logo
Laura Loomer Files New Supreme Court Petition—'Accountability Is Coming'

Laura Loomer Files New Supreme Court Petition—'Accountability Is Coming'

Newsweek2 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Conservative firebrand Laura Loomer is going after social media giant Meta, claiming in a new filing to the U.S. Supreme Court that it and another large company were part of an alleged criminal conspiracy to censor conservative voices like hers, leading to unsuccessful election outcomes.
Newsweek reached out to Loomer and Meta for comment.
Why It Matters
In late 2022, a treasure trove of emails now known as being part of the "Twitter files" questioned whether politicians and others of particular political persuasions were receiving due or unjust treatment on social media as a means to suppress free speech and nudge conversation.
That was part of a broader public pushback against social media companies that were uniquely employing different fact-check methods, notably during the COVID pandemic and surrounding major elections—especially the 2016 and 2020 presidential contests.
In January of this year, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg followed Elon Musk's lead by announcing a rollback of its censorship policies to become a free speech platform, saying, "The recent elections feel like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech."
What To Know
Loomer, an outspoken voice on social media, wrote Monday on X, formerly Twitter, that she filed a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in a civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) case against Meta, Procter & Gamble and others.
The Procter & Gamble portion of the claim alleges that the company provided Meta, then Facebook, with a list of conservatives who should have their speech suppressed.
Newsweek reached out to Procter & Gamble for comment.
"New evidence, like the Twitter Files and Zuckerberg's own admissions to government initiated censorship in support of the Democrats and against President Trump, reveals coordinated efforts to silence political speech and ruin the lives of those Big Tech deemed unworthy of having a voice over their support for President Trump," Loomer wrote on X.
Laura Loomer shows her support for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump outside a campaign event for Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, not pictured, at The Vault on October 5, 2023, in Tampa, Florida.
Laura Loomer shows her support for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump outside a campaign event for Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, not pictured, at The Vault on October 5, 2023, in Tampa, Florida.Loomer was unsuccessful in two separate congressional campaigns in Florida: one in 2020 and another in 2022.
In 2020, she unsuccessfully faced off against Democrat Lois Frankel in the race to represent Florida's 21st Congressional District. In 2022, she lost in the Republican primary against incumbent Daniel Webster in the race for Florida's 11th District.
More recently, she's been closely tied to President Donald Trump—sometimes to the point of Trump's own staffers wanting to keep distance between the pair due to questionable publicity. Trump in the past referred to her as a "free spirit."
Loomer, as part of her new legal filing, claims that "nobody has been more viciously attacked," adding that her attorney views it as the most egregious violation of rights against a citizen journalist "that he has ever seen."
"This case is about holding Big Tech accountable for racketeering that undermines our elections. ... Everyone involved in what happened to me will pay a price for what they did," she said. "It might not be today, but I promise you, it will happen someday.
"You don't just get to pretend like you are supporting conservatives once Trump gets elected and do nothing to make those you damaged whole again."
What People Are Saying
Zuckerberg, in January: "We're going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression on our platforms."
He added that fact-checkers "have just been too politically biased, and have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the U.S."
What Happens Next
It's unclear whether Loomer's request will receive a look from the High Court.
While the court is not obligated to hear all cases appealed to it, a writ of certiorari can help it decide which cases should take precedence.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

People Can't Believe The Trump Administration's WILD Attempt To Be Catchy With The Name Of Another Immigration Detention Center
People Can't Believe The Trump Administration's WILD Attempt To Be Catchy With The Name Of Another Immigration Detention Center

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

People Can't Believe The Trump Administration's WILD Attempt To Be Catchy With The Name Of Another Immigration Detention Center

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem drew swift backlash on Tuesday after unveiling plans for a new migrant detention center in Indiana — which she dubbed the 'Speedway Slammer.' In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Noem announced a partnership with Indiana Gov. Mike Braun (R) to expand detention capacity by 1,000 beds at Miami Correctional Facility near Bunker Hill. It will 'help remove the worst of the worst out of our country,' she wrote. Related: 'COMING SOON to Indiana: The Speedway Slammer,' Noem boasted. 'If you are in America illegally, you could find yourself in Indiana's Speedway Slammer. Avoid arrest and self deport now using the @CBP Home App,' she added. Critics condemned the announcement as disgusting, cruel, and dehumanizing, calling out the Trump administration's broader approach to immigration enforcement. They also slammed the center's 'stupid' name. Related: Many compared the branding of the facility to Florida's migrant detention center that Republicans have dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' because it's surrounded by snakes and alligators. Related: Related: This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Pine Belt chooses Republican candidates for special election in MS Senate. See who won
Pine Belt chooses Republican candidates for special election in MS Senate. See who won

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Pine Belt chooses Republican candidates for special election in MS Senate. See who won

In a surprising upset in the Tuesday, Aug. 5, Republican primary for the Senate District 42 special election, Don Hartness unseated incumbent Sen. Robin Robinson. In 2023, Robinson defeated Hartness in the Mississippi Senate District 42 race, winning with nearly 56% of the vote to Hartness' 44%. This time, Hartness won more than 70% of the vote in the three-person race that also included candidate RJ Robinson. A candidate needs to have 50% plus one vote to have the majority when there are multiple candidates in a primary. Otherwise a runoff election will be held between the two candidates who gained the most votes. In this instance, Hartness won far more than the minimum number of votes to win the primary outright. Since there are no opposing candidates for District 42 in the November special election, Hartness will take over the office from Robinson in January. In Senate District 44, Chris Johnson, the current senator for District 45, won a narrow victory over his opponent Patrick Lott, despite sparking a controversy earlier this year when he was accused of alienating the affection of a doctor's wife. Johnson received about 54% of the vote to Lott's 46%. Johnson will face Democratic challenger Shakita Taylor in November's special election. Results are unofficial until they are certified by the Mississippi Secretary of State's office. Here's how they voted: Senate District 42 Don Hartness: 4,246 votes or 70.7% Robin Robinson: 1,676 votes or 27.9% RJ Robinson: 84 votes or 1.4% Senate District 44 Chris Johnson: 2,282 votes or 53.8% Patrick Lott: 1,961 votes or 46.2% The special election was called after a federal judge ruled the 2021 redistricting plan was flawed. The legislative election held in 2023 was based on the 2021 district lines, following the 2020 Census. Those districts were challenged in 2022, and a federal court agreed that they diluted the Black vote in Mississippi. State lawmakers were ordered to go back to the drawing board to create new district lines in three areas of the state, with two centered on Senate districts and the third on the House of Representatives. The new plan was approved in May, and a special election was scheduled for November. The NAACP, which had filed the lawsuit challenging the redistricting, did not agree with the plans submitted for the Senate in DeSoto County nor the House of Representatives in the Golden Triangle, and appealed the three-judge panel ruling. The new plan for redistricting in the Hattiesburg area was not challenged. Other Pine Belt Senate races on the November ballot In addition to Senate Districts 42 and 44, the following races will also be on the November ballot: Incumbent Sen. Juan Barnett, D-Heidelberg, is running unopposed in District 34. Incumbent Sen. Joey Fillingane, R-Sumrall, is running unopposed in District 41. Hattiesburg attorney Anna Rush, a Republican, and former Hattiesburg mayor Johnny DuPree, a Democrat, are seeking the Senate District 45 seat. Lici Beveridge is a reporter for the Hattiesburg American and Clarion Ledger. Contact her at lbeveridge@ Follow her on X @licibev or Facebook at This article originally appeared on Hattiesburg American: Hartness, Johnson win Republican primary elections near Hattiesburg

GOP Sen. Tom Cotton questions new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan over alleged ties to Chinese military
GOP Sen. Tom Cotton questions new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan over alleged ties to Chinese military

New York Post

time2 minutes ago

  • New York Post

GOP Sen. Tom Cotton questions new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan over alleged ties to Chinese military

A top Republican senator demanded new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan reveal if he has any ties to China's Communist Party and military – citing national security concerns. In a letter sent Wednesday to Intel Chairman Frank Leary, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) wrote that he is concerned 'about the security and integrity of Intel's operations and its potential impact on US national security,' according to a copy of the letter obtained by The Post. Tan replaced ousted Intel chief Pat Gelsinger in March — a year after the struggling company was awarded a whopping $8 billion in Biden-era CHIPs Act funding. Advertisement 3 Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan speaking on stage in Taiwan in May. REUTERS Cotton's missive came after a report earlier this year claimed Tan invested at least $200 million across hundreds of Chinese firms between March 2012 and December 2024. Some of these advanced manufacturing and semiconductor firms have been linked to the Chinese Communist Party and military, Reuters reported in April. Advertisement In his letter, Cotton questioned whether the board had required Tan to divest from these stakes before assuming the CEO role. The senator asked whether Tan had disclosed his remaining investments to the US government, since Intel has a responsibility as a major recipient of federal funding. He also demanded to know whether the board was aware of subpoenas targeting Cadence Design – which Tan ran from 2008 to 2021 – before it hired him. 'Intel and Mr. Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the US defense ecosystem,' an Intel spokesperson told The Post. Advertisement Intel added that it will address the matter with Cotton, who asked for responses by Aug. 15. 3 Sen. Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's chairman with concerns about Lip-Bu Tan's reported ties to China. 'Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations,' Cotton wrote in the letter. 'Mr. Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations.' Advertisement In 2024, Intel was awarded $8.5 billion in CHIPs funding under the Secure Enclave program, a national security initiative to make secure microchips for defense and intelligence applications. Later that year, the government slashed that figure by more than $600 million to about $7.85 billion. Intel still ranks as one of the top companies receiving the most federal funding. 3 Intel ranks as one of the top companies receiving the most federal funding. Getty Images A source familiar with the matter told Reuters in April that Tan had divested from his positions in Chinese firms. The outlet reported at the time that Chinese databases still listed many of his investments as current. While it is not illegal for US citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies, there is a US Treasury list of banned Chinese firms. Reuters reported earlier this year that Tan was not invested directly in any company on that list. Meanwhile, Cadence Design last week agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to settle charges that it sold its chips to a Chinese military university, according to a Reuters report. Advertisement The institution was believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts, according to the report. Those sales took place under Tan's leadership at Cadence. After stepping down as CEO in 2021, Tan stayed on at Cadence as executive chairman through May 2023.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store