Watchdog must fine social media companies that are slow to remove racism after Jess Carter abuse, says culture secretary
Carter has declared herself ready to play in the Women's European Championship semi-final against Italy on Tuesday after speaking out on the hate she has faced online during the tournament.
Players have expressed frustration they are having to use their platform to pressure the tech firms, given how often footballers have had to deal with racist abuse.
There is now the Online Safety Act which should be compelling the companies to take action.
"We've introduced new laws so that platforms are under a legal obligation to take down that sort of disgusting content immediately," Ms Nandy told Sky News.
"And they can be pursued through fines, through Ofcom, if they don't do it.
"It's now up to those platforms and up to Ofcom to fulfil those roles that we've given them and make sure that this is stamped out online, that it's dealt with very quickly."
But Kick It Out chairman Sanjay Bhandari told Sky News on Sunday that "it's got worse on social media, not better" - singling out Elon Musk's X and Mark Zuckerberg's Instagram.
Neither of the companies has responded to requests for comment, including via a public X post.
England defender Lucy Bronze said "online abuse is getting worse and worse" in women's football.
Ms Nandy said: "The racial abuse that's been directed at Jess Carter is utterly disgusting and unfortunately is too common for women at the top of their game, not just in football but across sport as a whole.
"We're considering as a government what more we can do to protect women players who reach those levels of exposure."
The government has made dealing with sports issues a priority, with legislation passed today to introduce an independent regulator for men's football.
The watchdog aims to ensure clubs are run sustainably and are accountable to their fans.
Ms Nandy said: "There are now protections in law for fans and for clubs to make sure that we have really fit and proper owners; that there is somebody who can tackle rogue owners when problems arise, that we get a proper financial flow to ensure the sustainability of clubs throughout the football pyramid and to make that fans are put back at the heart of the game where they belong."
The Premier League remains concerned the regulator could harm the success of its competition through unintended consequences.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
France's top court strikes down pesticide clause in farming law
France's highest court on Thursday blocked a key part of a contentious farming law that would have brought back a banned pesticide. The court said that the measure failed to protect the environment and future generations. The rest of the law — known as the 'Duplomb law,' after the senator who proposed it — was allowed to stand. The bill, passed in early July, aimed to loosen rules for farmers and fast-track projects like water storage. It was backed by the government and major farming unions, but met fierce opposition from scientists, health experts and green groups. At the heart of the outrage was acetamiprid, a pesticide banned in France since 2018 for its role in harming bees and other pollinators. Farmers, especially sugar beet growers, had pushed for its return. But the court ruled that the proposal wasn't strict enough, and ignored France's constitutional commitment to environmental protection. The backlash was swift and widespread. A student-led petition against the law drew more than 2 million signatures — one of the biggest in French history. Opponents said that the bill was rushed through parliament with barely any debate, and warned that it put public health and biodiversity at risk. The ruling is a blow to President Emmanuel Macron's government, which had defended the bill until the end. Critics called the decision a win for democracy and the planet. Some lawmakers have already vowed to push for a full repeal in the coming months. Acetamiprid is currently approved by the European Union until 2033, and authorized in other member countries.
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
SNP is accused of betraying families amid calls to deny parole to killers who don't reveal where victims are
The latest bid to introduce 'Suzanne's Law' has been branded as 'yet more SNP spin' amid claims victims are still being failed by ministers. Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay has demanded a tougher approach which would block killers from being eligible for parole if they have failed to disclose the location of their victim's remains. It follows Justice Secretary Angela Constance's commitment to approve an amendment which states that the Parole Board 'must' take into account the issue when reaching decisions about releasing killers. The move, which is on course to be introduced before next year's Holyrood elections, is a strengthening of the current position which only states that the Parole Board may consider the issue when making decisions. But families of victims have demanded that ministers go further and introduce a 'no body no parole' rule which has already been adopted by some states in Australia, which blocks release of a killer if they do not co-operate on the location of remains. Mr Findlay said: 'After peddling a supposed Suzanne's Law for six years, this is yet more SNP spin which betrays victims and their families. 'For the parole board to 'take into account' a killer's non-disclosure amounts to very little. 'In all likelihood this would be subject to legal challenge if it was ever used to keep a killer behind bars. The Government know this fine well and they need to think again. If they don't, we will. 'Families whose loved ones have been killed and their bodies not recovered deserve so much better than headline-chasing SNP spin.' The families of two murder victims whose bodies have never been disclosed have welcomed the amendment set to be passed during stage 3 of the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform Bill after being introduced by MSP Jamie Greene at stage 2. But they are also pushing for a tougher approach during an upcoming review of parole rules. Arlene Fraser's husband Nat Fraser has twice been convicted of her murder following her 1998 disappearance in Elgin and her family spoke of the 'mental torture' they are having to endure because no trace of her has ever been found. The family of Suzanne Pilley, who was murdered in 2010 by her work colleague David Gilroy, who was given a life sentence for murder, also condemned his lack of remorse or rehabilitation as he continues to say what he did with her body. Under current legislation, Fraser will be eligible to be considered for parole in October 2028 and Gilroy in March 2030. Other victims whose remains have never been discovered include Alison McGarrigle, who was killed in 1997 by Charles O'Neill and William Lauchlan, who dumped her body at sea, financial adviser Lynda Spence, who was tortured and killed in 2011 by Colin Coats and Philip Wade, Margaret Fleming, who was last seen in 1999 and was killed by Edward Cairney and Avril Jones, and Patricia Henry, who was killed in 2017 by George Metcalff. Mr Findlay highlighted that the victims are all women and said their families are 'taunted' by killers who cruelly refuse to say where they are. He is now demanding a 'real Suzanne's Law' and is committed to pushing for changes in parliament. Gail Fairgrieve, Suzanne Pilley's sister, said: 'We would like to see the law changed initially so that when they come to trial they are well aware that if they never disclose where the remains of the body is then there is no chance of parole. That is where the law needs to stand, we need to move towards that. 'It's no body no parole, so they are instantly told at sentencing that that's the situation they are in and it's their choice at that point. 'Australia have went down those lines so there is no reason Scotland cannot do the same.' Ms Constance met with the families of Ms Pilley and Mrs Fraser on Wednesday and said afterwards that she was grateful for the opportunity. 'My deepest sympathies remain with them,' said the Justice Secretary. 'I remain firmly committed to the amendment, supported by Victim Support Scotland, that would mean the Parole Board must consider whether a prisoner has information about the disposal of a victim's remains, but has not disclosed it.'
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Crystal Palace to FINALLY appear at Court of Arbitration for Sport to appeal Europa League demotion
Crystal Palace will attempt to overturn their Europa League demotion at a high-stakes hearing on Friday – and the man at the centre of the issue will not be present. Eagles lawyers and officials will present their case having appealed UEFA's decision to drop them into the Europa Conference League thanks to breaches of its rules on multi-club ownership. Last month, revealed how Palace were in grave danger of being kicked out of the competition. And, following a hearing at UEFA HQ, the FA Cup winners' fears became reality. UEFA adjudicators ruled that John Textor, the US businessman whose company held a 43 per cent stake in the club along with a majority stake in fellow qualifiers Lyon, did hold 'control or decisive influence' at Selhurst Park, despite the fact he only possessed 25 per cent of voting rights. Because the French side finished in a higher position in their domestic league they took the slot, with Nottingham Forest subsequently leapfrogging Palace. Palace will appear at the Court of Arbitration for Sport, in Lausanne, Switzerland, but Textor, who was a key witness at the UEFA hearing and who has subsequently sold his stake in the club, will not be there. Palace want their demotion overturned and for either Lyon or Forest to be demoted. Forest are sending their own legal team. Those who attend have the option to evade publicity by entering via a side exit. It is understood Palace, who believe they have done nothing wrong, will shun such a manoeuvre and enter via the main entrance.
