist agenda will take a bite out of the Big Apple
Jack Mintz: Mamdani's socialist agenda will take a bite out of the Big Apple

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Jack Mintz: Mamdani's socialist agenda will take a bite out of the Big Apple

Polls in the U.S. and Canada show that the cost of living remains the top concern for voters. Pew Research Center reports inflation and the affordability of health care are rated as 'big problems' by almost two-thirds of Americans surveyed, while three-fifths of Canadians list the cost of living as the top issue in an Abacus July poll. The affordability agenda opens the door wide for far-left politicians to win elections. Zohran Mamdani, leading contender for New York City mayor and backed by 107 left-wing politicians and organizations, makes this crystal clear on his website: 'The cost of living is crushing working people but Zohran believes that government can lower costs and make life easier in our city.' Like any good socialists, Mamdani's affordability agenda delivers a host of freebies to the broad public, paid for by taxing the rich and corporations. Sounds familiar, no? He will freeze rents in stabilized apartments and spend $100 billion on 200,000 new social housing units over the next 10 years, 70 per cent financed by municipal debt. (All dollar amounts are in $US.) Another $800 million will enable New Yorkers to ride buses for free in new priority lanes. A new Department of Community Safety (cost $1.1 billion) will address subway and street safety, mental health, gun violence and hate. It will deploy outreach workers at 100 subway stations to greet people. And why not start young New Yorkers down the path of socialism, too? No-cost child care will be provided from six weeks through five years of age. Newborns will get free baby baskets. Columbia and NYU, already reeling from Donald Trump's endowment levies, will be taxed to cover the cost of free tuition at City University of New York (CUNY). State-operated grocery stores will be established while subsidies will be withdrawn from private grocery stores. The no-profit public grocery stores won't pay rent or property tax, to drive out price-gouging businesses. Were he alive today Karl Marx would be delighted by this state takeover of the 'means of production.' To help realize the socialist dream, New York's minimum wage will almost double by 2030: rising from US$16.50 to US$30 per hour. How will all these affordability costs be covered? With $10 billion more per year in taxes. An estimated $5 billion will come from raising NYC's corporate income tax rate from 8.85 to 11. 5 per cent, which, combined with federal and state corporate levies, will give NYC the highest corporate tax rate in North America — yes, Canada included. Another $4 billion will come from a two per cent tax hike on personal income over $1 million and a further $1 billion from tax and fine enforcement and 'smart' procurement. Given these simplistic promises to lower the cost of living by making somebody else pay, it's no surprise Mamdani is leading in the polls. The promises are a lot easier for Mamdani to make than it is for non-socialists to explain why they won't work. In fact, some of the ideas will make life even more unaffordable. Freezing rents will kill the incentive to supply new rental housing or repair what already exists. Over time, that will worsen housing shortages and raise prices even more. Free child care also sounds great until it leads to supply shortages, as we have seen with our $10-a-day program. Free bus fare will shift passengers from the subway to the bus, likely cramming them in like sardines in a can. Almost doubling the minimum wage will result in many low-skill workers losing their jobs. Grocery stores that operate without at least some profit won't be able to replace old equipment or hold inventory. Besides, it takes experience and knowledge to compete with Walmart. In Baldwin, Fla., and Erie, Kan., municipal grocery stores were initially welcomed by the public, only to fail miserably. Tax hikes almost certainly won't raise the amounts projected for them. Continent-highest corporate income tax rates will drive companies and profits out of the city. The personal tax hike may also lead to a decline in the tax base. New York City has been losing population since 2020, with 631,000 residents and $13.7 billion fleeing to low-tax states like North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Florida and Texas in 2021 and 2022. We Canadians know a lot about the democratic socialist agenda. The New Democratic Party pushes for new entitlements to be paid for by corporate tax hikes and wealth taxes. B.C.'s NDP government has increased every conceivable tax over the past decade even as its deficits have climbed to $9.4 billion, the highest of all provinces. Justin Trudeau's Liberal government pushed the socialist agenda, too, with new entitlement programs for child care, dental care and pharmacare in the past decade, all partly funded by a four-point income tax hike in 2016 on earnings over C$200,000 (which in U.S. dollars is a miniscule $150,000). Canada now has the highest personal income taxes in the G7 countries and, not surprisingly, has seen many people leave over the past decade, headed to lower-tax countries. Opinion: The West needs reform from, and in, Ottawa Jack Mintz: Don't expect big economic gains from lower interprovincial barriers The socialist affordability agenda is politically attractive right up until the economy starts sinking. That's when the population figures out that free stuff is not so free after all.

Terence Corcoran: We may never recover from the lockdowns
Terence Corcoran: We may never recover from the lockdowns

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Terence Corcoran: We may never recover from the lockdowns

During the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns, citizens of Canada and the world were advised not to be overly stressed by the short-term economic impacts. We were told that the governing authorities had the ability — through monetary policy, government spending and careful management of the pandemic — to overcome the unpleasant economic recession and social impacts to produce a swift return to normal growth and prosperity. One example from the Canadian archive of such claims is former finance minister Chrystia Freeland's 2022 budget speech, a rousing presentation that claimed the Canadian economy had sailed through the economic crisis. 'Canada has come roaring back,' she said. The economy 'is booming' and has 'largely recovered.' Today, five years after the 2020 COVID lockdowns, the great recovery from the excesses of the lockdown has yet to materialize in Canada, nor has much of the global economy returned to previous levels of economic achievement. A recent commentary in The Economist illustrated the world's failure to rebound from the pandemic. 'In the throes of the COVID-19 pandemic — when hospitals overflowed, schools and offices shut, and economies seized up — many asked when the world would recover. Five years later, the data show that the setback to living standards could endure.' Evidence that the world economy is a long way from recovery included a graph that plotted the global average Human Development Index. The HDI measures life expectancy at a national level, along with years of schooling and gross national income per person. The data followed a familiar path, with a sharp decline in 2020 and staggering recovery over the next few years, with projections of more decline through to 2030. For most wealthy regions such as Canada, Europe and the United States, HDI scores remain high even after the pandemic, although Canada has fallen to 16th place down from 10th. Among poor nations, however, scores declined and show no sign of recovery. As The Economist put it, 'for decades it looked as though on average the world would reach very high levels of development before 2030. If today's sluggish progress continues, it could take decades longer to reach that milestone.' Because of Canada's advanced state of economic development, index measures such as life expectancy and education levels are unlikely to have changed through an event like the pandemic. However, more volatile and important economic indicators show Canada to be falling behind. A few months ago, a Statistics Canada economic report plotted a graph that demonstrated the sharp impact of the pandemic on growth in GDP per capita. From its pre-pandemic trend peak of $58,100, real GDP per capita has fallen seven per cent, for a loss of $4,200 per person — equal to about $160 billion in lost GDP per year. Can this loss be recovered? The report warns that it will not be easy. To get back to trend by 2030, the Canadian economy would have to generate annual real GDP growth of 1.7 per cent (as shown in the nearby graph), a rate well above Canada's experience in recent decades when growth rates averaged 1.1 per cent or lower. The latest numbers paint an even more difficult struggle for Canada. In 2023, GDP per capita fell 1.3 per cent, followed by another decline of 1.4 per cent in 2024 — at a time when the country needs 1.7 per cent growth to get back to trend by 2030. In the current economic environment, filled with trade wrangles, massive government deficits and a trend toward greater government involvement in directing the economy, the odds of recovery from the 2020 pandemic lockdown are even slimmer than they were a year or two ago. Terence Corcoran: Canada's competition agencies are anti-competition Terence Corcoran: Finally, maybe, a real climate science debate To rebound from the pandemic, Canada's economy needs major injections of market-driven capital investment and a regulatory environment that encourages competition, along with government fiscal and interventionist discipline, none of which are on the horizon. • Email: tcorcoran@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump and Putin's Arctic Chess Game Is About Far More Than Ukraine
Trump and Putin's Arctic Chess Game Is About Far More Than Ukraine

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Trump and Putin's Arctic Chess Game Is About Far More Than Ukraine

Based on factual reporting, incorporates the expertise of the journalist and may offer interpretations and conclusions. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart prepare to hold what has all the makings of a historic summit in the far north frontier that nearly connects their two nations, Europe's deadliest conflict since World War II is just one of the issues that will come to define what the U.S. leader described as a "chess game." The two men's encounter in the Arctic will take place at the nexus of historic, strategic and geopolitical trends that define one of Earth's most contested regions—a source of both tension and, potentially, new cooperation between Washington and Moscow. Republican Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy, who will soon meet Trump ahead of the high-stakes summit at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, said the meeting has the potential to not only be "great for Alaska," but "if some just peace can come out of these discussions, that would be great for the world." "With regard to a better relationship with Russia, obviously a better relationship means that the rhetoric has ratcheted down," Dunleavy told Newsweek on the eve of the summit. "We can get back to cooperating on the Arctic through the Arctic Council and other groups that look at the future, what the Arctic is going to look like in terms of its politics, its resources, etc." "Also, they're two and a half miles away from us. They're very close to us," he added. "So anytime that you can have decent relationships with a neighbor that close bodes well for everyone." Left to right, U.S. President Donald Trump, Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy and Russian President Vladimir Putin are seen in this Newsweek illustration. Left to right, U.S. President Donald Trump, Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy and Russian President Vladimir Putin are seen in this Newsweek illustration. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Associated Press/Canva/Getty History in the Making When Putin arrives in Alaska, he will become the first Russian leader to ever set foot in the territory once held by the Russian Empire more than 150 years ago. Still today, the state is home to a small community of ethnic Russians and a sizable community of Indigenous people who trace their history across the Bering Strait. The U.S. purchase of Alaska—for the modern equivalent of around $129 million—came at a critical time for both nations. Czar Alexander II sought to bolster his economy by selling off indefensible territory following the devastating Crimean War fought against a great power alliance that included France, the United Kingdom and Ottoman Empire. U.S. President Andrew Johnson was dealing with the costly and politically contentious era of post-Civil War Reconstruction, leaving Secretary of State William H. Seward to pioneer the acquisition. The deal drew criticism at the time, widely ridiculed as "Seward's Folly." His vision, however, would be justified over time, first by the discovery of gold, then oil and finally, the strategic position that Alaska would ultimately hold as technological advancement globalized conflicts and allowed greater access to the once inaccessible waters of the Arctic. Having been the site of Japan's only North American invasion during World War II—a conflict in which Washington and Moscow banded together against common foes—and later a crucial front line in the Cold War between the U.S. and Soviet Union, Alaska awaits both Trump and Putin at a new crossroads in history. "It is undeniable that this meeting is historic," Mike Sfraga, who served as the first U.S. ambassador-at-large to the Arctic, told Newsweek. "Since the United States purchased what is now the state of Alaska from Russia in 1867," Sfraga said, "we have navigated nuanced and dramatic swings in our relationship, from allies during World War II, to intense adversaries during the Cold War, to cautious partners, to competitors once again—but today we are in a far more complicated geopolitical landscape." "If a fair and enduring peace in Ukraine can be achieved," he added, "better U.S.-Russian relations may enable cooperation among all Arctic nations so together they can address the pressing challenges and opportunities present throughout the region." Sfraga, who serves as interim chancellor of the University of Alaska Fairbanks, said that his institution "is well positioned to participate and perhaps lead in some of these efforts when the time and conditions are right." The entrance to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, is pictured on August 13, ahead of the August 15 meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The entrance to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, is pictured on August 13, ahead of the August 15 meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. DREW ANGERER/AFP/Getty Images A New Great Game Just days before Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, Sfraga, then-President Joe Biden's nominee to chair the U.S. Arctic Research Commission, expressed his concern to Newsweek over the potential loss of critical U.S.-Russia cooperation in the Arctic. Three and a half years later, he warns that "the war on Ukraine and its impacts throughout Europe and the globe demand the world's attention and a commitment to ensure territorial integrity, the rule of law, and the international rules-based system," and that "the Arctic region is not divorced from these geopolitical realities." In fact, Sfraga argued that "we already see the growing importance of the Arctic playing out in the interests, aspirations, activities, and conflicting worldviews of the world's great powers, the United States, Russia, and China." "Of the three, two are Arctic nations with Russia and China cooperating in the region at a concerning pace and increasing levels of complexity," he said. "So, it is inevitable that relations between the United States and Russia will impact the broader geopolitical landscape, and our shared Arctic will be an important part of this reality." Trump's recognition of the strategic importance of this region is evidenced by his stated desire to purchase an even larger stretch of Arctic real estate than Alaska, already by far the largest U.S. state. The U.S. leader's interest in Greenland has drawn a widespread mix of mockery—not unlike the purchase of Alaska at the time—and concern, including from NATO ally Denmark, which oversees the world's largest island as an autonomous territory. With Denmark uninterested in selling one of the last vestiges of its former empire, Trump has repeatedly refused to rule out the use of military force to acquire Greenland. "It could happen," Trump told NBC in May. "Something could happen with Greenland. I'll be honest, we need that for national and international security." Less shocked by such rhetoric is Putin, who earlier said during an International Arctic Forum meeting in March that "it's obvious that the United States will continue to systematically advance its geostrategic, military-political and economic interests in the Arctic." The Russian leader who has already opted for military action to seize claimed territories in Ukraine in what he portrays as a defense against NATO expansion, has long viewed Arctic expansion as a leading national objective. As Troy Bouffard, director of the University of Alaska Fairbanks' Center for Arctic Security and Resilience, pointed out, "one of Moscow's top five national priorities (not just Arctic) is development, promotion, and use of the Northern Sea Route (NSR) for commercial maritime purposes." "Russia has invested a huge amount of time, money, and effort in this strategic and economic endeavor," Bouffard told Newsweek. "By Russian Federal law, the NSR extends from the Kara Strait and top of Novaya Zemlya to the Bering Strait." A map created December 31, 2008, shows the Arctic region, along with the Northwest Passage, Northeast Passage and Northern Sea Route. A map created December 31, 2008, shows the Arctic region, along with the Northwest Passage, Northeast Passage and Northern Sea Route. Susie Harder/Arctic Program/U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Risks and Opportunities When it comes to the Pacific stretch of the Arctic, the potential for U.S.-Russia competition to go awry is obvious. This year alone, U.S. and Canadian fighters operating from the same base at which Trump and Putin will meet Friday have thrice scrambled to intercept Russian fighters and bombers entering Alaska's Air Defense Identification Zone. Last year, a joint Chinese-Russian patrol was intercepted by North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) jets for the first time. Just earlier this week, Moscow and Beijing conducted a joint naval patrol in the northern Asia-Pacific, arriving in the port of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, on the eastern coast of Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula. "All Arctic nations are acutely aware of how problems are invariably magnified in risk and negative impact because of the nature of the region," Bouffard said. "We all know it takes significantly more work to prevent and be prepared to deal with issues, which is extremely difficult to achieve with those that we are even aware of and have some level of control." On the other hand, he said, "the value of improved relations in the Arctic is something we know strongly, especially with those of us who have experience with it." And while both Trump and Putin are fond of military deployments as a means of signaling, Bouffard also pointed out that any actual instability in the Arctic runs counter to Moscow's primary economic goals in the region, as "regional stability is critical" for commercial interests and "effective management of the Bering region in all ways is critical to ensuring that Southeast Asia and other shipping interests feel confident about using the NSR as a shipping route to Europe." "Although some defense and deterrence-related competition will continue in the maritime and air domains, it'll likely remain not too alarming," Bouffard said. "This will drive Russian behavior and decisions more than anything else, short of something not foreseeable or controllable." Thus, it paves the way for a seemingly unlikely domain for cooperation, particularly, as Bouffard noted, that "the most important driving factor for President Putin regarding this meeting is focused on how to repair his relationship with President Trump." Breaking the Ice Senior Russian officials, including Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov and presidential investment and economic cooperation envoy Kirill Dmitriev, have already identified the Arctic as an agenda item for Putin's first meeting with Trump in six years. Pavel Devyatkin, senior associate and leadership group member at The Arctic Institute, told Newsweek that "the Arctic is a significant region for Russia as it is critical to Russia's economic outlook." "U.S.-Russia Arctic cooperation is at a severe low since the 2022 pause of the Arctic Council and White House termination of science and technology cooperation with Russia," Devyatkin said. "However, there are new opportunities for cooperation as American and Russian policymakers have indicated an interest in restoring Arctic economic cooperation, especially joint deals in Arctic oil, gas and natural resources." Trump, while emphasizing his focus on settling the Russia-Ukraine war, has not ruled out reports that he was considering allowing Moscow access to Alaska's wealth of rare earth minerals as part of a broader deal. Such an agreement would build upon a history of the Arctic marking an uncommon region for cooperation between the U.S. and Russia, whose relationship has been predominantly defined by tensions. "Past examples of U.S.-Russia Arctic cooperation have many lessons for today's situation: cooperation in the region can lead to trust building and spill over into other areas of cooperation," Devyatkin said. "In terms of real opportunities, there are complementary capabilities in Arctic natural resources, where Russian icebreaker vessels can be used with U.S. satellite technology to gain access to hard to reach resources and possibly open new routes for shipping." "The Arctic is a special region because of such complementarity and the geographic closeness of the U.S. and Russia," he added. "There is definitely room for U.S.-Russia cooperation in the Arctic. Competition is not an imperative." One example, recently shared with Newsweek by Andreas Østhagen, research director of Arctic and Ocean Politics at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute and senior fellow at the Arctic Institute, could be that "Russia perhaps could offer developing the Northern Sea route into a viable commercial traffic lane that's a Russian project, which the U.S. plays a part in, but is not the primary driver of." However it should manifest, many Arctic specialists hope for a breakthrough that could rekindle the kind of crucial collaboration that has been largely suspended since the war in Ukraine. "Scientific cooperation and emergency response collaboration between Alaska and Russia and other Arctic nations came to a halt (largely) when Russia invaded Ukraine," Fran Ulmer, associate of the Arctic Initiative at Harvard University's Belford Center and former chair of the U.S. Arctic Research Commission, told Newsweek. The disruption, she argued, has made it "very difficult" for the Arctic Council to address pressing challenges that commonly affect all eight Arctic nations, and by virtue, the world. "Issues like the increased rate of permafrost thaw and its damage to infrastructure are of concern to Russia and the U.S.," Ulmer said. "Without the opportunity to compare and share data, engineering advances and mitigating measures, we all fall behind in our ability to adapt." Now, she said, "many of us are hopeful that the kind of mutually beneficial cooperation that previously existed can be restored to the region when the Ukraine war is over." A giant screen displays an image of the Arktika nuclear-powered icebreaker and an inscription "The time of Russia", in central Moscow on February 13, 2024. A giant screen displays an image of the Arktika nuclear-powered icebreaker and an inscription "The time of Russia", in central Moscow on February 13, 2024. NATALIA KOLESNIKOVA/AFP/Getty Images A Nuclear North Pole Andrey Gubin, international relations scholar based in Russia's far east city of Vladivostok, also saw potential for U.S.-Russia cooperation on numerous fronts, noting how, "surprisingly, we have rather converged approaches in the Arctic," particularly as it relates to the interpretation of international law and trade routes. "Notably, Russia is open for negotiations on the Arctic agenda with the United States, especially on ecological issues, scientific researches, law regulations," Gubin told Newsweek. "Economically, we are not competing here, so the capacity for the practical cooperation beyond ideological blinders is still impressive." Perhaps even more consequentially, as nuclear rhetoric returns to the world stage, Gubin noted the necessity of security dialogue concerning a region where all three segments of both the U.S. and Russia's nuclear triad were designed to travel in the event of an apocalyptic war. "The region is extremely significant for the strategic deterrence, thus our nations try to minimize any third party's destabilizing involvement here, preferring to maintain military control," Gubin said. Trump and Putin will also meet at one of the lowest points in the history of arms control between Washington and Moscow, with the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty collapsing in 2019, the Anti Ballistic Missile (ABM, or BMD) Treaty long gone since 2001 and the critical New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) set to unravel in February without an extension. "Russia-U.S. START expires in less than a year, the INF and BMD Treaties were not even mentioned to be restored," Gubin said, "but Russia and the United States cannot neglect stability, still being able to erase each other with nukes." "So, both parties have a lot of common interests, and understand responsibility for the global peace," he added, "even if their approaches initially seem to be elusive or too hardline."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store