
Cricket chiefs bring in new rule after England were left raging when India exploited loophole to claim series win
England were left fuming in Pune five months ago when, with the series on the line, India were permitted to introduce Harshit Rana — a 90-mile-per-hour fast bowler — in place of batting all-rounder Shivam Dube.
Harshit went on to claim three key wickets in a 15-run victory that surged the home team into an unassailable 3-1 lead.
Match referee Javagal Srinath, a former India international, permitted the 'like-for-like' replacement during England's chase despite Harshit batting in only three of his previous 25 T20 career appearances, scoring two runs, and Dube bowling just nine overs in his previous dozen T20 internationals.
However, from now on concussion replacements must be settled upon in advance of the toss, removing the advantage previously held by the home team of selecting from a greater pool of players.
The other significant change made by the International Cricket Council in relation to concussions is the introduction of a mandatory seven-day sit-out period for any player deemed to have been concussed.
Remarkably, Dube returned to action for the fifth and final match of the series in Mumbai just 48 hours after the Pune row.
Previously, ICC guidelines stopped short of enforcing a sit-out, simply advising that a 'player should usually take at least seven days out.'
In a huge break with tradition, the ICC is also preparing to introduce injury substitutes for the first time at international level — after announcing a six-month trial in domestic first-class matches around the world from October.
Players who suffer serious injury on the field of play at any time after the match has started (including any pre-match warm-up period) can be replaced for the remainder of the match by a like-for-like player.
It is designed to stop teams becoming disadvantaged when a player is ruled out of participating further in normal capacity due to a significant impairment such as a fractured bone or torn muscle.
Among the changes to the playing conditions coming in with immediate effect is a requirement for a fielder who makes airborne contact with the ball beyond the boundary to then land and remain inside the boundary.
An individual that has left the field of play can make subsequent contact with the ball while still airborne but landing outside the perimeter will result in four or six being signalled and catches not being upheld, even if another player completes the fielding.
This change will be implemented in international cricket before it is included in the laws of the game by the MCC next year.
A stop clock in Test cricket has also been introduced, replicating its use in limited-overs internationals.
The fielding team will be given a warning if not ready to begin an over within 60 seconds of the previous one being completed. Failure to do so after two warnings will result in a five-run penalty being imposed against the fielding team for every subsequent breach up to 80 overs when the tally reverts back to zero.
Only one ball will be used in the last 16 overs of one-day international innings. Two new balls will be used until the end of the 34th over, at which point the fielding team will choose the ball to continue with.
The wicket zone for DRS judgments will now be the actual outline of the stumps and bails, while any deliberate short runs will not only lead to a five-run penalty, but the chance for the fielding team to choose which of the two batters takes strike next delivery.
On a trial basis in white-ball matches, the position of the batter's legs at the point of delivery will now be used as the reference point for a wide, even if the batter subsequently moves across to the off side, providing bowlers with greater leeway.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Wellingborough cricket club sees membership triple in three years
A cricket club said it has seen a surge in new members and that more young people have been taking up the sport. Divesh Patel took over as chair of Wellingborough Indians Cricket Club in Northampton three years ago when membership had dropped to about 30 said there had been a lot of interest from the local community, particularly young people, who had been following England in the Test club now had between 90 and 100 members with two senior teams and young people continued to join. "We have seen a surge in the popularity of the sport in general and have had a lot of interest from around the local community, it has been great," Mr Patel said."We continuously get a lot of interest in joining the club and hopefully [we will] continue to grow as kids are taking a lot of interest in the sport," he added. Club president Dilip Patel, who has been with the club since it formed in 1968, said there had been "tremendous change" over the years."We didn't always have these type of facilities. Now we have a lot of players coming from all sorts of backgrounds," he said."We have a lot of pride in what we have done to date and all out youth are getting the opportunity to reap the benefit of the hard work we have put in over the years."[The club] means a great deal to me and our community, especially the youth, and it gives them a great opportunity to come and enjoy the facilities we have here," he added. Dilip Patel said the club was open to anyone who wanted to play cricket, but it was not just about the sport, adding the social side was also a huge who plays with the under-10s, said: "I like playing cricket and it's always fun to meet all my friends."Anjni, who played on the under-13s, added it was fun to bond with the team and have fun while playing as well as being competitive. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


Times
11 hours ago
- Times
Cricket fixer ‘won't be involved in any fights shown on BBC'
The BBC obtained formal written assurances from its new boxing promoter that a convicted cricket spot-fixer would have no involvement in any of its fights. Boxxer, the promotional company co-founded by Ben Shalom, announced a 'historic' contract on Friday to air fights on BBC TV and BBC iPlayer. The deal follows Sky's decision not to renew its four-year £36million contract with Boxxer, which expired in June. The move to bring boxing back to free-to-air television is expected to come with a significantly reduced budget. A Sunday Times investigation last year revealed the extent of Boxxer's links to Mazhar Majeed, who was jailed for his role in corrupting a Test match between England and Pakistan at Lord's in 2010. After Boxxer won the Sky contract in 2021, Shalom credited Majeed with a key role in brokering Amir Khan's bout against Kell Brook in 2022, the company's first pay-per-view fight on the channel. The unlicensed agent, who served a second prison sentence for tax fraud in 2015, then claimed responsibility for negotiating Joshua Buatsi's multi-million-pound contract with Boxxer, and he has continued to act as an advisor to Chris Eubank Jr, who fought three times on Sky in fights co-promoted by Boxxer, most recently against Conor Benn in April. The promoter paid more than £300,000 to Star People Limited, a company controlled by Majeed's wife, for consultancy services, including a payment of about £80,000 in cash that was delivered by Boxxer's finance director to an employee of Star People in a bag at a meeting in central London in July 2023. Boxxer said Majeed's involvement in the sport pre-dates the company and that the payments related to his role as an adviser to Khan and were all 'fully receipted and accounted for'. On its website, the BBC highlighted both the Khan v Brook bout and Eubank's fight against Liam Smith as examples of events staged by Boxxer. The broadcaster confirmed to The Sunday Times that it had sought written assurances from Boxxer that Majeed would not be involved in any fights broadcast on its platforms. It is the first time the BBC has substantially invested in a national linear TV deal in the sport since a ten-fight agreement worth £1million with the Olympic super-heavyweight gold medallist Audley Harrison in 2001. 'Bringing professional boxing back to primetime BBC television, free-to-air, and to our extensive digital platforms is an exciting moment for us and hopefully for boxing fans,' Alex Kay-Jelski, the director of BBC Sport, said. The first fight of the new deal is mooted to take place on September 27, with 2021 Olympic gold medallist Lauren Price a possible headliner, but has not yet been announced. Speaking to talkSPORT, Shalom said: 'Everything will be shown on BBC iPlayer. Then we'll have the best slot you can possibly ask for: two hours leading into Match of the Day. Multi-fight, multi-year deal. Obviously it's amazing for Boxxer and the fighters, but I genuinely believe for the sport it is a historic moment for boxing. To get the support across the business, this is the entertainment shows, The One Show, all their collateral: BBC Sport, iPlayer, Strictly Come Dancing, BBC News, we're going to create entertainment out of this sport and the next big names.'


Times
11 hours ago
- Times
England answered most questions — but Jacob Bethell needs red-ball games
At the beginning of the summer I thought it was important for England to beat India — and for there to be fewer unanswered questions by the end of the series. England would desperately have wanted to win, and although they didn't manage it I saw them develop as a side. I think there are definitely fewer questions that need answering than at the start of the series, so there are a lot of positives to take. There were question marks over Zak Crawley and Ollie Pope at the start of the summer, and debate over whether Jacob Bethell should play, but there is no doubt now about the top seven. If there are no injuries it is set in stone: Crawley, Ben Duckett, Pope, Joe Root, Harry Brook, Ben Stokes and Jamie Smith. Going to Australia with everyone comfortable in their place is of massive importance. This team has been built for this tour to Australia and they now have a lot of experienced players — people with 50 or 60 caps, or many more in some cases — who are fully integrated into the side. If you go back to the series we won in 2010-11 that's what you need. Crawley and Pope did what you would have expected them to do — they more or less averaged in the series what they average in their career: Crawley 32 in the series compared to 31 overall and Pope 34 compared to 35. With Crawley you can look at his individual figures but you should really look at his opening partnership with Duckett, which is world class. It's partly down to Duckett's form over the past 18 months, but between them they really have the ability, whoever is bowling, to change the whole feel of the game. And Pope, although he declined as the series went on, has looked more solid and I thought he fell over less often to the off side. A year ago I would have said England's approach was very rigid and they played the same way no matter the game situation or conditions, whereas now you can see they adapt. Look at the Oval Test. In the first innings, with the ball nipping about, Crawley and Duckett took the attack to India and put on 92 inside 13 overs. But in the second innings conditions had flattened out a bit and they played the situation sensibly, putting on 50 in 14 overs. Even Brook, who made a brilliant century in the second innings, will learn from it. He came in with England really struggling and played himself in before smashing 28 from ten balls. It changed the game, and if he had got out playing an expansive shot at that stage I couldn't have criticised him. But then he settled into a really good rhythm with Root and they needed just over 70 to win with seven wickets in hand. England were in total control and he didn't need to play the shot he played at that point. Sitting in the changing room he will have known what he should have done, and if he's faced with the same situation in Melbourne this winter I really think he will have learnt. If Bethell is going to go to Australia as the spare batsman, logic would suggest he should play red-ball cricket for Warwickshire in September, rather than playing in England's white-ball games against South Africa and Ireland. He really struggled at the Oval, having faced only 67 balls in first-class cricket this summer. His two scoring shots were dancing down the wicket to give himself room and hitting a boundary through the off side. That's not a consistent way of scoring in Test cricket. A lot of things have changed under this group in the way Test cricket is played but a few things have stayed the same. As a young player, you just need time to play and to learn the format. In terms of the bowlers, I think England just need to go into the series with a set plan to rotate the seamers and stick to it. They need to think that Jofra Archer will play these particular Tests and the same for Mark Wood, Gus Atkinson and the other seamers. Atkinson looked so much better at the Oval, when he was bowling in the high 80mphs, than at the end of last summer, when he was tired and had bowled a lot and was down to the low 80s. Coming up with a plan for rotation is something that is very easy to do on paper and harder to do in practice, but it is amazing what can happen if you have a plan and stick to it. I think they will take several spinners with the Lions, who are going to be out in Australia — Liam Dawson, Shoaib Bashir, Rehan Ahmed and one other. I think it's hard to judge Dawson on one Test. It's not as though Ravindra Jadeja was running through England — a lot of his wickets were caught on the boundary. India really surprised me in the series with their incredible resilience. After conceding 669 at Old Trafford and then being 0 for two, I thought they would break as a side, but they fought back brilliantly. Mohammed Siraj is a real lesson to any cricketer. When he came on to bowl you never knew what he had done in his previous spell, whether it had gone well or badly. He came into bowl thinking, 'How can I make a difference in this spell?' It's a real lesson in thinking about what you can do in the future, not what you've done in the past.