IHC stops FIA from harassing Farhatullah Babar
IHC Justice Inam Amin Minhas heard the petition filed by Babar through lawyers Iman Mazari and Hadi Ali Chatha under Article 199. The Interior Ministry, the FIA and others have been made parties in the petition.
The petition stated that an FIA inquiry was initiated on March 25 on the complaints of "suspected corruption, tax evasion and acquisition of illegal assets" from a citizen, whom the petitioner did not know.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
FBR procurement plan: IHC-ordered automated IT refund system missing
ISLAMABAD: Despite assurance from Member (Policy) Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), Islamabad High Court's landmark judgment for effective enforcement of an automated income tax refund system under Section 170A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 has not been implemented and no provision has been provided in the annual procurement plan released by the FBR. The court's directive aimed to facilitate taxpayers and minimise interaction with tax functionaries when there is an issue of returning taxpayer money in the shape of refund, but the FBR has failed to take concrete steps in this regard. It is reliably learnt that a landmark order issued by IHC remained unimplemented by the FBR despite lapse of considerable time. Automated income tax refund system: FBR has failed to enforce IHC's directive When contacted tax lawyer Waheed Shahzad Butt who has argued the case before IHC told Business Recorder that a report titled 'Findings and Recommendations of Committee for Effective Enforcement of Section 170A' was submitted to the IHC, outlining comprehensive recommendations for implementation. However, despite assurances from Member (Policy) FBR that these recommendations would be implemented, no progress has been made till date. Waheed Butt further added that FBR's inaction is particularly surprising given the government's efforts to digitize tax processes. The failure to implement the automated refund system as directed by the IHC raises concerns about the FBR's commitment to transparency and efficiency. The FBR's lack of progress on this front is a missed opportunity to streamline tax processes and improve the overall taxpayer experience. This will not only enhance transparency and efficiency but also demonstrate the FBR's commitment to upholding the rule of law and respecting the directives of the judiciary, Waheed added. IHC order states: 'The FBR has submitted a report. The report and recommendations appear fairly comprehensive, and the Member (Policy) FBR appearing today has stated that these recommendations will be implemented in accordance with the USD 25 million loan from an international donor agency.' The objective of this petition seems to have been achieved. The petition is accordingly disposed of, leaving it open for the petitioner to approach the Court again if the recommendations are not implemented, the IHC ordered. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
LHC issues detailed judgement in Bahria Town properties auction case
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) noted that the amendment in National Accountability Ordinance (NAO) 1999 was made on 16-08-2022, while the plea bargain agreement was admittedly approved before the amendments in NAO, 1999, which is still in field. A division bench of the IHC comprising Chief Justice of IHC Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar and Justice Muhammad Asif, on Wednesday, issued detailed judgment of his order to turn down the petitions filed against the auction of Bahria Town properties. The judgment, authored by Justice Dogar, said convict/ Zain Malik kept returning the amount of plea bargain after the amendment in NAO. It concluded that prima facie, the convict malafidely discontinued the payment of remaining instalments in connivance with the surety on the pretext of amendment in order to refrain himself from returning the amount gained illegally. The court noted that as per Section 33E of the NAO, 1999 any fine or other sum due under this Ordinance, or as determined to be due by a Court shall be recoverable as arrears of land revenue. In this case admittedly, the determined amount has been approved by the Court, which is due against the petitioner being surety of the convict Zain Malik; therefore, the same can be recovered as arrears of land revenue by the NAB. The court noted that the record shows that Zain Malik was admittedly accused in three references and three investigations. He offered to return the illegal gains acquired by him in the commission of offence. The chairman NAB considered the offer of plea bargain along with affidavit of Zain Malik and determined his total joint liability of over Rs9 billion (Rs9,050,554,034) including the liability in reference No 02/2019. Zain Malik requested for payment in instalments, which was also considered by chairman NAB and accepted the offer of plea bargain. In this regard Rs1 billion was adjusted as down payment in six different cases, whereas, the remaining liability was agreed to be paid in three years. The statement of accused Zain Malik was recorded through Skype/ Video link facility from London, who was duly identified by his counsel. The statement of Col Khalilur Rehman (retired), vice Chief Executive of Bahria Town was also recorded, who acknowledged the sureties against the remaining liability in six different case including the reference No 02/2019. The judgment mentioned that on the application of respondent, the properties were attached vide orders dated 08.01.2024, 12.01.2024 and 19.01.2024 and the claim of the petitioner is that petitioner is independent juristic person and is not responsible for any act or deed of any of its shareholders and that it has never been an accused nor was declared proclaimed offender in reference No 19/ 2023 titled 'The State vs. Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi and others'; therefore, the properties, which are statedly belonging to the petitioner, could not have been attached by the Accountability Court-1, Islamabad. The judge observed that the Section 87 to 89 of the CrPC provide attachment of the property of an absconding accused as a coercive measure to compel his appearance. In this regard, as per Section 87 of the CrPC, when a court has reasons to believe that a person, against whom a warrant has been issued, is deliberately avoiding arrest, it may issue a proclamation requiring the accused to appear at a specified place and time. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Bahria Town auction: SC bench declines to hear case
ISLAMABAD: A bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, on Wednesday, declined to hear the case of auction of Bahria Town's properties. The chief justice sent the case back to a bench, which had previously heard the case. 'It would be appropriated for the old bench to hear this case,' CJP Afridi said. Farooq H Naek, representing Bahria Town, stated he has no objection if the matter is sent back to the old bench. He; however, told that detailed verdict of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has been announced, adding that he would submit additional objections on the detailed IHC verdict related to business tycoon Malik Riaz, who established the Bahria Town empire in Pakistan. A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan and comprising Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb on August 8, 2025, had turned down M/s Bahria Town (Private) Limited plea to halt the auction of its properties, but issued notices to the respondents. Justice Naeem questioned what the National Accountability Ordinance says about plea bargain. He noted that if an accused challenges the plea bargain process then it becomes inoperative, adding in the instant matter the accused has challenged the plea bargain, and the applications against them are pending, but the properties are being auctioned. Justice Naeem observed that instead of main petition only the Civil Miscellaneous Applications (CMAs) were fixed for hearing today (Friday), adding how come they can hear the CMAs without hearing the main petition. Naek told that he came to know about this case late at night, adding still the case is not issued on the cause list. The counsel stated thanks God that he was in Islamabad; therefore, appearing before the bench. The case was adjourned for an indefinite time period. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
