The 'new silent ones': Opponents lie low in Russia
Since the start of the offensive three years ago, Moscow has cracked down on any public dissent of what it calls the "special military operation".
Hundreds of critics have been prosecuted.
In one of the most recent cases, a Moscow court in January jailed for eight years a pensioner convicted of defaming Russia's military for denouncing "crimes" carried out by its troops in Ukraine.
As fierce fighting continues, hundreds of thousands of Russians fearing mobilisation and opposed to the offensive have fled the country.
Those opponents of the war who have stayed live in silence.
"Between 20 and 25 percent of Russians do not support the authorities," Denis Volkov, head of the Levada centre, told AFP. "They have turned in on themselves."
The Levada centre itself, an independent polling institute, is labelled a "foreign agent" by the authorities.
Opposition media refer to these critics as the "new silent ones" -- comparing them to those who kept quiet about their anti-Communist views in Soviet times.
- 'Buried alive' -
These Russians are stuck between a rock and a hard place -- on the one hand their compatriots living abroad denounce them for being "conformists" and on the other Kremlin supporters call them "traitors".
"Silent ones, we are all like that here!" one Internet user said in a debate on the new term on Facebook, which is banned in Russia and only accessible via a virtual private network (VPN).
"We stay here without venturing into the public space because whoever comes out dies in prison," said another user.
Maria, a 51-year-old data analyst living in Moscow, has paid the price for opposing the offensive.
"For me, everything was clear form the beginning. I tried to explain to five of my colleagues who supported the operation. Waste of time," she said.
In September 2022, she suggested to her manager that the company could move out of Russia so that younger employees could avoid mobilisation.
"The result was I lost my job," she said.
She has since found a new job and works out of her house in the countryside near Moscow where she lives with her husband, a university professor.
"It's almost three years since I became a silent one," Maria said.
"It's like taking early retirement or, worse, being buried alive."
- 'Careful not to say too much' -
Vasily, a graphics specialist and "long-term" Kremlin critic, shared the same frustration.
He said he was "always forced to check myself".
"I no longer read my books on the metro or my favourite bloggers and I am careful not to say too much in the office".
Others find solace in art.
Ekaterina, who is in her 60s, paints portraits of musicians and poets during their performances in a Moscow loft -- a way of getting away from "this difficult moment".
"I miss freedom. I always have to control myself," she told AFP, taking long pauses in order not to say the wrong thing.
"I find escape through flowers, I draw them and turn in on myself," she said.
Rock star Yury Shevchuk, once an outspoken Kremlin critic, also considers himself in the same category.
"Some chose to sing, I chose to stay silent," said the musician, whose concerts were cancelled in Russia when he criticised fake "patriotism" during a show in May 2022.
The "new silent ones", he said, "do not get on the barricades because it does not make a lot of sense at the moment," he said in an interview last year.
"But they are doing something good and thanks to them Russia will survive."
bur/jj

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Property closed after reports of anti social behaviour
A PROPERTY has been hit with a partial closure order following ongoing reports of anti-social behaviour and criminal activity by authorities. The order, granted by Weymouth Magistrates' Court on July 30, applies to the address at 10 Hyde Road, Gillingham, Dorset and will remain in effect for three months. Dorset Police, working in partnership with Sovereign Housing, applied for the order after receiving multiple complaints from residents about anti-social behaviour and criminality linked to the property. (Image: Notice of closure, Credit: Dorset Police) Under the terms of the closure, only the named occupant, Sovereign Housing staff or their agents, and emergency services are permitted to enter the premises. A spokesperson for Dorset Police said the action was taken to protect the community and prevent further disruption. Police have urged members of the public to report any suspected breaches of the order. Anyone with information should contact Dorset Police and quote reference number 55250097785.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
The left is trying to use international ‘lawfare' to shut down Musk and X
Elon Musk had three recent posts on X that are worth noting if you are opposed to censorship and cancellation. The first was two cartoon panels with the question, 'How do you tell who's telling the Truth?' The next panel offered the answer: 'The ones trying to silence other people are the ones lying.' Just prior to that, Musk had reposted a post that reads, 'President Trump's State Department has announced it is coming to the defense of Elon Musk's X after France labeled it an organized crime group and opened a criminal investigation. The State Department's DLR [the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor] stated, 'As part of a criminal investigation, an activist French prosecutor is requesting information on X's proprietary algorithm and has classified X as an 'organized crime group.' Democratic governments should allow all voices to be heard, not silence speech they dislike. The United States will defend the free speech of all Americans against acts of foreign censorship.'' And just prior to that, Musk reposted a post from the conservative activist Mark Kern: 'There is a full on attack on the Internet by the UK and EU, disguised as 'for the children.' The ID requirement is affecting even Discord users and X users. It is full on dystopian as they ramp up police to arrest people for speech.' Below that is a link to a Telegraph article with the headline 'Elite Police Squad to Monitor Anti-Migrant Posts on Social Media.' Multiple people I have spoken with in the U.S., the U.K. and the EU believe that Musk and his X platform represent the greatest single threat to the far left and its goal of pushing its narratives unchallenged across the globe. One way the left now seems intent on stopping Musk and X is by mimicking the various 'lawfare' schemes rolled out against then-candidate Donald Trump prior to the 2024 election, which many Trump supporters saw as an unethical attempt to force him out of the race. While that 'lawfare' tactic failed — thanks in large part to Trump taking it head-on, day after day, while exposing it for what it was — activists in Europe and elsewhere believe the strategy can be refined and hardened for use against Musk and X in an attempt to intimidate, censor or silence them. Lest we forget, back in 2023, the European Union opened a probe into X for alleged 'failure to counter illegal content and disinformation.' Ah. The catch-all accusation frequently used by the intelligentsia on the left: 'disinformation.' Recall the draconian COVID-19 dictates from the left enacted to combat 'disinformation'? Here is a January headline from ABC News: 'EU politicians warn against Elon Musk's incursions into European politics.' Of course, Musk might rightfully retort that his 'disinformation' and 'incursions' were not only protected free speech, but simply ways to point out severe double-standards and harmful policies that were having an adverse effect upon the majority of the citizens of those nations. I wrote a piece for this site a year ago titled ' Could Elon Musk actually be arrested and X cancelled?' I highlighted calls for Musk to be arrested for stating his opinions while anticipating that the personal animus directed against him, X and the internet by certain individuals and groups in Europe advocating for censorship and cancellation could grow. It now seems that I was correct. All of which raises an obvious question:Why do so many on the left want to prevent people around the world from gathering as much information as possible on their own, then coming to their own conclusions based on their own research? Do they fear people thinking for themselves? Do they fear their own constituents, customers and neighbors? Open minds open doors. I have always believed it imperative to listen to those I may disagree with. What if I am wrong and they are correct? What if they show me a truth I refused to believe out of ignorance, intolerance or indoctrination? Aren't I the one getting a gift — one I could not receive if their voices were censored or canceled? Alarmingly, many on the left in Europe — as well as in the U.S. — don't seem to share my belief that we need to listen to those we disagree with. Note this April headline from The New York Times: 'E.U. Prepares Major Penalties Against Elon Musk's X.' The opening paragraph of the article spells it out: 'European Union regulators are preparing major penalties against Elon Musk's social media platform, X, for breaking a landmark law to combat illicit content and disinformation, said four people with knowledge of the plans.' Once again, the left rolls out 'illicit content and disinformation' against Musk, X and the internet. Of course, millions around the world who are against censorship and cancellation and strongly in favor of free speech might say this is a transparent attempt by some on the left to intimidate and censor a site and voices that expose their continual failures to billions of people around the world. One person's 'disinformation' is another's 'irrefutable truth.' Don't hide behind censorship. Let the people think for themselves.


San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Myanmar military courts sentence 12 to life for human trafficking, including Chinese nationals
BANGKOK (AP) — Myanmar military courts have sentenced a dozen individuals — including five Chinese nationals — to life imprisonment for their involvement in multiple human trafficking cases, state-run media reported Saturday. According to the Myanma Alinn newspaper, the convictions stem from a range of offenses including the online distribution of sex videos and the trafficking of Myanmar women into forced marriages in China. In one case, five people — including two Chinese nationals identified as Lin Te and Wang Xiaofeng — were sentenced to life imprisonment by a military court in Yangon, the country's largest city, on July 29. They were found guilty under Myanmar's Anti-Trafficking in Persons law for producing sex videos involving three Myanmar couples and distributing the footage online for profit. In a separate case, the same court sentenced a woman and three Chinese nationals — Yibo, Cao Qiu Quan and Chen Huan. The group was convicted of planning to transport two Myanmar women, recently married to two of the convicted Chinese men, into China, the report said. Additionally, three other people received life sentences from a separate military court for selling a woman as a bride to China, and for attempting to do the same with another woman. In another case, a woman from Myanmar's central Magway region was given a 10-year sentence on July 30 for planning to transport two Myanmar women to be sold as brides to Chinese men, the report said. Human trafficking, particularly of women and girls lured or forced into marriages in China, remains a widespread problem in Myanmar, a country still reeling from civil war after the military seized power from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi in February 2021. The persisting conflict in most areas of Myanmar has left millions of women and children vulnerable to exploitation. A 2018 report by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Kachin Women's Association Thailand (KWAT) — which works to prevent and respond to trafficking in northern Kachin and Shan states bordering China — estimated that about 21,000 women and girls from northern Myanmar were forced into marriage in China between 2013 and 2017. In its latest report published in December, KWAT noted a sharp decline in the number of trafficking survivors accessing its services from 2020 to 2023. It attributed the decline to the COVID-19 pandemic and border closures caused by ongoing conflict following the army takeover. However, it reported a resurgence in 2024 as people from across Myanmar began migrating to China in search of work. Maj-Gen Aung Kyaw Kyaw, a deputy minister for Home Affairs, said during a June meeting that the authorities had handled 53 cases of human trafficking, forced marriage and prostitution in 2024, 34 of which involved China, according to a report published by Myanmar's Information Ministry. The report also said that a total of 80 human trafficking cases, including 14 involving marriage deception by foreign nationals, were recorded between January and June this year.