Ukraine and EU launch €100 million military innovation partnership
The BraveTech EU initiative, unveiled at the fourth annual Ukraine Recovery Conference (URC) in Rome, was announced by Ukraine's Digital Transformation Minister Mykhailo Fedorov and the EU's Defence Commissioner, Andrius Kubilius.
BraveTech EU is the first major tech alliance between Ukraine and Europe on equal terms, with each side set to invest €50 million in the programme.
The initiative will focus on small and medium-sized businesses and start-ups in both Ukraine and Europe.
The alliance will see both sides exchange regulatory experience, develop innovations and procure new defence technologies.
"European colleagues will receive results from the battlefield," Fedorov said at a press conference in Rome.
Other European countries may also join in to fund the initiative, he added.
"The EU and its member states have an industrial capacity that can help Ukraine develop new defence systems and increase European resilience," Kubilius said in a statement.
The programme is set to be rolled out in two phases, starting with hackathons for Ukrainian and European defence companies in autumn, Fedorov said in a post on his Telegram page.
In 2026, the plan is to expand the programme with larger grants and investment in the most promising projects.
The BraveTech EU initiative will integrate Ukraine's defence industry into European mechanisms, connecting Ukraine's BRAVE1 defence technology platform with EU platforms such as the European Defence Fund (EDF) and the EU Defence Innovation Scheme (EUDIS).
Zelenskyy has long called on Ukraine's western allies to provide more military support as the country's forces continue to battle Russia's forces since the 2022 full-scale invasion.
Patriots for Ukraine
The BraveTech EU programme was announced on the same day that US President Donald Trump said that Washington will send weapons, including Patriot air defence systems, to Ukraine via NATO.
"We're going to be sending Patriots to NATO and then NATO will distribute that," Trump told US TV channel CBS News, adding that the alliance would pay for the systems.
The Patriot missile system can detect and intercept a wide range of oncoming air targets, high-end ballistic missiles in particular, and is regarded as one of the world's best, at a time when Moscow is increasing its nightly missile and drone attacks amid its all-out war against Ukraine, now well into its fourth year.
Speaking at the Ukraine Recovery Conference in Rome on Thursday, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that Germany would pay for two of the systems, while Norway has agreed to supply one.
After repeated Russian drone and missile onslaughts on Kyiv, authorities also announced on Friday that they are establishing a comprehensive drone interception system under a project called Clear Sky.
The project includes a 260-million-hryvnia (approximately €5.3 million) investment in interceptor drones, operator training, and new mobile response units, according to Tymur Tkachenko, the head of the Kyiv military administration.
Zelenskyy appealed to foreign partners to help Ukraine accelerate the production of the newly developed interceptor drones, which have proven successful against Iranian-made Shahed drones and their Russian variant, the Geran-2.
"We found a solution, as a country, scientists and engineers found a solution. That's the key," he said. "We need financing. And then, we will intercept."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Is August the worst month to invest in European stocks?
ADVERTISEMENT European equities have entered what is historically the most challenging stretch of the calendar year, as August and September consistently deliver the weakest returns for the region's stock markets. Following a strong first half in 2025 and a slightly positive July, history suggests that the summer momentum in European equities often loses steam as August arrives. The month is typically defined by thinner trading volumes, greater market sensitivity to economic and geopolitical headlines, and a consistent pattern of higher volatility. August: The weakest month for European indices Analysis of the past three decades reveals a clear seasonal downturn in August. The EURO STOXX 50, Europe's blue-chip benchmark, has averaged a 1.66% decline during the month over the past 30 years, making it the worst-performing month of the year. It has ended August in positive territory only 43% of the time, and the broader STOXX Europe 600 tells a similar story. Over the past 24 years, this index has fallen by an average 0.7% in August, also with a 43% winning ratio. The most brutal August came in 1998, when the EURO STOXX 50 plunged 14.4%, followed closely by 2001's 13.79% loss. Country indices echo August's negative trend Zooming in on national markets, the pattern of August weakness is equally pronounced. This period is the weakest month for Germany's DAX, which posts an average decline of 2.2% and finishes in positive territory just 47% of the time. In France, the CAC 40 drops by 1.47% on average in August, narrowly ahead of September's 1.49% average fall, and sees only a 37% winning rate. Italy's FTSE MIB and Spain's IBEX 35 also see the negative sign, logging average August losses of 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively. German stocks: Some of the weakest August seasonality A group of Germany's blue chips consistently show downward August bias, with some of them marking it as their worst month of the year, both in terms of returns and win probability. According to TradingView data, some of the hardest-hit stocks include: • Thyssenkrupp AG leads the decline, tumbling an average 4.6% in August with a win rate of just 30%, meaning it has posted gains in only 9 of the past 30 years. • BMW AG averages a 4.1% loss in August with just a 37% win rate. Volkswagen AG, meanwhile, falls 3.3% and ends the month higher only 27% of the time — proof that even automakers aren't spared from late-summer volatility. • Deutsche Bank AG, Germany's largest lender, averages a 3.47% drop in August and matches Thyssenkrupp's 30% win ratio. • Utility giant SE and industrial titan Siemens AG also feel the seasonal drag, both slipping by nearly 2%, with win rates of 37% and 40%, respectively. • Deutsche Börse AG, operator of Germany's stock exchange, and consumer goods firm Beiersdorf AG both see their weakest performance in August, falling 1.72% and 1.66% on average, with win rates of 48% and 39%, respectively. Bottom line: August's seasonal slump hard to ignore With the EURO STOXX 50 and STOXX 600 up 8% and 7%, respectively, European equities have delivered a solid year-to-date performance. Much of this rebound has come on the back of a strong recovery from April's tariff-induced downturn, mirroring a broader global equity upswing. But history warns that August marks a persistent seasonal soft spot — particularly for Germany's corporate heavyweights, which tend to underperform more than their European peers. From broad indices to blue-chip stocks, the month shows a consistent pattern of lower returns, thinner liquidity, and heightened vulnerability to negative news flow. While no seasonal trend guarantees future performance, August remains, by many measures, the most challenging month for European investors.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Haunted by Merkel: Trump still grappling with Europe's lost leader
When US President Donald Trump issued a warning on Tuesday about the trade deal he agreed with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland on 27 July, it was another German – former Chancellor Angela Merkel - who appeared to be on his mind. Despite being out of power for almost four years, the former German leader's complex relationship with Donald Trump - marked at times by respect and dislike – appears to continue to exert influence over the US president. When quizzed on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' via phone Trump said of the trade deal that a pledge for the EU to invest $600 billion (€550 billion) in the US by the end of his second term will need to be honoured by the EU, or 35% blanket tariffs will be applied to the bloc. Before issuing that warning however the US president expounded in general on the benefits of his trade policy. Referring to the EU, Trump appeared to cast his mind back to a conversation with Merkel about the auto sector. 'I said to... let me just say a prime minister, a very nice prime minister, a couple [sic] of years ago, I said: 'How many [US] cars are you taking a year? Let me guess, is it one or two?'' 'She said: 'No, no, no, we don't take any of your cars,' he said, before adding: 'I said: 'That's not right, that's not a nice thing Angela.'' 'And now they take all our cars, all our trucks, 100%, in addition the EU is going to pay us $600 billion dollars,' Trump said. Addressing the 55th Munich Security Conference in February 2019, Merkel rejected Trump's claims that German cars represented a security threat to the US. Merkel told the conference that German auto giant BMW's largest plant is in South Carolina, rather than its home in Bavaria in southern Germany. 'If these cars, which are no less a threat than those built in Bavaria, are suddenly a national security threat to the US, then that's a shock to us,' she said. Last year, Merkel told Italian daily Corriere della Sera in an interview that 'Donald Trump was obsessed by the fact that, in his view, there were too many German cars in New York.' 'He had always said that, if he were to become president, he would have imposed such high tariffs that they [German cars] would have disappeared from the streets of Manhattan,' Merkel told the newspaper in an interview she gave ahead of the publication of her memoir. A see-sawing relationship In August 2015, before his first election, Trump complimented Merkel in an interview with Time magazine, saying "she's fantastic … highly respected'. But he soon changed his mind. By the time the former chancellor visited the White House in 2017 during Trump's first term, he attempted to embarrass her by refusing to shake her hand before the cameras, and then grilled her for allowing around one million refugees – mainly from Syria and Iraq – into Germany. When her memoir, Freedom, was published last year, Merkel said she misread Trump during that first meeting. 'Instead of stoically bearing it, I whispered to him that we should shake hands again,' Merkel wrote, adding: 'As soon as the words left my mouth, I shook my head at myself. How could I forget that Trump knew precisely what he was doing … He wanted to give people something to talk about with his behaviour, while I had acted as though I were having a conversation with someone completely normal.' 'It seemed that his main aim was to make the person he was talking to feel guilty… At the same time I had the impression… that he also wanted the person he was talking with to like him,' Merkel wrote of Trump's mercurial character. Merkel publicly registered regret when Trump did not concede defeat in November 2020's US election, saying: "A basic rule of democracy is: After elections, there are winners and losers. Both have to play their roles with decency and a sense of responsibility, so that democracy itself remains the winner." When German Chancellor Friedrich Merz visited The White House earlier this year, much preparation went into ensuring that the meeting with Donald Trump would not evolve into an on-air fiasco similar to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's earlier Oval Office confrontation. In the end Merz had nothing to worry about. Trump's only criticism was reserved for Angela Merkel, whom he slammed for building the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, and once again for opening up her country to refugees, telling her successor: 'I told her it shouldn't have happened.'
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
YouTube misinformation tools are inconsistent in Europe: report says
Two of Google's major tools to fight misinformation on YouTube only work sometimes, and only in certain European languages, a new study has found. When users watch a YouTube video on a topic that is often embroiled in misinformation, such as COVID-19 vaccines or climate change, a label should pop up to direct them to third-party sources with more information on the issue, for example Wikipedia. The information panel is also meant to appear in users' search results in their operating language. However AI Forensics, a Europe-based nonprofit that investigates major tech companies, found that this is often not the case. The researchers built a web crawler to test the panels, and found that across the 83 languages on the video platform, the information panels are applied inconsistently to 12 topics on Wikipedia's list of conspiracy theories as well as four types of publisher labels. All of the panels are available in English. In German, videos on all but one topic – the Armenian genocide – have these labels. Meanwhile, very few panels are available in Icelandic or Lithuanian. AI Forensics said the tests show YouTube pays 'disproportionate attention towards Western languages' and 'neglects' regional languages like Basque, Catalan, and Galician. YouTube's content disclaimers go beyond misinformation-prone topics. It also includes labels for news sources and fact-checkers that explain whether they are partially or fully funded by government sources, as a way to 'help you better understand the sources of news content,' the company says. But public funding was flagged in some countries and not others, the AI Forensics report found. Euronews, for example, receives some funding from the European Union. YouTube flagged this in some countries, but not in Denmark, Greece, Norway, Iceland, Finland, or Portugal. 'We are scared … there might be some group of people that have differential access to safety' measures to fight misinformation on the platform, Salvatore Romano, head of research at AI Forensics, told Euronews Next. 'Instead of increasing [the] trust of users on the platform, it is undermining [it],' Romano added. Unclear whether YouTube will address discrepancies YouTube's website notes that 'information panels may not be available in all countries/regions and languages,' and that the company is working to expand their reach. The AI Forensics team said they have met with YouTube to present their research. During those meetings, YouTube allegedly indicated that the discrepancies between languages were not supposed to happen, and that it didn't have a way to systematically check how the panels are deployed across Europe. AI Forensics said YouTube agreed to address these discrepancies but did not go into detail. YouTube did not respond to a Euronews Next request for clarity on the alleged meetings or the measures it plans to take. YouTube, under parent company Google, is a signatory to the European Commission's Code of Practice on Disinformation, a voluntary agreement that sets standards for tech companies to fight disinformation. In March, YouTube said that as part of its commitment, it will 'assess and update the topics prone to misinformation that receive additional context from information panels'. But Romano believes the haphazard content labeling could be even more extensive than the AI Forensics researchers found, given the report says it shows only a 'partial view' with a small sample of panels. Commission could put 'pressure on YouTube' over inconsistencies: AI Forensics Romano said he's hoping YouTube will correct the discrepancies. If it doesn't, he said he will call on the European Commission, the EU's executive body, to investigate a potential breach of the Digital Services Act (DSA). The Commission could, for example, request more information from YouTube about how it administers its panels, which is the first step of any DSA investigation, he said. 'The EU Commission could put pressure on YouTube to show them that this type of inconsistency is unacceptable across platforms and across products,' he said, noting that it creates 'second-rate markets' throughout Europe where standards meant to protect against misinformation are not being met. Euronews Next reached out to the Commission to confirm whether it would be asking for more information from YouTube but did not receive an immediate reply. Romano, at least, will be watching. He said his team built a tool to track how regularly YouTube's information labels come up in various languages. Through the publicly available tracker, people can see which topics have content labels in their language. It will also allow researchers to identify any changes to the information panels, Romano said.
