
Human Rights Commission considers discrimination complaint against Peter Dutton over Gaza comments
The complaint, coordinated by the law firm Birchgrove Legal, includes allegations that 'Palestinian-Australian, Arab-Australian and Muslim-Australian complainants' reported feeling 'dehumanised … and humiliated as an 'Other' who does not and should not matter to Australia' as a result of some of the Liberal leader's public commentary.
The complaint also alleges that 'as a national political leader' some of Dutton's commentary has 'created an environment of permissibility not only for hatred and racism directed at Palestinian-Australian, Arab-Australian and Muslim-Australian complainants but also other Australians who express solidarity with Palestinians, leading to many reports of feeling intimidated not to attend rallies in support of Palestinians and not to express support'.
The complaint was lodged in late November and accepted for assessment by the human rights commission in January, the firm said.
The lead complainants are the president of the Australian Palestine Advocacy Network, Nasser Mashni, and the academic Prof Peter Slezak, who is Jewish.
The complaint lists numerous public comments by Dutton – some made at public events or in media interviews – which it alleges show racially discriminatory behaviour by:
'justifying or otherwise failing to condemn violence against Palestinian civilians by Israel in likely breach of international humanitarian law';
'erasing the human rights and equal dignity and worth of Palestinians by denying crimes and atrocities committed against them';
'and conflating Palestinians as being terrorists or terrorist sympathisers'.
It alleges racially discriminatory treatment of Jewish people in some of the public commentary by 'conflating Jewish people with Israel's conduct and putting Jewish people in the way of hostility, discrimination and even violent harm'.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Dutton has consistently supported Israel throughout the Gaza crisis and called for stronger action in response to antisemitic attacks in Australia. He has acknowledged in comments not cited in the complaint that 'some Gazans will be people of good character, potentially able and willing to integrate into a democratic nation and subscribe to its values', and that some 'despise' Hamas, while calling for Australia to restrict the granting of humanitarian visas to Palestinians fleeing Gaza without thorough background checks.
A Birchgrove Legal spokesperson said the firm was confident it could demonstrate Dutton's comments that were cited in the complaint had contravened the Racial Discrimination Act.
'We need to demonstrate that everything he did was not reasonable and not in good faith and we think he has made that easy for us because he's been quite relentless and persistent in his commentary,' they said in a statement.
Section 18C of the act states that it is unlawful for someone to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person based on their race. The complaint also cites section 9 which makes racial discrimination unlawful.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Mashni in a statement accused Dutton of 'encouraging Australia to flout international law and withhold empathy to the human suffering occurring'.
Dutton's office did not respond when contacted for comment. The AHRC said it was 'unable to provide comment on any cases in relation to our complaints and handling arm'.
The commission does not investigate all the complaints it receives. But if it does investigate, it tries to resolve the matter by conciliation.
If that fails, the complainant can take action in the federal court.
In March Birchgrove Legal sent a request to the international criminal court to consider investigating Anthony Albanese, other members of the government (Penny Wong, Richard Marles, Clare O'Neil) and Dutton for alleged complicity in genocide over Israel's actions in Gaza.
The prime minister dismissed that request as having 'no credibility'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump insists he's reached 'excellent' tariff deals - but won't give any details
Donald Trump has signed orders for new tariffs to go into effect in seven days on a wide range of US trading partners, including Mexico, Japan, Taiwan and Australia Donald Trump insists he has set "excellent" new tariffs on a range of trading partners - but didn't give any details on these. The US President today stressed his trade agenda will maintain the global economy and sturdiness of alliances his nation has built up over decades. The White House announced agreements with various nations and blocs ahead of the president's self-imposed Friday deadline. The tariffs are being implemented at a later date in order for the rates schedule to be harmonised. Speaking last night, Mr Trump said: "We have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country." However, the world leader did not go into any detail on these, such as the nations involved and his senior administration officials also declined to offer more information when asked by reporters. It comes after Mr Trump recently reignited his feud with Sadiq Khan in front of Keir Starmer, with a savage jibe at the London Mayor. The Mirror understands some tariffs have been lowered, and it is thought these include the original 50% threat to Lesotho. It is believed the African nation's goods will now be taxed at 15%. Our understanding is Taiwan will have tariffs set at 20%, and Pakistan at 19%. Israel, Iceland, Norway, Fiji, Ghana, Guyana and Ecuador are among the countries with imported goods taxed at 15%. Switzerland would be tariffed at 39%, it is thought. However, Mr Trump, the former businessman, would not be drawn on commenting on exact arrangements for specific nations. But he did confess: "We haven't spoken to Canada today," in a pertinent reference following a fresh jibe at Mark Carney's nation earlier this week. The US leader had said it would be "very hard" to make a trade deal with Canada after the country became the latest nation to recognise a Palestinian state. He had posted on social media: "Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!" Yet, Mr Trump had announced a 50% tariff on goods from Brazil, but the order was only 10% as the other 40% were part of a separate measure approved by Mr Trump on Wednesday. One of his first significant moves as president was to impose tariffs on goods from both Mexico and Canada earlier this year. US Census Bureau figures show that the U.S. ran a $171.5 billion trade deficit with Mexico last year.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Keir Starmer refuses to commit to Palestine statehood deal that returns all Hamas hostages - as Lords say his pledge may break international law
The UK will recognise Palestine as a state next month even if Hamas fails to release its remaining Israeli hostages, Sir Keir Starmer suggested yesterday. Amid a growing backlash over the Prime Minister's pledge – plus warnings that he could be breaking international law – he refused to back calls to make a hostage deal a main condition of recognition. Earlier this week Sir Keir announced the UK will recognise a Palestinian state before the UN general assembly in New York next month unless Israel meets a raft of conditions, including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza. The decision was condemned by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said it rewarded 'Hamas's monstrous terrorism' – the group is still believed to be holding up to 50 hostages, many of whom were abducted during the attack on October 7, 2023, although only 20 are believed to still be alive. Sir Keir was asked yesterday whether he would still recognise a Palestinian state in September – a hugely diplomatic and symbolic move – even if Hamas refuses to release more hostages. Instead of a simple 'yes' or 'no', he replied: 'Those hostages need to be released immediately – they have been held for a very long time in intolerable conditions. 'So that absolutely needs to happen. And the situation on the ground in Gaza needs to change – there is a humanitarian catastrophe. And that's why I have said unless that changes materially – and obviously we will assess that as we get to September – then we will recognise Palestine.' The PM insisted he 'particularly' listens to freed hostages, after he was accused of 'moral failure' over his move by Emily Damari, a British-Israeli woman who had been held captive by Hamas . The PM told ITV he was 'absolutely clear that we must have the remaining hostages released – that's been our position throughout and I absolutely understand the unimaginable horror that Emily went through'. It came as some of the UK's most eminent lawyers wrote to the Attorney General, Lord Hermer, to warn that Sir Keir's pledge of recognition could undermine his commitment to upholding the law. Some 38 members of the House of Lords – among them seven KCs – said recognising Palestine may not meet the criteria for statehood under the Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933. In their letter, the peers said Palestine 'does not meet the international law criteria for recognition of a state, namely, defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states'. There is no certainty over the borders of Palestine, they said, and no single government. The peers added: 'You have said that a selective, 'pick and mix' approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience. 'Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the Government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law.' Business minister Gareth Thomas described the decision on Palestine as a 'political judgment' and that ministers 'believe it is' compliant with international law.


Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Slovenia imposes arms embargo on Israel
ATHENS, July 31 (Reuters) - Slovenia on Thursday imposed an embargo on exports, imports and transit of arms to Israel, two weeks after it declared Israeli ministers persona non grata, the state news agency STA reported citing a government statement. The measure was announced by Prime Minister Robert Golob after a government session. Golob said that Slovenia was the first European country to make such a move, STA reported. Slovenia recognised a Palestinian state in June last year and has since repeatedly called for a ceasefire in Gaza and increased aid deliveries to the enclave. Israel has denounced declarations last week by France, Britain and Canada that they may recognise a Palestinian state, saying that it would reward Hamas for its October 7, 2023 assault on Israeli territory. Earlier on Thursday U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff met Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a bid to salvage Gaza truce talks and tackle a humanitarian crisis.