Who Is TipRanks' All-Star Analyst on Alibaba Stock (BABA)?
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Alibaba is a Chinese e-commerce and cloud services company that connects buyers and sellers through its online platforms. For a thorough assessment of the stock, go to TipRanks' Stock Analysis page.
When we look at Chong's recommendation for Alibaba stock, he has had a 67% success rate on holding the stock for one year. Plus, he earned an average return of 14.51% during that period.
On an overall basis, copying Chong's trades and holding them for a year would give you an average return of 9.90% with 54% of your trades generating a profit.
Not Just BABA
Chong primarily focuses on covering the Technology sector in the U.S. and Hong Kong markets. Importantly, his most profitable rating to date was a Buy on Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Ltd. (KC), a Chinese cloud service provider. The analyst earned a massive 422.80% return on the call between March 11, 2024, and March 11, 2025.
Following phenomenally successful analysts' ratings can add profit to your portfolio. Find the best analyst to follow for any stock by scrolling down to the ' Best Analyst Covering ' feature on its Analyst Forecast page.
Top Analysts on TipRanks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
China may have more engineers, but it still lacks a culture of innovation
China announced last month a $100 billion push into artificial intelligence, intensifying what is already a fierce race for global tech dominance. Policymakers in Washington are watching with concern, and rightly so. China graduates more than 1.38 million engineers each year, about seven times more than does the U.S. The numbers sound alarming and suggest we're falling behind. But that's not the full story. While engineering degrees are critical, they don't guarantee technological leadership. What really drives innovation is not how many people you train, but how you train them. And here, China faces a deeper, cultural problem that raw output can't solve. The Chinese education system is highly structured and built for scale. But it's also rigid, top-down and deeply rooted in deference to authority. In most classrooms, memorization takes precedence over questioning and the teacher's word is rarely challenged. Correcting a professor's mistake could cause them to 'lose face,' a cultural breach that most students won't risk. This environment produces excellent test-takers but not risk-takers. It produces technical workers who are strong on facts but weak on critical thinking. They can follow a formula, but they struggle to break new ground. This is a key reason China, despite its massive engineering workforce, has yet to deliver the kind of world-changing breakthroughs we've seen from the U.S., from the microprocessor to the iPhone to mRNA vaccines. These innovations didn't come from rote learning. They came from interdisciplinary research, unorthodox thinking and cultures that reward questioning everything. Even when it comes to research output, China's surge in published papers masks a more complex reality. While China now leads the world in scientific publishing volume, scholars like Ming Xia have pointed out that much of this work lacks the originality, rigor and theoretical depth typical of Western scholarship. Plagiarism and fabrication remain persistent problems, even at top institutions. At Tsinghua University, one professor felt compelled to reassure students that if they wrote something publishable, he wouldn't steal it and submit it under his own name. The root issue is systemic. Many Chinese academics were trained in the same system they now uphold, one that prizes metrics and obedience over ideas and inquiry. As a result, scholarship often becomes descriptive, not theoretical. It explains what exists but rarely asks why it matters or how to build something new from it. Contrast that with American higher education. Our universities aren't perfect — they can be chaotic, expensive and uneven, but they're designed to cultivate thinkers, not just technicians. Students are encouraged to disagree with their professors, to explore across disciplines and to challenge the conventional wisdom. The freedom to question isn't a side effect of our system. It's the whole point. Yes, China has closed gaps in recent years by acquiring Western technology through joint ventures, forced transfers and even cyber espionage. But copying isn't creating. Without a culture that fosters original thought, China may scale existing tech but it won't lead the next wave of innovation. That doesn't mean the U.S. can relax. We need to double down on what works, investing in universities, supporting fundamental research and attracting the best minds from around the world. At the same time, we must protect critical technologies and intellectual property from exploitation. Still, we should remember what gives America an edge: a culture that values curiosity, dissent and the freedom to think differently. That's the foundation of every breakthrough we've ever made. In the long run, engineering dominance isn't just about how many degrees a country prints. It's about whether those engineers are trained to challenge the status quo and imagine something better. If the U.S. keeps leaning into its strengths of diversity, openness and academic freedom, we won't just keep pace with China. We will continue to lead.
Newsweek
20 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China's Maglev Trains Overcome Major Hurdle
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Researchers in China have researched a solution to one of the largest issues facing magnetic levitation (maglev) trains. Chinese engineers have developed porous buffers that fit into tunnel mouths to reduce low‑frequency shock waves by as much as 96 percent, a result that engineers said removed a major technical barrier to deploying prototype maglev vehicles capable of about 370 mph. Why it Matters The finding addressed the long‑standing "tunnel boom" problem, a low‑frequency piston‑like pressure that forms as very fast trains enter and exit tunnels. The waves can disturb people, wildlife and infrastructure, and they intensify as maglev speeds rise above conventional high‑speed rail limits. If confirmed in large‑scale field trials, the buffer design could ease planning and environmental objections to proposed ultra‑fast maglev corridors in China and beyond. What To Know Researchers tested a new mitigation that combined a roughly 100‑metre porous, sound‑absorbing buffer at tunnel portals with porous coatings on the early section of the tunnel lining. The porous structures allowed forward‑trapped air to bleed away before the vehicle reached the portal, suppressing the release of a concentrated low‑frequency shock wave, much like the baffles in a firearm silencer. Laboratory and field tests reported peak pressure reductions of up to 96 percent. Currently, only China, Japan, and South Korea operate commercial Maglev systems, with Beijing already running the world's longest commercial Maglev line between Shanghai and Pudong International Airport at speeds up to 267 mph. A green CR200J Fuxing bullet train is seen stopped at Fuling Railway Station under clear blue skies on July 04, 2025, in Chongqing, China. A green CR200J Fuxing bullet train is seen stopped at Fuling Railway Station under clear blue skies on July 04, 2025, in Chongqing, China. Getty Images China plans to deploy the ultra-high-speed maglev network to connect major cities nationwide, such as Beijing and Shanghai, which could reduce travel times between cities to 90 minutes or less. In June, China ran maglev tests that produced speeds of over 600 mph, which is faster than the speed at which commercial passenger aircraft fly. The other major hindrance to the speed of maglev trains is air resistance, which continues to build up at higher speeds. Engineers in China are testing the use of low-vacuum tubes to remove this issue. What People Are Saying Li Weichao, the director of the High-speed Maglev Electromagnetic Propulsion Technology Innovation Center, Donghu Laboratory, Li Weichao, told CGTN last month in reference to the 600mph test: "This is the fastest speed in the world. It's typical operating speed is 800 km/h. The entire construction is expected to be completed by the end of this year, and the platform will meet the conditions for acceptance." What Happens Next Engineers and planners said the next steps would include large‑scale field trials on representative tunnel geometries and fuller environmental assessments to confirm real‑world performance and to evaluate maintenance, durability and cost implications of adding 100‑metre buffer installations to tunnel portals.
CNBC
22 minutes ago
- CNBC
No stock in history has had more influence over the S&P 500 than Nvidia. What could go wrong?
The boom in artificial intelligence since late 2022 has made Nvidia's market value the largest in the S & P 500. But some on Wall Street are skeptical now that its dominance will continue. Nvidia's market capitalization — its stock price multiplied by the number of shares outstanding — ended Monday at roughly $4.5 trillion, equal to about 8% of the S & P 500. That's the "biggest weight in the S & P 500 of any individual stock," in data going back to 1981 , according to Apollo Global Management's chief economist, Torsten Slok. This comes on the heels of Nvidia shares seeing massive gains, having soared 239% in 2023, more than 171% in 2024 and 36% in 2025, through Monday's close. In the past three months alone, as the market fought its way back from April's brief tariff despair, Nvidia is 56% higher. Nearly nine out of every 10 analysts who cover Jensen Huang's company on Wall Street rate it a buy, and Nvidia now sells for 59 times its trailing 12-month earnings, according to FactSet data. "There's a reason the stock is up here, which is Nvidia continues to provide most of the most critical equipment for AI and the demand for AI usage," said D.A. Davidson analyst Gil Luria, one of the more bearish voices on Nvidia. "So, inferencing continues to rise as the models become ever so potent." NVDA 3M mountain NVDA, 3-month But there are two areas that could go wrong for Nvidia, according to Luria, who rates Nvidia a neutral and whose $135 price target implies that the stock will slide about 26% over the next year. One red flag is China. "The back and forth between the U.S. government, the Chinese government and Nvidia is a risk to a very big part of Nvidia's market," Luria continued. "They only report low-double-digit sales into China. It's safe to assume that a lot of their other sales are indirectly to China, either to Chinese companies domiciled otherwise, or sales to resellers that ultimately arrive in China. So, it's a big part of their sales that is at risk from either further action by [the] U.S. or by further restrictions from China." This past weekend, the Financial Times reported that Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices both agreed to give the U.S. government 15% share of revenues from chips sold in China in exchange for export licenses. Wells Fargo said Nvidia can grow more than 20% as a result of the agreement, which Luria described as uncertain at the same time as it "probably bodes well for their ability to sell the B30 [chips] either later this year or at some point next year. " Beyond the lack of clarity surrounding Nvidia's presence in the Chinese market, another bottleneck also poses a threat to the company's breakneck growth. "What most of their big customers are now talking about is that the chips aren't the bottleneck – it's the ability to have a data center on the power grid with HVAC equipment ready for chips that's holding them back," Luria added. That has already started to affect the company, the D.A. Davidson analyst pointed out. "The growth in electricity usage by data centers is so significant that we're going to start running into power limitations and electricity limitations. So, Nvidia's ability to grow may start being gated by factors that are out of their control," he added. Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at One Point BFG Wealth Partners, told CNBC that, as the market leader, Nvidia may eventually face another challenge as a result of the AI boom: increasing competition. For instance, Amazon Web Services has been making efforts to rival Nvidia when it comes to AI infrastructure , saying earlier this year that it's looking to reduce training costs associated with AI and provide an alternative to Nvidia's GPUs. "While they are riding an incredible and massive CapEx spending wave on the GenAI model [and] data center buildout, selling semis is still a very competitive and cyclical business," Boockvar said. "Nvidia's around 75% gross [profit] margin is not a long-term sustainable level, especially as their current biggest customers are all looking to be eventual competitors."
