
Defence or environment? London faces spending choices
AI- Generated Image
Torn between growing geopolitical tensions and constrained public finances, Britain's finance minister Rachel Reeves is set to unveil feared trade-offs in a government spending review on Wednesday.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer is boosting the defence budget, and reports point to National Health Service (NHS) being bolstered -- forcing other key ministries to tighten their belts.
"Sharp trade-offs are unavoidable," said the Institute for Fiscal Studies, a respected think tank, of the spending plans through to 2029-2030.
Reeves, the chancellor of the exchequer, is to detail day-to-day spending plans in her review to parliament on Wednesday.
An inaugural budget in October featured tax rises and big spending announcements on infrastructure, meaning belt-tightening has to come from elsewhere.
Already in March, Labour announced contested cuts to disability welfare payments, hoping to save more than £5 billion ($6.8 billion) by the start of the next decade.
Thousands of protestors gathered in central London on Saturday, many holding placards that read "tax the rich, stop the cuts -- welfare not warfare".
The government on Sunday announced £86 billion of investment in science and technology and defence by 2030.
Reeves hopes the spending will boost sluggish growth, which risks added pressure from the tariffs trade war unleashed by US President Donald Trump.
Reeves is set to announce a funding boost of up to £30 billion for the NHS, according to The Times newspaper.
Britain's media has in recent days reported on tough, last-minute discussions between the Treasury and the interior ministry, particularly regarding the police budget, as well as with the energy department amid fears for the UK's carbon-reduction commitments.
- Defence priority -
Reeves has amended her fiscal rules to allow the government more headroom for investment in the run-up to the spending review.
At the same time, she wishes to balance the books so that tax revenues match day-to-day spending, meaning the government borrows only to invest.
The chancellor has allowed the Treasury to borrow more, particularly for infrastructure projects across the vital housing and energy sectors.
This has handed her a windfall of £113 billion over five years.
"When it comes to capital spending, government investment is set to be sustained at historically high levels in the coming years," the IFS noted.
"If spent well, this should help contribute to growth and to better public services in years to come."
Citing Russia's invasion of Ukraine, London has announced it will increase its defence budget to 2.5 percent of UK gross domestic product by 2027 -- and up to 3.0 percent by 2034, helped by cutting international aid.
"While going for growth and fixing the NHS will still be central to the Spending Review, bolstering the nation's defence is now considered an urgent pressing need," said Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown.
While seeking to cut costs, it has been reported that the Labour government may later this year announce plans to lift a cap on child benefits and reverse a decision to scrap a winter heating benefit for millions of pensioners, after a backlash over the policies from some of its party members.
Possible "U-turns on benefit and welfare spending, increased pressure to ramp up defence spending and higher borrowing costs have left the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, in a sticky position", concluded Ruth Gregory, deputy chief UK economist at Capital Economics.
"If she wishes to avoid a political backlash and/or an adverse reaction in the financial markets, she probably has little choice but to raise taxes in the Autumn Budget."
The government has already hiked a business tax that entered into force in April.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
US-China tariff deal: Trade talks held second day in London; rare earth minerals and AI chips in focus
AI-generated image Trade negotiations between the US and China continue for a second day in London on Tuesday, following US President Donald Trump 's assessment that while China presents challenges, the US is making progress in the discussions. At Lancaster House, a prominent 19th-century building situated near Buckingham Palace, the Chinese delegation headed by Vice Premier He Lifeng engaged with US officials including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on Monday. The Chinese representation includes Wang Wentao, the commerce minister, alongside trade negotiator Li Chenggang. Trump's Monday evening statement to journalists confirmed, "We are doing well with China. China's not easy." Following their Geneva discussions last month, both nations agreed to pause the implementation of substantial tariffs for 90 days, addressing concerns about potential economic downturn caused by their ongoing trade disputes. Post-Geneva talks, tensions have risen between the nations regarding AI-capable semiconductors, visa policies for Chinese students in American educational institutions, and the supply of "rare earth" minerals crucial to manufacturing sectors. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo Last Thursday, Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping conducted an extensive telephone conversation to improve diplomatic relations. Trump subsequently announced via social media that negotiations would commence in London. As the primary global supplier of rare earths, China has indicated potential relaxation of its April export limitations, which had caused concern among global automotive manufacturers. Simultaneously, Beijing seeks removal of US restrictions on Chinese access to advanced semiconductor technology. Trump expressed his intention to increase Chinese market access for American products. "If we don't open up China, maybe we won't do anything," Trump said at the White House. "But we want to open up China." This comes as top US and Chinese officials convened in London on Monday to work on stabilizing the delicate pause in their trade conflict, which has impacted global markets. The latest round of diplomacy follows a tentative agreement in Geneva last month, where both sides committed to a 90-day pause on the steep tariffs, some over 100%, they had imposed on each other in a tit-for-tat escalation. The temporary truce, announced on May 12, offered some breathing space, though tensions remain high. Since the Geneva breakthrough, the two nations have had disagreements over advanced semiconductors used in artificial intelligence, visa restrictions for Chinese students in the US, and the export of rare earth minerals, critical raw materials used in electric vehicles and consumer electronics. The rare earths issue is likely to be a key topic in the London talks, after China began mandating export licenses for producers dealing in seven of these materials in April. The move triggered supply shortages, sending global automakers scrambling and raising fears of production halts. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
4 hours ago
- Business Standard
'China is not easy,' says Trump as trade talks move to second day in London
The US and China are holding a second day of talks Tuesday in London aimed at easing their trade dispute, after President Donald Trump said China is not easy but the US was doing well at the negotiations. A Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng met US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer for several hours on Monday at Lancaster House, an ornate 200-year-old mansion near Buckingham Palace. Wang Wentao, China's commerce minister, and trade negotiator Li Chenggang are also in Beijing's delegation. Asked late Monday how the negotiations were going, Trump told reporters: We are doing well with China. China's not easy. The two sides are trying to build on negotiations in Geneva last month that agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. Since the Geneva talks, the US and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, visas for Chinese students at American universities and rare earth minerals that are vital to carmakers and other industries. Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the following day that the trade talks would resume in London. China, the world's biggest producer of rare earths, has signaled it may ease export restrictions it placed on the elements in April, alarming automakers around the world who rely on them. Beijing, in turn, wants the U.S. to lift restrictions on Chinese access to the technology used to make advanced semiconductors. Trump said that he wants to open up China, the world's dominant manufacturer, to U.S. products. If we don't open up China, maybe we won't do anything, Trump said at the White House. But we want to open up China.


Hans India
7 hours ago
- Hans India
Trump Accuses China Of Breaking Trade Agreement, Regrets Being "Mr Nice Guy" In Tariff Deal
President Donald Trump has publicly accused China of breaching its trade agreement with the United States, expressing regret over his decision to ease punitive tariffs that had severely impacted the Chinese economy. The accusation comes amid stalled negotiations and growing tensions between the world's two largest economies. In a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform, Trump detailed his reasoning behind the original trade deal, claiming he had intervened to prevent what he perceived as potential economic collapse in China. The President stated that his unprecedented 145 percent tariffs had made it "virtually impossible for China to trade into the United States marketplace," causing widespread factory closures and civil unrest. "Two weeks ago China was in grave economic danger! The very high Tariffs I set made it virtually impossible for China to TRADE into the United States marketplace which is, by far, number one in the World," Trump wrote, describing the severe impact of his trade policies on Chinese commerce. The President revealed that his decision to negotiate a deal was motivated by concern for China's deteriorating situation rather than American interests. "I saw what was happening and didn't like it, for them, not for us. I made a FAST DEAL with China in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation," he explained. Trump's statement followed comments from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who informed Fox News that trade negotiations with China had reached an impasse. Bessent emphasized that meaningful progress would require direct engagement between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, highlighting the complexity of the ongoing discussions. The current trade dispute stems from earlier this month when the Trump administration agreed to reduce the 145 percent tariff to 30 percent, while China reciprocated by lowering its tariff rate on American goods from 125 percent to 10 percent. This mutual reduction was intended as a 90-day temporary measure to defuse escalating trade tensions. The agreement emerged from intensive negotiations in Geneva, Switzerland, marking the first high-level diplomatic talks between Washington and Beijing since Trump imposed his steep tariffs on Chinese imports. The discussions were characterized as marathon sessions aimed at preventing a full-scale trade war between the economic superpowers. However, Treasury Secretary Bessent noted that while the temporary deal succeeded in calming financial markets, it failed to address fundamental American concerns about China's state-controlled economic model. This underlying issue continues to complicate long-term trade relationship stability between the nations. Following the stalled China negotiations, the Trump administration has redirected its trade focus toward other significant partners, including Japan, India, and the European Union. This strategic shift suggests the administration is pursuing multiple trade fronts while China talks remain deadlocked. The trade dispute has also faced legal challenges, with a US trade court ruling Wednesday that President Trump exceeded his executive authority by imposing most tariffs on Chinese and other imports under emergency powers legislation. However, a federal appeals court quickly reinstated the tariffs within 24 hours, temporarily suspending the lower court's decision pending government appeal review. The appeals court has established specific deadlines for the legal proceedings, requiring plaintiffs to respond by June 5 and the Trump administration to file their response by June 9. This legal timeline adds another layer of complexity to the already challenging trade relationship between the United States and China.