From Ukraine to migration - four European Parliament debates to follow
Military aid to Ukraine, migrant returns and reduction of bureaucracy on the table for MEPs.
ADVERTISEMENT
Amid growing tensions between Europe and the US, and between two crucial summits of EU leaders on defence, MEPs are heading to Strasbourg for a plenary session packed with controversial debates. Here is a selection of the most interesting topics to follow. Military aid to Ukraine
On Wednesday, March 12, MEPs will vote on a resolution urging the EU to maintain its support for Ukraine, even if the United States withdraws its backing. The resolution, which is non-legislative, also focuses on European contributions to the security guarantees needed to ensure peace in Ukraine after the war—an issue on which EU Member States remain deeply divided.
Beyond this vote, several debates related to the Russian war in Ukraine are scheduled. On Tuesday morning, MEPs will assess the outcome of the March 6 Special European Council, while in the afternoon, discussions will centre on the upcoming white paper on the future of European defence, set to be unveiled soon by the Commission.
Wednesday's agenda includes two debates: one on the use of frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine and another on the phase-out of Russian energy in EU countries.
While resolutions in favour of Ukraine generally receive broad support in the chamber, debates on the topic remain nuanced. 'We are completely against deploying European troops in Ukraine,' a spokesperson for the Patriots for Europe group said during a press conference. Return of migrants
On Tuesday, March 11, the European Commission is set to present the so-called 'Return Directive' in Strasbourg—a new legal framework aimed at speeding up processes for repatriating rejected asylum seekers to their countries of origin.
On the same day, MEPs will give a first assessment of the proposal, which seeks to increase the return rate of third-country nationals who are not entitled to stay in the EU. Currently, only about one in four foreign nationals ordered to leave an EU member state is actually deported.
A source familiar with the matter told Euronews that the Commission's proposal will not include discussion of 'return hubs'- centres outside the EU where migrants would be hosted while awaiting repatriation. The idea has been circulating after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen raised the issue.
However, the debate is expected to be tense, with radical right-wing parties calling for swifter procedures and stricter policies to combat irregular migration, while left-leaning groups emphasise the need to uphold migrants' fundamental rights. Reducing bureaucracy at a faster pace
On Monday, March 10, Parliament will discuss the so-called 'Omnibus Package', a recent Commission proposal aimed at cutting red tape and simplifying legislation for EU businesses and citizens.
Last week, the European People's Party (EPP), the largest group in the chamber, sent a letter to the Parliament President Roberta Metsola—seen by Euronews—requesting a fast-track procedure. The EPP's goal is to quickly approve a specific part of the package, the so-called 'Stop the Clock' proposal, which seeks to postpone certain requirements on corporate sustainability and due diligence reporting.
Metsola will announce the EPP's request at the session's opening, and the vote will take place in the next plenary session in April. However, the debate is expected to be heated, as the Socialists & Democrats (S&D) and Renew Europe are in no hurry to approve the new rules.
A possible outcome could be an alliance between the EPP and the right-wing groups European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) and Patriots for Europe (PfE)—a coalition sometimes referred to as the "Venezuela Majority." Cross-border recognition of parenthood
On Wednesday, March 12, Parliament will debate a European Commission proposal to ensure that parenthood established in one EU member state is automatically recognised in all the others.
However, the issue remains contentious due to concerns about children born via surrogacy and those of same-sex couples. Since surrogacy and same-sex unions are regulated differently across member states, some governments resist being required to recognize parenthood established under the laws of another country. ADVERTISEMENT
As a result, an estimated two million children risk having their parents' legal status downgraded when they move to another EU country, according to Commission data.
The proposal requires unanimous approval by the Council, but its not yet there. MEPs will press Council and Commission representatives in the chamber to explain why.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Fact check: Where in Europe grants the most citizenships?
Italians have been voting over the past couple of days on whether to slash citizenship residency requirements for non-EU immigrants from 10 years to five, but misinformation has swirled about the vote. The country's Minister of Infrastructure and Transport Matteo Salvini and others have claimed that Italy is the European country that grants the most citizenship applications, for example. "The most dangerous [referendum] is the one that would extend citizenship to hundreds of thousands of people indiscriminately, with Italy being the number one European country in terms of the granting of citizenship every year," he said in May. However, it's not true that Italy approves the most citizenship requests year on year, and we can check this by looking at the most recent numbers from Eurostat. They show that in 2023, Spain granted the most citizenships, sitting at more than 240,000. That accounts for 22.9% of the total number of citizenships granted in the EU. Italy came in second place with 214,000; then Germany with 200,000; France 97,000 and Sweden with 68,000. The UK granted 202,000 citizenships in 2023, according to British government figures. The leader board changes when the number of citizenships granted is analysed in relation to a country's population. In this instance, Luxembourg came first in the EU in 2023, with 8.8 citizenships per thousand people, followed by Sweden (6.4), Spain (5), Belgium (4.7) and Italy (3.6) scraping into the top five. Slovakia, Bulgaria and Lithuania grant the fewest citizenships per 1,000 people, according to Eurostat, all of them sitting at below 0.5. Eurostat also calculates the naturalisation rate for each country. It compares the number of citizenships granted to the non-national resident population. Under this metric, the highest naturalisation rate was in Sweden (7.9), then Romania (5.9) and Italy (4.1). "In 2023, in the EU as a whole, 2.6 usual residents per hundred resident non-national citizens were granted citizenship," Eurostat said. It's true, therefore, that Italy consistently ranks among the highest by total number of citizenships granted, and has given the most in some years, such as in 2022 and 2020. In the former, Italy again naturalised around 214,000 people, and in the latter it handed out citizenship to some 132,000. Nevertheless, as things stand and as the results of the referendum come in, Italy has some of the strictest citizenship requirements in Europe, with immigrants needing to live there for 10 years before officially becoming Italian. Others such as Switzerland, Lithuania and Slovenia have similar stipulations in place, while a sizeable amount of European countries ask that immigrants live there only five years. For example, Finland, France, Ireland and Portugal. While Italy has been mulling reducing its naturalisation requirements, some countries are considering going or have already gone the other way. The UK government has announced that it intends to bring in new rules raising the amount of time an immigrant has to live in the country before they can apply for citizenship from five to 10 years, unless they can show "a real and lasting contribution to the economy and society". Belgium meanwhile recently increased the cost of applying for citizenship from €150 to €1,000. Hosted by Prince Albert of Monaco, the final day of the Blue Economy and Finance Forum (BEFF) closed with leaders pledging their support and calling for global responsibility to protect the oceans. William, Prince of Wales, said the challenge of protecting the world's oceans was "like none that we have faced before" and that the clock is ticking: "I believe that urgency and optimism have the power to bring about the action needed to change the course of history. I'm an optimist because as the founder of the Earthshot Prize, I see the incredible examples of the ideas, innovations and technologies that are harnessing the power of the ocean whilst protecting its vitality." "Watching human activity reduce beautiful sea forests to barren deserts, the base of our oceans is simply heart-breaking for many. It is an urgent wake-up call to just what is going on in our oceans, but it can no longer be a matter of out of sight, out of mind. The need to act to protect our ocean is now in full view, as ever," Prince William added. Meanwhile, in his closing speech, French President Emmanuel Macron criticised countries that deny climate change and cut budgets on this matter. 'We've been hearing that, basically, climate change, the threat to biodiversity, the issue of the oceans, all of that, is a matter of opinion," Macron said. He continued: "I'm going to tell you: no, we don't have the right to do that because it's not an opinion, but it's scientifically established." The French president also hinted at potential developments in the near future: "We have a duty to mobilise because the science is clear and the facts are there. There is no inevitability. And so, with a few governments, we will in the coming days make strong decisions and mobilise the international community." A major focus of the weeklong summit was the push to ratify the High Seas Treaty, which would enable conservation in international waters. The forum is the precursor to the United Nations Oceans Conference (UNOC) in Nice, where more than 50 world leaders are expected to attend. The US administration will not send representatives.
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
NATO learns as Ukraine's 'creativity' changes battlefield
"What the Ukrainians did in Russia was a Trojan horse -- and the trojan horse was thousands of years ago," French Admiral Pierre Vandier, NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, said in an interview. "Today, we see this kind of tactic being reinvented by technical and industrial creativity." Vandier said the operation showed how crucial innovation and adaptation were for victory, as modern warfare changes at lightning speed. "It was a real coup." "We are entering a dynamic era where armies must rely on both major planning but also adaptive planning," the navy commander said. "We will witness continuous innovation where, week by week, month by month or year by year, we will be able to invent things we hadn't anticipated." 'Must act quickly' Faced with the Russian threat, NATO this week adopted new objectives for its defence capabilities to ensure it will be able to repel Moscow. But Western intelligence agencies have warned that the Kremlin is reconstituting its forces at a pace far outstripping NATO and could be ready to attack the alliance in as little as four years. "Time is truly a crucial parameter. We must act quickly," Vandier said. The admiral, who previously commanded France's flagship Charles De Gaulle aircraft carrier, said NATO needed to amass the forces to dissuade any adversary from trying an attack. "When you say 'I'm defending myself', you have the weapons to defend. When you say you deter, you have the weapons to deter," he said. "That's what should prevent war -- making the adversary think: "Tomorrow morning, I won't win." NATO countries under pressure from US President Donald Trump are expected to agree a major increase in their defence spending target at a summit in The Hague this month. That should see a dramatic surge in spending on military hardware. But if cheap Ukrainian drones can inflict billions of dollars in damage on Russian bombers, is it still worth investing in vastly expensive systems? "No-one in the military sphere will tell you that we can do without what we'll call traditional equipment," Vandier said. "However, we are certain we need new equipment to complement it." Officials say that over 70 percent of battlefield casualties in Ukraine are caused by drones. But while drones are indispensable in modern warfare, they are not omnipotent. "Today, you won't cross the Atlantic with a 10-meter-long (33-foot-long) drone. You won't easily locate submarines with such tools," Vandier said. "If they accompany your large platforms, you'll be able to achieve much better results at much lower costs." Integrating new technologies The admiral, who works out of NATO's US base in Norfolk, Virginia, said the major challenge was "integrating new technologies and new combat methods, based on what we've witnessed in Ukraine". NATO and Ukraine have established a centre in Poland designed to help the alliance learn lessons from Russia's invasion of its neighbour. Artificial Intelligence and robotics are also increasingly having an impact and are set to help reshape the battlefield. "All modern armies will have piloted and non-piloted capabilities," Vandier said. "It's much more efficient to deliver ammunition with a ground robot than with a squad of soldiers who could face a 155-millimeter (six-inch) shell." This transformation of military capabilities within the alliance, which NATO aims to expand by at least 30 percent over coming years, will come at a significant cost, estimated in hundreds of billions of euros (dollars). Vandier insisted that while the financial effort was "substantial" it was "fully realistic". "Today, we have all the tools. We have the engineering. We have the expertise. We have the technology. So, we need to get started," he said.
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
The Russian family of dissidents that spans generations
From her kitchen, Zoïa Svetova is changing the world. When we interviewed Svetova, her face was radiant, her smile warm. Yet the eyes and hands of the 66-year-old journalist, one of the most respected in the anti-Kremlin circles in Moscow, betrayed a deep concern. In her central Moscow apartment, a haven for the Russian intelligentsia, the black-clad police could burst in at any moment. One of Svetova's sons had just been placed on the list of people sought by the authorities. The authorities made no announcement, but Mediazona, a website independent of the Kremlin, extracted the information from an Interior Ministry database: Tikhon Dzyadko, editor-in-chief of the opposition channel Dojd, labeled an "undesirable organization" by Moscow since 2023 and in exile in the Netherlands, was being prosecuted in a criminal case. No further details were available. The family is used to this; they have generations of dissidents. "Since the beginning of the USSR, we have been on the side of Russians oppressed by their own state," insisted Svetova. "On the side of justice, of people who are in their right." The police could therefore appear at any moment to search the apartment, a family nest for generations. They would not find Tikhon, who left the country over three years ago. Svetova now lives alone. "Life is about taking risks. I feel the danger, but I don't want to think about it," she confided over tea and a few chocolates, those brightly wrapped treats unchanged since Soviet times. In her home, time seemed to have stood still. Black-and-white family photos, colorful icons, small pieces of jewelry, candle stubs, an hourglass, miniature baskets and other items had accumulated on the wooden furniture.
