logo
In Indonesia, a startup captures coolants to stop global warming

In Indonesia, a startup captures coolants to stop global warming

Japan Times3 days ago
In the basement of a Jakarta housing complex, surrounded by the silver piping of the air-conditioning system, Indonesian technician Ari Sobaruddin is doing his part to tackle climate change.
Ari and his colleagues will spend 12 hours capturing AC refrigerant to stop this "super-pollutant" — thousands of times more potent than carbon dioxide — from leaking into the atmosphere.
It is plodding, sweaty work, but Ari, a member of climate startup Recoolit, does not mind.
"I love it because it's about preserving nature, saving nature," the 30-year-old technician said.
Recoolit began working in Indonesia in 2021 to tackle what it considers an often-overlooked contributor to climate change: refrigerants.
These gases found in air-conditioners, fridges and cars are an old environmental problem.
In the 1970s, research showed refrigerants called chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were destroying the ozone layer.
Countries agreed to phase them out under a deal that came into force in 1989.
While their replacements, particularly hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), are less harmful to the ozone layer, they still have major climate-warming properties.
"And those are in AC units, in the form of refrigerant banks ... everywhere in developing countries right now," said Recoolit's head of operations Yosaka Eka Putranta.
'Growing problem'
There are international agreements to phase out HFCs too, but, particularly in developing countries, they will be in use for decades yet.
Demand is increasing as climate change fuels record temperatures and expanding middle classes seek cooling and refrigeration.
"It is a growing problem because we need our indoor environments to be more resilient to climate change," said Robyn Schofield, associate professor of atmospheric chemistry at the University of Melbourne.
A field and warehouse officer for climate startup Recoolit checks AC refrigerant stored in cylinders at the company's warehouse in Jakarta on June 12. |
AFP-JIJI
HFCs are expected to account for between 7% and 19% of greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, according to the United Nations.
The risk comes during maintenance or disposal, when refrigerants like the HFC Ari is capturing can be released accidentally or on purpose.
In Indonesia, as in most countries, this venting is illegal, but enforcement is limited.
"It's odourless, we cannot trace it. (Capturing) it takes so much resources. The machine, the people," said Recoolit's senior business development manager Erik Cahyanta.
"So some people just release it."
Recoolit trains, equips and incentivises technicians to capture refrigerant so it can be destroyed.
Technicians get 50,000 rupiah ($3) per kilogram of recovered refrigerant, which Recoolit sends to a government-approved cement kiln or municipal incinerator to be destroyed.
While refrigerant can be recycled or reused, Recoolit argues this is imperfect.
"Who's going to guarantee that when the refrigerants are injected again ... they are going to stay there without another venting?" said Yosaka.
Big tech interest
Recoolit sells carbon credits based on the amount of refrigerant it destroys, priced at $75 a unit.
Carbon credits have faced criticism in recent years, and Benja Faecks of Carbon Market Watch warned that "offsetting" can give the impression "that emissions can simply be erased through financial transactions."
This allows "polluters to claim 'carbon neutrality' or 'negating ongoing emissions' without actually reducing their own emissions," she said.
Recoolit argues its carbon credits are robust because it measurably destroys a climate-warming gas.
While many carbon credits are sold on exchanges with third-party verification, Recoolit sells directly to buyers and uses a credit methodology developed by the Carbon Containment Lab, a nonprofit spun out from Yale University.
Yosaka said canisters are sampled, and analysis is then done by the region's only qualified lab, in Malaysia, to confirm the contents are refrigerants.
Destruction facilities pass a "trial burn test" confirming they can break down refrigerants.
Recoolit also pays less than the market price for coolants to avoid creating a market for new refrigerants.
Refrigerant destruction remains a relatively small part of the carbon market. Existing players include U.S.-based Tradewater, which grew out of California's state-level emissions caps and has worked in Latin America and Africa.
But Recoolit has attracted attention from one of the market's biggest corporate players: Google.
Earlier this year, the tech giant announced a partnership with Recoolit and a second company to prevent emissions equivalent to 1 million tons of carbon dioxide.
Google says it wants to help Recoolit scale up operations and expand outside Indonesia.
Some critics say refrigerant capture should simply be enforced by government policy, but Recoolit argues it is filling a real-world gap unlikely to be addressed otherwise.
And Schofield said the need for refrigerant capture is significant.
"As a climate action ... it's a very good one," she said.
"I wish we had more of it."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As Trump sows tariff confusion, rules of global commerce give way to chaos
As Trump sows tariff confusion, rules of global commerce give way to chaos

Japan Times

timea day ago

  • Japan Times

As Trump sows tariff confusion, rules of global commerce give way to chaos

Six months into his new administration, U.S. President Donald Trump's assault on global trade has lost any semblance of organization or structure. He has changed deadlines suddenly. He has blown up negotiations at the eleventh hour, often raising unexpected issues. He has tied his tariffs to complaints that have nothing to do with trade, like Brazil's treatment of its former president, Jair Bolsonaro, or the flow of fentanyl from Canada. Talks with the United States were like "going through a labyrinth' and arriving "back to square one,' said Airlangga Hartarto, the Indonesian minister for economic affairs, who met with U.S. officials in Washington on Wednesday. The resulting uncertainty is preventing companies and countries from making plans as the rules of global commerce give way to a state of chaos. "We're still far away from making real deals,' said Carsten Brzeski, global head of macroeconomics at the bank ING in Germany. He called the uncertainty "poison' for the global economy. Gone is the idea that the White House would strike 90 deals in 90 days after a period of rapid-fire negotiation, as Trump pledged in April. Instead, Washington has signed bare-bone agreements with big trading partners including China, while sending many other countries blunt and mostly standardized letters announcing hefty tariffs to start Aug. 1. Policymakers in Indonesia, Japan and elsewhere learned about letters setting tariff rates only when Trump posted them on social media. Airlangga said he was "amazed and surprised' to find that his country would face a 32% tariff, unchanged from what was announced in April. Negotiations had been going well, he thought. Trading partners that have received such letters are now frantically pushing to reduce the country-specific rates, which range from 20% to 50%, though Trump has at some points suggested that room to negotiate may be limited. For those who have not yet received a letter — Trump suggested Thursday that the European Union's was coming imminently — the developments have underscored that any negotiations are precarious. Trade deals appear to hinge on one person, Trump, and even carefully constructed agreements can be upended on his whim. "People are dealing with it as a rolling damage-limitation exercise,' said Andrew Small, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund who worked until recently as an adviser at the EU's executive arm. Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson, said countries were continuing to eagerly offer concessions to maintain access to the U.S. economy. Trump had been clear that the United States, as the world's biggest and best consumer market, "holds the cards and leverage in negotiations,' he said. Yet even reaching a trade deal may not diminish uncertainty. Trump proclaimed on social media in July that he had made a trade agreement with Vietnam that would charge a 20% tariff on Vietnamese products, with a higher 40% tariff rate on some goods that have Chinese components in them. "In return, Vietnam will do something that they have never done before, give the United States of America TOTAL ACCESS to their Markets for Trade,' he said. But the countries never released a joint statement clarifying what they had agreed to. Three people familiar with the matter, who declined to be named to discuss sensitive conversations, said Vietnamese officials had not agreed to the tariffs that Trump announced, and that negotiations were ongoing. Two of the people said the countries had reached an understanding on trade, but when Trump spoke on the phone with Vietnamese General Secretary To Lam on July 2, he took it upon himself to renegotiate some of those terms, surprising officials on both sides. A White House official who declined to be named because he was not authorized to speak publicly about the matter said the Americans and Vietnamese had reached an agreement. But he declined to elaborate further. He said both sides were continuing to discuss details of the higher tariff rate for goods with Chinese components, and had agreed to negotiate them in more depth later. Trump's push to reorder the global trading system started in February, shortly after he took office. Since then, he has imposed tariffs on sectors including metals and cars, and on specific countries, including Canada and China. In early April, Trump announced across-the-board tariffs that applied in different amounts to different countries, calculated using a simple equation that relied in part on a nation's trade gap with the United States. After Trump unveiled the numbers on a poster in the Rose Garden of the White House, a rapid volley of negotiations kicked off. Trading partners began to flock to Washington to try to talk down their rates while securing carve-outs for sectors. Within a few days, Trump partially suspended the across-the-board tariffs until July 9 to allow for three frenzied months of deal-making. The United States announced a framework agreement with Britain in May, and a handshake with Vietnam last week that now appears to be in flux, but most countries have not made a deal yet. Trump sent out nearly two dozen letters this week telling trading partners they would be subjected to hefty tariff rates, though the date when they start to bite has been pushed back to Aug. 1. And even those who thought that they might be close to an agreement might watch those careful negotiations implode. Take the EU, which is by some measures the United States' single most important trading partner. The 27-nation bloc has been working toward an agreement that would likely include a 10% baseline tariff, with exemptions for key goods. In return, the bloc would pledge to buy more from and invest more in the United States. But EU officials have long been unwilling to say they think a deal is likely. Even before Trump announced in an interview with NBC on Thursday that the bloc would soon receive a letter of its own, European policymakers remained painfully aware that the situation could detonate. That's partly because of the cautionary tale of Canada. Negotiations there were disrupted for a dramatic 48 hours in late June over the country's digital-services tax, which would have applied to large U.S. tech companies. Trump said he wouldn't continue negotiating if the tax remained in effect, and Canada's government quickly dropped it. Canada had then been negotiating toward an agreement by a July 21 deadline when on Thursday, it, too, received a letter announcing a 35% tariff and a new deadline of Aug. 1. Nor has Canada been the only last-minute surprise. The United States lurched into a sudden trade war with Brazil on Wednesday after Trump announced in a letter to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil that 50% tariffs would take effect Aug. 1. "The way that Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro, a Highly Respected Leader throughout the World during his Term, including by the United States, is an international disgrace,' Trump wrote. A few hours later, Lula said Brazil would reciprocate against the tariffs. "Brazil is a sovereign country with independent institutions that will not accept being abused by anyone,' he said in a statement. Thai officials also received a letter from Trump, but they emphasized reasons for hope. Pichai Chunhavajira, the finance minister, said Tuesday that Trump must not yet have taken into account a revised proposal to increase bilateral trade when he sent a letter setting the tariff at 36%, unchanged from April. "It is a template, everyone gets the same letter and the same text applies for every country,' said Supavud Saicheua, who is an adviser to Pichai. Thai negotiators are still unclear about what Trump wants, Supavud added. The 36% tariff "was calculated by some math that we have never heard of before,' he said. Even countries that hope they are in a solid negotiating position face uncertainty. While Indian officials have been emphasizing Trump's warm relations with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the United States has made tariff announcements over the past week that threaten to rock India's economy. Trump said at a meeting in the White House this week that, after a year, imports of all pharmaceutical products would be "tariffed at a very, very high rate, like 200%.' That would be crushing for India, where pharmaceutical exports earned almost $30 billion last year, with the United States its biggest market by far. U.S. trading partners have seen that there are no guarantees, except that further trade whiplash probably lies ahead. "We understand that the decision is on the POTUS,' Airlangga said, using the acronym for the president of the United States. This article originally appeared in The New York Times © 2025 The New York Times Company

Pyongyang-Beijing rail services to resume after 5-year hiatus, sources say
Pyongyang-Beijing rail services to resume after 5-year hiatus, sources say

NHK

timea day ago

  • NHK

Pyongyang-Beijing rail services to resume after 5-year hiatus, sources say

NHK has learned that North Korea and China have agreed to resume the passenger train service linking their capitals for the first time in over five years. Operations were suspended in January 2020 due to the spread of the coronavirus. Multiple sources familiar with China-North Korea relations told NHK that the railway authorities of the two countries have agreed to restart the service between Pyongyang and Beijing shortly. The sources say final arrangements are underway and operations are expected to resume as early as August. North Korea has been rapidly deepening ties with Russia, including military cooperation. But some observers say the North is keeping its distance from China, as Beijing's stance is to implement UN Security Council sanctions over Pyongyang's nuclear and missile programs. Meanwhile, visits from North Korea to China for inspection and training purposes have increased since May. One expert says bilateral relations have shown signs of improvement, but caution is required to determine whether the restart indicates a full-fledged change in their relationship. China's Foreign Ministry told NHK that it is unaware of any move in relation to the rail service, and the matter should be directed to the relevant department.

Rubio says Japan defense spending hike less about money, more about capabilities
Rubio says Japan defense spending hike less about money, more about capabilities

Japan Times

time2 days ago

  • Japan Times

Rubio says Japan defense spending hike less about money, more about capabilities

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio hinted Friday that while Washington is asking Japan to boost its defense spending, the thinking behind the push is likely to align with the views of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Asked during a briefing in Malaysia for his thoughts on reports that the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is pressuring Japan to ramp up its defense budget to as much as 5% of its gross domestic product (GDP), Rubio refuted the characterization of this as a 'demand.' 'We've encouraged them to invest in certain capabilities,' he said after the conclusion of Association of Southeast Asian Nations-related meetings. 'It's less to do with the amount of money and more to do about certain things they can do.' These comments echoed the view of Ishiba, who has repeatedly said that Japan will not be told how much to spend, and that what is most important is the substance of strengthened defense capabilities — not arbitrary figures. 'At the end of the day, we are in agreement with Japan on collective self-defense, on the ability to come to each other's aid in a time of conflict or in a time of danger,' Rubio said. 'We understand that there are dynamics, constitutional and legal, that limit their ability to invest in certain things versus other things, but we have a very close relationship with Japan, very close." Last month, the Pentagon told The Japan Times that it had made the 5% of GDP on defense a 'global standard' for Japan and other U.S. allies, in the first official confirmation that Washington is asking Tokyo to pump up its defense budget even further. Japan has denied that a specific figure has ever been broached, but Trump in April called the two countries' alliance 'one-sided' — remarks that echoed views from his first term, when he demanded Tokyo cough up more cash or risk the removal of U.S. troops. Ostensibly pacifist Japan has in recent years undertaken a dramatic transformation of its security policy, including a five-year plan to ramp up defense spending to 2% of GDP by 2027. But pouring even more cash into defense coffers would come with significant political costs as the government focuses on domestic economic priorities amid growing uncertainty over how to secure funds. Japan is currently getting far less bang for its buck as inflation and the yen's diminishing value erode its plans for the country's largest military buildup in postwar history. Defense Minister Gen Nakatani said in April that defense spending was within striking distance of the 2% target, at 1.8% of GDP.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store