Do not travel warning after tree blocks West Coast Main Line
Anyone with tickets can be used on the same route on Tuesday instead.Any passengers who no longer want to travel due to the disruption can request a full refund from the point of purchase.The disruption is expected to last until the end of the day.
Alternative routes
Andy McClements, from TransPennine Express, said: "It's rare that we advise customers not to travel, but it is likely to take much of today to clear the tree from the lines and we cannot guarantee travel between Carlisle and either Glasgow or Edinburgh."We will have additional members of staff out and about on the route today to help our customers, and we are allowing customers with tickets to travel tomorrow to help get them where they need to be."TransPennine Express said anyone who decides to travel on Monday can use their ticket on the following services:Between Edinburgh and Manchester in both directions on the East Coast Main Line (via York) on TransPennine Express servicesBetween Edinburgh and York in both directions on any LNER or CrossCountry serviceBetween Edinburgh and Newcastle in both directions on Lumo servicesBetween Carlisle and Newcastle, and Manchester Airport and Lancaster in both directions on Northern servicesBetween Glasgow and Edinburgh in both directions on ScotRail services
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
43 minutes ago
- Times
Holidaymakers with pet separation anxiety simply pack the pooch
It's not a dog's life if you are a pet in Britain. Our national capacity to spoil our furry friends extends to taking them on holiday with us, according to research. A study has found that growing numbers of people are taking their dogs — and sometimes other animals — on trips because they cannot bear to be separated from them. The study found that roughly one in four (26 per cent) of owners have taken their pets on foreign holidays, and the trend is driven by young people. Half of 24 to 34-year-olds have travelled abroad with their animals, compared with less than one in ten over-55s (9 per cent). Londoners are the most likely to take their pets with them. Holidaymakers may not have noticed the trend because the law forbids pets, except guide dogs, from travelling in the cabin of aircraft to and from the UK. However, most flag carriers, such as British Airways and Air France, have long-established pet cargo schemes. You won't see touring pets in the cabin of the aircraft, they have their own area ALAMY The research found that two thirds of owners would like to be able to travel on a plane with their pets, a practice that is allowed for animals below a certain size and weight on many European and American routes. Most owners who take their dogs with them on holiday to Europe use ferries and Eurotunnel, which both accept animals. Pets are allowed to leave and return to the UK under the Pet Travel Scheme, provided they meet the entry and exit requirements, such as having a microchip, a rabies vaccination and an animal health certificate. The certificates must be issued by a vet within ten days of travel. Ferries and Eurotunnel allow for fuss-free travel, but get the paperwork in order ALAMY The survey of more than 1,200 pet owners by the Co-op found that more than half (56 per cent) of those who take their pets abroad do so because 'they're part of the family'. However, roughly one in eight (12 per cent) said they do so because pet boarding facilities are too expensive. Most licensed kennels charge £17 to £20 per dog per day. Rates in London are often far higher — up to £90 a night for standard kennels and even £120 a night for high-end 'canine country clubs'. A third (33 per cent) of owners said they take their pets along because it ensures they will stay active on holiday, but one in three (31 per cent) said they 'couldn't bear the thought of leaving them at home' and would miss them too much. Another factor is that veterinary services are considerably cheaper on the Continent. An investigation by The Times in 2023 found that some procedures are up to three times more expensive in the UK than in France. • 13 of the best dog-friendly Airbnbs in the UK The Co-op says owners need to be careful when travelling abroad with pets because most standard insurance policies do not cover them for emergency treatment overseas. Andrew Nevitt, of Co-op Insurance, said: 'If you are taking your pet abroad, it's important that you ensure you have the correct documentation and they have had the necessary vaccines.' He added: 'Having the right insurance policy in place is also crucial as it will provide you with peace of mind that, should your pet require any treatment, any vet bills will be covered.'
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
The new eGates programs hopes to make it a quick trip through airport customs at these three cities
Security screening company CLEAR announced it is piloting biometric 'eGates' is coming to three major American airports in partnership with the Transportation Security Administration ahead of a nationwide rollout. CLEAR and TSA's pilot program kicked off Tuesday at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson, next week at Reagan National and the week of August 31 at Seattle-Tacoma, Axios reported. The eGates are being trialed ahead of what is expected to be a massive year for travel in the U.S., as airports anticipate millions of international travelers for big events such as the 2026 World Cup, expected to draw in 20 million visitors, and America's 250th birthday. 'This is frictionless travel. This is more secure," CLEAR CEO Caryn Seidman-Becker told Axios. "This is making airports great again, ahead of the World Cup." "It's fully integrated. It's one step. And the total transaction time should be between three and six seconds," Seidman-Becker added. The move will also free up CLEAR agents 'to bring other services to travelers,' Seidman-Becker said. The eGates are being fully funded by CLEAR, at no cost to taxpayers, the company said. Only travelers with CLEAR+ memberships, which allow them to bypass lengthy security lines, will be able to access the eGates. A CLEAR+ membership costs $209 a year. The new eGates will conduct real-time biometric verification to confirm travelers' identities, meaning once travelers are verified, they can bypass the TSA podium and go straight to physical screening. They then take that biometric data, such as facial recognition, and compare it with a passport to check someone's ID and let them through security. The TSA will still have complete operational control over the eGates, including triggering gate access and enforcing government security requirements. CLEAR says it has no access to 'no-fly' watchlists, cannot override TSA gate decisions and does not manually open the gates. CLEAR and TSA agents will remain at the gates to help travelers. The company says it only transmits limited data, such as the live photo, boarding pass and ID the traveler used for enrollment. While for now, the eGates simply provide a shortcut to the luggage screening process, they will eventually be able to scan passengers fully via biometrics, according to The Points Guy. After launching its pilot program, it will expand to at least 30 more airports within the next few years, according to the report. 'Our expectation is to roll this out nationwide and so that by the time the World Cup comes around next summer our airports are competing and leading with the airports around the world,' Seidman-Becker, the company's CEO, said.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Why does British Airways want to charge £652 for switching one domestic flight?
Many transatlantic flights overfly the Outer Hebrides; my British Airways flight last week from London to Denver did just that. But for the residents of Scotland's wonderful Western Isles, reaching America proves a palaver. Dolina MacLeod and her husband face a long journey in October when they travel from the Outer Hebrides to visit their daughter in New York. 'We booked some time ago on British Airways from Edinburgh to New York via London Heathrow, both ways,' she says. 'Since then, flight schedules have updated.' Many people like to book flights months ahead. You have a fair chance of getting a better fare. But one downside is that airlines may tweak their schedules. A one-hour shift earlier or later is not much of a problem for straightforward point-to-point flights. But for connecting flights, it can mean an extended wait and a much longer journey overall. 'I enquired with British Airways to change the last leg of our journey – from Heathrow to Edinburgh – to an Inverness flight,' says Ms MacLeod. 'This provides easier transportation links to return home to the Outer Hebrides.' The extra distance is 112 miles. The extra cost? 'I was incredibly shocked to be quoted £652 as the charge to make this change,' she says. 'I accept that there will always be amendment charges but the charges being quoted are more than the original fare for the entire trip from Edinburgh to NYC and back for one person.' Ms MacLeod also spotted that the very Heathrow-Inverness flight she wished to fly on is being sold for just £56 one way, including a checked bag. So how could this bizarre state of affairs come about: that so small an amendment could trigger such a surge in cost? And is there anything to stop the couple from simply buying London-Inverness tickets? Let me explain. Passengers rationally want to book at the lowest possible fare. Airlines are prepared to sell cheap tickets – but always with strings attached. If changes are permitted at all, they will come with an amendment fee plus any increase when the fare is recalculated. Edinburgh-London-New York and back, booked months ahead, is a different beast from an outbound flight to JFK from the Scottish capital, but returning to Inverness, two months out. Computer doesn't say 'no', but it does say '£652'. Unreasonable? It might appear so, but the dark art of airline revenue management makes that sort of figure inevitable. Connecting flights such as Ms MacLeod's, going New York-London-Edinburgh tend to be cheaper than non-stop JFK-Heathrow tickets, because other airlines are offering enticingly priced routings via Dublin, Reykjavik or Amsterdam. So what's to stop them from forfeiting the Heathrow-Edinburgh leg and just buying those new flights? Plenty. First, as soon as you 'no-show' for a segment of a multi-stop journey, you are technically in breach of contract and the airline could pursue you for the difference in cost between what you paid for and what you actually flew. Ending the journey at Heathrow without taking the onward flight could easily trigger an additional fare of hundreds of pounds. In practice, carriers do not chase passengers for the difference in fare unless there is clear evidence of repeated 'tariff abuse' – which, of course, does not apply to the Hebridean couple. I confess I once booked an Orlando-Manchester-Dublin ticket with no intention of using the leg to the Irish capital, thereby saving £500. I self-justified this episode of tariff abuse on the grounds that Virgin Atlantic would not have got my business at the price it wanted to charge for the non-stop flight from Florida alone. On that premeditated occasion, I made sure to carry cabin baggage only. If your ticket says Dublin via Manchester, that is where your checked luggage will be going. In my experience, airlines will not countenance requests for your bag to be checked for only part of the journey. Some might take advantage of BA's mighty cabin baggage allowance – two bags weighing up to 23kg each. But I fear Ms MacLeod and her husband will simply need to stick with the flight to Edinburgh, and perhaps vow to book closer to departure next time. Meanwhile, they can gaze at all the transatlantic traffic six miles overhead. Simon Calder, also known as The Man Who Pays His Way, has been writing about travel for The Independent since 1994. In his weekly opinion column, he explores a key travel issue – and what it means for you.
